Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2603.00924 (cs)
[Submitted on 1 Mar 2026 (v1), last revised 9 Mar 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:Conformal Prediction for Risk-Controlled Medical Entity Extraction Across Clinical Domains

Authors:Manil Shrestha, Edward Kim
View a PDF of the paper titled Conformal Prediction for Risk-Controlled Medical Entity Extraction Across Clinical Domains, by Manil Shrestha and Edward Kim
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for medical entity extraction, yet their confidence scores are often miscalibrated, limiting safe deployment in clinical settings. We present a conformal prediction framework that provides finite-sample coverage guarantees for LLM-based extraction across two clinical domains. First, we extract structured entities from 1,000 FDA drug labels across eight sections using GPT-4.1, verified via FactScore-based atomic statement evaluation (97.7\% accuracy over 128,906 entities). Second, we extract radiological entities from MIMIC-CXR reports using the RadGraph schema with GPT-4.1 and Llama-4-Maverick, evaluated against physician annotations (entity F1: 0.81 to 0.84). Our central finding is that miscalibration direction reverses across domains: on well-structured FDA labels, models are underconfident, requiring modest conformal thresholds ($\tau \approx 0.06$), while on free-text radiology reports, models are overconfident, demanding strict thresholds ($\tau$ up to 0.99). Despite this heterogeneity, conformal prediction achieves target coverage ($\geq 90\%$) in both settings with manageable rejection rates (9--13\%). These results demonstrate that calibration is not a global model property but depends on document structure, extraction category, and model architecture, motivating domain-specific conformal calibration for safe clinical deployment.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.00924 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2603.00924v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.00924
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Manil Shrestha [view email]
[v1] Sun, 1 Mar 2026 05:12:25 UTC (940 KB)
[v2] Mon, 9 Mar 2026 06:54:54 UTC (945 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Conformal Prediction for Risk-Controlled Medical Entity Extraction Across Clinical Domains, by Manil Shrestha and Edward Kim
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences