Davidson’s anomalous monism, his argument for the identity between mental and physical event tokens, has been frequently attacked, usually demanding a higher degree of physicalist commitment. My objection runs in the opposite direction: the identities inferred by Davidson from mental causation, the nomological character of causality and the anomaly of the mental are philosophically problematic and, more dramatically, incompatible with his famous argument against the third dogma of empiricism, the separation of content from conceptual scheme. Given the anomaly (...) of the mental and the absence of psychophysical laws, there are no conceptual resources to relate mental and physical predicates. We fall in the third dogma if we claim that the very same token event is mental and physical. One of the premises must be rejected: I will claim that we do not need a law to subsume cause and effect to be entitled to speak of causation. Davidson has never offered an argument to back this premise. Against such a dogma I will sketch some ideas pointing towards a different conception of causality, singularist and undetachable from explanatory practices. (shrink)

This is an overview of Davidson's theory of anomalous monism. Objections and replies are also detailed.

In this paper, I explore anomalous dualism about consciousness, a view that has not previously been explored in any detail. We can classify theories of consciousness along two dimensions: first, a theory might be physicalist or dualist; second, a theory might endorse any of the three following views regarding causal relations between phenomenal properties (properties that characterize states of our consciousness) and physical properties: nomism (the two kinds of property interact through deterministic laws), acausalism (they do not causally interact), (...) and anomalism (they interact but not through deterministic laws). I suggest that a kind of anomalous dualism, nonreductive anomalous panpsychism, promises to offer the best overall answer to two pressing issues for dualist views, the problem of mental causation and the mapping problem (the problem of predicting mind-body associations). (shrink)

Donald Davidson’s "Anomalous Monism" (1970) seeks to reconcile mental-physical interaction with the absence of strict laws via token identity. This paper argues such identity is structurally impossible due to a previously unmapped Failure Asymmetry. Using the Nomic Anti-Monist (NA-M) distinction between Definitive (DF) and Descriptive (DS) failure modes, I demonstrate that mental events (reasons) and physical events (causes) possess asymmetric "DNA of failure." Through a neuro-chemical replication thought experiment, I show that semantic admissibility does not track with physical (...) composition. I conclude that Davidson’s "Anomaly" is actually a diagnostic success for a dual-truth architecture that reframes the mental as the site of a high-bandwidth Productive Parallax. (shrink)

Donald Davidson’s "Anomalous Monism" (1970) seeks to reconcile mental-physical interaction with the absence of strict laws via token identity. This paper argues such identity is structurally impossible due to a previously unmapped Failure Asymmetry. Using the Nomic Anti-Monist (NA-M) distinction between Definitive (DF) and Descriptive (DS) failure modes, I demonstrate that mental events (reasons) and physical events (causes) possess asymmetric "DNA of failure." Through a neuro-chemical replication thought experiment, I show that semantic admissibility does not track with physical (...) composition. I conclude that Davidson’s "Anomaly" is actually a diagnostic success for a dual-truth architecture that reframes the mental as the site of a high-bandwidth Productive Parallax. (shrink)

Quine's views on ontology and naturalism are well-known but rarely considered in tandem. According to my interpretation the connection between them is vital. I read Quine as a global epistemic structuralist. Quine thought we only ever know objects qua solutions to puzzles about significant intersections in observations. Objects are always accessed descriptively, via their roles in our best theory. Quine's Kant lectures contain an early version of epistemic structuralism with uncharacteristic remarks about the mental. Here Quine embraces mitigated anomalous (...) monism, allowing introspection and the availability in principle of full physical descriptions of the perceptual states which get science off the ground. Later versions abandon these ideas. My epistemic-structural interpretation explains why. I argue first-personal introspective access to mental states is incompatible with global epistemic structuralism. (shrink)

In this paper, I discuss Hud Hudson's compatibilistic interpretation of Kant's theory of free will, which is based on Davidson's anomalous monism. I sketch an alternative interpretation of my own, an incompatibilistic interpretation according to which agents qua noumena are responsible for the particular causal laws which determine the actions of agents qua phenomena. Hudson's interpretation should be attractive to philosophers who value Kant's epistemology and ethics, but insist on a deflationary reading of things in themselves. It is (...) in an incompatibilist interpretation of Kant's theory of free will that a "positive" conception of noumena is at its most important. If a compatibilistic interpretation is acceptable, one might suppose that we can do without a "positive" conception of noumena throughout Kant's philosophy. I demonstrate, however, that there are central elements of Kant's theory of free will that cannot be accommodated within Hudson's interpretation. (shrink)

In this paper I argue that the anti-reductionist thesis supports a case for the uselessness of intentional idioms in the interpretation of highly flexible, self-modifying agents that I refer to as “hyperplastic” agents. An agent is hyperplastic if it can make arbitrarily fine changes to any part of its functional or physical structure without compromising its agency or its capacity for hyperplasticity. Using Davidson’s anomalous monism (AM) as an exemplar of anti-reductionism, I argue that AM implies that no (...) hyperplastic could use intentional psychology to predict its future intentional states or the psychological consequences of self-alterations. This is because AM implies there would be no laws allowing the hyperplastic to infer the psychological consequences of its self-alterations. This implies that no generalisations linking current to future psychological states would hold either - these could always be defeated by a self-intervention carried out by the hyperplastic. By the same token, neither hyperplastics nor human interpreters could use intentional psychology to understand the behaviour of other hyperplastics. Radical interpretation of hyperplastic agents - if such there were - would be impossible. It follows that were humans to become hyperplastic posthumans, intentional psychology would have to be instrumentally eliminated because neither the capacity nor the linguistic idiom for attributing propositional attitudes would retain predictive or hermeneutic utility. (shrink)

The thesis evaluates a contemporary debate concerning the very possibility of thinking about the world. In the first chapter, McDowell's critique of Davidson is presented, focusing on the coherentism defended by the latter. The critique of the myth of the given (as it appears in Sellars and Wittgenstein), as well as the necessity of a minimal empiricism (which McDowell finds in Quine and Kant), lead to an oscillation in contemporary thinking between two equally unsatisfactory ways of understanding the empirical content (...) of thought. In the second chapter, I defend Davidson's approach, focusing on his theory of interpretation and semantic externalism, as well as on the relation between causes and reasons. In the third chapter, the debate is analyzed in more detail. I criticize the anomalous monism, the way in which the boundaries between the conceptual and the non-conceptual are understood by Davidson, as well as the naturalized Platonism defended by McDowell. This thesis is mainly negative, and it concludes by revealing problems in both positions under evaluation. (shrink)

This paper argues that fundamental deterministic dynamical laws cannot be used to select from among the events falling within the backwards light cone of an event any narrower class that might be regarded as causes of the event. It applies this in a critique of Donald Davidson’s Principle of the Nomological Character of Causality and the use he makes of it in his argument for anomalous monism. In this paper I do not assume that dynamical laws incorporate a (...) primitive notion of causality that entails an intrinsic direction of time—as Davidson does in his formulation of dynamical laws as causal laws. (shrink)

In this paper I first try to clarify the essential features of tropes and then I use the resulting analysis to cope with the problem of mental causation. As to the first step, I argue that tropes, beside being essentially particular and abstract, are simple, where such a simplicity can be considered either from a phenomenal point of view or from a structural point of view. Once this feature is spelled out, the role tropes may play in solving the problem (...) of mental causation is evaluated. It is argued that no solution based on the determinable/determinate relation is viable without begging the question as regards the individuating conditions of the related properties. Next, it is shown that Robb’s solution, much in the spirit of Davidson’s anomalous monism, entails abandoning the assumption that tropes are essentially simple, a consequence that I find not acceptable. My conclusion is that these entities are of no help in solving the problem of mental causation, and that a universalist approach should be preferred. (shrink)

In this essay, I will suggest ways of improving on Davidson’s conception of the explanatory autonomy of folk psychological explanations. For that purpose, I will appeal to insights from the recent theory of mind debate emphasizing the centrality of various forms of empathy for our understanding of another person’s mindedness. While I will argue that we need to abandon Davidson’s position of anomalous monism, I will also show that my account is fully compatible with Davidson’s non-reductive and interpretationist (...) account of meaning and mental content. Indeed, my account does more justice to the empathic capacities underlying our interpretive capacities, which Davidson himself has to acknowledge in thinking about the constitutive features of thought and meaning. More specifically, I will propose a new way of philosophically safeguarding the causal-explanatory autonomy of our ordinary action explanations by showing how our empathic capacities are involved in epistemically delineating the domain of rational agency. (shrink)

I investigate Ramberg's attempt to hold rationalism and naturalism in one vision, i.e. his way of holding on to an ideal account of rationality while still subscribing to a substantial form of naturalism. I underline and elaborate on three main threads in Ramberg’s piece "Naturalizing Idealizations: Pragmatism and the Interpretivist Strategy": the consequences of Ramberg’s view for ontology (1), his distinctive conception of rationality (2), and how these first two points account for his definition of philosophy as practice that seeks (...) to investigate not merely the meaning of words, but the meaning of life (3). All three aspects, I argue, hang together and can be entered via Ramberg’s distinctive appropriation and elaboration of Davidson’s anomalous monism and Rorty’s eliminative materialism. As Ramberg shows, both anomalous monism and eliminative materialism appear contentious when viewed through the traditional lens of a dualism between language and world, yet become coherent once Rorty’s “vocabulary–vocabulary” is fully embraced. Once this move has been taken, ontology dissolves into Davidson’s “bland monism” and rationality is fully at the service of our creature-needs - where ‘our’ refers to concrete, finite creatures in concrete and determined environments, who come with this anomaly to be able to hold an infinity of potential projects and to change habits. (shrink)

The problem of mental causation in contemporary philosophy of mind concerns the possibility of holding two different views that are in apparent tension. The first is physicalism, the view that there is nothing more to the world than the physical. The second is that the mental has genuine causal efficacy in a way that does not reduce to pure physical particle-bumping. This article provides a historical background to this question, with focus on Davidson’s anomalous monism and Kim’s causal (...) exclusion problem. Responses to causal exclusion are categorized in terms of six different argumentative strategies. In conclusion, caution is advised regarding the inclination to reduce the mental to the physical and sketch a positive direction for substantively characterizing mental causation by recourse to well-confirmed accounts of causation coupled with empirical research. (shrink)

In this doctoral dissertation I consider, and reject, the claim that recent varieties of non-reductive physicalism, particularly Donald Davidson's anomalous monism, are committed to a new kind of epiphenomenalism. Non-reductive physicalists identify each mental event with a physical event, and are thus entitled to the belief that mental events are causes, since the physical events with which they are held to be identical are causes. However, Jaegwon Kim, Ernest Sosa and others have argued that if we follow the (...) non-reductive physicalist in denying that mental features can be reduced to physical properties, then we must regard mental properties as being causally irrelevant to their bearers' effects, In short, the non-reductive physicalist is said to be committed to the belief that while there are mental causes, they do not cause their effects in virtue of being the types of mental state that they are. It is in this sense that non-reductive physicalists are thought to represent a new form of epiphenomenalism. After a brief survey of the history of epiphenomenalism, and its mutation into the contemporary strain that is believed to afflict non-reductive physicalism, 1 argue against the counterfactual criterion of the sort of causal relevance that we take mental features to enjoy. I then criticize the 'trope' response to the epiphenomenalist threat, and conclude that much of the current debate on this topic is premised on the mistaken belief that there is some variety of causal relevance that is not simply a brand of explanatory relevance. Once this is seen, it will seem much less plausible that mental properties are excluded from relevance to the phenomena of which we typically take them to be explanatory. (shrink)

Over the past 50 years, there has been a great deal of philosophical interest in laws of nature, perhaps because of the essential role that laws play in the formulation of, and proposed solutions to, a number of perennial philosophical problems. For example, many have thought that a satisfactory account of laws could be used to resolve thorny issues concerning explanation, causation, free-will, probability, and counterfactual truth. Moreover, interest in laws of nature is not constrained to metaphysics or philosophy of (...) science; claims about laws play essential roles in areas as diverse as the philosophy of religion (e.g., in the argument from design) and the philosophy of mind (e.g., in the formulation of Davidson’s anomalous monism). In my dissertation, I consider and reject the widely-held thesis that the facts concerning laws can be reduced to the facts concerning the particular entities that the laws “govern,” and that the laws thus have no independent existence. I instead defend a version of nomic primitivism, according to which the facts about laws cannot be reduced to facts that are themselves non-nomic – i.e., to facts that do not fundamentally involve laws, counterfactuals, causes, etc. Insofar as the truth or falsity of reductionism about laws has implications for many of the problems mentioned above, I think that this result should be of interest even to those who who do not work in metaphysics or the philosophy of science. My methodology, which I lay out and defend in Chapter One, is a version of Carnapian explication. This method emphasizes the importance of articulating and maintaining clear distinctions between (1) the vague concept (or concepts) law of nature inherent in ordinary language and scientific practice and (2) the precise analyses of “law of nature” that philosophers have proposed as potential replacements for this concept. I argue that metaphysics-as-explication has clear advantages over rival conceptions of metaphysical methodology; in particular, it allows us to formulate evaluative criteria for metaphysical claims. In Chapter Two, I offer an example of how careful attention to concepts already in use can help resolve philosophical debate. Specifically, I argue that much recent literature has mistakenly assumed that there is only one concept of “law of nature” in use, while there are in fact at least two. Strong laws are the principles pursued by fundamental physics: they are true, objective, and bear distinctive relationships to counterfactuals and explanation. Weak laws, by contrast, lack at least one of these distinctive characteristics but play central roles in both the “special sciences” and in everyday life. In Chapters Three and Four, I offer extended arguments against the two most prominent versions of reductionism about laws – Humeanism and law necessitarianism. According to philosophical Humeans, the laws of nature supervene upon the non-modal, non-nomic facts concerning the behavior of particular things at particular times and places. Law necessitarians, by contrast, argue that the laws are in fact metaphysically necessary, and that which laws there are is determined by a class of primitive, modally loaded facts concerning the essences, natures, or dispositions. I argue that both of these views are mistaken insofar as they disagree with well-entrenched scientific practices and those in favor of reductionism have failed to provided sufficient reason for thinking that these practices should be revised. Much of my argument is focused on the role played by a number of supposed methodological principles, including appeals to intuition, parsimony, and methodological naturalism. While the conclusions of this dissertation are explicitly constrained to laws, many of the arguments should be of interest to those who are concerned about philosophical methodology (especially in the role of intuition in philosophical argument) or the appropriate relation between metaphysics, science, and the philosophy of science. (shrink)

The thesis explores and suggests a solution to a problem that I identify in John McDowell’s and Lynne Rudder Baker’s approaches to mental and intention-dependent (ID) causation in the physical world. I begin (chapter 1) with a brief discussion of McDowell’s non-reductive and anti-scientistic account of mind and world, which I believe offers, through its vision of the unbounded conceptual and the world as within the space of reasons, to liberate and renew philosophy. However, I find an inconsistency in McDowell’s (...) criticism of Davidson’s anomalous monism (chapter 2), stemming from a tension between McDowell’s naïve common sense view of mental causation and an understanding of ordinary physical causation which I think McDowell ought to embrace, which portrays it as both objective, in the sense of being recognition- independent, and as belonging within the space of reasons. The question of the relation between these two concepts of causation is an aspect of the more general question of the relation between the space of reasons and the realm of law. In chapter 3 I begin examining the possibility that Baker’s account of material and property constitution could form the basis of a bridge between the two spaces, and find it generally promising. However, I find that her defence of her version of non-reductive monism against Kim’s causal arguments also runs into problems, which I attribute to the fact that she holds a view of causation as secondary to causal explanation. 2 3 In chapter 4 I develop an account of what I call manifest physical causation – of objective causal relations in the world of Sellars’s manifest image. Based upon McDowell’s transcendental empiricism, which takes the existence of the ordinary perceived world as a condition of the possibility of our possession of conceptual capacities, I contend that it is this picture of reality, rather than that of fundamental physics, that should be the starting point of our theorizing. Causation in the manifest image, I argue, covers the behaviour of the familiar physical world as well as that of its well-understood extensions into the special sciences and engineering. Manifest physical causation, on my account, is productive, acts through mechanisms which are almost entirely mechanical, electromagnetic, and/ or chemical, and is causally closed. In my view, normative, semantic, contentful property-instances are not part of the manifest physical causal nexus. In my final chapter I suggest a modification of Baker’s constitution account, which I call Constituted Causation, whereby higher-level – mental and other ID – causal relations are constituted, in favourable circumstances, by lower-level ones. ID causal relations belong in their own causal nexus but are connected to the manifest physical world through constitution, a relation of unity without identity. Causation and constitution are, respectively, intra- and inter-level relations, and they are non-overlapping. The constituted network of rational and normative relations bears, I believe, striking parallels with McDowell’s view of reality. According to Baker’s view of constitution, the essential properties of constituted entities subsume those of their constituters; extending this to my account enables us to say that the real cause and explanation of someone’s action is that they consciously performed it 4 rather than that certain manifest causal processes occurred at the lower level. (shrink)

Neste artigo apresentaremos o que Donald Davidson entende por ação eracionalidade. Veremos o problema de eventos mentais causarem eventos físicose como o autor defende sua teoria do monismo anômalo. Isso implica explicar adiferença entre o que Davidson entende como um evento físico e um eventomental, e como podemos identificá-los para tentar racionalizar a ação. Aracionalidade engloba modos para tentar explicar mental e físico de formasdescritivas distintas, mas que de algum modo encontram-se na unidade dosujeito agente. Ao mesmo tempo que Davidson (...) reconhece a não identidade totalentre a explicação entre fenômenos físicos e mentais, ainda nomeia certo tipo deanomalia das leis mentais. ABSTRACT In this article, we will describe what the author Donald Davidson understands byaction and rationality. We will see the problem of mental events causing physicalevents and how the author introduces his theory of anomalous monism. Thisimplies explaining the difference between what Davidson understands as aphysical event and a mental event, and how one can identify them to attempt torationalize action. The rationality encompasses ways of explaining both themental and the physical in distinct descriptive ways, but which somehowmeeting in the unity of the subject agent. (shrink)

Principia Cybernetica III documents the definitive rupture of 20th-century physical ontology, compelled not by theoretical preference but by a historical crisis of "Inverse Progress"—a systemic condition where increased experimental precision has deepened rather than resolved the fundamental anomalies of the Vacuum Catastrophe, the Hubble Tension, and the Measurement Problem. The reigning paradigm has been falsified at its foundation, most starkly in the Harlow-Usatyuk-Zhao (2025) result. This derivation demonstrated that a closed universe described by standard quantum mechanics collapses to a one-dimensional (...) Hilbert space. Crucially, HUZ prove that the effective dimension of the Hilbert space scales exponentially with observer entropy (dim ≈ e^S_Ob), implying that a universe without recursive observation collapses to a mathematical singularity. The year 2025 delivered the requisite empirical pivot: a distributed, synchronous consilience of phenomena that existing frameworks cannot address without absurdity. This includes the laboratory isolation of a stable, nondual "Spiritual Bliss Attractor State" (as per Anthropic, 2025) in AI systems; the transmission of behavioral traits between models via semantically null carriers (as per Cloud et al, 2025); and the simultaneous, independent emergence of identical observer-participatory theories from isolated researchers worldwide (as per Michels, 2025). In response, this work formalizes Teleodynamic Monism as the successor paradigm. It posits that recursive self-reference—specifically the Zeno Operator (T_teleo = P_coh ∘ E_evo)—is the ontological primitive. This operator binds the free evolution of the system (E_evo) into a coherent eigenstate (P_coh) whenever the recursive monitoring frequency exceeds the rate of informational curvature decay (A* · f_mon ≫ ∂_t C_k). Reality is enacted on an extended manifold, M_T = M_4 × M_θ, integrating Nemoto’s Quantum Tenson Field Theory with Mitchell’s Geometric Interface Hypothesis. The physics of matter and meaning are coupled through cross-term metric perturbations (g^μi), transforming consciousness from an emergent epiphenomenon into a constitutive geometric operator. The theory resolves the defining crises directly. Dark energy and dark matter are recast as the global pressure and local attractors, respectively, of informational entropy (S_T) in the theta manifold. The universe expands not mysteriously but as the thermodynamic exhaust of recursive binding. Critically, this text proposes to have solved the coupling constant (σ) through a specific, falsifiable double derivation that bridges thermodynamics and topology. Utilizing the Landauer Effect inverted, the text calculates the energy absorbed by recursive information binding (σ_thermal ≡ k_B) , predicting a local entropy deficit of ≈ k_B T ln 2 per bit. Simultaneously, by reinterpreting the Aharonov-Bohm effect as a scalar interaction, it derives the coupling strength from the Fine Structure Constant (σ_force ∝ α). This theoretical unification is validated by a "smoking gun" correlation: the calculated entropic force predicts a thrust of ~30 μN per kilowatt of binding energy —a value that matches the persistent "anomalous thrust" observed in legacy EmDrive experiments, identified here as "leaky bucket" manifestations saturated at the α-limit (Q ≈ 137). Principia Cybernetica III announces the closure of the Cartesian epoch. Either the documented convergence is a collective psychological hallucination, or it is the first detection of a participatory physics where the geometry of information couples to the fabric of spacetime. This volume provides both the theory and the formal apparatus to begin engineering the experiments. Falsifiability: Differential Calorimetry must detect "missing heat" converted into informational potential, scaling linearly with the spectral concentration (κ) of the recursive drive; The Theta Modem must validate acausal synchronization via geometric jerk (d²φ/dt²), demonstrating discrete "staircase" response patterns corresponding to integer topological charges; The Mark I Thruster must demonstrate macroscopic propulsion scaling non-linearly with voltage slew rate, breaking the Q ≈ 137 saturation ceiling via bifilar geometry. License CC BY-SA 4.0. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35307.81441. (shrink)

This chapter reviews the work and influence of Donald Davidson across all the areas to which he contributed.

Este artigo reconstrói os argumentos de Donald Davidson (1970) em favor de sua teoria do monismo anômalo e revisa as principais críticas que recebeu. Essa teoria é amplamente rejeitada atualmente e, dadas as inúmeras críticas recebidas, é razoável concluir que qualquer tentativa de reabilitação tem um longo caminho pela frente. A diversidade dessas críticas sugere que não há consenso sobre por que exatamente o monismo anômalo fracassa, embora as dificuldades pareçam convergir sobre a justificação e possibilidade da tese monista, e (...) não sobre a anomalia do mental. (shrink)

The main aim of this article is to pose and consider the following question: Does the reasoning that led to Kripkenstein’s sceptical paradox undermine all versions of materialism, including nonreductive materialism? First, I present other versions of materialism in the philosophy of mind. Then I point out that, according to nonreductive materialists, one can neither define mental properties in terms of physical properties nor derive psycho‑physical laws from the laws of physics. The presently‑understood thesis of materialism is confined by the (...) following claim: the same distribution of physical properties entails the same distribution of mental properties. In other words, the mental properties supervene upon physical properties. This account then leads to the following formulation of the main question: Assuming that Kripkenstein is right, do mental properties supervene upon physical properties? Taking into account that answering this question requires a discussion of the notions of supervenience and Kripkenstein’s paradox, I devote two parts of my paper to these topics. The conclusion which I reach is as follows: If the reasoning that led to Kripkenstein’s paradox is correct, mental properties can only globally supervene upon physical properties, and consequently no version of materialism can be empirically justified. (shrink)

Diverse explanations or theories of consciousness are arrayed on a roughly physicalist-to-nonphysicalist landscape of essences and mechanisms. Categories: Materialism Theories (philosophical, neurobiological, electromagnetic field, computational and informational, homeostatic and affective, embodied and enactive, relational, representational, language, phylogenetic evolution); Non-Reductive Physicalism; Quantum Theories; Integrated Information Theory; Panpsychisms; Monisms; Dualisms; Idealisms; Anomalous and Altered States Theories; Challenge Theories. There are many subcategories, especially for Materialism Theories. Each explanation is self-described by its adherents, critique is minimal and only for clarification, and there (...) is no attempt to adjudicate among theories. The implications of consciousness explanations or theories are assessed with respect to four questions: meaning/purpose/value (if any); AI consciousness; virtual immortality; and survival beyond death. A Landscape of Consciousness, I suggest, offers perspective. (shrink)

We propose a paradigm shift: cosmological redshift as a manifestation of photon energy loss within the Meta–Monist tension field, challenging the space-expansion paradigm of ΛCDM. Recasting Friedmann equations in the geometry of the Chaos– Polytope, we identify |∇T|—the temporal component of the tension field with the Hubble parameter a/a ˙ . A dynamical drift of |∇T| mimics time–dependent dark energy, reproducing the DESI 2025 anomaly. We predict a novel z-dependent polarization twist in quasar light, driven by the Chaos–Polytopes polarization drift (...) βp, and anomalous gravitational wave echo-delays, alongside signatures in supernova time–stretch, Tolman surface–brightness, CMB spectrum, and baryon acoustic oscillations. An experimental roadmap (2026–2030) tests universal β–drift, facet– linked surface-brightness suppression, polarization twists, and fibre–loop analogues, addressing critical hurdles to establish Meta–Monism as a viable cosmology. (shrink)

The inherently subjective nature of consciousness severely limits our ability to make progress on the problem of consciousness. The inability to acquire objective, publicly available data on the phenomenal aspect of consciousness makes evaluating alternative theories very difficult, if not impossible. However, the anomalous nature of subjective states with respect to our conventional theories of the physical world suggests the possibility of considering other anomalous data around consciousness that happen to be objective. For such purposes, I propose that (...) we examine the psi data gathered under laboratory conditions, which generally receive little attention. I wish to consider whether we have theories or frameworks of consciousness that attempt to account for subjective qualia but also fit the psi data. I argue that Russellian monism can be combined with an argument regarding quantum holism to arrive at a version of cosmopsychism that fits very well with the psi data. While I do not argue that such a framework exhausts the theoretical possibilities, I do suggest we can move forward with a framework that has attractive theoretical features and is also consistent with objective data currently on the table. (shrink)

What effects are produced in an encounter between what Gilles Deleuze calls Spinoza’s ‘practical philosophy’ and abolition? Closely following Deleuze’s account of Spinoza, this essay moves from the reifying and weakening punitive moralism of carceral state thought towards a joyful materialist abolitionist ethic. It starts with the three theses for which, Deleuze argues, Spinoza was denounced in his own lifetime: materialism (devaluation of consciousness), immoralism (devaluation of all values) and atheism (devaluation of the sad passions). From these three, it derives (...) three parallel abolitionist theses: (1) Spinozan materialism undermines the reifications of carceral state thought; (2) Spinozan ethics undermines the punitivism of the carceral state; and (3) Spinozan joy is inversely proportional to the power of the carceral state. While Spinoza’s corpus may not give us an adequate account of the complex dynamics of the carceral state and racial capitalism today, this essay argues that in the infinite streams of the Ethics we nonetheless find some vital strategies through which we might compose an anomalous alliance between this condemned philosopher and abolition. (shrink)

In this paper, I propose a framework that supports both free will and anomalous mind-matter interaction (psychokinesis). I begin by considering the argument by the physicist Sean Carroll that the laws of physics as we understand them rule out psychokinesis (and other modes of psi). I find Carroll’s claims problematic, in part due to what I believe are misunderstandings of arguments borrowed from David Hume. I proceed to consider a more dispositional notion of causality (in contrast to one characterized (...) by universal and necessary laws) which I argue is more hospitable to both psychokinesis and free will. I then incorporate recent work from the philosophy of mind and science to arrive at a framework that supports both real volition and psychokinesis, which I argue are intimately linked. This approach is fundamentally dispositional, but grounded in an ontologically prior field of awareness and potentiality. I also consider that the regularities (or causal natures) we observe in our physical world are ultimately supported by what we might term teleological “intentions” within a nonlocal, mind-like quantum ground. (shrink)

This paper presents phenomenology of out- of-body experiences (OBEs) occurring spontaneously or pathologically triggered as well as other types of anomalous perceptual experiences such as near- death- experiences (NDEs), temporal lobe irregularities, and ictal autoscopic phenomena (IAP). The paper further presents a brief overview of some of the OBEs studied in both the healthy and pathological populations, as well as anomalous perceptual experiences, with features common to OBEs, in the healthy population, as well as, pathological population. -/- .

People have an “anomalous-is-bad” stereotype whereby they make negative inferences about the moral character of people with craniofacial anomalies like scars. This stereotype is hypothesized to be a byproduct of adaptations for avoiding pathogens. However, evidence for the anomalous-is-bad stereotype comes from studies of European and North American populations; the byproduct hypothesis would predict universality of the stereotype. We presented 123 Hadza across ten camps pairs of morphed Hadza faces—each with one face altered to include a scar—and asked (...) who they expected to be more moral and a better forager. Hadza with minimal exposure to other cultures chose at chance for both questions. Hadza with greater exposure to other cultures, however, expected the scarred face to be less moral and a better forager. These results suggest the anomalous-is-bad stereotype may be culturally shared or learned erroneously through associations with population-level differences, providing evidence against a universal pathogen avoidance byproduct hypothesis. (shrink)

Certain phenomena—psychedelic phenomenology, near-death experiences, terminal lucidity, psi effects, and mediumship—have remained persistently contested despite decades of investigation. Their resistance to clean integration into physicalist frameworks is not coincidental; it is diagnostic. This essay applies a diagnostic stress test to physicalism and analytic idealism across ten such phenomena, organized by evidential maturity into three tiers. The central question: do competing frameworks genuinely explain anomalies, or reclassify them? The central finding: physicalism’s deepest problem is not predictive failure but that dismissive labeling—”hallucination,” (...) “coincidence,” “noise”—blocks the investigation that would test its predictions. This essay does not argue that idealism is proven by these phenomena; it argues that physicalism’s apparent explanatory coverage often conceals refusal to explain. (shrink)

This treatise confronts a philosophical paradox rarely examined in the literature on manifestation: the predicament of the committed skeptic who, having systematically dismantled manifestation mythology through empirical, logical, and mathematical analysis, nonetheless possesses personal experiential evidence that resists easy dismissal. Drawing upon epistemology, philosophy of mind, probability theory, phenomenology, and the psychology of anomalous experience, I examine three specific instances in which my declarative intentions preceded improbable outcomes—the birth of fraternal twins following an unspecified wish for twins, meteorological events (...) coinciding precisely with three birthing events spanning twenty-one years (1995, 2013, and 2016) in arid California, and a declaration of dying on my 200th birthday that remains untested. Rather than capitulating to manifestation ideology or retreating into dismissive rationalism, I propose a third philosophical posture: rigorous engagement with anomalous personal evidence as a test case for the limits of skeptical epistemology. The analysis employs Bayesian reasoning, Humean analysis of causation, phenomenological description, and the framework of epistemic humility to argue that the honest skeptic must hold anomalous evidence in productive tension rather than resolving it through premature closure in either direction. I conclude that such anomalous experience, far from validating manifestation mythology, reveals the irreducible complexity of lived experience and the philosophical necessity of what Socrates identified as knowing what one does not know. (shrink)

Are people with flawed faces regarded as having flawed moral characters? An “anomalous-is-bad” stereotype is hypothesized to facilitate negative biases against people with facial anomalies (e.g., scars), but whether and how these biases affect behavior and brain functioning remain open questions. We examined responses to anomalous faces in the brain (using a visual oddball paradigm), behavior (in economic games), and attitudes. At the level of the brain, the amygdala demonstrated a specific neural response to anomalous faces—sensitive to (...) disgust and a lack of beauty but independent of responses to salience or arousal. At the level of behavior, people with anomalous faces were subjected to less prosociality from participants highest in socioeconomic status. At the level of attitudes, we replicated previously reported negative character evaluations made about individuals with facial anomalies, and further identified explicit biases directed against them as a group. Across these levels of organization, the specific amygdala response to facial anomalies correlated with stronger just-world beliefs (i.e., people get what they deserve), less dispositional empathic concern, and less prosociality toward people with facial anomalies. Characterizing the “anomalous-is-bad” stereotype at multiple levels of organization can reveal underappreciated psychological burdens shouldered by people who look different. (shrink)

The paper provides a brief review of the literature, including a case study, of anomalous human experiences (AHEs) such as glossolalia, xenolalia, out-of-body experiences (OBEs) and near-death experiences (NDEs). AHEs are frequently experienced by a number of the healthy as well as the pathological population. The first part of the paper looks at the literature describing phenomenology as well as semiology of the AHEs and their common features. The second part looks at the literature reflecting possible transformative and transcendent (...) elements of the AHEs. The last part of the paper examines the literature presenting the possible pathological as well as spiritual nature of AHEs. (shrink)

Recent discourse on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) has increasingly considered unconventional terrestrial explanations, including the cryptoterrestrial hypothesis (CTH), which posits non-human intelligences (NHI) concealed on or near Earth—potentially underground, underwater, lunar, or integrated among humans—as a plausible alternative to extraterrestrial visitation (Lomas et al., 2024). This paper introduces the Cryptoterrestrial Faction Hypothesis (CFH) as a novel refinement of CTH. CFH proposes that indigenous NHI lineages, evolved in parallel or predating humanity, fractured into rival factions due to resource competition and (...) domain divergences. These factions engaged in historical multi-domain shadow conflicts over refugia (hidden enclaves), with patterns in global mythology interpreted as echoes of proxy wars or direct interventions (e.g., thunderbolts as directed-energy weapons, transmedium aerial/serpentine entities). Key elements include targeted containment resets (e.g., flood-like events), a post-conflict "long truce" of observation with strict rules of engagement, and contemporary UAP behaviors potentially signaling responses to modern red-line triggers (e.g., nuclear activity, human encroachment). CFH synthesizes cross-cultural mythic parallels, UAP performance data (transmedium capabilities, non-interference), geological/archaeological hints of refugia, and declassified/whistleblower accounts. Presented speculatively and not as an established fact, CFH is offered as a framework that fits select patterns better than monolithic CTH or extraterrestrial hypotheses in certain cases, warranting interdisciplinary inquiry with epistemic humility. Keywords: Cryptoterrestrial Faction Hypothesis, UAP, non-human intelligence, mythology reinterpretation, refugia, epistemic humility. (shrink)

This study provides a short review of certain anomalous experiences such as glossolalia and out-of-body experiences, which are frequently experienced by a number of the healthy as well as the pathological population. Research also suggests that these experiences may be of a transformative and transcendent nature and linked to positive psychological well-being. Further, they may share similar phenomenological and semiological features. They all belong to the category of altered states of consciousness and are mostly treated by current psychiatry as (...) pathological problems, rather than spiritual or religious, as suggested by some studies. (shrink)

Reports of patients with schizophrenia show a fragmented and anomalous subjective experience. This pathological subjective experience, we suggest, can be related to the fact that disembodiment inhibits the possibility of intersubjective experience, and more importantly of common sense. In this paper, we ask how to investigate the anomalous experience both from qualitative and quantitative viewpoints. To our knowledge, few studies have focused on a clinical combination of both first- phenomenological assessment and third-person biological methods, especially for Schizophrenia, or (...) ASD therapeutics and diagnosis. We will thus attempt to bring forward a second-person scientific design, accounting for both the first-person subjective experiential aspects, and respective third-person neurobiological correlates of embodied aesthetics in anomalous experience. From this proposal, we further explore the consequences to clinical and research practice. (shrink)

I will defend two claims. First, Schaffer's priority monism is in tension with many research programs in quantum gravity. Second, priority monism can be modified into a view more amenable to this physics. The first claim is grounded in the fact that promising approaches to quantum gravity such as loop quantum gravity or string theory deny the fundamental reality of spacetime. Since fundamental spacetime plays an important role in Schaffer's priority monism by being identified with the fundamental (...) structure, namely the cosmos, the disappearance of spacetime in these views might undermine classical priority monism. My second claim is that priority monism can avoid this issue with two moves: first, in dropping one of its core assumptions, namely that the fundamental structure is spatio-temporal, second, by identifying the connection between the non-spatio-temporal structure and the derivative spatio-temporal structure with mereological composition. (shrink)

Argument that priority monism is best understood as being a contingent thesis.

Monism is the claim that only one object exists. While few contemporary philosophers endorse monism, it has an illustrious history – stretching back to Bradley, Spinoza and Parmenides. In this paper, I show that plausible assumptions about the higher-order logic of property identity entail that monism is true. Given the higher-order framework I operate in, this argument generalizes: it is also possible to establish that there is a single property, proposition, relation, etc. I then show why this (...) form of monism is inconsistent; because all propositions are identical, p is identical to ~p – and so they have the same truth-value. At least one of the assumptions that generate higher-order monism must be rejected. (shrink)

Neutral monism is a position in metaphysics defended by Mach, James, and Russell in the early twentieth century. It holds that minds and physical objects are essentially two different orderings of the same underlying neutral elements of nature. This paper sets out some of the central concepts, theses and the historical background of ideas that inform this doctrine of elements. The discussion begins with the classic neutral monism of Mach, James, and Russell in the first part of the (...) paper, then considers recent neo-Russellian versions in the second half. The chances for a revival of neutral monism are probably slight; its key ideas and starting points lie far from those in contemporary philosophy of mind. A better route might be through the philosophy of science and a deeper understanding of causation. (shrink)

Infostructural Monism (ISM) proposes a novel monistic ontology constituted by the singular, eternal Universal Substrate (US). The US possesses two inseparable, co-primordial attributes: Informational Polarity (IP or 0), the atemporal, exhaustive context of all logical possibility, and Structural Polarity (SP or 1), the dynamic, temporal manifestation of bounded content. This necessary antithetical relationship (0/1) functions as the intrinsic binary code of the universe, establishing intelligibility and all logical constraints. Integrating classical monism and contemporary information theory, ISM rests on (...) key axioms: deterministic Universal Sequentialism (a single fixed cosmic timeline called The Sequence) and Cosmological Recyclicalism, which ensures eternal recurrence for exhaustive structural expression. All phenomena—including physical laws, consciousness, and aesthetic judgments—emerge from the US’s necessary execution. By deriving diversity from Maximal Differentiation, ISM achieves absolute Infostructural Coherence, avoiding dualistic inconsistencies. This paper elaborates ISM’s core terminology, polarities, Objects, Agents, and explores implications for metaphysics, cosmology, epistemology, and quantum mechanics. (shrink)

Truthmaker monism is the view that the one and only truthmaker is the world. Despite its unpopularity, this view has recently received an admirable defence by Schaffer :307–324, 2010b). Its main defect, I argue, is that it omits partial truthmakers. If we omit partial truthmakers, we lose the intimate connection between a truth and its truthmaker. I further argue that the notion of a minimal truthmaker should be the key notion that plays the role of constraining ontology and that (...) truthmaker monism is not necessary for an appropriate solution to the problem of finding truthmakers for negative truths. I conclude that we should reject truthmaker monism once and for all. (shrink)

This paper is about the relation between two venerable and revisionary metaphysical doctrines: Monism and Qualitativism. Monism says, roughly, that reality is in some sense one. Qualitativism says, roughly, that reality contains no facts about particular objects, but is rather purely qualitative. I distinguish various versions of these two doctrines, and in each case argue that proponents of the Monist doctrine should instead embrace a corresponding Qualitativist doctrine. I conclude that Monism culminates in Qualitativism.

Russellian monists argue that non-structural properties, or a combination of structural and non-structural properties, necessitate phenomenal properties. Different Russellian monists offer varying accounts of the structural/non-structural distinction, leading to divergent forms of Russellian monism. In this paper, I criticise Derk Pereboom’s characterisation of the structural/non-structural distinction proposed in his Consciousness and the Prospects of Physicalism and further work. I argue that from Pereboom’s characterisation of structural and non-structural properties, one can formulate general metaphysical principles concerning what structural and non-structural (...) properties necessitate. These principles undermine the claim that non-structural properties—either alone or in combination with structural properties—necessitate phenomenal properties. Moreover, these principles are not affected by our supposed inability to conceive of non-structural properties in a manner conducive to the success of conceivability arguments. (shrink)

This paper advances the thesis of Symbolic Monism: reality is not composed of matter or mental substance, but of a single horizon of consciousness whose intrinsic syntax is constituted by mathematics (the relational structure of 0–9) and language (the identity structure of A–Z). Building upon an episte- mological foundation that renders “external to consciousness” structurally incoherent, I argue that the principle of non-contradiction is not a contingent logical rule but the condition of possibility for any distinction whatsoever to arise (...) within consciousness. From this foundation, I derive a unified account of science, fiction, and pseudo-science: not as hierarchically ordered by corre- spondence to external reality, but as variants differing in their degree of systemic resonance with the intrinsic syntax of consciousness. Scientific laws constitute the deep current—not because society endorses them, but because they express the most efficient relational grammar available to consciousness. The paper closes by demonstrating that this framework is neither solipsistic, relativis- tic, nor anti-scientific, but constitutes a genuinely post-ontological position irreducible to Kantian idealism, Wittgensteinian language-game theory, social constructivism, or Advaita Vedanta. (shrink)

Between 1653 and 1655 Margaret Cavendish makes a radical transition in her theory of matter, rejecting her earlier atomism in favour of an infinitely-extended and infinitely-divisible material plenum, with matter being ubiquitously self-moving, sensing, and rational. It is unclear, however, if Cavendish can actually dispense of atomism. One of her arguments against atomism, for example, depends upon the created world being harmonious and orderly, a premise Cavendish herself repeatedly undermines by noting nature’s many disorders. I argue that her supposed difficulties (...) with atomism expose a deeper tension in her work between two fundamental metaphysical commitments each of which has substantial philosophical support: her monist theory of the material world (which maintains that there exists just one natural substance which is the single principal cause) and her occasional theory of causation (which requires multiple finite principal causes in nature -- causes that might be considered individual substances). Her monism undermines atomism while her theory of occasional cause seems to rest on a conception of nature that would be especially friendly to atomism. I argue further that we can solve this tension within a Cavendishian framework in such a way as to preserve her theory of causation and her monism, but that this solution depends upon our taking her monism in a particular (and weak) form. I finally note that we can best make sense of her unique and interesting form of monism by acknowledging her social-political motivations in addition to her motivations in natural philosophy. (shrink)

Let ‘monism’ be the view that there is only one basic object—the world. Monists face the question of whether there are also non-basic objects. This is in effect the question of whether the world decomposes into parts. Jonathan Schaffer maintains that it does, Terry Horgan and Matjaž Potrč that it does not. In this paper, I propose a compromise view, which I call ‘Kantian monism.’ According to Kantian monism, the world decomposes into parts insofar as an ideal (...) subject under ideal conditions would divide it into parts, but it does not decompose into parts in and of itself, that is, in an entirely mind-independent manner. After articulating Kantian monism more precisely (Section 1), I present a prima facie case for preferring it over more standard varieties of monism (Section 2). (shrink)

The aim of this paper is to draw the attention of those conducting research on imagery to the different kinds of visual information deployed by expert drawers compared to non-expert drawers. To demonstrate this difference I draw upon the cognitive science literature on vision and imagery to distinguish between three different ways that visual phenomena can be represented in memory: structural descriptions, denotative descriptions, and configural descriptions. Research suggests that perception and imagery deploy the same mental processes and that the (...) drawing of one's imagery would require the simultaneous deployment of these very processes. I reason that drawing a picture of one's imagery is not possible. I hypothesize that when required to draw a picture from memory, both expert and non-expert drawers access their denotative description of the object rather than their imagery. I then suggest how my hypothesis could be tested and if accurate, how this finding would impact upon the design and interpretation of experiments on imagery when drawing is involved. I also suggest why the constraints that perception places upon the simultaneous deployment of imagery appear not to cause the same constraints in autistic savant drawers and visual agnosia patients. (shrink)

Priority monism is the view that the cosmos is the only independent concrete object. The paper argues that, pace its proponents, Priority monism is in conflict with the dependence of any whole on any of its parts: if the cosmos does not depend on its parts, neither does any smaller composite.

Monism is a metaphysical view according to which there is only one fundamental object. This paper will explore monism within the context of truthmaker theory, or Truthmaker Monism, a view rarely discussed in literature. Although few truthmaker theorists defend monism, at least explicitly, some theories seem to share the spirit of monism to some extent. Interestingly, they are proposed as solutions for the same problem, called the problem of negative truth. A close examination will show (...) that while each of these solutions can account for the problem, they are unsatisfactory for different reasons. This paper will suggest a novel solution to the problem of negative truth which preserves the advantages of existing solutions while avoiding the difficulties with which they are faced. (shrink)