Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2310.14573 (cs)
[Submitted on 23 Oct 2023]

Title:Exploring the Boundaries of GPT-4 in Radiology

Authors:Qianchu Liu, Stephanie Hyland, Shruthi Bannur, Kenza Bouzid, Daniel C. Castro, Maria Teodora Wetscherek, Robert Tinn, Harshita Sharma, Fernando Pérez-García, Anton Schwaighofer, Pranav Rajpurkar, Sameer Tajdin Khanna, Hoifung Poon, Naoto Usuyama, Anja Thieme, Aditya V. Nori, Matthew P. Lungren, Ozan Oktay, Javier Alvarez-Valle
View a PDF of the paper titled Exploring the Boundaries of GPT-4 in Radiology, by Qianchu Liu and 18 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The recent success of general-domain large language models (LLMs) has significantly changed the natural language processing paradigm towards a unified foundation model across domains and applications. In this paper, we focus on assessing the performance of GPT-4, the most capable LLM so far, on the text-based applications for radiology reports, comparing against state-of-the-art (SOTA) radiology-specific models. Exploring various prompting strategies, we evaluated GPT-4 on a diverse range of common radiology tasks and we found GPT-4 either outperforms or is on par with current SOTA radiology models. With zero-shot prompting, GPT-4 already obtains substantial gains ($\approx$ 10% absolute improvement) over radiology models in temporal sentence similarity classification (accuracy) and natural language inference ($F_1$). For tasks that require learning dataset-specific style or schema (e.g. findings summarisation), GPT-4 improves with example-based prompting and matches supervised SOTA. Our extensive error analysis with a board-certified radiologist shows GPT-4 has a sufficient level of radiology knowledge with only occasional errors in complex context that require nuanced domain knowledge. For findings summarisation, GPT-4 outputs are found to be overall comparable with existing manually-written impressions.
Comments: EMNLP 2023 main
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2310.14573 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2310.14573v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.14573
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Qianchu Liu [view email]
[v1] Mon, 23 Oct 2023 05:13:03 UTC (38 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Exploring the Boundaries of GPT-4 in Radiology, by Qianchu Liu and 18 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-10
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences