Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2102.07890 (cs)
[Submitted on 15 Feb 2021 (v1), last revised 19 Mar 2021 (this version, v2)]

Title:Data Interpolation Accuracy Comparison: Gravity Model Versus Radial Basis Function

Authors:Amirehsan Ghasemi, Kelvin J Msechu, Arash Ghasemi, Mbakisya A. Onyango, Ignatius Fomunung, Joseph Owino
View a PDF of the paper titled Data Interpolation Accuracy Comparison: Gravity Model Versus Radial Basis Function, by Amirehsan Ghasemi and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In this paper, the accuracy of two mesh-free approximation approaches, the Gravity model and Radial Basis Function, are compared. The two schemes' convergence behaviors prove that RBF is faster and more accurate than the Gravity model. As a case study, the interpolation of temperature at different locations in Tennesse, USA, are compared. Delaunay mesh generation is used to create random points inside and on the border, which data can be incorporated in these locations. 49 MERRA weather stations as used as data sources to provide the temperature at a specific day and hour. The contours of interpolated temperatures provided in the result section assert RBF is a more accurate method than the Gravity model by showing a smoother and broader range of interpolated data.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Numerical Analysis (math.NA)
Cite as: arXiv:2102.07890 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2102.07890v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.07890
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Arash Ghasemi [view email]
[v1] Mon, 15 Feb 2021 23:05:18 UTC (747 KB)
[v2] Fri, 19 Mar 2021 22:23:14 UTC (747 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Data Interpolation Accuracy Comparison: Gravity Model Versus Radial Basis Function, by Amirehsan Ghasemi and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-02
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.NA
math
math.NA

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences