Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

arXiv:2604.10702 (cs)
[Submitted on 12 Apr 2026 (v1), last revised 24 Jun 2026 (this version, v4)]

Title:Backbone-Conditional Behavior of Modality Gating in Multi-Modal Prostate MRI Segmentation: A 5-Fold Cross-Validation and Gate Mechanism Analysis

Authors:Yongbo Shu, Wenzhao Xie, Shanhu Yao, Zirui Xin, Luo Lei, Kewen Chen, Aijing Luo
View a PDF of the paper titled Backbone-Conditional Behavior of Modality Gating in Multi-Modal Prostate MRI Segmentation: A 5-Fold Cross-Validation and Gate Mechanism Analysis, by Yongbo Shu and 6 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Robust segmentation of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on multi-parametric MRI must tolerate frequent degradation of its most informative diffusion sequences. Multi-modal fusion commonly employs learned modality gating under the assumption that gates implement per-sample modality quality routing -- rarely tested directly. We ask how gating behaves across backbone architectures. We systematically analyze modality-isolated gated fusion (MIGF) for csPCa segmentation on two backbones (nnU-Net and Mamba) using PI-CAI (n=1500), with cross-cohort validation on Prostate158 (n=158): a factorial ablation over gating, modality dropout, and deep supervision under 5-fold cross-validation (180 trained models), plus a gate-weight and counterfactual analysis of 30 trained gating models. Modality gating is backbone-conditional. On nnU-Net, adding gating reduces the ranking score (marginal effect -0.037; gating configurations p<0.05), whereas on Mamba the gating-plus-dropout configuration improves it (+0.024, p=0.037). Gate-weight analysis explains this: nnU-Net gates collapse into a near-static modality prior (across-case SD 0.0033), while Mamba gates retain sample-dependent variation (0.0365, ~11x larger, non-overlapping); replacing per-sample gates with their training-set mean leaves nnU-Net unchanged but degrades Mamba. Modality dropout is the only component beneficial on both backbones. Under cross-cohort shift, convolutional backbones collapse to case-level specificity near zero, whereas Mamba retains it (MIGF-Mamba highest, 0.31). Learned modality gates do not universally perform per-sample quality routing; their effective behavior is conditional on the backbone's inherent modality awareness. Among tested configurations, MIGF-Mamba is the most cross-cohort robust, and training-time modality dropout is the only component beneficial across both backbones.
Comments: Major revision. Single-fold analysis replaced by 5-fold cross-validation (180 trained models) plus a direct gate-mechanism analysis; conclusions updated to show that modality gating is backbone-conditional. Supersedes v1
Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.10702 [cs.CV]
  (or arXiv:2604.10702v4 [cs.CV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.10702
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yongbo Shu [view email]
[v1] Sun, 12 Apr 2026 15:54:21 UTC (2,342 KB)
[v2] Tue, 14 Apr 2026 01:44:05 UTC (2,342 KB)
[v3] Sat, 18 Apr 2026 13:05:33 UTC (2,346 KB)
[v4] Wed, 24 Jun 2026 08:44:37 UTC (1,833 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Backbone-Conditional Behavior of Modality Gating in Multi-Modal Prostate MRI Segmentation: A 5-Fold Cross-Validation and Gate Mechanism Analysis, by Yongbo Shu and 6 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2026-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences