You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the best practices section, there are a number of statements that sound normative (as mentioned in issue #2974). Some of these may not need to be normative, but others seem like they should be.
They MAY enter a title for the annotation set (empty by default). Such a title SHOULD become the exported filename.
They MUST be able to choose the directory in which the annotation set will be stored.
The file extension MUST be .annotation .
It might be helpful for reading systems to have normative, consistent requirements in implementing annotations, in addition to best practices, but I would like input from reading systems!
Section
https://w3c.github.io/epub-specs/epub34/annotations/#best-practices-for-reading-systems
Describe the problem
In the best practices section, there are a number of statements that sound normative (as mentioned in issue #2974). Some of these may not need to be normative, but others seem like they should be.
Some examples:
https://w3c.github.io/epub-specs/epub34/annotations/#exporting-annotations-as-a-detached-file
It might be helpful for reading systems to have normative, consistent requirements in implementing annotations, in addition to best practices, but I would like input from reading systems!
Describe the fix or new feature you propose
No response