Tested on smaller JSON?
#1407
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Yep. I don't know where the results are, but when @lemire tested it, simdjson was the fastest implementation even for very small files (though its margin was much smaller the smaller the files got). I used to worry about this too; but given those results, I don't think there's actually much in the way of overhead. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
See one of the figures in the readme which addresses this concern. We initially focused on "sizeable files", but later found out that we scaled well to larger or smaller files. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
One of my applications for this would have very random length JSON objects. Have you tested this how it fares with smaller JSON vs other libs?
This project seems very exciting. I used to program DSP, so I know how fast SIMD can be, though there is a small translation cost.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions