Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Robotics

arXiv:2510.01830 (cs)
[Submitted on 2 Oct 2025 (v1), last revised 12 Jul 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:What Matters in RL-Based Methods for Object-Goal Navigation? An Empirical Study and A Unified Framework

Authors:Hongze Wang, Boyang Sun, Jiaxu Xing, Fan Yang, Marco Hutter, Dhruv Shah, Davide Scaramuzza, Marc Pollefeys
View a PDF of the paper titled What Matters in RL-Based Methods for Object-Goal Navigation? An Empirical Study and A Unified Framework, by Hongze Wang and 7 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Object-Goal Navigation (ObjectNav) is a key capability for deploying mobile robots in everyday environments such as homes, schools, and workplaces. In this task, an agent must locate an instance of a target object category in previously unseen environments using only onboard perception, requiring the integration of semantic understanding, spatial reasoning, and long-horizon planning. Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a dominant paradigm for ObjectNav, yet modern systems involve numerous design choices across perception modules, policy architectures, and inference-time strategies. The relative impact of these components, however, remains poorly understood. In this work, we present a large-scale empirical study of modular RL-based ObjectNav systems. We decompose the navigation pipeline into three key components: perception, policy, and test-time enhancement, and conduct extensive controlled experiments to analyze their individual contributions. Our results suggest that improvements in perception quality and test-time strategies often yield larger performance gains than policy improvements alone, highlighting the importance of understanding how different components interact within modular navigation systems. Motivated by these findings, we introduce a unified framework for systematically studying modular ObjectNav systems. Guided by our analysis, we build an enhanced system that achieves state-of-the-art performance on the Gibson benchmark, improving SPL by 6.6% and success rate by 2.7% over prior methods. We also introduce a human expert baseline, achieving 98% success, highlighting the significant gap between current RL agents and human-level navigation. Finally, we provide practical insights and design recommendations for each module to help guide future research. Project page: this https URL.
Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO)
Cite as: arXiv:2510.01830 [cs.RO]
  (or arXiv:2510.01830v2 [cs.RO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.01830
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Boyang Sun [view email]
[v1] Thu, 2 Oct 2025 09:24:32 UTC (2,714 KB)
[v2] Sun, 12 Jul 2026 08:12:37 UTC (5,401 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled What Matters in RL-Based Methods for Object-Goal Navigation? An Empirical Study and A Unified Framework, by Hongze Wang and 7 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-10
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences