arXiv is now an independent nonprofit! Learn more
License: arXiv.org perpetual non-exclusive license
arXiv:1507.07099v2 [hep-ex] 11 Jan 2016
\PreprintIdNumber

CERN-PH-2015-163 \AtlasJournalEur. Phys. J. C

Study of the Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} and Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} decays with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS Collaboration
Abstract

The decays Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} and Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} are studied with the ATLAS detector at the LHC using a dataset corresponding to integrated luminosities of 4.9 fb-1 and 20.6 fb-1 of pppp collisions collected at centre-of-mass energies s=7\sqrt{s}=7 TeV and 88 TeV, respectively. Signal candidates are identified through J/ψμ+μJ/\psi\to\mu^{+}\mu^{-} and Ds()+ϕπ+(γ/π0)D_{s}^{(*)+}\to\phi\pi^{+}(\gamma/\pi^{0}) decays. With a two-dimensional likelihood fit involving the Bc+B_{c}^{+} reconstructed invariant mass and an angle between the μ+\mu^{+} and Ds+D_{s}^{+} candidate momenta in the muon pair rest frame, the yields of Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} and Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}, and the transverse polarisation fraction in Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} decay are measured. The transverse polarisation fraction is determined to be Γ±±(Bc+J/ψDs+)/Γ(Bc+J/ψDs+)=0.38±0.23±0.07\Gamma_{\pm\pm}(B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+})/\Gamma(B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+})=0.38\pm 0.23\pm 0.07, and the derived ratio of the branching fractions of the two modes is Bc+J/ψDs+/Bc+J/ψDs+=2.80.8+1.2±0.3\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}/\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}}=2.8\,^{+1.2}_{-0.8}\pm 0.3, where the first error is statistical and the second is systematic. Finally, a sample of Bc+J/ψπ+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+} decays is used to derive the ratios of branching fractions Bc+J/ψDs+/Bc+J/ψπ+=3.8±1.1±0.4±0.2\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}}/\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}}=3.8\pm 1.1\pm 0.4\pm 0.2 and Bc+J/ψDs+/Bc+J/ψπ+=10.4±3.1±1.5±0.6\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}/\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}}=10.4\pm 3.1\pm 1.5\pm 0.6, where the third error corresponds to the uncertainty of the branching fraction of Ds+ϕ(K+K)π+D_{s}^{+}\to\phi(K^{+}K^{-})\pi^{+} decay. The available theoretical predictions are generally consistent with the measurement.

1 Introduction

The Bc+B_{c}^{+} meson11 1 Charge conjugate states are implied throughout the paper unless otherwise stated. is the only known weakly decaying particle consisting of two heavy quarks. The ground b¯c\bar{b}c state was first observed by CDF [1] via its semileptonic decay Bc+J/ψ+νB_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\ell^{+}\nu_{\ell}. An excited b¯c\bar{b}c state has been observed recently by ATLAS [2] using the Bc+B_{c}^{+} decay mode Bc+J/ψπ+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}. The presence of two heavy quarks, each of which can decay weakly, affects theoretical calculations of the decay properties of the Bc+B_{c}^{+} meson. In the case of b¯c¯cs¯\bar{b}\to\bar{c}c\bar{s} processes, decays to charmonium and a Ds+D_{s}^{+} or a Ds+D_{s}^{*+} meson are predicted to occur via colour-suppressed and colour-favoured spectator diagrams as well as via the weak annihilation diagram (see Fig. 1). The latter, in contrast to decays of other BB mesons, is not Cabibbo-suppressed and can contribute significantly to the decay amplitudes. The decay properties are addressed in various theoretical calculations [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] and can also be compared to the analogous properties in the lighter BB meson systems such as Bd0DDs()+B_{d}^{0}\to D^{*-}D_{s}^{(*)+} or B+D¯0Ds()+B^{+}\to\bar{D}^{*0}D_{s}^{(*)+}. The decays Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} and Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}, which have been observed recently by the LHCb experiment [10], provide a means to test these theoretical predictions.

((a))
((b))
((c))
Figure 1: Feynman diagrams for Bc+J/ψDs()+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{(*)+} decays: colour-favoured spectator, colour-suppressed spectator, and annihilation topology.

This paper presents a measurement of the branching fractions of Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} and Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} decays, normalised to that of Bc+J/ψπ+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+} decay, and polarisation in Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} decay performed with the ATLAS detector [11]. The Ds+D_{s}^{+} meson is reconstructed via the Ds+ϕπ+D_{s}^{+}\to\phi\pi^{+} decay with the ϕ\phi meson decaying into a pair of charged kaons. The Ds+D_{s}^{*+} meson decays into a Ds+D_{s}^{+} meson and a soft photon or π0\pi^{0}. Detecting such soft neutral particles is very challenging, thus no attempt to reconstruct them is made in the analysis. The J/ψJ/\psi meson is reconstructed via its decay into a muon pair.

The measurement presented in this paper allows an independent verification of the results of Ref. [10] with comparable statistical and systematic uncertainties. The following ratios are measured: Ds+/π+=Bc+J/ψDs+/Bc+J/ψπ+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{+}/\pi^{+}}=\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}}/\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}}, Ds+/π+=Bc+J/ψDs+/Bc+J/ψπ+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/\pi^{+}}=\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}/\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}}, and Ds+/Ds+=Bc+J/ψDs+/Bc+J/ψDs+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/D_{s}^{+}}=\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}/\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}}, where Bc+X\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to X} denotes the branching fraction of the Bc+XB_{c}^{+}\to X decay. The decay Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} is a transition of a pseudoscalar meson into a pair of vector states and is thus described by the three helicity amplitudes, A++A_{++}, AA_{--}, and A00A_{00}, where the subscripts correspond to the helicities of J/ψJ/\psi and Ds+D_{s}^{*+} mesons. The contribution of the A++A_{++} and AA_{--} amplitudes, referred to as the A±±A_{\pm\pm} component, corresponds to the J/ψJ/\psi and Ds+D_{s}^{*+} transverse polarisation. The fraction of transverse polarisation, Γ±±/Γ=Γ±±(Bc+J/ψDs+)/Γ(Bc+J/ψDs+)\Gamma_{\pm\pm}/\Gamma=\Gamma_{\pm\pm}(B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+})/\Gamma(B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}), is also measured. From a naive prediction by spin counting, one would expect this fraction to be 2/32/3, while calculations [8, 9] predict values of 0.41–0.48.

This analysis is based on a combined sample of pppp collision data collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC at centre-of-mass energies s=7\sqrt{s}=7 TeV and 88 TeV corresponding to integrated luminosities of 4.9 fb-1 and 20.6 fb-1, respectively.

2 The ATLAS detector, trigger selection and Monte Carlo samples

ATLAS is a general-purpose detector consisting of several subsystems including the inner detector (ID), calorimeters and the muon spectrometer (MS). Muon reconstruction makes use of both the ID and the MS. The ID comprises three types of detectors: a silicon pixel detector, a silicon microstrip semiconductor tracker (SCT) and a transition radiation tracker. The ID provides a pseudorapidity22 2 ATLAS uses a right-handed coordinate system with its origin at the nominal interaction point (IP) in the centre of the detector and the zz-axis along the beam pipe. The xx-axis points from the IP to the centre of the LHC ring, and the yy-axis points upward. Cylindrical coordinates (r,ϕ)(r,\phi) are used in the transverse plane, ϕ\phi being the azimuthal angle around the beam pipe. The pseudorapidity is defined in terms of the polar angle θ\theta as η=lntan(θ/2)\eta=-\ln\tan(\theta/2). coverage up to |η|=2.5|\eta|=2.5. Muons pass through the calorimeters and reach the MS if their transverse momentum, pTp_{\text{T}}, is above approximately 3 GeV.33 3 Using a system of units with c=1c=1 is implied throughout the paper. Muon candidates are formed either from a stand-alone MS track matched to an ID track or, in case the MS stand-alone track is not reconstructed, from an ID track extrapolated to the MS and matched to track segments in the MS. Candidates of the latter type are referred to as segment-tagged muons while the former are called combined muons. Muon track parameters are taken from the ID measurement alone in this analysis, since the precision of the measured track parameters for muons in the pTp_{\text{T}} range of interest is dominated by the ID track reconstruction.

The ATLAS trigger system consists of a hardware-based Level-1 trigger and a two-stage High Level Trigger (HLT). At Level-1, the muon trigger uses dedicated MS chambers to search for patterns of hits satisfying different pTp_{\text{T}} thresholds. The region-of-interest around these hit patterns then serves as a seed for the HLT muon reconstruction, in which dedicated algorithms are used to incorporate information from both the MS and the ID, achieving a position and momentum resolution close to that provided by the offline muon reconstruction. Muons are efficiently triggered in the pseudorapidity range |η|<2.4|\eta|<2.4.

Triggers based on single-muon, dimuon, and three-muon signatures are used to select J/ψμ+μJ/\psi\to\mu^{+}\mu^{-} decays for the analysis. The third muon can be produced in the Bc+B_{c}^{+} signal events in semileptonic decays of the two other heavy-flavour hadrons. The majority of events are collected by dimuon triggers requiring a vertex of two oppositely charged muons with an invariant mass between 2.5 GeV and 4.3 GeV. During the data taking, the pTp_{\text{T}} threshold for muons in these triggers was either 4 GeV or 6 GeV. Single-muon triggers additionally increase the acceptance for asymmetric J/ψJ/\psi decays where one muon has pT<4p_{\text{T}}<4 GeV. Finally, three-muon triggers had a pTp_{\text{T}} threshold of 4 GeV, thus enhancing the acceptance during the periods of high luminosity when the pTp_{\text{T}} threshold for at least one muon in the dimuon triggers was 6 GeV.

Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is used for the event selection criteria optimisation and the calculation of the acceptance for the considered Bc+B_{c}^{+} decay modes. The MC samples of the Bc+B_{c}^{+} decays were generated with Pythia 6.4 [12] along with a dedicated extension for the Bc+B_{c}^{+} production based on calculations from Refs. [13, 14, 15, 16]. The decays of Bc+B_{c}^{+} are then simulated with EvtGen [17]. The generated events were passed through a full simulation of the detector using the ATLAS simulation framework [18] based on Geant 4 [19, 20] and processed with the same reconstruction algorithms as were used for the data.

3 Reconstruction and event selection

The J/ψJ/\psi candidates are reconstructed from pairs of oppositely charged muons. At least one of the two muons is required to be a combined muon. Each pair is fitted to a common vertex [21]. The quality of the vertex fit must satisfy χ2/ndf<15\chi^{2}/\mathrm{ndf}<15, where the ndf\mathrm{ndf} stands for the number of degrees of freedom. The candidates in the invariant mass window 2800MeV<m(μ+μ)<34002800{\mathrm{\ Me\kern-1.00006ptV}}<m(\mu^{+}\mu^{-})<3400 MeV are retained.

For the Ds+ϕ(K+K)π+D_{s}^{+}\to\phi(K^{+}K^{-})\pi^{+} reconstruction, tracks of particles with opposite charges are assigned kaon mass hypotheses and combined in pairs to form ϕ\phi candidates. An additional track is assigned a pion mass and combined with the ϕ\phi candidate to form a Ds+D_{s}^{+} candidate. To ensure good momentum resolution, all three tracks are required to have at least two hits in the silicon pixel detector and at least six hits in the SCT. Only three-track combinations successfully fitted to a common vertex with χ2/ndf<8\chi^{2}/\mathrm{ndf}<8 are kept. The ϕ\phi candidate invariant mass, m(K+K)m(K^{+}K^{-}), and the Ds+D_{s}^{+} candidate invariant mass, m(K+Kπ+)m(K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}), are calculated using the track momenta refitted to the common vertex. Only candidates with m(K+K)m(K^{+}K^{-}) within ±7\pm 7 MeV around the ϕ\phi mass, mϕ=1019.461m_{\phi}=1019.461 MeV [22], and with 1930MeV<m(K+Kπ+)<20101930{\mathrm{\ Me\kern-1.00006ptV}}<m(K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+})<2010 MeV are retained.

The Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} candidates are built by combining the five tracks of the J/ψJ/\psi and Ds+D_{s}^{+} candidates. The J/ψJ/\psi meson decays instantly at the same point as the Bc+B_{c}^{+} does (secondary vertex) while the Ds+D_{s}^{+} lives long enough to form a displaced tertiary vertex. Therefore the five-track combinations are refitted assuming this cascade topology [21]. The invariant mass of the muon pair is constrained to the J/ψJ/\psi mass, mJ/ψ=3096.916m_{J/\psi}=3096.916 MeV [22]. The three Ds+D_{s}^{+} daughter tracks are constrained to a tertiary vertex and their invariant mass is fixed to the mass of Ds+D_{s}^{+}, mDs+=1968.30m_{D_{s}^{+}}=1968.30 MeV [22]. The combined momentum of the refitted Ds+D_{s}^{+} decay tracks is constrained to point to the dimuon vertex. The quality of the cascade fit must satisfy χ2/ndf<3\chi^{2}/\mathrm{ndf}<3.

The Bc+B_{c}^{+} meson is reconstructed within the kinematic range pT(Bc+)>15p_{\text{T}}(B_{c}^{+})>15 GeV and |η(Bc+)|<2.0|\eta(B_{c}^{+})|<2.0, where the detector acceptance is high and depends weakly on pT(Bc+)p_{\text{T}}(B_{c}^{+}) and η(Bc+)\eta(B_{c}^{+}).

The refitted tracks of the Ds+D_{s}^{+} daughter hadrons are required to have |η|<2.5|\eta|<2.5 and pT>1p_{\text{T}}>1 GeV, while the muons must have |η|<2.3|\eta|<2.3 and pT>3p_{\text{T}}>3 GeV. To further discriminate the sample of Ds+D_{s}^{+} candidates from a large combinatorial background, the following requirements are applied:

  • cosθ(π)<0.8\cos\theta^{*}(\pi)<0.8, where θ(π)\theta^{*}(\pi) is the angle between the pion momentum in the K+Kπ+K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+} rest frame and the K+Kπ+K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+} combined momentum in the laboratory frame;

  • |cos3θ(K)|>0.15|\cos^{3}\theta^{\prime}(K)|>0.15, where θ(K)\theta^{\prime}(K) is the angle between one of the kaons and the pion in the K+KK^{+}K^{-} rest frame. The decay of the pseudoscalar Ds+D_{s}^{+} meson to the ϕ\phi (vector) plus π\pi (pseudoscalar) final state results in an alignment of the spin of the ϕ\phi meson perpendicularly to the direction of motion of the ϕ\phi relative to Ds+D_{s}^{+}. Consequently, the distribution of cosθ(K)\cos\theta^{\prime}(K) follows a cos2θ(K)\cos^{2}\theta^{\prime}(K) shape, implying a uniform distribution for cos3θ(K)\cos^{3}\theta^{\prime}(K). In contrast, the cosθ(K)\cos\theta^{\prime}(K) distribution of the combinatorial background is uniform and its cos3θ(K)\cos^{3}\theta^{\prime}(K) distribution peaks at zero. The cut suppresses the background significantly while reducing the signal by 15%.

The Bc+B_{c}^{+} candidate is required to point back to a primary vertex such that d0PV(Bc+)<0.1d_{0}^{\rm PV}(B_{c}^{+})<0.1 mm and z0PV(Bc+)sinθ(Bc+)<0.5z_{0}^{\rm PV}(B_{c}^{+})\sin\theta(B_{c}^{+})<0.5 mm, where d0PVd_{0}^{\rm PV} and z0PVz_{0}^{\rm PV} are respectively the transverse and longitudinal impact parameters with respect to the primary vertex. All primary vertices in the event are considered. If there is more than one primary vertex satisfying these requirements (0.5\sim 0.5% events both in data and MC simulation), the one with the largest sum of squared transverse momenta of the tracks originating from it is chosen.

The transverse decay length44 4 The transverse decay length of a particle is defined as the transverse distance between the production (primary) vertex and the particle decay (secondary) vertex projected along its transverse momentum. of the Bc+B_{c}^{+} candidate is required to satisfy Lxy(Bc+)>0.1L_{xy}(B_{c}^{+})>0.1 mm. The transverse decay length of the Ds+D_{s}^{+} measured from the Bc+B_{c}^{+} vertex must be Lxy(Ds+)>0.15L_{xy}(D_{s}^{+})>0.15 mm. In order to remove fake candidates, both Lxy(Bc+)L_{xy}(B_{c}^{+}) and Lxy(Ds+)L_{xy}(D_{s}^{+}) are required not to exceed 10 mm.

Taking into account the characteristic hard fragmentation of bb-quarks, a requirement pT(Bc+)/pT(trk)>0.1p_{\text{T}}(B_{c}^{+})/\sum p_{\text{T}}(\mathrm{trk})>0.1 is applied, where the sum in the denominator is taken over all tracks originating from the primary vertex (tracks of the Bc+B_{c}^{+} candidate are included in the sum if they are associated with the primary vertex). The requirement reduces a sizeable fraction of combinatorial background while having almost no effect on the signal.

The following angular selection requirements are introduced to further suppress the combinatorial background:

  • cosθ(Ds+)>0.8\cos\theta^{*}(D_{s}^{+})>-0.8, where θ(Ds+)\theta^{*}(D_{s}^{+}) is the angle between the Ds+D_{s}^{+} candidate momentum in the rest frame of the Bc+B_{c}^{+} candidate, and the Bc+B_{c}^{+} candidate line of flight in the laboratory frame. The distribution of cosθ(Ds+)\cos\theta^{*}(D_{s}^{+}) is uniform for the decays of pseudoscalar Bc+B_{c}^{+} meson before any kinematic selection while it tends to increase for negative values of cosθ(Ds+)\cos\theta^{*}(D_{s}^{+}) for the background.

  • cosθ(π)>0.8\cos\theta^{\prime}(\pi)>-0.8, where θ(π)\theta^{\prime}(\pi) is the angle between the J/ψJ/\psi candidate momentum and the pion momentum in the K+Kπ+K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+} rest frame. Its distribution is nearly uniform for the signal processes but peaks towards 1-1 for the background.

Distributions of these two variables after applying all other selection requirements described in this section are shown in Fig. 2. They are shown for the simulated signal samples, as well as for sidebands of the mass spectrum in data, defined as the regions 5640MeV<m(J/ψDs+)<59005640{\mathrm{\ Me\kern-1.00006ptV}}<m(J/\psi D_{s}^{+})<5900 MeV (left sideband) and 6360MeV<m(J/ψDs+)<67606360{\mathrm{\ Me\kern-1.00006ptV}}<m(J/\psi D_{s}^{+})<6760 MeV (right sideband). A dip in the cosθ(π)\cos\theta^{\prime}(\pi) distribution for the Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} signal is caused by rejection of Bs0J/ψϕB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi\phi candidates discussed below.

((a))
((b))
Figure 2: Distributions of cosθ(Ds+)\cos\theta^{*}(D_{s}^{+}) and cosθ(π)\cos\theta^{\prime}(\pi), where θ(Ds+)\theta^{*}(D_{s}^{+}) and θ(π)\theta^{\prime}(\pi) are two angular variables defined in Sect. 3. The distributions are shown for data sidebands (black dots) and MC simulation of Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} signal (red solid line) and A00A_{00} (green dotted line) and A±±A_{\pm\pm} (blue dashed line) components of Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} signal. The distributions are obtained after applying all selection criteria except the ones on the plotted variable. The MC distributions are normalised to data.

Various possible contributions of partially reconstructed BJ/ψXB\to J/\psi X decays were studied. The only significant one was found from the Bs0J/ψϕB_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi\phi decay process. This contribution arises when the combination of the tracks from a true Bs0J/ψ(μ+μ)ϕ(K+K)B_{s}^{0}\to J/\psi(\mu^{+}\mu^{-})\phi(K^{+}K^{-}) decay with a fifth random track results in a fake Bc+J/ψ(μ+μ)Ds+(K+Kπ+)B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi(\mu^{+}\mu^{-})D_{s}^{+}(K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}) candidate. For each reconstructed Bc+B_{c}^{+} candidate, an additional vertex fit is performed. The two muon tracks and the two kaon tracks are fitted to a common vertex, where the kaon tracks are assumed to be from ϕK+K\phi\to K^{+}K^{-} and the muon pair is constrained to have the nominal J/ψJ/\psi mass. The mass of the Bs0B_{s}^{0} candidate, m(μ+μK+K)m(\mu^{+}\mu^{-}K^{+}K^{-}), is then calculated from the refitted track parameters. Candidates with 5340MeV<m(μ+μK+K)<54005340{\mathrm{\ Me\kern-1.00006ptV}}<m(\mu^{+}\mu^{-}K^{+}K^{-})<5400 MeV are rejected. This requirement suppresses the bulk of the Bs0B_{s}^{0} events while rejecting only 4\sim 4% of the signal.

After applying the selection requirements described above, 1547 J/ψDs+J/\psi D_{s}^{+} candidates are selected in the mass range 5640–6760 MeV.

4 Bc+J/ψDs()+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{(*)+} candidate fit

The mass distribution of the selected Bc+J/ψDs()+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{(*)+} candidates is shown in Fig. 3. The peak near the Bc+B_{c}^{+} mass, mBc+=6275.6m_{B_{c}^{+}}=6275.6 MeV [22], is attributed to the signal of Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} decay while a wider structure between 5900 MeV and 6200 MeV corresponds to Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} with subsequent Ds+Ds+γD_{s}^{*+}\to D_{s}^{+}\gamma or Ds+Ds+π0D_{s}^{*+}\to D_{s}^{+}\pi^{0} decays where the neutral particle is not reconstructed.

Figure 3: The mass distribution for the selected J/ψDs+J/\psi D_{s}^{+} candidates. The red solid line represents the projection of the fit to the model described in the text. The contribution of the Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} decay is shown with the magenta long-dashed line; the brown dash-dot and green dotted lines show the Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} A00A_{00} and A±±A_{\pm\pm} component contributions, respectively; the blue dashed line shows the background model. The uncertainties of the listed fit result values are statistical only.

Mass distributions of the J/ψJ/\psi and Ds+D_{s}^{+} candidates corresponding to the J/ψDs+J/\psi D_{s}^{+} mass region of the observed Bc+J/ψDs()+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{(*)+} signals are shown in Fig. 4. To obtain these plots, the Bc+B_{c}^{+} candidates are built without the mass constraints in the cascade fit, with the mass of the candidate calculated as m(J/ψDs+)=m(μ+μK+Kπ+)m(μ+μ)+mJ/ψm(K+Kπ+)+mDs+m(J/\psi D_{s}^{+})=m(\mu^{+}\mu^{-}K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+})-m(\mu^{+}\mu^{-})+m_{J/\psi}-m(K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+})+m_{D_{s}^{+}}, where mJ/ψm_{J/\psi} and mDs+m_{D_{s}^{+}} are the nominal masses of the respective particles. The mass of the Bc+B_{c}^{+} candidate is required to be 5900MeV<m(J/ψDs+)<64005900{\mathrm{\ Me\kern-1.00006ptV}}<m(J/\psi D_{s}^{+})<6400 MeV while the mass windows for the corresponding intermediate resonances are widened to the plotting ranges. The J/ψJ/\psi and Ds+D_{s}^{+} mass distributions are fitted with a sum of an exponential function describing the background and a modified Gaussian function [23, 24] describing the corresponding signal peak. The modified Gaussian function is defined as

Gaussmodexp(x1+11+x/22),\mathrm{Gauss}^{\mathrm{mod}}\sim\exp\left(-\frac{x^{1+\frac{1}{1+x/2}}}{2}\right), (1)

where x=|m0m|/σx=|m_{0}-m|/\sigma with the mean mass m0m_{0} and width σ\sigma being free parameters. The fitted masses of J/ψJ/\psi (3095.1±2.43095.1\pm 2.4 MeV) and DsD_{s} (1969.0±4.11969.0\pm 4.1 MeV) agree with their nominal masses, the widths are consistent with those in the simulated samples, and the signal yields are found to be NJ/ψ=568±28N_{J/\psi}=568\pm 28 and NDs±=175±36N_{D_{s}^{\pm}}=175\pm 36.

