8000
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

VintaSend Templates API

REST API that exposes a ManagedTemplateService over HTTP, built with Django and django-ninja.

It exists so a template-management UI does not have to embed a template store: the UI becomes a pure API client, and any implementation of this contract can serve it. It is the templates-side sibling of vintasend-api, which does the same for notifications, and follows the same conventions — bearer-token auth, a { data } / { error } envelope, 1-indexed pages, camelCase on the wire.

openapi.yaml is generated, not maintained. It is produced from the route declarations in api.py and the schemas in contract.py and query.py by manage.py export_openapi. A test asserts the committed copy matches the live routes, so a change that was not regenerated fails the suite rather than shipping a stale contract.

┌─────────────────────┐   HTTPS + API key    ┌───────────────────────┐
│  Template mgmt UI   │ ───────────────────▶ │ vintasend-templates-  │
│  server-side only   │ ◀─────────────────── │ api (this project)    │
└─────────────────────┘     JSON contract    └───────────┬───────────┘
                                                         │
                                          ┌──────────────┴──────────────┐
                                          │  Your ManagedTemplateService│
                                          │  template manager backend + │
                                          │  managed template renderer  │
                                          └─────────────────────────────┘

The API owns everything that needs backend credentials — database access, template rendering. The UI owns presentation and user authentication.

Why Django, for a library with no web framework

The same reason as vintasend-api: the template store decides. The reference backend, vintasend-django-templates-manager, persists templates through the Django ORM, and reading them needs a Django app registry and connection handling — another framework's process would have to boot a half-configured Django anyway.

Nothing is lost for non-Django deployments. BaseTemplateManagerBackend is a pluggable seam, so a FastAPI application storing templates through SQLAlchemy is served by this same API: point MANAGED_TEMPLATE_SERVICE_FACTORY at a factory that builds a SQLAlchemy-backed service and the HTTP layer neither knows nor cares.

Endpoints

Method Path Purpose
GET /health Liveness probe (unauthenticated)
GET /api/v1/capabilities Filter capabilities of the configured backend
GET /api/v1/templates List template versions with filters and pagination
POST /api/v1/templates Create a template's first version
GET /api/v1/templates/{key} One version — the latest unless ?version= is given
DELETE /api/v1/templates/{key} Delete one version (the latest unless ?version=)
GET /api/v1/templates/{key}/versions Every version, newest first
POST /api/v1/templates/{key}/versions Create a new version from the latest
GET /api/v1/templates/{key}/versions/{version} One pinned version
DELETE /api/v1/templates/{key}/versions/{version} Delete one pinned version
GET /api/v1/templates/{key}/composition One version assembled — what the engine actually receives
GET /api/v1/templates/{key}/status-history Status audit trail, most recent first
POST /api/v1/templates/{key}/status Move a version to an explicitly named status
POST /api/v1/templates/{key}/activate Publish a version
POST /api/v1/templates/{key}/deactivate Retire a version without archiving it
POST /api/v1/templates/{key}/archive Archive a version (terminal by default)
POST /api/v1/templates/{key}/preview Render a version against a supplied context
PUT /api/v1/templates/{key}/tags Replace one version's tags, in place
GET /api/v1/tags List tags with filters and pagination
POST /api/v1/tags Create a tag ahead of any template using it
GET /api/v1/tags/{slug} One tag
PATCH /api/v1/tags/{slug} Rename a tag (its slug is regenerated)
DELETE /api/v1/tags/{slug} Delete a tag, stripping it from every template
POST /api/v1/tags/{slug}/archive Retire a tag from the pickers
POST /api/v1/tags/{slug}/restore Put an archived tag back on offer

A browsable version of the generated schema is served at /api/v1/docs.

Conventions a client can rely on:

  • page is 1-indexed.
  • hasMore is true when a page comes back full. The template-manager seam has no count method, so no total is available.
  • GET /templates lists one row per key by default. A row in the store is a version, so the raw read returns a key once per version it has ever had. mostRecentActiveVersion defaults to true and narrows that to each key's current version — the highest-numbered active or draft one. Send mostRecentActiveVersion=false to list every version.
  • version omitted means "the latest" everywhere except status-history, where it means "every version" — that endpoint forwards it to the backend, which returns the whole key's trail.
  • Every template payload carries isAbstract: whether that version is a base to build on rather than one to send. See Composition.
  • Every template payload carries allowedTransitions: the statuses that version can move to right now, as the configured service answers it. A UI enables buttons from that rather than reimplementing the lifecycle or discovering it by catching a 409.
  • Timestamps are ISO-8601 UTC strings, null when unset — never absent.
  • Errors always use the envelope { "error": { "code", "message", "details"? } }.

Tags

Tags label template versions so they can be found. A template carries any number of tags and a tag is carried by any number of templates.

  • The slug is the identity. It is normalized from the text — lowercased, accents folded, everything else collapsed to - — and is unique store-wide, so Black Friday, black friday and BLACK-FRIDAY are one tag. Store the slug, not the text.

  • Anywhere a tag is named, its text works too. GET /tags/Black%20Friday and GET /tags/black-friday are the same lookup, and the same holds for the filters.

  • Tags are created on the fly. Send tags on POST /templates or POST /templates/{key}/versions and any tag that does not exist yet is created. Use POST /tags only when a collision should be reported rather than resolved — it is a 409 there and silent everywhere else.

  • Renaming changes the slug. PATCH /tags/{slug} regenerates it, so a stored filter naming the old slug stops matching. Read the new slug off the response. Renaming onto another tag's text is allowed and yields -2: two tags may read the same, and the slug is what tells them apart.

  • Archive hides the tag; delete removes the label. An archived tag drops out of GET /tags?status=active but stays on the templates carrying it, and filtering by it still finds them. Deleting is what strips the label, and it is not reversible.

  • Searching by tag uses includesAllTags (carries every tag listed) or includesAnyOfTags (carries at least one). Repeat the parameter per tag. Sending both combines them with AND, like every other filter pair. A template matching several of the tags listed is returned once, not once per match.

    GET /api/v1/templates?includesAllTags=billing&includesAllTags=urgent
    GET /api/v1/templates?includesAnyOfTags=billing&includesAnyOfTags=marketing
    
  • Tags belong to a version, not a key, so two versions of one template can be labelled differently — a draft can be tagged for review without relabelling what is live.

Versions in the listing

The store holds a row per version, and a template-management UI almost always wants a list of templates. GET /api/v1/templates therefore defaults to mostRecentActiveVersion=true:

GET /api/v1/templates                                # one row per key — the current version
GET /api/v1/templates?mostRecentActiveVersion=false  # every version of every key
GET /api/v1/templates/{key}/versions                 # every version of one key, newest first

Current means the highest-numbered active or draft version: what is published, plus the draft on its way to replacing it. A key whose versions are all inactive or archived has no current version and does not appear in the default listing — ask for mostRecentActiveVersion=false, or filter by status, to see it.

false lifts the restriction rather than inverting it: it lists everything, not only the rows the default hides. The complement is a legitimate query in the library's filter vocabulary ({"most_recent_active_version": False}) but there is no wire parameter for it, because no UI has asked to list only superseded versions.

The narrowing happens in the store, so pagination still counts what the backend counted. A backend declining fields.mostRecentActiveVersion has the filter dropped like any other unsupported one, and its listing shows every version.

Composition: templates built on templates

A managed template can build on another one, and all of it is resolved before any template engine runs — so the stored bodyTemplate is only half of what renders:

base-email    <html><body>
                {% managed_block header %}<h1>Acme</h1>{% managed_endblock %}
                {% managed_children %}
                {% managed_include "footer" %}
              </body></html>

welcome       {% managed_extends "base-email" %}
              {% managed_block header %}<h1>Welcome!</h1>{% managed_endblock %}
              <p>Hi {{ name }}, welcome aboard.</p>

The tag language belongs to vintasend-managed-templatesmanaged_extends, managed_children, managed_block / managed_endblock, managed_super, managed_include, with version=2 to pin a reference. This API stores those templates as written and exposes what they assemble to.

GET /api/v1/templates/{key}/composition returns the assembled sources, plus what the version directly references and whether it is abstract:

GET /api/v1/templates/welcome/composition          # the latest version
GET /api/v1/templates/welcome/composition?version=3

{ "data": {
    "key": "welcome",
    "version": 3,
    "isAbstract": false,
    "references": [
      { "kind": "extends", "key": "base-email", "version": null, "field": "bodyTemplate" }
    ],
    "composedBodyTemplate": "<html><body><h1>Welcome!</h1>...",
    "composedSubjectTemplate": null,
    "composedPreheaderTemplate": null
} }

Nothing there is rendered against a context: {{ name }} and every other engine tag survives untouched. POST /templates/{key}/preview is what renders — and it composes first, so a preview shows the base's chrome around the child's content, exactly as a real send would.

A template that cannot be assembled — a base that does not exist, a chain that loops, a malformed tag — is a 409 TEMPLATE_COMPOSITION_ERROR carrying the library's message, which names the reference chain that broke. It is a 409 and not a 404 because the template asked for is there; what it names is not. Previewing the same template is a 409 PREVIEW_UNAVAILABLE for the same reason.

Two more things worth knowing:

  • Each of the three sources composes against the same field of what it references. A child's body extends the base's body, its subject extends the base's subject. field on every reference says which one it was written in.
  • References are direct only. What the referenced templates themselves reference is not followed, and nothing is resolved — a reference to a template that does not exist is reported here rather than raising.

isAbstract

Every template payload carries isAbstract: true when the version is a base to build on rather than a template to send — it declares a {% managed_children %} hole, or blocks without extending anything.

GET /api/v1/templates?isAbstract=false   # what a "pick a template to send" screen lists
GET /api/v1/templates?isAbstract=true    # the bases, for a "pick a base to extend" screen
GET /api/v1/templates                    # both

On a listing it is read from the backend's stored flag, so filtering is a column lookup rather than a parse of every row, and serializing a page costs nothing. The composition endpoint recomputes it from the source instead, which makes that copy the authority — worth asking for when the flag cannot be trusted, such as a backend that predates it.

A backend declining fields.isAbstract has the filter dropped like any other unsupported one, and its listing shows both.

Error codes

Code Status Means
BAD_REQUEST 400 Invalid input; details.issues names the fields.
UNAUTHORIZED 401 Missing or wrong API key.
NOT_FOUND 404 No such template key, or no such version of it.
CONFLICT 409 The request cannot be applied in the current state.
INVALID_STATUS_TRANSITION 409 The lifecycle does not allow that status change.
PREVIEW_UNAVAILABLE 409 The template could not be rendered; the message says why.
TEMPLATE_COMPOSITION_ERROR 409 The template could not be assembled — a missing base, a loop, a malformed tag. The message names the chain.
INTERNAL_ERROR 500 Unexpected failure. Logged in full, reported generically.

Authentication

Every /api/v1 request must carry the shared secret:

Authorization: Bearer $VINTASEND_API_KEY

Call this API from your UI's own server side so the key never reaches a browser. If you do need to call it from a browser, set VINTASEND_API_CORS_ORIGINS to the allowed origins — and put a per-user auth layer in front of it first.

Getting started

poetry install
cp .env.example .env

Then configure the service the API should read from (below), and run:

poetry run python manage.py runserver 0.0.0.0:3334

Configuring your service

The API ships no template store of its own. Point MANAGED_TEMPLATE_SERVICE_FACTORY at a callable that returns a configured service:

# vintasend_templates_management_api/vintasend_config.py
from vintasend_managed_templates.managed_template_renderer import ManagedTemplateEmailRenderer
from vintasend_managed_templates.managed_template_service import ManagedTemplateService


def create_template_service():
    backend = ...   # your BaseTemplateManagerBackend
    renderer = ManagedTemplateEmailRenderer(backend, ...)  # wraps an ordinary renderer

    return ManagedTemplateService(
        template_manager_backend=backend,
        template_renderer=renderer,
    )

Start from vintasend_config.example.py, copying it to vintasend_templates_management_api/vintasend_config.py (gitignored). The factory is called once per process and its result reused, so it must be safe to call once and the service it returns must be safe to share across requests.

Only the preview endpoint uses the renderer, so a deployment that never previews can pass one that raises.

The lifecycle is your service's, not this API's. A ManagedTemplateService subclass with its own ALLOWED_STATUS_TRANSITIONS, or one built with validate_status_transitions=False, is reported accurately through allowedTransitions and enforced through the same 409.

Environment variables

Variable Required Description
VINTASEND_API_KEY yes Shared secret clients must send as a bearer token.
MANAGED_TEMPLATE_SERVICE_FACTORY yes Dotted path to the callable building your service.
VINTASEND_API_CORS_ORIGINS no Comma-separated browser origins allowed to call the API.
DJANGO_SECRET_KEY no Django requires one; this API signs nothing.
DJANGO_DEBUG / DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS / DJANGO_LOG_LEVEL no Standard Django knobs.
DJANGO_DB_* no Only needed by backends that resolve their models through Django.

The first two are enforced by a Django system check, so a deployment missing either fails on manage.py check and on runserver rather than on the first request. Run manage.py check in your release step if you serve with gunicorn.

Development

poetry run python manage.py runserver          # dev server
poetry run pytest                              # tests
poetry run ruff check .                        # lint
poetry run ruff format .                       # format
poetry run mypy                                # type-check
poetry run python manage.py export_openapi     # regenerate openapi.yaml
poetry run python manage.py export_openapi --check   # fail if it is stale

Tests drive the real Django application through the test client over a real ManagedTemplateService composed of in-memory seams. Faking the seams rather than the service is deliberate: version resolution, the transition table and filter validation are the service's behaviour, and this API's job is to expose it faithfully — a fake service would let a route drift from the thing it is meant to be exposing without the suite noticing.

Design notes

Worth knowing if you are implementing this contract elsewhere, or wondering why something is missing.

There is no ordering. BaseTemplateManagerBackend.get_paginated_filtered_templates takes filters, page and page_size and no ordering argument, so an order can never reach the store. Sorting the page the API received would order rows within a page while the rows chosen for that page stayed in the backend's own order — right on page 1 and wrong after it, with nothing raised. So the list endpoint accepts no ordering parameter and /capabilities publishes no orderBy.* keys. The two places an order is guaranteed are the ones the service sorts itself over a complete result set: version listings and status history, both unpaginated for exactly that reason.

vintasend_managed_templates.filters does define ManagedTemplateOrderBy; it is unused by the seam. If a release threads it through, add the capability keys and the query parameters together.

Pagination needs no negotiation. vintasend-api reads pagination.oneIndexed off each backend because notification backends genuinely differ. Here ManagedTemplateService validates page >= 1 itself and no call reaches a backend without passing through that validation, so the wire's 1-indexing is the service's convention.

Capabilities are supplied, not required. BaseTemplateManagerBackend declares no get_filter_capabilities, unlike BaseNotificationBackend. Rather than add an abstract method to a published seam, this API supplies the default map and reads a backend's report only if it happens to expose one. A backend that adds the method later is picked up with no change here. As with notifications, a backend declares only what it cannot do and its report is merged over an all-True default.

Composition is reported, not enforced on write. A template that extends a base which does not exist yet is stored without complaint: a UI drafting a set of templates would otherwise have to create them in dependency order, and a base can legitimately be written after the child that names it. The cost is that a broken reference is found on read rather than on save — which is why GET /templates/{key}/composition exists and returns the library's message verbatim, and why a save-then-check round trip is the pattern for an editor that wants to warn before publishing. Publishing is where it matters: a template that cannot be assembled cannot be sent, so check before POST /templates/{key}/activate.

Preview contexts are plain dicts. The renderer seam types a context as NotificationContextDict, but that class cannot represent an ordinary nested object: its validation requires every value inside a nested dict to itself be a NotificationContextDict, with no base case for a scalar, so {"user": {"name": "Ana"}} is inexpressible. None values and lists of strings are refused for related reasons, and both appear in real stored contexts. Since a notification's stored context_used is a plain dict and renderers only read from a context, the caller's object is passed through — the same thing vintasend-api does. A preview that refused what a real send carries would be a worse guide to production than no preview.

Updates create versions. POST /templates/{key}/versions rather than a PATCH, because the backend copies the latest version forward and applies the non-None fields to the copy. An already-published version is never modified, and the route shape says so.

Deletion is per version. The seam has no operation removing every version of a key, so neither does this API; doing it as a loop here would be a multi-step deletion with no transaction around it.

Retagging is the one write that does not create a version. PUT /templates/{key}/tags edits a version in place, unlike every other write on a template. Tags describe how a template is found, not what it renders, so relabelling one for search should not fork a version and drop it back to draft. To change tags and content together, send tags on POST /templates/{key}/versions instead — where an omitted tags carries the previous version's forward and [] clears them.

Tag listing is paged in this API, not in the store. The template-manager seam has no paginated tag read, so GET /tags slices the page in process. That is sound in a way in-process ordering would not be: get_tags returns the whole set in one stable order, so a page is a slice of a complete list rather than a re-sort of an arbitrary window.

fields.mostRecentActiveVersion is a capability of its own. It is not a column test like every other field: a backend answers it by comparing a row against the other versions of its key, which a store keeping no version history cannot do. Declining it means the list endpoint drops it and returns a row per version — the honest answer for a store that has only one.

The two tag filters are separate capabilities. fields.includesAllTags and fields.includesAnyOfTags are different queries — the first needs a per-template count over the tags asked for, the second only needs membership — so a backend can support one without the other. As with every filter, a declined one is dropped rather than failing the request.

License

MIT

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

0