8000
Skip to content

refactor(rlm): enhance code fence parsing and REPL entry formatting - #9309

Merged
isaacbmiller merged 12 commits into
mainfrom
isaac/rlm-debug-drew-21726
Feb 20, 2026
Merged

refactor(rlm): enhance code fence parsing and REPL entry formatting#9309
isaacbmiller merged 12 commits into
mainfrom
isaac/rlm-debug-drew-21726

Conversation

@isaacbmiller
@isaacbmiller isaacbmiller commented Feb 18, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The RLM module has the LLM write Python in markdown code fences (python ... ), which must be stripped before execution. Previously, _strip_code_fences used a permissive regex that silently passed through anything it couldn't parse — unlabeled fences, multiple blocks, or prose mixed with code would reach the interpreter and fail in confusing ways.

This PR rewrites _strip_code_fences as a strict parser that raises SyntaxError on malformed input rlm.py:69-103. Because it can now raise, a new _execute_action_code method rlm.py:534-550 wraps both fence stripping and interpreter execution with proper error handling, replacing duplicated try/except blocks in the sync and async iteration paths.

@isaacbmiller
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7d218582c4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread dspy/predict/rlm.py Outdated
@isaacbmiller
isaacbmiller marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2026 00:36
@isaacbmiller
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Discussed offline

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

0