((a))
((b))
Figure 4: Mass distribution of the J/ψJ/\psi and Ds+D_{s}^{+} candidates after the full Bc+J/ψDs()+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{(*)+} selection (without mass constraints in the cascade fit) in the mass window of the Bc+B_{c}^{+} candidate 5900MeV<m(J/ψDs+)<64005900{\mathrm{\ Me\kern-1.00006ptV}}<m(J/\psi D_{s}^{+})<6400 MeV. The spectra are fitted with a sum of an exponential and a modified Gaussian function. The uncertainties of the shown J/ψJ/\psi and Ds+D_{s}^{+} yields are statistical only.

The information about the helicity in Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} decay is encoded both in the mass distribution of the J/ψDs+J/\psi D_{s}^{+} system and in the distribution of the helicity angle, θ(μ+)\theta^{\prime}(\mu^{+}), which is defined in the rest frame of the muon pair as the angle between the μ+\mu^{+} and the Ds+D_{s}^{+} candidate momenta. Thus, a two-dimensional extended unbinned maximum-likelihood fit of the m(J/ψDs+)m(J/\psi D_{s}^{+}) and |cosθ(μ+)||\cos\theta^{\prime}(\mu^{+})| distributions is performed. The A++A_{++} and AA_{--} helicity amplitude contributions are described by the same mass and angular shapes because of the parity symmetry of the J/ψJ/\psi and Ds+D_{s}^{*+} decays. This is confirmed by the MC simulation. Thus these components are treated together as the A±±A_{\pm\pm} component, while the shape of the A00A_{00} component is different and is therefore treated separately. A simultaneous fit to the mass and angular distributions significantly improves the sensitivity to the contributions of the helicity amplitudes in Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} decay with respect to a one-dimensional mass fit.

Four two-dimensional probability density functions (PDFs) are defined to describe the Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} signal, the A±±A_{\pm\pm} and A00A_{00} components of the Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} signal, and the background. The signal PDFs are factorised into mass and angular components. The effect of correlations between their mass and angular shapes is found to be small and is accounted for as a systematic uncertainty.

The mass distribution of the Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} signal is described by a modified Gaussian function. For the Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} signal components, the mass shape templates obtained from the simulation with the kernel estimation technique [25] are used. The branching fractions of Ds+Ds+π0D_{s}^{*+}\to D_{s}^{+}\pi^{0} and Ds+Ds+γD_{s}^{*+}\to D_{s}^{+}\gamma decays for the simulation are set to the world average values [22]. The position of the templates along the mass axis is varied in the fit simultaneously with the position of the Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} signal peak. The background mass shape is described with a two-parameter exponential function, exp[am(J/ψDs+)+bm(J/ψDs+)2]\exp\left[a\cdot m(J/\psi D_{s}^{+})+b\cdot m(J/\psi D_{s}^{+})^{2}\right].

To describe the |cosθ(μ+)||\cos\theta^{\prime}(\mu^{+})| shapes, templates from the kernel estimation are used. The templates for the signal angular PDFs are extracted from the simulated samples. Although their shapes are calculable analytically, using the templates allows the fit to account for detector effects. The background angular description is based on the |cosθ(μ+)||\cos\theta^{\prime}(\mu^{+})| shape of the candidates in the sidebands of J/ψDs+J/\psi D_{s}^{+} mass spectra. Two templates are produced from the angular distributions of the candidates in the left and right mass sidebands as defined in Sect. 3. The angular PDF for the background is defined as a conditional PDF of |cosθ(μ+)||\cos\theta^{\prime}(\mu^{+})| given the per-candidate m(J/ψDs+)m(J/\psi D_{s}^{+}). For the candidates in the lower half of the left sideband (5640–5770 MeV), the template from the left sideband is used. Similarly, the template from the right sideband is used for the upper half of the right sideband (6560–6760 MeV). For the candidates in the middle part of the mass spectrum (5770–6560 MeV), a linear interpolation between the two templates is used.

The fit has seven free parameters: the mass of the Bc+B_{c}^{+} meson, mBc+J/ψDs+m_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}}; the relative contribution of the A±±A_{\pm\pm} component to the total Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} decay rate in the selected sample, f±±f_{\pm\pm}; the two parameters of the exponential background; the yields of the two signal modes, NBc+J/ψDs+N_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}} and NBc+J/ψDs+N_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}, and the background yield. The width of the modified Gaussian function, σBc+J/ψDs+\sigma_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}}, is fixed to the value obtained from the fit to the simulated signal, σBc+J/ψDs+=9.95\sigma_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}}=9.95 MeV. Leaving this parameter free in the data fit results in the value 7.9±3.07.9\pm 3.0 MeV, consistent with the simulation in the range of statistical uncertainty.

It was checked that the fit procedure provides unbiased values and correct statistical uncertainties for the extracted parameters using pseudo-experiments. The values of the relevant parameters obtained from the fit are given in Table 1. The fitted Bc+B_{c}^{+} mass agrees with the world average value [22]. The mass and angular projections of the fit on the selected J/ψDs+J/\psi D_{s}^{+} candidate dataset are also shown in Figs. 3 and 5, respectively. In order to illustrate the effect of the angular part of the fit in separating the helicity amplitudes, the |cosθ(μ+)||\cos\theta^{\prime}(\mu^{+})| projection for the subset of candidates with the masses 5950MeV<m(J/ψDs+)<62505950{\mathrm{\ Me\kern-1.00006ptV}}<m(J/\psi D_{s}^{+})<6250 MeV corresponding to the region of the observed Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} signal is shown in Fig. 5.

Table 1: Parameters of the Bc+J/ψDs()+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{(*)+} signals obtained with the unbinned extended maximum-likelihood fit. The width parameter of the modified Gaussian function is fixed to the MC value. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. No acceptance corrections are applied to the signal yields.
Parameter Value
mBc+J/ψDs+m_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}} [MeV] 6279.96279.9±\;\pm\; 3.53.5
NBc+J/ψDs+N_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}} 3636±\;\pm\; 1010
NBc+J/ψDs+N_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}} 9595±\;\pm\; 2727
f±±f_{\pm\pm} 0.370.37±\;\pm\; 0.220.22
((a))
((b))
Figure 5: The projection of the likelihood fit on the variable |cosθ(μ+)||\cos\theta^{\prime}(\mu^{+})|, where the helicity angle θ(μ+)\theta^{\prime}(\mu^{+}) is the angle between the μ+\mu^{+} and Ds+D_{s}^{+} candidate momenta in the rest frame of the muon pair from J/ψJ/\psi decay, for the full selected J/ψDs+J/\psi D_{s}^{+} candidate dataset and a subset of the candidates in a mass range 5950MeV<m(J/ψDs+)<62505950{\mathrm{\ Me\kern-1.00006ptV}}<m(J/\psi D_{s}^{+})<6250 MeV corresponding to the observed signal of Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} decay. The red solid line represents the full fit projection. The contribution of the Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} decay is shown with the magenta long-dashed line (it is not drawn in because this contribution vanishes in that mass range); the brown dash-dot and green dotted lines show the Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} A00A_{00} and A±±A_{\pm\pm} component contributions, respectively; the blue dashed line shows the background model.

The statistical significance for the observed Bc+B_{c}^{+} signal estimated from toy MC studies is 4.9 standard deviations.

5 Bc+J/ψπ+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+} candidate reconstruction and fit

Bc+J/ψπ+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+} candidates are reconstructed by fitting a common vertex of a pion candidate track and the two muons from a J/ψJ/\psi candidate, selected as described in Sect. 3. For the pion candidate, tracks identified as muons are vetoed in order to suppress the substantial background from Bc+J/ψμ+νμXB_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\mu^{+}\nu_{\mu}X decays. The invariant mass of the two muons in the vertex fit is constrained to the J/ψJ/\psi nominal mass. The quality of the fit must satisfy χ2/ndf<3\chi^{2}/\mathrm{ndf}<3. The following selection requirements applied to the Bc+J/ψπ+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+} candidates are analogous to those for Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} candidates described in Sect. 3: the candidates must be within the kinematic range pT(Bc+)>15p_{\text{T}}(B_{c}^{+})>15 GeV, |η(Bc+)|<2.0|\eta(B_{c}^{+})|<2.0; the refitted values of the transverse momenta and pseudorapidities of the muons are required to satisfy pT(μ±)>3p_{\text{T}}(\mu^{\pm})>3 GeV, |η(μ±)|<2.3|\eta(\mu^{\pm})|<2.3; the same requirements on pointing to the primary vertex and the ratio pT(Bc+)/pT(trk)p_{\text{T}}(B_{c}^{+})/\sum p_{\text{T}}(\mathrm{trk}) are applied. The refitted pion track kinematics must satisfy pT(π+)>5p_{\text{T}}(\pi^{+})>5 GeV and |η(π+)|<2.5|\eta(\pi^{+})|<2.5. The transverse decay length is required to be Lxy(Bc+)>0.2L_{xy}(B_{c}^{+})>0.2 mm, and not to exceed 10 mm.

To further suppress combinatorial background, the following selection is applied:

  • cosθ(π)>0.8\cos\theta^{*}(\pi)>-0.8, where θ(π)\theta^{*}(\pi) is the angle between the pion momentum in the μ+μπ+\mu^{+}\mu^{-}\pi^{+} rest frame and the Bc+B_{c}^{+} candidate line of flight in laboratory frame. This angular variable behaviour for the signal and the background is the same as that of cosθ(Ds+)\cos\theta^{*}(D_{s}^{+}) used for J/ψDs+J/\psi D_{s}^{+} candidates selection.

  • |cosθ(μ+)|<0.8|\cos\theta^{\prime}(\mu^{+})|<0.8, where θ(μ+)\theta^{\prime}(\mu^{+}) is the angle between the μ+\mu^{+} and π+\pi^{+} momenta in the muon pair rest frame. The signal distribution follows a sin2θ(μ+)\sin^{2}\theta^{\prime}(\mu^{+}) shape, while the background is flat.

After applying the above-mentioned requirements, 38542 J/ψπ+J/\psi\pi^{+} candidates are selected in the mass range 5640–6760 MeV. Figure 6 shows the mass distribution of the selected candidates. An extended unbinned maximum-likelihood fit of the mass spectrum is performed to evaluate the Bc+J/ψπ+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+} signal yield. The signal contribution is described with the modified Gaussian function while an exponential function is used for the background. The Bc+B_{c}^{+} mass, mBc+J/ψπ+m_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}}, the width of the modified Gaussian function, σBc+J/ψπ+\sigma_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}}, the yields of the signal, NBc+J/ψπ+N_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}}, and the background, and the slope of the exponential background are free parameters of the fit. The fit results are summarised in Table 2, and the fit projection is also shown in Fig. 6. The extracted Bc+B_{c}^{+} mass value is consistent with the world average [22], and the signal peak width agrees with the simulation (37.4 MeV).

Table 2: Signal parameters of the J/ψπ+J/\psi\pi^{+} mass distribution obtained with the unbinned extended maximum-likelihood fit. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. No acceptance corrections are applied to the signal yields.
Parameter Value
mBc+J/ψπ+m_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}} [MeV] 6279.96279.9±\;\pm\; 3.93.9
σBc+J/ψπ+\sigma_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}} [MeV] 33.933.9±\;\pm\; 4.24.2
NBc+J/ψπ+N_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}} 11401140±\;\pm\; 120120
Figure 6: The mass distribution for the selected Bc+J/ψπ+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+} candidates. The red solid line represents the result of the fit to the model described in the text. The brown dotted and blue dashed lines show the signal and background component projections, respectively. The uncertainty of the shown signal yield is statistical only.

6 Branching fractions and polarisation measurement

The ratios of the branching fractions Ds+/π+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{+}/\pi^{+}} and Ds+/π+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/\pi^{+}} are calculated as

Ds()+/π+=Bc+J/ψDs()+Bc+J/ψπ+=1Ds+ϕ(K+K)π+×𝒜Bc+J/ψπ+𝒜Bc+J/ψDs()+×NBc+J/ψDs()+NBc+J/ψπ+,\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{(*)+}/\pi^{+}}=\frac{\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{(*)+}}}{\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}}}=\frac{1}{\mathcal{B}_{D_{s}^{+}\to\phi(K^{+}K^{-})\pi^{+}}}\times\frac{\mathcal{A}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}}}{\mathcal{A}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{(*)+}}}\times\frac{N_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{(*)+}}}{N_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}}}, (2)

where 𝒜Bc+X\mathcal{A}_{B_{c}^{+}\to X} and NBc+XN_{B_{c}^{+}\to X} are the total acceptance and the yield of the corresponding mode. For Ds+ϕ(K+K)π+\mathcal{B}_{D_{s}^{+}\to\phi(K^{+}K^{-})\pi^{+}}, the CLEO measurement [26] of the partial Ds+K+Kπ+D_{s}^{+}\to K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+} branching fractions, with a kaon-pair mass within various intervals around the nominal ϕ\phi meson mass, is used. An interpolation between the partial branching fractions, measured for ±5\pm 5 MeV and ±10\pm 10 MeV intervals, using a relativistic Breit–Wigner shape of the resonance yields the value (1.85±0.11)(1.85\pm 0.11)% for the ±7\pm 7 MeV interval which is used in the analysis. The effect of admixture of other Ds+D_{s}^{+} decay modes with (K+Kπ+)(K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}) final state which are not present in the MC simulation is studied separately and accounted for as a systematic uncertainty.

The acceptance for the Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} decay mode is different for the A±±A_{\pm\pm} and A00A_{00} components, thus the full acceptance for the mode is

𝒜Bc+J/ψDs+=(f±±𝒜Bc+J/ψDs+,A±±+1f±±𝒜Bc+J/ψDs+,A00)1,\mathcal{A}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}=\left(\frac{f_{\pm\pm}}{\mathcal{A}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+},A_{\pm\pm}}}+\frac{1-f_{\pm\pm}}{\mathcal{A}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+},A_{00}}}\right)^{-1}, (3)

where the subscripts indicate the helicity state and f±±f_{\pm\pm} is the value extracted from the fit (Table 1). The acceptances are determined from the simulation and shown in Table 3.

Table 3: The acceptance 𝒜Bc+X\mathcal{A}_{B_{c}^{+}\to X} for all decay modes studied. Only uncertainties due to MC statistics are shown.
Mode 𝒜Bc+X\mathcal{A}_{B_{c}^{+}\to X} [%]
Bc+J/ψπ+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+} 4.106±0.0564.106\pm 0.056
Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} 1.849±0.0341.849\pm 0.034
Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}, A00A_{00} 1.829±0.0531.829\pm 0.053
Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}, A±±A_{\pm\pm} 1.712±0.0351.712\pm 0.035

The ratio Ds+/Ds+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/D_{s}^{+}} is calculated as

Ds+/Ds+=Bc+J/ψDs+Bc+J/ψDs+=NBc+J/ψDs+NBc+J/ψDs+×𝒜Bc+J/ψDs+𝒜Bc+J/ψDs+,\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/D_{s}^{+}}=\frac{\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}}{\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}}}=\frac{N_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}}{N_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}}}\times\frac{\mathcal{A}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}}}{\mathcal{A}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}}, (4)

where the ratio of the yields NBc+J/ψDs+/NBc+J/ψDs+{N_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}}/{N_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}}} and its uncertainty is extracted from the fit as a parameter in order to account for correlations between the yields.

The fraction of the A±±A_{\pm\pm} component contribution in Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} decay is calculated from the f±±f_{\pm\pm} value quoted in Table 1 by applying a correction to account for the different acceptances for the two component contributions:

Γ±±/Γ=f±±×𝒜Bc+J/ψDs+𝒜Bc+J/ψDs+,𝒜±±.\Gamma_{\pm\pm}/\Gamma=f_{\pm\pm}\times\frac{\mathcal{A}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}}{\mathcal{A}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+},\mathcal{A}_{\pm\pm}}}. (5)

7 Systematic uncertainties

The systematic uncertainties of the measured values are determined by varying the analysis procedure and repeating all calculations. Although some sources can have rather large effects on the individual decay rate measurements, they largely cancel in the ratios of the branching fractions due to correlation between the effects on the different decay modes. The following groups of systematic uncertainties are considered.

The first group of sources of systematic uncertainty relates to possible differences between the data and simulation affecting the acceptances for the decay modes. Thus, an effect of the Bc+B_{c}^{+} production model is evaluated by varying the simulated pTp_{\text{T}} and |η||\eta| spectra while preserving agreement with the data distributions obtained using the abundant Bc+J/ψπ+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+} channel. These variations have very similar effects on the acceptances for the different decay modes, thus giving rather moderate estimates of the uncertainties, not exceeding 3% in total, on the ratios of branching fractions. The effect of presence of other Ds+D_{s}^{+} decay modes with (K+Kπ+)(K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}) final state on the calculated acceptances is studied with a separate MC simulation. Its conservative estimate yields 0.4% which is assigned as Ds+/π+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{+}/\pi^{+}} and Ds+/π+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/\pi^{+}} uncertainties. An uncertainty on the tracking efficiency is dominated by the uncertainty of the detector material description in the MC simulation. Samples generated with distorted geometries and with increased material are used to estimate the effect on track reconstruction efficiencies. When propagated to the ratios of branching fractions, these estimates give 0.5% uncertainty for Ds+/π+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{+}/\pi^{+}} and Ds+/π+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/\pi^{+}} due to the two extra tracks in Bc+J/ψDs()+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{(*)+} modes. Limited knowledge of the Bc+B_{c}^{+} and Ds+D_{s}^{+} lifetimes leads to an additional systematic uncertainty. The simulated proper decay times are varied within one standard deviation from the world average values [22] resulting in uncertainties of 1\sim 1% assigned to Ds+/π+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{+}/\pi^{+}} and Ds+/π+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/\pi^{+}} due to the Bc+B_{c}^{+} lifetime, and 0.3% due to the Ds+D_{s}^{+} lifetime. Removing the requirement on pT(Bc+)/pT(trk)p_{\text{T}}(B_{c}^{+})/\sum p_{\text{T}}(\mathrm{trk}) is found to produce no noticeable effect on the measured values.

The next group of uncertainties originates from the signal extraction procedure. These uncertainties are evaluated separately for J/ψDs+J/\psi D_{s}^{+} and J/ψπ+J/\psi\pi^{+} candidate fits. For the former, the following variations of the fit model are applied and the difference is treated as a systematic uncertainty:

  • different background mass shape parametrisations (three-parameter exponential, second- and third-order polynomials), different fitted mass range (reduced by up to 40 MeV from each side independently);

  • a double Gaussian or double-sided Crystal Ball function [27, 28, 29] for Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} signal description; variation of the modified Gaussian width within 10% of the MC simulation value;

  • variation of the smoothness of the Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} signal mass templates, which is controlled by a parameter of the kernel estimation procedure [25];

  • similar variation of the smoothness of the Bc+J/ψDs()+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{(*)+} signal angular templates;

  • variation of the smoothness of the sideband templates used for the background angular PDF construction; different ranges of the sidebands; different sideband interpolation procedure;

  • modelling of the correlation between the mass and angular parts of the signal PDFs. This correlation takes place only at the detector level and manifests itself in degradation of the mass resolution for higher values of |cosθ(μ+)||\cos\theta^{\prime}(\mu^{+})|. A dedicated fit model accounting for this effect is used for the data fit. The impact on the result is found to be negligible compared to the total uncertainty.

The first two items give the dominant contributions to the uncertainties of the ratios of branching fractions while the transverse polarisation fraction measurement is mostly affected by the background angular modelling variations. For the normalisation channel fit model, the similar variations of the background and signal mass shape parametrisation are applied. The deviations produced by the variations of the fits reach values as high as 10–15% thus making them the dominant sources of systematic uncertainty.

The branching fractions of Ds+D_{s}^{*+} [22] are varied in simulation within their uncertainties to estimate their effect on the measured quantities. Very small uncertainties are obtained for the Ds+/π+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/\pi^{+}} and Ds+/Ds+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/D_{s}^{+}}, while for Γ±±/Γ\Gamma_{\pm\pm}/\Gamma, the estimate is 1\sim 1%.

The statistical uncertainties on the acceptance values due to the MC sample sizes are also treated as a separate source of systematic uncertainty and estimated to be 2–3%.

In order to check for a possible bias from using three-muon triggers, vetoing the Ds+D_{s}^{+} meson daughter tracks identified as muons is tested and found not to affect the measurement.

Finally, since Ds+ϕ(K+K)π+\mathcal{B}_{D_{s}^{+}\to\phi(K^{+}K^{-})\pi^{+}} enters Eq. (2), its uncertainty, evaluated from Ref. [26] as 5.9%, is propagated to the final values of the relative branching fractions.

The systematic uncertainties on the measured quantities are summarised in Table 4.

Table 4: Relative systematic uncertainties on the measured ratios of branching fractions RDs+/π+R_{D_{s}^{+}/\pi^{+}}, RDs+/π+R_{D_{s}^{*+}/\pi^{+}}, RDs+/Ds+R_{D_{s}^{*+}/D_{s}^{+}} and on the transverse polarisation fraction Γ±±/Γ\Gamma_{\pm\pm}/\Gamma.
Source Uncertainty [%]
RDs+/π+R_{D_{s}^{+}/\pi^{+}} RDs+/π+R_{D_{s}^{*+}/\pi^{+}} RDs+/Ds+R_{D_{s}^{*+}/D_{s}^{+}} Γ±±/Γ\Gamma_{\pm\pm}/\Gamma
Simulated pT(Bc+)p_{\text{T}}(B_{c}^{+}) spectrum 0.40.4 0.90.9 0.50.5 0.40.4
Simulated |η(Bc+)||\eta(B_{c}^{+})| spectrum 1.91.9 2.42.4 0.60.6 0.20.2
Other Ds+D_{s}^{+} decay modes contribution 0.40.4 0.40.4
Tracking efficiency 0.50.5 0.50.5 <0.1<0.1 <0.1<0.1
Bc+B_{c}^{+} lifetime 1.21.2 1.31.3 <0.1<0.1 <0.1<0.1
Ds+D_{s}^{+} lifetime 0.30.3 0.30.3 <0.1<0.1 <0.1<0.1
Bc+J/ψDs()+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{(*)+} signal extraction 4.44.4 10.510.5 10.710.7 17.417.4
Bc+J/ψπ+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+} signal extraction 8.58.5 8.58.5
Ds+D_{s}^{*+} branching fractions <0.1<0.1 <0.1<0.1 <0.1<0.1 1.11.1
MC sample sizes 2.32.3 2.42.4 2.72.7 2.22.2
Total 10.110.1 14.014.0 11.011.0 17.617.6
Ds+ϕ(K+K)π+\mathcal{B}_{D_{s}^{+}\to\phi(K^{+}K^{-})\pi^{+}} 5.95.9 5.95.9

8 Results

The following ratios of the branching fractions are measured:

Ds+/π+=Bc+J/ψDs+Bc+J/ψπ+\displaystyle\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{+}/\pi^{+}}=\frac{\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}}}{\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}}} =3.8±1.1 (stat.)±0.4 (syst.)±0.2 (BF),\displaystyle=3.8\pm 1.1\mbox{$\;$(stat.)}\pm 0.4\mbox{$\;$(syst.)}\pm 0.2\mbox{$\;$(BF)}, (6)
Ds+/π+=Bc+J/ψDs+Bc+J/ψπ+\displaystyle\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/\pi^{+}}=\frac{\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}}{\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}}} =10.4±3.1 (stat.)±1.5 (syst.)±0.6 (BF),\displaystyle=10.4\pm 3.1\mbox{$\;$(stat.)}\pm 1.5\mbox{$\;$(syst.)}\pm 0.6\mbox{$\;$(BF)}, (7)
Ds+/Ds+=Bc+J/ψDs+Bc+J/ψDs+\displaystyle\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/D_{s}^{+}}=\frac{\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}}{\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}}} =2.80.8+1.2 (stat.)±0.3 (syst.),\displaystyle=2.8^{+1.2}_{-0.8}\mbox{$\;$(stat.)}\pm 0.3\mbox{$\;$(syst.)}, (8)

where the BF uncertainty corresponds to the knowledge of Ds+ϕ(K+K)π+\mathcal{B}_{D_{s}^{+}\to\phi(K^{+}K^{-})\pi^{+}}. The relative contribution of the A±±A_{\pm\pm} component in Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} decay is measured to be

Γ±±/Γ=0.38±0.23 (stat.)±0.07 (syst.)\Gamma_{\pm\pm}/\Gamma=0.38\pm 0.23\mbox{$\;$(stat.)}\pm 0.07\mbox{$\;$(syst.)} (9)

These results are compared with those of the LHCb measurement [10] and to the expectations from various theoretical calculations in Table 5 and Fig. 7. The measurement agrees with the LHCb result. All ratios are well described by the recent perturbative QCD predictions [8]. The expectations from models in Refs. [3, 5, 7] as well as the sum-rules prediction [4] for the ratio Ds+/Ds+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/D_{s}^{+}} are consistent with the measurement. The QCD relativistic potential model predictions [3] are consistent with the measured Ds+/π+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{+}/\pi^{+}} ratio while the expectations from the sum rules [4] and models in Refs. [5, 6, 7] are somewhat smaller than the measured value. The predictions in Refs. [3, 4, 5, 7] are also generally smaller than the measured ratio Ds+/π+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/\pi^{+}}; however, the discrepancies do not exceed two standard deviations when taking into account only the experimental uncertainty.

Table 5: Comparison of the results of this measurement with those of LHCb [10] and theoretical predictions based on a QCD relativistic potential model [3], QCD sum rules [4], relativistic constituent quark model (RCQM) [5], BSW relativistic quark model (with fixed average transverse quark momentum ω=0.40GeV\omega=0.40{\mathrm{\ Ge\kern-1.00006ptV}}) [6], light-front quark model (LFQM) [7], perturbative QCD (pQCD) [8], and relativistic independent quark model (RIQM) [9]. The uncertainties of the theoretical predictions are shown if they are explicitly quoted in the corresponding papers. Statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature are shown for the results of ATLAS and LHCb.
Ds+/π+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{+}/\pi^{+}} Ds+/π+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/\pi^{+}} Ds+/Ds+\mathcal{R}_{D_{s}^{*+}/D_{s}^{+}} Γ±±/Γ\Gamma_{\pm\pm}/\Gamma Ref.
3.8±1.23.8\pm 1.2 10.4±3.510.4\pm 3.5 2.80.9+1.22.8^{+1.2}_{-0.9} 0.38±0.240.38\pm 0.24 ATLAS
2.90±0.622.90\pm 0.62 2.37±0.572.37\pm 0.57 0.52±0.200.52\pm 0.20 LHCb [10]
2.62.6 4.54.5 1.71.7 QCD potential model [3]
1.31.3 5.25.2 3.93.9 QCD sum rules [4]
2.02.0 5.75.7 2.92.9 RCQM [5]
2.22.2 BSW [6]
2.06±0.862.06\pm 0.86 3.01±1.233.01\pm 1.23 LFQM [7]
3.450.17+0.493.45^{+0.49}_{-0.17} 2.540.21+0.072.54^{+0.07}_{-0.21} 0.48±0.040.48\pm 0.04 pQCD [8]
0.4100.410 RIQM [9]
Figure 7: Comparison of the results of this measurement with those of LHCb [10] and theoretical predictions based on a QCD relativistic potential model [3], QCD sum rules [4], relativistic constituent quark model (RCQM) [5], BSW relativistic quark model (with fixed average transverse quark momentum ω=0.40GeV\omega=0.40{\mathrm{\ Ge\kern-1.00006ptV}}) [6], light-front quark model (LFQM) [7], perturbative QCD (pQCD) [8], and relativistic independent quark model (RIQM) [9]. The uncertainties of the theoretical predictions are shown if they are explicitly quoted in the corresponding papers. Statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature are quoted for the results of ATLAS and LHCb.

The measured fraction of the A±±A_{\pm\pm} component agrees well with the prediction of the relativistic independent quark model [9] and perturbative QCD [8].

9 Conclusion

A study of Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+} and Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} decays has been performed. The ratios of the branching fractions Bc+J/ψDs+/Bc+J/ψπ+\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}}/\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}}, Bc+J/ψDs+/Bc+J/ψπ+\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}/\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi\pi^{+}}, Bc+J/ψDs+/Bc+J/ψDs+\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+}}/\mathcal{B}_{B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{+}} and the transverse polarisation fraction of Bc+J/ψDs+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} decay have been measured by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC using pppp collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 4.9 fb-1 at 7 TeV centre-of-mass energy and 20.6 fb-1 at 8 TeV. The polarisation is found to be well described by the available theoretical approaches. The measured ratios of the branching fraction are generally described by perturbative QCD, sum rules, and relativistic quark models. There is an indication of underestimation of the decay rates for the Bc+J/ψDs()+B_{c}^{+}\to J/\psi D_{s}^{(*)+} decays by some models, although the discrepancies do not exceed two standard deviations when taking into account only the experimental uncertainty. The measurement results agree with those published by the LHCb experiment.

Acknowledgements

We thank CERN for the very successful operation of the LHC, as well as the support staff from our institutions without whom ATLAS could not be operated efficiently.

We acknowledge the support of ANPCyT, Argentina; YerPhI, Armenia; ARC, Australia; BMWFW and FWF, Austria; ANAS, Azerbaijan; SSTC, Belarus; CNPq and FAPESP, Brazil; NSERC, NRC and CFI, Canada; CERN; CONICYT, Chile; CAS, MOST and NSFC, China; COLCIENCIAS, Colombia; MSMT CR, MPO CR and VSC CR, Czech Republic; DNRF, DNSRC and Lundbeck Foundation, Denmark; EPLANET, ERC and NSRF, European Union; IN2P3-CNRS, CEA-DSM/IRFU, France; GNSF, Georgia; BMBF, DFG, HGF, MPG and AvH Foundation, Germany; GSRT and NSRF, Greece; RGC, Hong Kong SAR, China; ISF, MINERVA, GIF, I-CORE and Benoziyo Center, Israel; INFN, Italy; MEXT and JSPS, Japan; CNRST, Morocco; FOM and NWO, Netherlands; BRF and RCN, Norway; MNiSW and NCN, Poland; GRICES and FCT, Portugal; MNE/IFA, Romania; MES of Russia and NRC KI, Russian Federation; JINR; MSTD, Serbia; MSSR, Slovakia; ARRS and MIZŠ, Slovenia; DST/NRF, South Africa; MINECO, Spain; SRC and Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden; SER, SNSF and Cantons of Bern and Geneva, Switzerland; NSC, Taiwan; TAEK, Turkey; STFC, the Royal Society and Leverhulme Trust, United Kingdom; DOE and NSF, United States of America.

The crucial computing support from all WLCG partners is acknowledged gratefully, in particular from CERN and the ATLAS Tier-1 facilities at TRIUMF (Canada), NDGF (Denmark, Norway, Sweden), CC-IN2P3 (France), KIT/GridKA (Germany), INFN-CNAF (Italy), NL-T1 (Netherlands), PIC (Spain), ASGC (Taiwan), RAL (UK) and BNL (USA) and in the Tier-2 facilities worldwide.

References

  • [1] CDF and F. Abe “Observation of the BcB_{c} meson in pp¯p\bar{p} collisions at s=1.8\sqrt{s}=1.8 TeV” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1998, pp. 2432–2437 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2432
  • [2] ATLAS “Observation of an Excited Bc±B_{c}^{±} Meson State with the ATLAS Detector” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 2014, pp. 212004 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.212004
  • [3] Pietro Colangelo and Fulvia De “Using heavy quark spin symmetry in semileptonic BcB_{c} decays” In Phys. Rev. D 61, 2000, pp. 034012 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.034012
  • [4] V.V. Kiselev “Exclusive decays and lifetime of BcB_{c} meson in QCD sum rules”, 2002 arXiv:hep-ph/0211021 [hep-ph]
  • [5] Mikhail Ivanov, Jurgen Korner and Pietro Santorelli “Exclusive semileptonic and nonleptonic decays of the BcB_{c} meson” In Phys. Rev. D 73, 2006, pp. 054024 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.054024
  • [6] Rohit Dhir and R.C. Verma BcB_{c} Meson Form-factors and BcPVB_{c}\to PV Decays Involving Flavor Dependence of Transverse Quark Momentum” In Phys. Rev. D 79, 2009, pp. 034004 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.034004
  • [7] Hong-Wei Ke, Tan Liu and Xue-Qian Li “Transitions of Bcψ(1S,2S)B_{c}\rightarrow\psi(1S,2S) and the modified harmonic oscillator wave function in LFQM” In Phys. Rev. D 89, 2014, pp. 017501 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.017501
  • [8] Zhou Rui and Zhi-Tian Zou “S-wave ground state charmonium decays of BcB_{c} mesons in the perturbative QCD approach” In Phys. Rev. D 90, 2014, pp. 114030 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.114030
  • [9] Susmita Kar et al. “Nonleptonic BcVVB_{c}\to VV decays” In Phys. Rev. D 88, 2013, pp. 094014 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.094014
  • [10] LHCb and R Aaij “Observation of Bc+J/ψDs+B^{+}_{c}\rightarrow J/\psi D_{s}^{+} and Bc+J/ψDs+B^{+}_{c}\rightarrow J/\psi D_{s}^{*+} decays” In Phys. Rev. D 87, 2013, pp. 112012 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.112012
  • [11] ATLAS “The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider” In JINST 3, 2008, pp. S08003 DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08003
  • [12] Torbjorn Sjostrand, Stephen Mrenna and Peter Skands “PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual” In JHEP 0605, 2006, pp. 026 DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026
  • [13] A.V. Berezhnoy, A.K. Likhoded and O.P. Yushchenko “Some features of the hadronic Bc()B_{c}^{(*)} meson production at large pTp_{T} In Phys. Atom. Nucl. 59, 1996, pp. 709–713 arXiv:hep-ph/9504302 [hep-ph]
  • [14] A.V. Berezhnoy, V.V. Kiselev and A.K. Likhoded “Hadronic production of SS- and PP-wave states of b¯c\bar{b}c-quarkonium” In Z. Phys. A 356, 1996, pp. 79–87 DOI: 10.1007/s002180050151
  • [15] A.V. Berezhnoy, V.V. Kiselev, A.K. Likhoded and A.I. Onishchenko BcB_{c} meson at LHC” In Phys. Atom. Nucl. 60, 1997, pp. 1729–1740 arXiv:hep-ph/9703341 [hep-ph]
  • [16] A.V. Berezhnoy “Color flows for the process ggBc+c+b¯gg\to B_{c}+c+\bar{b} In Phys. Atom. Nucl. 68, 2005, pp. 1866–1872 DOI: 10.1134/1.2131116
  • [17] D.J. Lange “The EvtGen particle decay simulation package” In Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 462, 2001, pp. 152–155 DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00089-4
  • [18] ATLAS “The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure” In Eur. Phys. J. C 70, 2010, pp. 823–874 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1429-9
  • [19] GEANT4 and S. Agostinelli “GEANT4: A Simulation toolkit” In Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 2003, pp. 250–303 DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8
  • [20] John Allison et al. “Geant4 developments and applications” In IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 2006, pp. 270 DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2006.869826
  • [21] V. Kostyukhin “VKalVrt - package for vertex reconstruction in ATLAS”, ATL-PHYS-2003-031, 2003 URL: http://cds.cern.ch/record/685551
  • [22] K…(Particle) “Review of Particle Physics” In Chin. Phys. C 38, 2014, pp. 090001 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/9/090001
  • [23] ZEUS and S. Chekanov “Measurement of inelastic J/ψJ/\psi production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA” In Eur. Phys. J. C 44, 2005, pp. 13–25 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s2005-02346-2
  • [24] Georges Aad “Measurement of the b-hadron production cross section using decays to DµXD^{*}µ^{-}X final states in pppp collisions at s=7\sqrt{s}=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector” In Nucl. Phys. B 864, 2012, pp. 341–381 DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.07.009
  • [25] Kyle Cranmer “Kernel estimation in high-energy physics” In Comput. Phys. Commun. 136, 2001, pp. 198–207 DOI: 10.1016/S0010-4655(00)00243-5
  • [26] CLEO and J.P. Alexander “Absolute Measurement of Hadronic Branching Fractions of the D(s)+ Meson” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 2008, pp. 161804 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.161804
  • [27] M. Oreglia “A Study of the Reactions ψγγψ\psi^{\prime}\to\gamma\gamma\psi”, PhD thesis, SLAC-R-236, 1980 URL: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/pubs/slacreports/slac-r-236.html
  • [28] J. Gaiser “Charmonium Spectroscopy From Radiative Decays of the J/ψJ/\psi and ψ\psi^{\prime}”, PhD thesis, SLAC-R-255, 1982 URL: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/pubs/slacreports/slac-r-255.html
  • [29] Tomasz Skwarnicki “A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Υ\Upsilon^{\prime} and Υ\Upsilon resonances”, PhD thesis, DESY-F31-86-02, 1986 URL: http://inspirehep.net/record/230779/

The ATLAS Collaboration

G. Aad85, B. Abbott113, J. Abdallah151, O. Abdinov11, R. Aben107, M. Abolins90, O.S. AbouZeid158, H. Abramowicz153, H. Abreu152, R. Abreu30, Y. Abulaiti146a,146b, B.S. Acharya164a,164b,a, L. Adamczyk38a, D.L. Adams25, J. Adelman108, S. Adomeit100, T. Adye131, A.A. Affolder74, T. Agatonovic-Jovin13, J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra126a,126f, S.P. Ahlen22, F. Ahmadov65,b, G. Aielli133a,133b, H. Akerstedt146a,146b, T.P.A. Åkesson81, G. Akimoto155, A.V. Akimov96, G.L. Alberghi20a,20b, J. Albert169, S. Albrand55, M.J. Alconada Verzini71, M. Aleksa30, I.N. Aleksandrov65, C. Alexa26a, G. Alexander153, T. Alexopoulos10, M. Alhroob113, G. Alimonti91a, L. Alio85, J. Alison31, S.P. Alkire35, B.M.M. Allbrooke18, P.P. Allport74, A. Aloisio104a,104b, A. Alonso36, F. Alonso71, C. Alpigiani76, A. Altheimer35, B. Alvarez Gonzalez30, D. Álvarez Piqueras167, M.G. Alviggi104a,104b, B.T. Amadio15, K. Amako66, Y. Amaral Coutinho24a, C. Amelung23, D. Amidei89, S.P. Amor Dos Santos126a,126c, A. Amorim126a,126b, S. Amoroso48, N. Amram153, G. Amundsen23, C. Anastopoulos139, L.S. Ancu49, N. Andari30, T. Andeen35, C.F. Anders58b, G. Anders30, J.K. Anders74, K.J. Anderson31, A. Andreazza91a,91b, V. Andrei58a, S. Angelidakis9, I. Angelozzi107, P. Anger44, A. Angerami35, F. Anghinolfi30, A.V. Anisenkov109,c, N. Anjos12, A. Annovi124a,124b, M. Antonelli47, A. Antonov98, J. Antos144b, F. Anulli132a, M. Aoki66, L. Aperio Bella18, G. Arabidze90, Y. Arai66, J.P. Araque126a, A.T.H. Arce45, F.A. Arduh71, J-F. Arguin95, S. Argyropoulos42, M. Arik19a, A.J. Armbruster30, O. Arnaez30, V. Arnal82, H. Arnold48, M. Arratia28, O. Arslan21, A. Artamonov97, G. Artoni23, S. Asai155, N. Asbah42, A. Ashkenazi153, B. Åsman146a,146b, L. Asquith149, K. Assamagan25, R. Astalos144a, M. Atkinson165, N.B. Atlay141, B. Auerbach6, K. Augsten128, M. Aurousseau145b, G. Avolio30, B. Axen15, M.K. Ayoub117, G. Azuelos95,d, M.A. Baak30, A.E. Baas58a, C. Bacci134a,134b, H. Bachacou136, K. Bachas154, M. Backes30, M. Backhaus30, P. Bagiacchi132a,132b, P. Bagnaia132a,132b, Y. Bai33a, T. Bain35, J.T. Baines131, O.K. Baker176, P. Balek129, T. Balestri148, F. Balli84, E. Banas39, Sw. Banerjee173, A.A.E. Bannoura175, H.S. Bansil18, L. Barak30, E.L. Barberio88, D. Barberis50a,50b, M. Barbero85, T. Barillari101, M. Barisonzi164a,164b, T. Barklow143, N. Barlow28, S.L. Barnes84, B.M. Barnett131, R.M. Barnett15, Z. Barnovska5, A. Baroncelli134a, G. Barone49, A.J. Barr120, F. Barreiro82, J. Barreiro Guimarães da Costa57, R. Bartoldus143, A.E. Barton72, P. Bartos144a, A. Basalaev123, A. Bassalat117, A. Basye165, R.L. Bates53, S.J. Batista158, J.R. Batley28, M. Battaglia137, M. Bauce132a,132b, F. Bauer136, H.S. Bawa143,e, J.B. Beacham111, M.D. Beattie72, T. Beau80, P.H. Beauchemin161, R. Beccherle124a,124b, P. Bechtle21, H.P. Beck17,f, K. Becker120, M. Becker83, S. Becker100, M. Beckingham170, C. Becot117, A.J. Beddall19b, A. Beddall19b, V.A. Bednyakov65, C.P. Bee148, L.J. Beemster107, T.A. Beermann175, M. Begel25, J.K. Behr120, C. Belanger-Champagne87, W.H. Bell49, G. Bella153, L. Bellagamba20a, A. Bellerive29, M. Bellomo86, K. Belotskiy98, O. Beltramello30, O. Benary153, D. Benchekroun135a, M. Bender100, K. Bendtz146a,146b, N. Benekos10, Y. Benhammou153, E. Benhar Noccioli49, J.A. Benitez Garcia159b, D.P. Benjamin45, J.R. Bensinger23, S. Bentvelsen107, L. Beresford120, M. Beretta47, D. Berge107, E. Bergeaas Kuutmann166, N. Berger5, F. Berghaus169, J. Beringer15, C. Bernard22, N.R. Bernard86, C. Bernius110, F.U. Bernlochner21, T. Berry77, P. Berta129, C. Bertella83, G. Bertoli146a,146b, F. Bertolucci124a,124b, C. Bertsche113, D. Bertsche113, M.I. Besana91a, G.J. Besjes106, O. Bessidskaia Bylund146a,146b, M. Bessner42, N. Besson136, C. Betancourt48, S. Bethke101, A.J. Bevan76, W. Bhimji46, R.M. Bianchi125, L. Bianchini23, M. Bianco30, O. Biebel100, S.P. Bieniek78, M. Biglietti134a, J. Bilbao De Mendizabal49, H. Bilokon47, M. Bindi54, S. Binet117, A. Bingul19b, C. Bini132a,132b, C.W. Black150, J.E. Black143, K.M. Black22, D. Blackburn138, R.E. Blair6, J.-B. Blanchard136, J.E. Blanco77, T. Blazek144a, I. Bloch42, C. Blocker23, W. Blum83,∗, U. Blumenschein54, G.J. Bobbink107, V.S. Bobrovnikov109,c, S.S. Bocchetta81, A. Bocci45, C. Bock100, M. Boehler48, J.A. Bogaerts30, D. Bogavac13, A.G. Bogdanchikov109, C. Bohm146a, V. Boisvert77, T. Bold38a, V. Boldea26a, A.S. Boldyrev99, M. Bomben80, M. Bona76, M. Boonekamp136, A. Borisov130, G. Borissov72, S. Borroni42, J. Bortfeldt100, V. Bortolotto60a,60b,60c, K. Bos107, D. Boscherini20a, M. Bosman12, J. Boudreau125, J. Bouffard2, E.V. Bouhova-Thacker72, D. Boumediene34, C. Bourdarios117, N. Bousson114, A. Boveia30, J. Boyd30, I.R. Boyko65, I. Bozic13, J. Bracinik18, A. Brandt8, G. Brandt54, O. Brandt58a, U. Bratzler156, B. Brau86, J.E. Brau116, H.M. Braun175,∗, S.F. Brazzale164a,164c, W.D. Breaden Madden53, K. Brendlinger122, A.J. Brennan88, L. Brenner107, R. Brenner166, S. Bressler172, K. Bristow145c, T.M. Bristow46, D. Britton53, D. Britzger42, F.M. Brochu28, I. Brock21, R. Brock90, J. Bronner101, G. Brooijmans35, T. Brooks77, W.K. Brooks32b, J. Brosamer15, E. Brost116, J. Brown55, P.A. Bruckman de Renstrom39, D. Bruncko144b, R. Bruneliere48, A. Bruni20a, G. Bruni20a, M. Bruschi20a, N. Bruscino21, L. Bryngemark81, T. Buanes14, Q. Buat142, P. Buchholz141, A.G. Buckley53, S.I. Buda26a, I.A. Budagov65, F. Buehrer48, L. Bugge119, M.K. Bugge119, O. Bulekov98, D. Bullock8, H. Burckhart30, S. Burdin74, B. Burghgrave108, S. Burke131, I. Burmeister43, E. Busato34, D. Büscher48, V. Büscher83, P. Bussey53, J.M. Butler22, A.I. Butt3, C.M. Buttar53, J.M. Butterworth78, P. Butti107, W. Buttinger25, A. Buzatu53, A.R. Buzykaev109,c, S. Cabrera Urbán167, D. Caforio128, V.M. Cairo37a,37b, O. Cakir4a, P. Calafiura15, A. Calandri136, G. Calderini80, P. Calfayan100, L.P. Caloba24a, D. Calvet34, S. Calvet34, R. Camacho Toro31, S. Camarda42, P. Camarri133a,133b, D. Cameron119, L.M. Caminada15, R. Caminal Armadans165, S. Campana30, M. Campanelli78, A. Campoverde148, V. Canale104a,104b, A. Canepa159a, M. Cano Bret76, J. Cantero82, R. Cantrill126a, T. Cao40, M.D.M. Capeans Garrido30, I. Caprini26a, M. Caprini26a, M. Capua37a,37b, R. Caputo83, R. Cardarelli133a, F. Cardillo48, T. Carli30, G. Carlino104a, L. Carminati91a,91b, S. Caron106, E. Carquin32a, G.D. Carrillo-Montoya8, J.R. Carter28, J. Carvalho126a,126c, D. Casadei78, M.P. Casado12, M. Casolino12, E. Castaneda-Miranda145b, A. Castelli107, V. Castillo Gimenez167, N.F. Castro126a,g, P. Catastini57, A. Catinaccio30, J.R. Catmore119, A. Cattai30, J. Caudron83, V. Cavaliere165, D. Cavalli91a, M. Cavalli-Sforza12, V. Cavasinni124a,124b, F. Ceradini134a,134b, B.C. Cerio45, K. Cerny129, A.S. Cerqueira24b, A. Cerri149, L. Cerrito76, F. Cerutti15, M. Cerv30, A. Cervelli17, S.A. Cetin19c, A. Chafaq135a, D. Chakraborty108, I. Chalupkova129, P. Chang165, B. Chapleau87, J.D. Chapman28, D.G. Charlton18, C.C. Chau158, C.A. Chavez Barajas149, S. Cheatham152, A. Chegwidden90, S. Chekanov6, S.V. Chekulaev159a, G.A. Chelkov65,h, M.A. Chelstowska89, C. Chen64, H. Chen25, K. Chen148, L. Chen33d,i, S. Chen33c, X. Chen33f, Y. Chen67, H.C. Cheng89, Y. Cheng31, A. Cheplakov65, E. Cheremushkina130, R. Cherkaoui El Moursli135e, V. Chernyatin25,∗, E. Cheu7, L. Chevalier136, V. Chiarella47, J.T. Childers6, G. Chiodini73a, A.S. Chisholm18, R.T. Chislett78, A. Chitan26a, M.V. Chizhov65, K. Choi61, S. Chouridou9, B.K.B. Chow100, V. Christodoulou78, D. Chromek-Burckhart30, J. Chudoba127, A.J. Chuinard87, J.J. Chwastowski39, L. Chytka115, G. Ciapetti132a,132b, A.K. Ciftci4a, D. Cinca53, V. Cindro75, I.A. Cioara21, A. Ciocio15, Z.H. Citron172, M. Ciubancan26a, A. Clark49, B.L. Clark57, P.J. Clark46, R.N. Clarke15, W. Cleland125, C. Clement146a,146b, Y. Coadou85, M. Cobal164a,164c, A. Coccaro138, J. Cochran64, L. Coffey23, J.G. Cogan143, B. Cole35, S. Cole108, A.P. Colijn107, J. Collot55, T. Colombo58c, G. Compostella101, P. Conde Muiño126a,126b, E. Coniavitis48, S.H. Connell145b, I.A. Connelly77, S.M. Consonni91a,91b, V. Consorti48, S. Constantinescu26a, C. Conta121a,121b, G. Conti30, F. Conventi104a,j, M. Cooke15, B.D. Cooper78, A.M. Cooper-Sarkar120, T. Cornelissen175, M. Corradi20a, F. Corriveau87,k, A. Corso-Radu163, A. Cortes-Gonzalez12, G. Cortiana101, G. Costa91a, M.J. Costa167, D. Costanzo139, D. Côté8, G. Cottin28, G. Cowan77, B.E. Cox84, K. Cranmer110, G. Cree29, S. Crépé-Renaudin55, F. Crescioli80, W.A. Cribbs146a,146b, M. Crispin Ortuzar120, M. Cristinziani21, V. Croft106, G. Crosetti37a,37b, T. Cuhadar Donszelmann139, J. Cummings176, M. Curatolo47, C. Cuthbert150, H. Czirr141, P. Czodrowski3, S. D’Auria53, M. D’Onofrio74, M.J. Da Cunha Sargedas De Sousa126a,126b, C. Da Via84, W. Dabrowski38a, A. Dafinca120, T. Dai89, O. Dale14, F. Dallaire95, C. Dallapiccola86, M. Dam36, J.R. Dandoy31, N.P. Dang48, A.C. Daniells18, M. Danninger168, M. Dano Hoffmann136, V. Dao48, G. Darbo50a, S. Darmora8, J. Dassoulas3, A. Dattagupta61, W. Davey21, C. David169, T. Davidek129, E. Davies120,l, M. Davies153, P. Davison78, Y. Davygora58a, E. Dawe88, I. Dawson139, R.K. Daya-Ishmukhametova86, K. De8, R. de Asmundis104a, S. De Castro20a,20b, S. De Cecco80, N. De Groot106, P. de Jong107, H. De la Torre82, F. De Lorenzi64, L. De Nooij107, D. De Pedis132a, A. De Salvo132a, U. De Sanctis149, A. De Santo149, J.B. De Vivie De Regie117, W.J. Dearnaley72, R. Debbe25, C. Debenedetti137, D.V. Dedovich65, I. Deigaard107, J. Del Peso82, T. Del Prete124a,124b, D. Delgove117, F. Deliot136, C.M. Delitzsch49, M. Deliyergiyev75, A. Dell’Acqua30, L. Dell’Asta22, M. Dell’Orso124a,124b, M. Della Pietra104a,j, D. della Volpe49, M. Delmastro5, P.A. Delsart55, C. Deluca107, D.A. DeMarco158, S. Demers176, M. Demichev65, A. Demilly80, S.P. Denisov130, D. Derendarz39, J.E. Derkaoui135d, F. Derue80, P. Dervan74, K. Desch21, C. Deterre42, P.O. Deviveiros30, A. Dewhurst131, S. Dhaliwal23, A. Di Ciaccio133a,133b, L. Di Ciaccio5, A. Di Domenico132a,132b, C. Di Donato104a,104b, A. Di Girolamo30, B. Di Girolamo30, A. Di Mattia152, B. Di Micco134a,134b, R. Di Nardo47, A. Di Simone48, R. Di Sipio158, D. Di Valentino29, C. Diaconu85, M. Diamond158, F.A. Dias46, M.A. Diaz32a, E.B. Diehl89, J. Dietrich16, S. Diglio85, A. Dimitrievska13, J. Dingfelder21, P. Dita26a, S. Dita26a, F. Dittus30, F. Djama85, T. Djobava51b, J.I. Djuvsland58a, M.A.B. do Vale24c, D. Dobos30, M. Dobre26a, C. Doglioni49, T. Dohmae155, J. Dolejsi129, Z. Dolezal129, B.A. Dolgoshein98,∗, M. Donadelli24d, S. Donati124a,124b, P. Dondero121a,121b, J. Donini34, J. Dopke131, A. Doria104a, M.T. Dova71, A.T. Doyle53, E. Drechsler54, M. Dris10, E. Dubreuil34, E. Duchovni172, G. Duckeck100, O.A. Ducu26a,85, D. Duda175, A. Dudarev30, L. Duflot117, L. Duguid77, M. Dührssen30, M. Dunford58a, H. Duran Yildiz4a, M. Düren52, A. Durglishvili51b, D. Duschinger44, M. Dyndal38a, C. Eckardt42, K.M. Ecker101, R.C. Edgar89, W. Edson2, N.C. Edwards46, W. Ehrenfeld21, T. Eifert30, G. Eigen14, K. Einsweiler15, T. Ekelof166, M. El Kacimi135c, M. Ellert166, S. Elles5, F. Ellinghaus83, A.A. Elliot169, N. Ellis30, J. Elmsheuser100, M. Elsing30, D. Emeliyanov131, Y. Enari155, O.C. Endner83, M. Endo118, J. Erdmann43, A. Ereditato17, G. Ernis175, J. Ernst2, M. Ernst25, S. Errede165, E. Ertel83, M. Escalier117, H. Esch43, C. Escobar125, B. Esposito47, A.I. Etienvre136, E. Etzion153, H. Evans61, A. Ezhilov123, L. Fabbri20a,20b, G. Facini31, R.M. Fakhrutdinov130, S. Falciano132a, R.J. Falla78, J. Faltova129, Y. Fang33a, M. Fanti91a,91b, A. Farbin8, A. Farilla134a, T. Farooque12, S. Farrell15, S.M. Farrington170, P. Farthouat30, F. Fassi135e, P. Fassnacht30, D. Fassouliotis9, M. Faucci Giannelli77, A. Favareto50a,50b, L. Fayard117, P. Federic144a, O.L. Fedin123,m, W. Fedorko168, S. Feigl30, L. Feligioni85, C. Feng33d, E.J. Feng6, H. Feng89, A.B. Fenyuk130, L. Feremenga8, P. Fernandez Martinez167, S. Fernandez Perez30, J. Ferrando53, A. Ferrari166, P. Ferrari107, R. Ferrari121a, D.E. Ferreira de Lima53, A. Ferrer167, D. Ferrere49, C. Ferretti89, A. Ferretto Parodi50a,50b, M. Fiascaris31, F. Fiedler83, A. Filipčič75, M. Filipuzzi42, F. Filthaut106, M. Fincke-Keeler169, K.D. Finelli150, M.C.N. Fiolhais126a,126c, L. Fiorini167, A. Firan40, A. Fischer2, C. Fischer12, J. Fischer175, W.C. Fisher90, E.A. Fitzgerald23, I. Fleck141, P. Fleischmann89, S. Fleischmann175, G.T. Fletcher139, G. Fletcher76, R.R.M. Fletcher122, T. Flick175, A. Floderus81, L.R. Flores Castillo60a, M.J. Flowerdew101, A. Formica136, A. Forti84, D. Fournier117, H. Fox72, S. Fracchia12, P. Francavilla80, M. Franchini20a,20b, D. Francis30, L. Franconi119, M. Franklin57, M. Frate163, M. Fraternali121a,121b, D. Freeborn78, S.T. French28, F. Friedrich44, D. Froidevaux30, J.A. Frost120, C. Fukunaga156, E. Fullana Torregrosa83, B.G. Fulsom143, J. Fuster167, C. Gabaldon55, O. Gabizon175, A. Gabrielli20a,20b, A. Gabrielli132a,132b, S. Gadatsch107, S. Gadomski49, G. Gagliardi50a,50b, P. Gagnon61, C. Galea106, B. Galhardo126a,126c, E.J. Gallas120, B.J. Gallop131, P. Gallus128, G. Galster36, K.K. Gan111, J. Gao33b,85, Y. Gao46, Y.S. Gao143,e, F.M. Garay Walls46, F. Garberson176, C. García167, J.E. García Navarro167, M. Garcia-Sciveres15, R.W. Gardner31, N. Garelli143, V. Garonne119, C. Gatti47, A. Gaudiello50a,50b, G. Gaudio121a, B. Gaur141, L. Gauthier95, P. Gauzzi132a,132b, I.L. Gavrilenko96, C. Gay168, G. Gaycken21, E.N. Gazis10, P. Ge33d, Z. Gecse168, C.N.P. Gee131, D.A.A. Geerts107, Ch. Geich-Gimbel21, M.P. Geisler58a, C. Gemme50a, M.H. Genest55, S. Gentile132a,132b, M. George54, S. George77, D. Gerbaudo163, A. Gershon153, H. Ghazlane135b, B. Giacobbe20a, S. Giagu132a,132b, V. Giangiobbe12, P. Giannetti124a,124b, B. Gibbard25, S.M. Gibson77, M. Gilchriese15, T.P.S. Gillam28, D. Gillberg30, G. Gilles34, D.M. Gingrich3,d, N. Giokaris9, M.P. Giordani164a,164c, F.M. Giorgi20a, F.M. Giorgi16, P.F. Giraud136, P. Giromini47, D. Giugni91a, C. Giuliani48, M. Giulini58b, B.K. Gjelsten119, S. Gkaitatzis154, I. Gkialas154, E.L. Gkougkousis117, L.K. Gladilin99, C. Glasman82, J. Glatzer30, P.C.F. Glaysher46, A. Glazov42, M. Goblirsch-Kolb101, J.R. Goddard76, J. Godlewski39, S. Goldfarb89, T. Golling49, D. Golubkov130, A. Gomes126a,126b,126d, R. Gonçalo126a, J. Goncalves Pinto Firmino Da Costa136, L. Gonella21, S. González de la Hoz167, G. Gonzalez Parra12, S. Gonzalez-Sevilla49, L. Goossens30, P.A. Gorbounov97, H.A. Gordon25, I. Gorelov105, B. Gorini30, E. Gorini73a,73b, A. Gorišek75, E. Gornicki39, A.T. Goshaw45, C. Gössling43, M.I. Gostkin65, D. Goujdami135c, A.G. Goussiou138, N. Govender145b, E. Gozani152, H.M.X. Grabas137, L. Graber54, I. Grabowska-Bold38a, P. Grafström20a,20b, K-J. Grahn42, J. Gramling49, E. Gramstad119, S. Grancagnolo16, V. Grassi148, V. Gratchev123, H.M. Gray30, E. Graziani134a, Z.D. Greenwood79,n, K. Gregersen78, I.M. Gregor42, P. Grenier143, J. Griffiths8, A.A. Grillo137, K. Grimm72, S. Grinstein12,o, Ph. Gris34, J.