Jump to content

Ask a question/Recent questions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 113.22.199.115 (talk) to last version by Hasley: ?
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 49: Line 49:
We are looking to have different login pages for different users, e.g. the business team logs in at '[[Business]]' and the engineers at '[[Engineering]]'. Is this possible? [[User:Justinmreina|Justinmreina]] ([[User talk:Justinmreina|talk]]) 05:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
We are looking to have different login pages for different users, e.g. the business team logs in at '[[Business]]' and the engineers at '[[Engineering]]'. Is this possible? [[User:Justinmreina|Justinmreina]] ([[User talk:Justinmreina|talk]]) 05:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
:{{ping|Justinmreina}} Hi. This page is focused on the Wikimedia sites. For help with questions related to the MediaWiki software, please ask at the related project, [[mw:Project:Support desk]]. Thanks. [[User:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Quiddity (WMF)|talk]]) 19:50, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
:{{ping|Justinmreina}} Hi. This page is focused on the Wikimedia sites. For help with questions related to the MediaWiki software, please ask at the related project, [[mw:Project:Support desk]]. Thanks. [[User:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Quiddity (WMF)|talk]]) 19:50, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

== Ask for a approval for a Oauth app ==

==Xinbenlv's question==
<section begin=question />
<!-- Please write BELOW this line -->

Dear friends / admin, (and previously approved admins: {{ping|Tgr_(WMF)}}, {{ping|BDavis_(WMF)}})

Can you help '''approve''' these OAuth apps:
* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:OAuthListConsumers/view/c122a589c582777abedab6d24ad9b6ee
* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:OAuthListConsumers/view/3d5ba5ee78059231f7c61dd000c5c26b

and '''remove/delete/reject''' these Oauth apps:

* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:OAuthListConsumers/view/b0885495f14a700cf6051fe5bb236c4d
* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:OAuthListConsumers/view/b23dc0953823140067bd78c68e6102a0
* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:OAuthListConsumers/view/5f5a20b5eccab0b187116ad47d19be01
* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:OAuthListConsumers/view/5d25218a782d144200f1b54fbf5657bc

If this is not the best place to notify admins, can you route me to the right one?


[[User:Xinbenlv|Xinbenlv]] ([[User talk:Xinbenlv|talk]]) 22:30, 3 January 2020 (UTC)


<!-- Please write ABOVE this line. Your signature will be added automatically.

-->[[User:Xinbenlv|Xinbenlv]] ([[User talk:Xinbenlv|talk]]) 22:30, 3 January 2020 (UTC)<span class="aaq-view-discussion" id="2o75xsrf4q"><includeonly>
: {{TNT|AAQ view discussion|2o75xsrf4q}}</includeonly></span>
<section end=question /><!--

You may post responses below this line. -->

Revision as of 22:30, 3 January 2020

Ask public question  You can also email questions privately to answers(_AT_)wikimedia.org

Disclaimer: Please note that your IP address or username will be auto-filled when you save your question by pressing the "Save page" button at the bottom of the edit window. Also, please remember that by submitting a question here you are releasing it in the public domain, so that we may use or release them for research or other purposes. Please do not provide private information here. If you would like to ask your question via email instead, please send it to answers(_AT_)wikimedia.org.

Archives: /Archive 1

Tetizeraz's question: Where can I find information about "the landscape of the Wikimedia movement and its structures"?

Hi! I was reading Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Working Groups and one of the requirements was "A good understanding of the landscape of the Wikimedia movement and its structures" and I'll be honest, I have no idea where to start reading about it. I know there's Wikimania, the various projects like Commons, Wikipedia, Wikidata, etc. I know there are mailing lists, although I'm not sure how active people are in those mailing lists. Sprinkle some drama (I'm not sure if knowing a little bit about discussions and "fights" is important) I just get lost in a sea of information. Could someone help me know where to start reading about it, and understand more the WMF, the Wikimedia Foundation, and the people involved? Thanks! Tetizeraz (talk) 02:19, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tetizeraz:, thanks for this interesting question.
Since the Movement Strategy Process focuses on the structures, it should be said that the knowledge you seek is about structures: WMF, affiliates, committees and other bodies. This is the third bullet point explained on the page Wikimedia movement.
The first page that comes to my mind is Wikimedia movement affiliates. This is the first step with basic information. In my (totally personal) opinion, in order to have a "good understanding of the landscape", one should be aware of capacity and budgeting, so I'd recommend reading about Simple Annual Plan Grants (sAPG) program and APG through the Funds Dissemination Committee process. Particularly plans and reports of individual organizations, both newest and older ones. Plus, documentation on collaborations between affiliates. Research papers, e.g. on databases like JSTOR, might be eye-opening.
But this is the obvious, publicly expressed, fairly easily accessible level, and a fraction of total. Observations and conclusions from various comparisons are less obvious, because they haven't been necessarily put into words. There's a huge amount of research that could be potentially done. There is confidential information accessible for some employees, board members or other functionaries. How to learn more, beyond documentation? I'd say: get involved in the governance level of an affiliate and talk with people who have been involved. SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 21:19, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bylaws, Section IV.7

Hi, I have question concerning the text of the Bylaws, Section IV.7, "Any Trustee may be removed, with or without cause, by a majority vote of the Trustees then in office in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 617.0808(1), or other relevant provisions of the Act." What is this Section 617.0808 referred to and where can I find it ? As far as I can see its not specified in the text. Claude J (talk) 16:36, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Claude J: Hi. It looks like "the Act" is defined further up in the page at foundation:Bylaws#Section_3._Selection. (first paragraph) - searching the web for that specific Act name and section number, gives this page as a likely result (although there may be better results, I am not a lawyer). Hope that helps, Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 20:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thats it, thank you.--Claude J (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Job descriptions of WMF Staff

I've been trying to document certain aspects of the WMF here on Meta, and I've been having some difficulty as a result of the lack of data on the jobs and responsibilities of the various WMF employees. It would be quite helpful if the WMF could provide the list of job descriptions of all current WMF staff. Would this be possible? Yair rand (talk) 06:14, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Can you set a specific entry page per user

We are looking to have different login pages for different users, e.g. the business team logs in at 'Business' and the engineers at 'Engineering'. Is this possible? Justinmreina (talk) 05:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Justinmreina: Hi. This page is focused on the Wikimedia sites. For help with questions related to the MediaWiki software, please ask at the related project, mw:Project:Support desk. Thanks. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 19:50, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ask for a approval for a Oauth app

Xinbenlv's question


Dear friends / admin, (and previously approved admins: @Tgr (WMF):, @BDavis (WMF):)

Can you help approve these OAuth apps:

and remove/delete/reject these Oauth apps:

If this is not the best place to notify admins, can you route me to the right one?


Xinbenlv (talk) 22:30, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Xinbenlv (talk) 22:30, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]