Skip to main content
Cornell University
Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2207.03598

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:2207.03598 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 7 Jul 2022]

Title:Assessing theoretical uncertainties for cosmological constraints from weak lensing surveys

Authors:Ting Tan, Dominik Zuercher, Janis Fluri, Alexandre Refregier, Federica Tarsitano, Tomasz Kacprzak
View a PDF of the paper titled Assessing theoretical uncertainties for cosmological constraints from weak lensing surveys, by Ting Tan and Dominik Zuercher and Janis Fluri and Alexandre Refregier and Federica Tarsitano and Tomasz Kacprzak
View PDF
Abstract:$ $Weak gravitational lensing is a powerful probe which is used to constrain the standard cosmological model and its extensions. With the enhanced statistical precision of current and upcoming surveys, high accuracy predictions for weak lensing statistics are needed to limit the impact of theoretical uncertainties on cosmological parameter constraints. For this purpose, we present a comparison of the theoretical predictions for the nonlinear matter and weak lensing power spectra, based on the widely used fitting functions ($\texttt{mead}$ and $\texttt{rev-halofit}$), emulators ($\texttt{EuclidEmulator}$, $\texttt{EuclidEmulator2}$, $\texttt{BaccoEmulator}$ and $\texttt{CosmicEmulator}$) and N-body simulations ($\texttt{Pkdgrav3}$). We consider the forecasted constraints on the $\Lambda \texttt{CDM}$ and $\texttt{wCDM}$ models from weak lensing for stage III and stage IV surveys. We study the relative bias on the constraints and their dependence on the assumed prescriptions. Assuming a $\Lambda \texttt{CDM}$ cosmology, we find that the relative agreement on the $S_8$ parameter is between $0.2-0.3\sigma$ for a stage III-like survey between the above predictors. For a stage IV-like survey the agreement becomes $1.4-3.0\sigma$. In the $\texttt{wCDM}$ scenario, we find broader $S_8$ constraints, and agreements of $0.18-0.26\sigma$ and $0.7-1.7\sigma$ for stage III and stage IV surveys, respectively. The accuracies of the above predictors therefore appear adequate for stage III surveys, while the fitting functions would need improvements for future stage IV weak lensing surveys. Furthermore, we find that, of the fitting functions, $\texttt{mead}$ provides the best agreement with the emulators. We discuss the implication of these findings for the preparation of the future weak lensing surveys.
Comments: 18 pages, 10 figures
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:2207.03598 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:2207.03598v1 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.03598
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1142
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Ting Tan [view email]
[v1] Thu, 7 Jul 2022 21:57:57 UTC (1,800 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Assessing theoretical uncertainties for cosmological constraints from weak lensing surveys, by Ting Tan and Dominik Zuercher and Janis Fluri and Alexandre Refregier and Federica Tarsitano and Tomasz Kacprzak
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-07
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • Click here to contact arXiv Contact
  • Click here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status