Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Sound

arXiv:2605.20266 (cs)
[Submitted on 18 May 2026 (v1), last revised 3 Aug 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:A Survey of Large Audio Language Models: Generalization, Trustworthiness, and Outlook

Authors:Kaiwen Luo, Zhenhong Zhou, Leyan Wang, Liang Lin, Tianyu Shao, Yuanhe Zhang, Yang Xiao, Yuxuan Li, Miao Yu, Kailin Lyu, Jiaming Zhang, Li Sun, Songze Li, Yueming Wu, Ting Dang, Xiaojun Jia, Dongrui Liu, Kai Li, Rohan Kumar Das, Siyuan Liang, Xinfeng Li, Qiankun Li, Jing Chen, Xingjun Ma, Kun Wang, Junhao Dong, Deqing Zou, Yu Cheng, Xia Hu, Zhigang Zeng, Sen Su, Yang Liu, Yu-Gang Jiang, Philip S. Yu, Yew-Soon Ong
View a PDF of the paper titled A Survey of Large Audio Language Models: Generalization, Trustworthiness, and Outlook, by Kaiwen Luo and 34 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have paved the way for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Among these, Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) are essential for realizing universal auditory intelligence. Despite their remarkable performance, the escalation of LALMs' capabilities has significantly outpaced the development of systemic frameworks to ensure their trustworthiness. This survey provides a comprehensive investigation into the endogenous mechanisms of LALMs, detailing the architectural innovations and alignment algorithms that facilitate emergent reasoning. Specifically, we analyze how the transition to unified end-to-end frameworks and the integration of continuous acoustic signals expand the attack surface. To rigorously evaluate the risks within these paradigms, we establish a comprehensive taxonomy of trustworthiness, categorizing critical vulnerabilities such as cross-modal jailbreaking, latent acoustic backdoors, and biometric privacy leakage. We review the state-of-the-art LALMs through six analytical pillars: hallucination, robustness, safety, privacy, fairness, and authentication. The pronounced imbalance between a mature offensive landscape and underdeveloped defenses highlights persistent trustworthiness gaps and multidimensional risks in audio-centric intelligence. Finally, we propose a roadmap advocating for ``Defense-in-Depth'' architectures, causal auditory world modeling, and intrinsic representation engineering to support the development of more reliable and trustworthy audio intelligence. Our project has been uploaded to GitHub this https URL.
Subjects: Sound (cs.SD)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.20266 [cs.SD]
  (or arXiv:2605.20266v2 [cs.SD] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20266
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Kevin Luo [view email]
[v1] Mon, 18 May 2026 20:21:32 UTC (35,777 KB)
[v2] Mon, 3 Aug 2026 05:14:12 UTC (26,559 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Survey of Large Audio Language Models: Generalization, Trustworthiness, and Outlook, by Kaiwen Luo and 34 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license

Current browse context:

cs.SD
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences