Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:2011.04682 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 9 Nov 2020 (v1), last revised 13 Feb 2021 (this version, v2)]

Title:Exploring Early Dark Energy solution to the Hubble tension with Planck and SPTPol data

Authors:Anton Chudaykin, Dmitry Gorbunov, Nikita Nedelko
View a PDF of the paper titled Exploring Early Dark Energy solution to the Hubble tension with Planck and SPTPol data, by Anton Chudaykin and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:A promising idea to resolve the long standing Hubble tension is to postulate a new subdominant dark-energy-like component in the pre-recombination Universe which is traditionally termed as the Early Dark Energy (EDE). However, as shown in Refs. \cite{Hill:2020osr,Ivanov:2020ril} the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and large-scale structure (LSS) data impose tight constraints on this proposal. Here, we revisit these strong bounds considering the Planck CMB temperature anisotropy data at large angular scales and the SPTPol polarization and lensing measurements. As advocated in Ref. \cite{Chudaykin:2020acu}, this combined data approach predicts the CMB lensing effect consistent with the $\Lambda$CDM expectation and allows one to efficiently probe both large and small angular scales. Combining Planck and SPTPol CMB data with the full-shape BOSS likelihood and information from photometric LSS surveys in the EDE analysis we found for the Hubble constant $H_0=69.79\pm0.99\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}Mpc^{-1}}$ and for the EDE fraction $f_{\rm EDE}<0.094\,(2\sigma)$. These bounds obtained without including a local distance ladder measurement of $H_0$ (SH0ES) alleviate the Hubble tension to a $2.5\sigma$ level. Including further the SH0ES data we obtain $H_0=71.81\pm1.19\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}Mpc^{-1}}$ and $f_{\rm EDE}=0.088\pm0.034$ in full accordance with SH0ES. We also found that a higher value of $H_0$ does not significantly deteriorate the fit to the LSS data. Overall, the EDE scenario is (though weakly) favoured over $\Lambda$CDM even after accounting for unconstrained directions in the cosmological parameter space. We conclude that the large-scale Planck temperature and SPTPol polarization measurements along with LSS data do not rule out the EDE model as a resolution of the Hubble tension. This paper underlines the importance of the CMB lensing effect for robust constraints on the EDE scenario.
Comments: 14+3 pages, 2+1 figures, 4 tables; v2: Appendix A added, matched version accepted by Phys. Rev. D
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)
Report number: INR-TH-2020-041
Cite as: arXiv:2011.04682 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:2011.04682v2 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.04682
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. D 103, 043529 (2021)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.043529
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Anton Chudaykin A. S. [view email]
[v1] Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:01:30 UTC (1,532 KB)
[v2] Sat, 13 Feb 2021 22:23:19 UTC (1,557 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Exploring Early Dark Energy solution to the Hubble tension with Planck and SPTPol data, by Anton Chudaykin and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-11
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
hep-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences