Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2601.03089 (cs)
[Submitted on 6 Jan 2026 (v1), last revised 26 May 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:Faithfulness Evaluation for Decoder-only LLM Attributions with Controlled Retained Information

Authors:Xin Huang, Antoni B. Chan
View a PDF of the paper titled Faithfulness Evaluation for Decoder-only LLM Attributions with Controlled Retained Information, by Xin Huang and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated with input attribution methods, yet comparing such explanations remains challenging. Existing soft-perturbation faithfulness metrics, such as Soft-NC and Soft-NS, can conflate attribution quality with the number of words retained during perturbation: attribution methods with larger average scores may keep more words and therefore obtain inflated scores. To address this issue, we propose $\pi$-Soft-NC and $\pi$-Soft-NS, an evaluation framework that compares attribution methods under the same expected retaining probability, thus controlling the number of retained words. We further introduce Grad-ELLM, a gradient-based attribution method tailored to autoregressive decoder-only LLMs, which combines gradient-derived channel importance with attention-derived token importance at each decoding step. Experiments on classification and open-generation tasks with Llama and Mistral show that Grad-ELLM achieves strong comprehensiveness-oriented faithfulness under $\pi$-Soft-NC, while there is no dominant method under $\pi$-Soft-NS. Our evaluation metric serves as a rigorous framework to compare XAI methods for LLMs, which will support progress in the field.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2601.03089 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2601.03089v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.03089
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Xin Huang [view email]
[v1] Tue, 6 Jan 2026 15:22:39 UTC (2,127 KB)
[v2] Tue, 26 May 2026 16:19:50 UTC (1,031 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Faithfulness Evaluation for Decoder-only LLM Attributions with Controlled Retained Information, by Xin Huang and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2026-01
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.LG

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences