Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

వైజాసత్య@te.wikiquote

I am admin in Telugu wikipedia, wiktionary and wikisource. I am requesting temporary admin access in te wikiquote to install extensions and templates and customize few features as community has shown recent interest in developing the project. Thanks --వైజాసత్య (talk) 06:48, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please create a local request/announcement nevertheless, in case anyone comes by and has comments. Also, please note that you can't install MediaWiki extensions by yourself. --MF-W 21:30, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant Gadgets. I have posted a local request / announcement now --వైజాసత్య (talk) 07:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is on hold until 25 February then (minimum 1 week for discussion). --MF-W 02:33, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pratyya_Ghosh@bn.wiktionary

Pratyya contacted me over IRC, requesting me to grant him 1.5 years of temp adminship per the above discussion. I would like more eyes on this, ans I like transparency, so i am posting it here. The reason I'm posting and not Pratyya, is he will have limited access to internet until the 22nd, when his term would already expire. Please comment/execute as you see fit. best Matanya (talk) 21:40, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Username fixed. --M/ (talk) 21:43, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me. Ajraddatz (talk) 22:18, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Historically, we have not given temporary admin rights for periods of longer than one year, IIRC. -- Avi (talk) 13:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly already did so and also remember others doing it. I am very much in favour of giving 1,5 years of temporary adminship when someone has already had temporary adminship several times before. --MF-W 14:27, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. After an extended period of trusted service I see no reason not to extend for longer periods. However, I would set a maximum limit of 2 years, in line with the global inactivity policy limits, unless the project has its own more restrictive activity policy (unlikely I know). QuiteUnusual (talk) 13:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I don't like the idea of the longest term. Many communities have a confirmation process, and that is from a year, and I don't think that small wikis should have a longer period than a year. It is not an onerous process.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My own opinion is if the wiki isn't large or active enough for permanent admins, then a year is a reasonably long enough length of time. If the admin starts the discussion just a bit more than a week before the expiration, it can be seamless. I don't think there is anything wrong with giving rights for 18 months; i just don't see it as substantially superior to 12. -- Avi (talk) 19:35, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

•  Granted for 1 year to expire on 2016-02-23. With only around a half-dozen non-bot, non-automated editors with more than 10 edits in the past 30 days (Pratyya himself only has 3 edits in the past 30 days), I do not believe that BnWikT is ready for permanent admins at this time. Also, while this will be Pratyya's fourth go round here, it is only the second time privileges will be of duration > 6 months, so I will extend temporary admin privileges for one more year. Hopefully, by this time in 2016, the project will have grown enough so that permanent adminship may be considered. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 17:52, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uchup19@su.wikiquote

I just want the sundanese wikiquote be better, hope considered. Hatur nuhun. Uchup19 (talk) 07:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On hold till 25 Feb.--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 11:40, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

CheckUser access

Oversight access

Removal of access

Inactive administration

1. Samsam22
2. Eskandarany
3. Ramsis_II
4. Mahmudmasri

--ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: is there a local policy about inactivity? Would you please do a very short summary of its contents. Is there a local discussion that has taken place to which you can provide a wikilink? Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:16, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

düüvelskääl@kshwiki

inactivity: 3 visits in 4 years inactive since more than a year as per local policy thus all privileges must be removed, sysop privilege not used since 4 years. --Kasallamä (talk) 17:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like they were active as recent as yesterday. Ajraddatz (talk) 18:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That was last year. We've 2015 now. --Kasallamä (talk) 06:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until 28 Feb 2015 Only a couple of days past a year. I have pinged the user on their talk page and asked them to respond here within the week.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:03, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Raghith@ml.wikipedia

Please remove my administrator privileges. Raghith (talk) 06:45, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Mentifisto 07:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mingwangx@zh.wikinews

Ou0430 (talk) 07:06, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Mentifisto 07:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.Ou0430 (talk) 07:32, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Funfood@commonswiki

• • While this is non-controversial, as commons is a home wiki for me, I'll hold off for now. There is no reason to wait 24 hours; the waiting occurred on the commons already. -- Avi (talk) 17:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for their service. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Checkusers and oversighters on nowiki

We (the functionaries) came to the conlusion that the need for these tools on the Norwegian Wikipedia, since the volume is so low that the tools are rarely used, and hence we don't feel confident with how to use the tools when we need them. We would rather have this function served by the stewards, who are more competent in their use. The discussion where this was decided is archived on no:Wikipedia:Tinget/Arkiv/2014-48#Avslutning av IP-kontrollør funksjon (CU). If you require any information, translation or clarification, just ping me. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 19:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jon for the explanation, this is a very responsible act. --Nemo 19:14, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Done Thank you all for your service and volunteer activities. -- Avi (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Steward requests/Permissions/Footer