Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Information Retrieval

arXiv:2608.09440 (cs)
[Submitted on 10 Aug 2026]

Title:MetaStrategy: Generative Ranking with Executable LLM Strategies

Authors:Chengyu Lai, Jiuning Lin, Zhibo Xiao, Xiaodong Zhu, Ruiquan Lan, Bin Zhang, Zihong Huang, Wendong Zhang, Chuxin Chen, Yinjiang Cai, Shuai Zhong, Lingqing Zhang, Dimin Wang, Jialin Zhu, Han Zhu
View a PDF of the paper titled MetaStrategy: Generative Ranking with Executable LLM Strategies, by Chengyu Lai and 14 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Industrial recommender systems rank heterogeneous content under coupled user, business, commercial, and experience objectives. Existing generative ranking methods typically construct item sequences directly, making them difficult to integrate with mature predictive models, operational rules, and field-level guardrails. We present MetaStrategy, a framework that instead generates a structured, executable ranking strategy. Conditioned on request context, a large language model (LLM) policy emits a typed JSON bundle controlling objective weights, content and category preferences, experience constraints, and position policies. A deterministic validator and compiler instantiate an isolated Generator that competes atomically with incumbents under the list-level Evaluator of the Generator-Evaluator (GE) architecture. We train the policy in a production-path replay environment that re-executes logged requests through the current re-ranking stack without user exposure. The method combines selection, relative-rank, and baseline-lift rewards, a self-competitive curriculum that feeds frequent strategies back as competitors, and Evaluator-routed reward-augmented on-policy distillation that transfers complementary 4B-parameter Teachers into a compact 0.8B-parameter Student. We deploy MetaStrategy in Taobao Homepage Guess You Like through diff-triggered nearline generation; LLM inference remains outside synchronous ranking, with no observable increase in response time (RT). In a seven-day user-randomized online A/B test, MetaStrategy wins 27.93% of treatment-side GE calls and significantly improves click page views (click PV) by 2.11%, item-detail page views (IPV) by 3.12%, and transaction amount by 2.83%.
Subjects: Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.09440 [cs.IR]
  (or arXiv:2608.09440v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.09440
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Chengyu Lai [view email]
[v1] Mon, 10 Aug 2026 11:16:09 UTC (1,371 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled MetaStrategy: Generative Ranking with Executable LLM Strategies, by Chengyu Lai and 14 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
view license

Additional Features

  • Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.IR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences