-
Bouncing microdroplets on hydrophobic surfaces
Authors:
Jamie Mclauchlan,
Jim S. Walker,
Vatsal Sanjay,
Maziyar Jalaal,
Jonathan P. Reid,
Adam M. Squires,
Anton Souslov
Abstract:
Intuitively, slow droplets stick to a surface and faster droplets splash or bounce. However, recent work suggests that on non-wetting surfaces, whether microdroplets stick or bounce depends only on their size and fluid properties, but not on the incoming velocity. Here, we show using theory and experiments that even poorly wetting surfaces have a velocity-dependent criterion for bouncing of aqueou…
▽ More
Intuitively, slow droplets stick to a surface and faster droplets splash or bounce. However, recent work suggests that on non-wetting surfaces, whether microdroplets stick or bounce depends only on their size and fluid properties, but not on the incoming velocity. Here, we show using theory and experiments that even poorly wetting surfaces have a velocity-dependent criterion for bouncing of aqueous droplets, which is as high as 6 m/s for diameters of 30-50 microns on hydrophobic surfaces such as Teflon. We quantify this criterion by analyzing the interplay of dissipation, surface adhesion, and incoming kinetic energy, and describe a wealth of associated phenomena, including air bubbles and satellite droplets. Our results on inertial microdroplets elucidate fundamental processes crucial to aerosol science and technology.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
How effective are face coverings in reducing transmission of COVID-19?
Authors:
Joshua F. Robinson,
Ioatzin Rios de Anda,
Fergus J. Moore,
Florence K. A. Gregson,
Jonathan P. Reid,
Lewis Husain,
Richard P. Sear,
C. Patrick Royall
Abstract:
In the COVID-19 pandemic, billions are wearing face masks, in both health care settings and in public. Which type of mask we should wear in what situation, is therefore important. There are three basic types: cotton, surgical, and respirators (e.g. FFP2, N95 and similar). All are essentially air filters worn on the face. Air filtration is relatively well understood, however, we have almost no dire…
▽ More
In the COVID-19 pandemic, billions are wearing face masks, in both health care settings and in public. Which type of mask we should wear in what situation, is therefore important. There are three basic types: cotton, surgical, and respirators (e.g. FFP2, N95 and similar). All are essentially air filters worn on the face. Air filtration is relatively well understood, however, we have almost no direct evidence on the relative role played by aerosol particles of differing sizes in disease transmission. But if the virus concentration is assumed independent of aerosol particle size, then most virus will be in particles > 1 $μ$m. We develop a model that predicts surgical masks are effective at reducing the risk of airborne transmission because the filtering material most surgical masks use is highly effective at filtering particles with diameters > 1 $μ$m. However, surgical masks are significantly less effective than masks of FFP2, N95 and similar standards, mostly due to the poor fit of surgical masks. Earlier work found that ~30% of the air bypasses a surgical mask and is not filtered. This highlights the fact that standards for surgical masks do not specify how well the mask should fit, and so are not adequate for protection against COVID-19.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2022; v1 submitted 2 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Efficacy of face coverings in reducing transmission of COVID-19: calculations based on models of droplet capture
Authors:
Joshua F. Robinson,
Ioatzin Rios de Anda,
Fergus J. Moore,
Jonathan P. Reid,
Richard P. Sear,
C. Patrick Royall
Abstract:
In the COVID--19 pandemic, among the more controversial issues is the use of masks and face coverings. Much of the concern boils down to the question -- just how effective are face coverings? One means to address this question is to review our understanding of the physical mechanisms by which masks and coverings operate -- steric interception, inertial impaction, diffusion and electrostatic captur…
▽ More
In the COVID--19 pandemic, among the more controversial issues is the use of masks and face coverings. Much of the concern boils down to the question -- just how effective are face coverings? One means to address this question is to review our understanding of the physical mechanisms by which masks and coverings operate -- steric interception, inertial impaction, diffusion and electrostatic capture. We enquire as to what extent these can be used to predict the efficacy of coverings. We combine the predictions of the models of these mechanisms which exist in the filtration literature and compare the predictions with recent experiments and lattice Boltzmann simulations, and find reasonable agreement with the former and good agreement with the latter. Building on these results, we explore the parameter space for woven cotton fabrics to show that three-layered cloth masks can be constructed with comparable filtration performance to surgical masks under ideal conditions. Reusable cloth masks thus present an environmentally friendly alternative to surgical masks so long as the face seal is adequate enough to minimise leakage.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2021; v1 submitted 11 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Nucleation kinetics in drying sodium nitrate aerosols
Authors:
Joshua F. Robinson,
Florence K. A. Gregson,
Rachael E. H. Miles,
Jonathan P. Reid,
C. Patrick Royall
Abstract:
A quantitative understanding of the evaporative drying kinetics and nucleation rates of aqueous based aerosol droplets is important for a wide range of applications, from atmospheric aerosols to industrial processes such as spray drying. Here, we introduce a numerical model for interpreting measurements of the evaporation rate and phase change of drying free droplets made using a single particle a…
▽ More
A quantitative understanding of the evaporative drying kinetics and nucleation rates of aqueous based aerosol droplets is important for a wide range of applications, from atmospheric aerosols to industrial processes such as spray drying. Here, we introduce a numerical model for interpreting measurements of the evaporation rate and phase change of drying free droplets made using a single particle approach. We explore the evaporation of aqueous sodium chloride and sodium nitrate solution droplets. Although the chloride salt is observed to reproducibly crystallise at all drying rates, the nitrate salt solution can lose virtually all of its water content without crystallising. The latter phenomenon has implications for our understanding of the competition between the drying rate and nucleation kinetics in these two systems. The nucleation model is used in combination with the measurements of crystallisation events to infer nucleation rates at varying equilibrium state points, showing that classical nucleation theory provides a good description of the crystallisation of the chloride salt but not the nitrate salt solution droplets. The reasons for this difference are considered.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.