User talk:TadejM/Archive 1

Dobrodošli! Welcome! Bienvenue! Wilkommen! Bienvenuti! Namaste! Velkommen! Tervetuloa! Velkominn! Karibu! Sveiki! Witam! Bienvenuti! Hosgeldiniz! Mingalaba! Yangshok! Welkom! Bienvenidos!

You can leave messages here in English, Slovenian, German or French.

I left you a message on en, but you keep uploading prohibited materials so I'm leaving it here too in hopes that you see it soon.

I noticed you uploaded this picture and say it's free for noncommercial use. Noncommercial materials are not permitted on commons; see this. Since you checked the box on the upload screen (which states I affirm that the copyright holder of this file agrees to release it under the terms of a free license as defined in Commons:Licensing) you need to rectify this by either changing the license or having it deleted. Cheers. CryptoDerk 19:21, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

Also, in an unrelated note, I see you're using the {{GFDL}} for images you have the copyright on. You can use {{GFDL-self}} if it's your image. CryptoDerk 19:24, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

You are now an admin here on Commons. Congratulations! villy ♦ ✎ 09:18, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. --Eleassar my talk 13:36, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Zdravo, Eleassar! Lahko, prosim, zbrišeš Image:Coloana fara starsit.jpg? Hvala. --Romanm 19:24, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Hi there, yeah you're welcome. Congratulations on becoming an administrator btw :-) regards.. Gryffindor 13:41, 10 October 2005 (UTC) ps: if you are interested and need help, take a look at Esperanza maybe you're interested..

Ali morda veš (in znaš popraviti) zakaj se pri sliki dneva če je stran v slovenščini (tudi na tvoji predstavitveni strani je tako) izpiše namesto imena (opisa) slike oznake tempate? --Janeznovak 11:01, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Ni posebnega problema. Na srečo to niso moderne umetniške slike in se takoj vidi kaj je prikazano. --Janeznovak 12:57, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

• Halló Eleassar! Shoud image:Green check.png be transparent? See en:user:Gangleri/tests/bugzilla/5623. Best regards Gangleri · Th · T 08:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Pozdravljen kolega. Kam, če te smem pobarati, in zakaj bežiš s slovenske Wikipedije? | Tcie 16:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Odgovor si lahko prebereš tukaj. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 19:08, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello TadejM/Archive 1,

as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.

If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence 22:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Zdravo, Eleassar! Na Commons:Featured_picture_candidates se je razpasla navada uporabe nesubstituiranih predlog {{oppose}}, {{contra}}, ipd. Saj veš: tistih, ki tako zelo obremenjujejo strežnike! Morda bi kot administrator tudi tukaj naredil Red, kot si ga tako lepo v slovenski Wikipediji (samo predlog...)? --romanm (talk) 21:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Socrates blue.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Wikipeder 08:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm running from Firefox on a windows system. I removed an image and didn't do anything else. How can I possibly be more careful? Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass ^demandez 00:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC) P.S.: Pardon if this is a repeat (bot debugging...)

Loco085 02:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi! This is Wikimachine from Wikipedia! I commented on your vagina image's talk page. Could you reply? (69.245.43.115 17:11, 31 December 2006 (UTC))

Hello, why do you upload small logo ? Is it need ? I dont understand why ? Thanks a lot. ~ bayo or talk 12:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I uploaded them to be used as part of a wikipediasister-type template in Slovenian Wikipedia (actually sl:Predloga:Sorodni projekti). They originate from the English WP, but there they are uploaded locally for protection against vandalism. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 13:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I tagged this image {{Nsd}}, while awaiting confirmation here. The problem is that I expect the permission to be something like You can use this image under the GNU license for use on Wikipedia, which would be invalid as there is no such thing as the GNU license and because it might be unfree, depending on the wording of the permission. -- Bryan (talk to me) 13:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi, sorry for bugging you again, but why do you upload small logos such as Image:Wikimedia-logo-35px.png? You can easily use the bigger version using [[Image:Wikimedia-logo.svg|35px]] . -- Bryan (talk to me) 13:53, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, I think the images used were specially-compressed 35px images, which saved several KB from the Main Page size. Also the PNGs in question were derived directly from this bigger versions and optimized specifically for use in the template (with the blank border removed).

If you don't agree I suggest that you ask on en:template talk:WikipediaSister for further explanation as I'm just updating Slovenian templates from en: (or I'll ask). --Eleassar ^(t/p) 14:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

You could have saved yourself a bit of trouble on Image:Gulf toadfish.jpg by checking the scientific name Opsanus beta - the image has been on commons for awhile already. Stan Shebs 18:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Could you please invite users of Slovenian Wikipedia into participation in this project? Thank you. --EugeneZelenko 14:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

 Done. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi, thank your for uploading so nice graphics. We would need an unlocked Padlock for the German Wikipedia. Could you help us? Thanks in andvance -129.27.12.8 17:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Zanima me, kako tukaj nominirati sliko za sliko dneva oz ali je to sploh mogoče. hvaležna bom za odgovor.Inki 00:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Postopek je popolnoma odprt. Sliko dneva lahko na strani Commons:Slika dneva izbere kateri koli uporabnik. Če ima dobre razloge, lahko tudi zamenja že izbrano sliko. Vendar je to treba storiti nekaj dni pred uporabo slike, da imajo sodelavci dovolj časa za prevod opisa (in za pogovor o izbiri v primeru nasprotovanj). --Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi :) My name is Milan. I’m a user on the serbian wiki. I want to upload some pictures from the website www.myexit.org. It’s about a music festival EXIT in Novi Sad, Serbia. This website have a licence CC-BY-SA-NC , and it’s not compatible with GFDL (because of NC). But we on the serbian wiki have a special permission to upload and use all pictures and text from this website. Is it possible to upload these pictures on the Wikimedia Commons. I don’t want someone erase them because of this licences incomatibility. I’m sorry if my english is not very good. Please answer here. Thank you!

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Fran levstik.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. RedCoat 16:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi Eleassar. I see you have done some localisation work for Slovenian here on Commons. I was wondering if you knew about the MediaWiki localisation project Betawiki. This wiki allows you to translate (into any supported language) the complete interface of MediaWiki and its extensions. If you like translating and want to help make MediaWiki more usable for your language, please stop by and help. Cheers! Siebrand 18:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

let's try again. You may have missed the above message due to the template below... Siebrand 09:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

can you please help me?

Zdravo. Ker si tu admin, lahko zbrišeš mojo osebno stran? Delam čistko in preusmeritve. Hvala, lp. --Tone 19:18, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Ok. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 16:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Eleassar. As I was cleaning up UI messages in the MediaWiki: namespace, I came across your name as editor of those pages for /sl quite often. I also checked if you had a presence on Betawiki, the MediaWiki localisation project. And guess what: you have! It just appears that you have not been active there since mid-2006. I *huge lot* has happended there since then. Unfortunately no one is maintaining the 'sl' localisation yet[1]. I do hope we will see you there so you can do a lot for the MediaWiki users that natively speak Slovenščina. My advise if to try and get more users in than only you: it improves quality and lowers the individual workload. I do hope to see you there soon. Cheers! Siebrand 20:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

--Veliki Kategorizator 18:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

--Veliki Kategorizator 18:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Nate se obračam z vprašanjem - zakaj je moja kategorija Files by User:Amazone7, prešla pod skrite kategorije, torej hidden categories? Meni to namreč ni najbolj všeč. --Inki 12:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

S tem se nisem ukvarjal, tako da pravzaprav ne vem. Vprašaj na commons:Village pump, lahko pa si tudi nastaviš te kategorije kot vidne na Special:Preferences (Misc). --Eleassar ^(t/p) 16:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi there! At 07:56, 13 June 2008 you deleted my photo "Image:Piran Portoroz Peninsula.jpg" ‎ (Copyright violation: Photography of a copyrighted 2D map). This is a photograph of 2D map displayed on public tourist information billboards in the streets of Portoroz. I photographed it in the street, just as I would photograph any other billboard. I would regard it as being in the public domain. Please re-consider your decision that this is a copyrighted map. If you agree with my view, please leave a note on Zlerman and I will upload the image again. Thank you, --Zlerman (talk) 09:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

This 2D work is not in the public domain even if displayed on public billboards. Publishing a photo of it under the PD tag without the consent of the copyright owner means copyright violation. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 10:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello Eleassar. The Danish law says that photos are not allowed if the artwork is the central motif of the image. Jeancaffou's photo was the statue itself, head-on, so prohibited under that law. The two images we have show the statue quite remotely (especially the second), and so they could be -borderline maybe- accepted as a no-violation. these images weren't proposed for deletion before, I guess since the others were deleted and these left they should be OK, but a DR could start so that there is discussion - Badseed ^talk 19:17, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Nekdo me je opozoril, da ima Image:Krka pri Kostanjecici.JPG napačen naslov. Sem se zatipkal pri nalaganju. Pred približno enim mesecem sem zaprosil s predlogo rename za preimenovanje pa ni nič. Ko sem še enkrat pogledal sem ugotovil da mora nek pooblaščeni uporabnik dati svoje mnenje k preimenovanju. Kor administrator to (kolikor vem) si. Prosim naredi kar je treba in lahko. Hvala. --Janeznovak (talk) 13:33, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

88.253.125.67 14:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi Eleassar,
do you remember where you did take this File:Christmas crib.jpg image? Is it typical of your home country? I'm asking because I'm trying to sort all the nativity scene images. --Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sardischer_Gebirgsmolch.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sardischer_Gebirgsmolch.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

See also my comment on User_talk:Martina_Nolte#Dateibeschreibung_File:Sardischer_Gebirgsmolch.jpg--Martina Nolte (talk) 12:48, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Ker si administrator tu bi te prosil da popraviš "slovenski" prevod v tej zaklenjeni predlogi, ker je precej amatersko (da ne rečem kaj manj politično korektnega) da piše "Sopstveno delo" ko izbere človek slovenski vmesnik. Hvala. --Yerpo (talk) 12:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi! Some of Lanfra (talk · contribs)'s uploads seem to be portraits of people like you and me (see for instance File:Jug Simona.jpg, File:Janja Kisilak.jpg or File:Farič Katja.jpg), all in category:Prekmurje. They seem out of scope to me. Can you please check them and ask the user what they are about? Thanks in advance, Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Deutsch | Español

Dear TadejM/Archive 1. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

---

Hello, TadejM!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 12:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Leptodactylidae distribution.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Usually for recent work of art, we request an OTRS authorization, which here was requested and never sent. --Eusebius (talk) 15:57, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

If you know the copyright holder personally, you have the ability to make her secure an OTRS permission. Instead, you chose to ignore the fact that an OTRS permission had been requested by another admin a while ago and restored the image without grounding your action on an OTRS ticket or on an undeletion request. I'm astonished with the ease with which you admit making exceptions to the rules (exceptions involving sysop actions) in personal cases. Please make Ines Zgonc "clean" the situation through OTRS. --Eusebius (talk) 20:50, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

I don't think that's actually needed. You may verify at this or this page that the username 'Amazone75' or 'Amazone7' belongs to Ines Zgonc. Her other works are available here. Stop being so pedantic where that's of no use. Thanks. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:38, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

So you just don't understand at all why OTRS authorizations have been introduced by the WMF? --Eusebius (talk) 09:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

That's what you say. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Flag_of_Belgrade.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

-Nard the Bard 06:09, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

why did you block it for

What? Whom? --Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:31, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Could you check the licence for File:Perko Lojze-Grozde 99.jpg? It says that the person who took a photograph released the image to PD but what about the author of the paining? I think the licence is improper. --Tone (talk) 12:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

You're right. The information about the painting is lacking. There should also be an OTRS confirmation of the right to use the image (which was created by the uploader's brother). --Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:24, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello,

I'm sorry to inform you but I made a request for removal of your administrator rights here on Commons. Today started the new inactivity run and you where listed, because you where listed as inactive last run also the policy says your rights need to be removed.

I want to thank you for your hard work here on Commons and please come back when you have more time for the beautiful project, Huib talk ^{Abigor @ meta} 08:25, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Polynesia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

– Kwj2772 (msg) 10:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Horse in field.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Dana boomer (talk) 21:53, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean by "under the GFDL license". Do you mean where it says "Contributed by en:User:fir0002"? If so, how do you know this user actually took this photo? Many times inexperienced users upload photos that they haven't actually taken - just because someone added the photo doesn't mean that they took it. And I don't see any other user's name on the page. Also, where was this transferred from on en.wp? There is no history (deleted or otherwise) under this filename there. Dana boomer (talk) 23:54, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the links. The link on the image page was incorrect and so was taking me to a red link with no history at en.wp. I have fixed this. Also, the history at en.wp does say that the image was taken by fir0002; I have tweaked the commons image so that it specifies this. Dana boomer (talk) 13:52, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Please, delete wrong version (photo):

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/8/8d/20110317110131!Darja_Kap%C5%A1.jpg

Thanks! --Andrejj (talk) 11:06, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Please contact someone else - I am not active enough here so my adminship has been revoked. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:26, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Osteitis fibrosa cystica tibiae X-ray.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:34, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

The license was valid (see User talk:Magog the Ogre). --Eleassar ^(t/p) 11:56, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi TadejM/Archive 1, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
• Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Morning Sunshine (talk) 14:07, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 14:17, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Re your question elsewhere: to translate "nominate for deletion" (and the gadget that produces it), we need MediaWiki:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete.js/sl.js, like MediaWiki:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete.js/de.js. (The original English is near the bottom of MediaWiki:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete.js.) You can't create this page directly, but you can make User:Eleassar/Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete.js/sl.js and ask an admin to move it. If you have any questions, ask me or go to MediaWiki talk:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete.js. cheers, Rd232 (talk) 17:12, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Template:Spomenik should be renamed, as Spomenik means monument in several languages, and this template is related only to Slovenian monuments. --WhiteWriter ^speaks 20:37, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

I've moved it to Template:SpomenikSVN, per ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 for Slovenia. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:21, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

File:AtlBalkrelig.jpg: OK, I'll do tomorrow,--Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 14:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Spiridon! This map is great, but I'd like to point out that in en:Prekmurje, Slovenia, the Protestant religion is predominant in some municipalities. See e.g. [1] (pg. 72, karta 22, in green). This has a great significance in this otherwise Catholic country. Can you please correct this? Thanks in advance. --Eleassar (t/p) 17:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Done. Wishes, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 17:09, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:21, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Emonski zid 1913 razglednica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 06:59, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Iapetus mosaic color.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

50.36.97.24 12:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Tvoja interpretacija, da dlib ne objavlja fotografij (kljub tisti publikaciji (za katero pa ne piše, da je kakšno pravilo ustanove ali da se sploh upošteva)) neznanih avtorjev je PMM napačna. Ne vidim razloga, da bi pri delu slik avtorja objavili, pri delu pa ne (če je znan), saj je to vendarle neka ugledna ustanova, avtor pa je eden najpomembnejših podatkov. Ob tem pri nekaterih celo piše v opombah, da je avtor neznan.[2] --Sporti (talk) 10:43, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Potem mi pa povej, zakaj nekje piše, da je avtor neznan, drugje pa ne. Dosledno bi bilo, da bi pisalo, da je avtor neznan, povsod, ne samo pri nekaterih slikah. Da so bibliografski podatki v dlib nepopolni, je bilo tudi že izpostavljeno. Da je avtor res neznan, je mogoče dokazati samo pri tistih slikah, kjer je to izrecno omenjeno. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 05:02, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Nikjer ni navedeno samo, da je avtor neznan, ampak je v nekaterih opombah to omenjeno v sicer daljši opombi. Sicer pa tam "piše", da je avtor neznan, kjer ni naveden. Če dlibu zaupamo za podatke o tem kdo je avtor, kdaj je bilo posneto in ostalo, potem ne vidim razloga, da ne bi tudi o tem, da je avtor neznan. Tale publikacija (DLIB.SI PLUS: MODELI RAZČIŠČEVANJA AVTORSKIH PRAVIC ZA IZBRANE SKUPINE AVTORSKIH DEL ZA DIGITALIZACIJO IN/ALI OBJAVO NA DLIB.SI), na katero se sklicuješ, pa ima datum 29. september 2010, torej za tem, ko so že naložili gradivo in torej ne more veljati za nazaj. --Sporti (talk) 05:27, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Kje na portalu piše, da je "avtor neznan, kjer ni naveden"? Publikacija sicer ni predpis, temveč študija, ki opozarja, da dLib avtorskopravno ni popolnoma varen (gl. Cilji študije) in želi biti recept za identifikacijo imetnikov avtorskih pravic (na istem mestu) - očitno se s tem do tedaj torej niso natančneje ukvarjali. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 07:57, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Kje na portalu piše, da je "avtor neznan, kjer ni naveden" - verjetno nikjer (ker je to jasno po zdravi pameti), toda nekako se lahko od ugledne ustanove pričakuje, da so navedli avtorja, kjer je znan, drugje pa niso, ker ni znan. Praktično vse fotografije so iz Zbirke upodobitev znanih Slovencev NUK. Prav tako nikjer ne piše, da je leto neznano, kjer ni navedeno, ali da založnik ni znan, kjer ni naveden, itd. --Sporti (talk) 08:43, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Kako je pa z audio in video posnetki, v tisti publikaciji je npr. navedeno: "Na podlagi prevladujoče doktrine in sodne prakse je tako mogoče zaključiti, da izvajalci za izvedbe, izvedene pred 28. aprilom 1990 ne uživajo varstva" (npr)? --Sporti (talk) 08:18, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Pmm pripadajo avtorske pravice avtorju besedila, avtorju notnega zapisa oz. melodije in izvajalcu. V kolikor sta melodija in besedilo v javni domeni, so izvedbe, posnete pred 28. aprilom 1990, proste. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:29, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Veliko od teh je ljudskih, potem je samo vprašanje avtorja melodije, če je posneto ob spremljavi. --Sporti (talk) 09:37, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Zakaj je ljubljanski zmaj copyvio ? Avtor zmaja je umrl več kot 70 let nazaj. Malo obrazloži, sama etiketa ne bo dovolj. --Mile (talk) 15:01, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Avtor zmaja je umrl leta 1946. Glej Commons:FOP#Slovenia in Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ljubljana_dragon.JPG. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 15:24, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Are you happy with your nomination? By the way, here on the European map, Slovenia is green colored - meaning no problems with this country.--MrPanyGoff 07:45, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing this out. I've left a request for update at Template talk:Map-FoP-Europe. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 07:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jezersko-solčavska ovca Molička planina 1.tif.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and illustrative. --Vassil 09:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:NUK-maketa.JPG

Yours sincerely Eleassar ^(t/p) 17:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:NUK1.jpg

Yours sincerely Eleassar ^(t/p) 17:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Plečnik Zapornica na Lj-2.JPG

Eleassar (t/p) 12:36, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Why you will delete my photos?! I have all references and all that's necessary!Cromen (talk) 17:58, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

I've stated the reason at the deletion request. You are invited to express your opinion against it there. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 18:02, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Dear sir! Whole section of my user talk page is devoted only to you and your contributions (follow this link). Please leave your comments in the frame of that section and continue your stub-list. It is much more transparent when data is sorted in a list, rather than spread around the talk page with several redundant templates. Thank you! Žiga (talk) 18:54, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

You seem to be very upset. Of course I'm trying to keep your talk page tidy and up to date.. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 19:01, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Ok, razumem, zakaj smo morali pobrisati kup slovenskih logotipov, ne razumem pa, zakaj je sedem krogov, razporejenih v tabeli 3x4, avtorsko zaščiteno delo. Če mi uspeš obrazložiti in me prepričati, bom z veseljem pisal na IJS za dovoljenje OTRS. --Domen (talk) 19:53, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Menim, da izpolnjuje merila za avtorsko delo: stvaritev, individualnost, intelektualnost oz. duhovnost, izraženost in izhajanje s področja znanosti, umetnosti ali književnosti. To pomeni:

• je človekova stvaritev in ne rezultat naprave (stvaritev)
• vsebuje osebno noto avtorja (individualnost)
• nastalo v avtorjevem "duhu" (duhovnost - intelektualni produkt človekovega ustvarjanja)
• zaznavno s človekovimi čuti (izraženost)
• izhaja s področja grafičnega oblikovanja (področje umetnosti)

--Eleassar ^(t/p) 20:17, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Ok, na njihovi strani [3] piše, da gre za črke IJS v 5-bitni kodi na teleprinterskem luknjanem traku. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 20:41, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Do you know if there are any FOP issues with File:Ljubljana Drachenbrücke 03.jpg? A user just uploaded a fair use copy to English Wikipedia: en:File:Ljubljana Drachenbrücke 03 on English Wikipedia.jpg. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

This bridge is most probably (unless there was a special provision for architecture in pre-1995 Yugoslav laws) still protected by copyright. Its author, sl:Jurij Zaninović, died in 1946. See COM:FOP#Slovenia. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

OK. I've adjusted the file information page on Wikipedia. I guess that the Commons file should be deleted. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:42, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

I'll try to get the pre-1995 acts to verify for sure, but if nothing particular regarding the architecture (i.e. shorter than 70-year term for it in contrast to other works) is found, most of the files in the Category:Dragon bridge (Ljubljana) should be deleted. Images of architecture can be uploaded to the English Wikipedia with the en:Template:FoP-USonly tag. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:52, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, and this one is also permitted as en:Template:PD-ineligible-USonly and en:Template:PD-US-1923-abroad. Bridges are not copyrightable in the United States (see COM:FOP#United States). Are they copyrightable in Slovenia? --Stefan4 (talk) 21:56, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

The modern copyright act does not explicitely mention them, but places architectural works among copyrighted works.(Article 5) An article on copyright in architecture in Slovenia mentions them as protected.(pg. 63) The same author explicitely mentioned the Triple Bridge as covered by Article 55 of this act (non-commercial FOP only) in her diploma thesis.[4] I therefore assume they are. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 22:46, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Pri slikah činov Slovenske vojske si spremenil končnico spletne strani .htm v .hmt (npr. [5]). Namerno ali si se zatipkal? --Domen (talk) 13:52, 2 October 2012 (UTC)