User talk:Ies

2006-1 | 2007-1 | 2008-1 | 2008-2 | 2008-3 | 2009-1 | 2009-2 | 2009-3 | 2009-4 | 2010-1 | 2010-2 | 2010-3 | 2010-4 | 2011-1 | 2011-2 | 2011-3 | 2012-1 | 2012-2 | 2013-1 | 2013-2 | 2014-1 | 2014-2 | 2014-3 | 2015-1 | 2015-2 | 2015-3 | 2015-4 | 2016-1 | 2016-2 | 2016-3 | 2017-1 | 2018-1 | 2018-2 | 2019-1 | 2019-2 | 2020-1 | 2020-2 | 2021-1 | 2022-1 | 2023-1

––––

File:Leipzig - Am Sportforum - Sportforum 09 ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 09:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calw - Marktplatz - Stadtkirche in 04 ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Busdorf - Haithabu - Wikinger-Häuser 05 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wilsede_3b_(Dat_ole_Huus) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

F. Riedelio • 💬 07:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 17 ies.jpg

And also:

• File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 19 ies.jpg
• File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 20 ies.jpg
• File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 31 ies.jpg
• File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 32 ies.jpg
• File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 33 ies.jpg
• File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 35 ies.jpg
• File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 36 ies.jpg
• File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 37 ies.jpg
• File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 38 ies.jpg
• File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 39 ies.jpg
• File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 45 ies.jpg
• File:Wuppertal - Schwimmoper 46 ies.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women called queens has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

186.173.21.236 14:23, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Frank, gerade bin ich auf Deine beeindruckende Sammlung von Schildern in Essen gestoßen. Wie mir früher schon bei Deinen vielen Fotos von Info-Tafeln in Wuppertal aufgefallen ist, immer sind sie (wie auch alle anderen Fotos) von bestechender Qualität. Weshalb nur laden so viele User Schilder mit (meist historischen) Erläuterungen hoch, wenn der Text nicht mehr zu lesen ist (gerne weil man selbst die Kamera zu schief gehalten hat)? Und wieso wird eine solche Folie aufgehängt? Zwei Sätze und ein fetter Grammatikfehler, da hätte sich doch ein Neuausdruck plus Laminierung gelohnt. Aber selbst auf einem Lehrpfad gerät der erste Satz der Erklärung aus dem Lot - und keiner merkt's anscheinend. Übrigens waren das zwei Zufallsbeobachtungen, ich hab' jetzt nicht nach Fehlern gesucht; aber gestaunt, wie vielfältig Deine Schildersammlung ist. Im übrigen bist Du ja ein Urgestein von Commons. Allzuviele Leute dürften nicht mehr Fotos hier veröffentlicht haben als Du. Und das ohne Serien von zwei Dutzend Aufnahmen des immer gleichen Objekts aus minimal veränderter Perspektive. Neben die technische tritt bei dieser Riesenmenge von Fotos eine logistische Qualität (korrekte Bezeichnung und Kategorisierung), das ist perfekt. Meine Anerkennung wollte ich mal loswerden. Schade dass Du Wuppertal verloren gegangen bist! Aber selbst Deine wertvollen (nun auch schon wieder 14 Jahre alten - tempus fugit!) Aufnahmen der Schwimmoper werden angegangen von selbsternannten Wächtern des Urheberrechts - weshalb erinnert mich das denn doch ein wenig an die politischen Zustände im Lande? Mit dieser rhetorischen Frage wünsche ich Dir ein schönes Wochenende. Gruß Im Fokus (talk) 14:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]