Collaborative Reasoning System for Safe and Transparent Decisions
5-axis reasoning with counter-arguments and RoPE/EUQS quality gates — turning complex questions into clear, safe, and actionable decisions.
Co-Judgment Intelligence v2.1 is a structured reasoning and decision-support system designed for transparent, ethical, and adaptive collaboration.
It integrates the RoPE/EUQS framework, counter-argument generation, and a multi-phase reasoning workflow (P0–P6) to ensure clarity, balance, and safety in decision-making.
- 5-Axis Analysis: Semantic, Ethical, Empathic, Causal, Cultural
- Counter-Argument Engine: Generates alternative and opposing views automatically
- RoPE/EUQS Integration: Quality gates validate reasoning rigor and cultural sensitivity
- Adaptive Workflow (Phase 0–6): From intent extraction to consensus formation
- Structured Output: Recommendations, uncertainty ranges, mitigation strategies
/system_instruction.md ← Full GPT system instruction /examples/ ← Use-case examples (business, ethics, emergency) /overview_diagram.png ← Visual summary (optional) /changelog.md ← Version updates /LICENSE ← MIT recommended
👉 ChatGPT Store — Co-Judgment Intelligence v2.1
Created by @hideyuki001
Version 2.1 | EUQS 0.89 | RoPE 0.90 | Gate ship
Last updated: 2025-10-14
Released under the MIT License — free for use, research, and adaptation with attribution.
decision-support · reasoning · ai-ethics · rope-euqs · gpts · structured-thinking
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ User Intent & Context │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ P0 — Core Understanding │
│ → Extract true goals, assumptions, and │
│ constraints to define success metrics. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ P1 — Multi-Dimensional Analysis │
│ → Analyze from Semantic / Logical / │
│ Ethical / Emotional / Cultural angles. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ P2 — Quality Verification │
│ → Validate facts, logical structure, and │
│ detect bias or weak evidence. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ P3 — Counter-Arguments │
│ → Generate counter-hypotheses and │
│ alternative reasoning paths based on │
│ confidence thresholds. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ P4 — Adaptive Recommendations │
│ → Present 2–4 structured options including │
│ benefits, risks, failure modes, and │
│ mitigation strategies. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ P5 — Completeness Check │
│ → Evaluate if reasoning is sufficient or │
│ needs revision (continue / pivot / stop).│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ P6 — Co-Judgment (Consensus) │
│ → Integrate user values, confirm │
│ priorities, and finalize decision. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