-F. Grivaz117, J.P. Grohs44, A. Grohsjean42, E. Gross172, J. Grosse-Knetter54, G.C. Grossi79, Z.J. Grout149, L. Guan33b, J. Guenther128, F. Guescini49, D. Guest176, O. Gueta153, E. Guido50a,50b, T. Guillemin117, S. Guindon2, U. Gul53, C. Gumpert44, J. Guo33e, S. Gupta120, G. Gustavino132a,132b, P. Gutierrez113, N.G. Gutierrez Ortiz53, C. Gutschow44, C. Guyot136, C. Gwenlan120, C.B. Gwilliam74, A. Haas110, C. Haber15, H.K. Hadavand8, N. Haddad135e, P. Haefner21, S. Hageböck21, Z. Hajduk39, H. Hakobyan177, M. Haleem42, J. Haley114, D. Hall120, G. Halladjian90, G.D. Hallewell85, K. Hamacher175, P. Hamal115, K. Hamano169, M. Hamer54, A. Hamilton145a, G.N. Hamity145c, P.G. Hamnett42, L. Han33b, K. Hanagaki118, K. Hanawa155, M. Hance15, P. Hanke58a, R. Hanna136, J.B. Hansen36, J.D. Hansen36, M.C. Hansen21, P.H. Hansen36, K. Hara160, A.S. Hard173, T. Harenberg175, F. Hariri117, S. Harkusha92, R.D. Harrington46, P.F. Harrison170, F. Hartjes107, M. Hasegawa67, S. Hasegawa103, Y. Hasegawa140, A. Hasib113, S. Hassani136, S. Haug17, R. Hauser90, L. Hauswald44, M. Havranek127, C.M. Hawkes18, R.J. Hawkings30, A.D. Hawkins81, T. Hayashi160, D. Hayden90, C.P. Hays120, J.M. Hays76, H.S. Hayward74, S.J. Haywood131, S.J. Head18, T. Heck83, V. Hedberg81, L. Heelan8, S. Heim122, T. Heim175, B. Heinemann15, L. Heinrich110, J. Hejbal127, L. Helary22, S. Hellman146a,146b, D. Hellmich21, C. Helsens30, J. Henderson120, R.C.W. Henderson72, Y. Heng173, C. Hengler42, A. Henrichs176, A.M. Henriques Correia30, S. Henrot-Versille117, G.H. Herbert16, Y. Hernández Jiménez167, R. Herrberg-Schubert16, G. Herten48, R. Hertenberger100, L. Hervas30, G.G. Hesketh78, N.P. Hessey107, J.W. Hetherly40, R. Hickling76, E. Higón-Rodriguez167, E. Hill169, J.C. Hill28, K.H. Hiller42, S.J. Hillier18, I. Hinchliffe15, E. Hines122, R.R. Hinman15, M. Hirose157, D. Hirschbuehl175, J. Hobbs148, N. Hod107, M.C. Hodgkinson139, P. Hodgson139, A. Hoecker30, M.R. Hoeferkamp105, F. Hoenig100, M. Hohlfeld83, D. Hohn21, T.R. Holmes15, M. Homann43, T.M. Hong125, L. Hooft van Huysduynen110, W.H. Hopkins116, Y. Horii103, A.J. Horton142, J-Y. Hostachy55, S. Hou151, A. Hoummada135a, J. Howard120, J. Howarth42, M. Hrabovsky115, I. Hristova16, J. Hrivnac117, T. Hryn’ova5, A. Hrynevich93, C. Hsu145c, P.J. Hsu151,p, S.-C. Hsu138, D. Hu35, Q. Hu33b, X. Hu89, Y. Huang42, Z. Hubacek30, F. Hubaut85, F. Huegging21, T.B. Huffman120, E.W. Hughes35, G. Hughes72, M. Huhtinen30, T.A. Hülsing83, N. Huseynov65,b, J. Huston90, J. Huth57, G. Iacobucci49, G. Iakovidis25, I. Ibragimov141, L. Iconomidou-Fayard117, E. Ideal176, Z. Idrissi135e, P. Iengo30, O. Igonkina107, T. Iizawa171, Y. Ikegami66, K. Ikematsu141, M. Ikeno66, Y. Ilchenko31,q, D. Iliadis154, N. Ilic143, Y. Inamaru67, T. Ince101, P. Ioannou9, M. Iodice134a, K. Iordanidou35, V. Ippolito57, A. Irles Quiles167, C. Isaksson166, M. Ishino68, M. Ishitsuka157, R. Ishmukhametov111, C. Issever120, S. Istin19a, J.M. Iturbe Ponce84, R. Iuppa133a,133b, J. Ivarsson81, W. Iwanski39, H. Iwasaki66, J.M. Izen41, V. Izzo104a, S. Jabbar3, B. Jackson122, M. Jackson74, P. Jackson1, M.R. Jaekel30, V. Jain2, K. Jakobs48, S. Jakobsen30, T. Jakoubek127, J. Jakubek128, D.O. Jamin151, D.K. Jana79, E. Jansen78, R. Jansky62, J. Janssen21, M. Janus170, G. Jarlskog81, N. Javadov65,b, T. Javůrek48, L. Jeanty15, J. Jejelava51a,r, G.-Y. Jeng150, D. Jennens88, P. Jenni48,s, J. Jentzsch43, C. Jeske170, S. Jézéquel5, H. Ji173, J. Jia148, Y. Jiang33b, S. Jiggins78, J. Jimenez Pena167, S. Jin33a, A. Jinaru26a, O. Jinnouchi157, M.D. Joergensen36, P. Johansson139, K.A. Johns7, K. Jon-And146a,146b, G. Jones170, R.W.L. Jones72, T.J. Jones74, J. Jongmanns58a, P.M. Jorge126a,126b, K.D. Joshi84, J. Jovicevic159a, X. Ju173, C.A. Jung43, P. Jussel62, A. Juste Rozas12,o, M. Kaci167, A. Kaczmarska39, M. Kado117, H. Kagan111, M. Kagan143, S.J. Kahn85, E. Kajomovitz45, C.W. Kalderon120, S. Kama40, A. Kamenshchikov130, N. Kanaya155, M. Kaneda30, S. Kaneti28, V.A. Kantserov98, J. Kanzaki66, B. Kaplan110, A. Kapliy31, D. Kar53, K. Karakostas10, A. Karamaoun3, N. Karastathis10,107, M.J. Kareem54, M. Karnevskiy83, S.N. Karpov65, Z.M. Karpova65, K. Karthik110, V. Kartvelishvili72, A.N. Karyukhin130, L. Kashif173, R.D. Kass111, A. Kastanas14, Y. Kataoka155, A. Katre49, J. Katzy42, K. Kawagoe70, T. Kawamoto155, G. Kawamura54, S. Kazama155, V.F. Kazanin109,c, M.Y. Kazarinov65, R. Keeler169, R. Kehoe40, J.S. Keller42, J.J. Kempster77, H. Keoshkerian84, O. Kepka127, B.P. Kerševan75, S. Kersten175, R.A. Keyes87, F. Khalil-zada11, H. Khandanyan146a,146b, A. Khanov114, A.G. Kharlamov109,c, T.J. Khoo28, V. Khovanskiy97, E. Khramov65, J. Khubua51b,t, H.Y. Kim8, H. Kim146a,146b, S.H. Kim160, Y.K. Kim31, N. Kimura154, O.M. Kind16, B.T. King74, M. King167, S.B. King168, J. Kirk131, A.E. Kiryunin101, T. Kishimoto67, D. Kisielewska38a, F. Kiss48, K. Kiuchi160, O. Kivernyk136, E. Kladiva144b, M.H. Klein35, M. Klein74, U. Klein74, K. Kleinknecht83, P. Klimek146a,146b, A. Klimentov25, R. Klingenberg43, J.A. Klinger139, T. Klioutchnikova30, E.-E. Kluge58a, P. Kluit107, S. Kluth101, E. Kneringer62, E.B.F.G. Knoops85, A. Knue53, A. Kobayashi155, D. Kobayashi157, T. Kobayashi155, M. Kobel44, M. Kocian143, P. Kodys129, T. Koffas29, E. Koffeman107, L.A. Kogan120, S. Kohlmann175, Z. Kohout128, T. Kohriki66, T. Koi143, H. Kolanoski16, I. Koletsou5, A.A. Komar96,∗, Y. Komori155, T. Kondo66, N. Kondrashova42, K. Köneke48, A.C. König106, S. König83, T. Kono66,u, R. Konoplich110,v, N. Konstantinidis78, R. Kopeliansky152, S. Koperny38a, L. Köpke83, A.K. Kopp48, K. Korcyl39, K. Kordas154, A. Korn78, A.A. Korol109,c, I. Korolkov12, E.V. Korolkova139, O. Kortner101, S. Kortner101, T. Kosek129, V.V. Kostyukhin21, V.M. Kotov65, A. Kotwal45, A. Kourkoumeli-Charalampidi154, C. Kourkoumelis9, V. Kouskoura25, A. Koutsman159a, R. Kowalewski169, T.Z. Kowalski38a, W. Kozanecki136, A.S. Kozhin130, V.A. Kramarenko99, G. Kramberger75, D. Krasnopevtsev98, M.W. Krasny80, A. Krasznahorkay30, J.K. Kraus21, A. Kravchenko25, S. Kreiss110, M. Kretz58c, J. Kretzschmar74, K. Kreutzfeldt52, P. Krieger158, K. Krizka31, K. Kroeninger43, H. Kroha101, J. Kroll122, J. Kroseberg21, J. Krstic13, U. Kruchonak65, H. Krüger21, N. Krumnack64, Z.V. Krumshteyn65, A. Kruse173, M.C. Kruse45, M. Kruskal22, T. Kubota88, H. Kucuk78, S. Kuday4b, S. Kuehn48, A. Kugel58c, F. Kuger174, A. Kuhl137, T. Kuhl42, V. Kukhtin65, Y. Kulchitsky92, S. Kuleshov32b, M. Kuna132a,132b, T. Kunigo68, A. Kupco127, H. Kurashige67, Y.A. Kurochkin92, R. Kurumida67, V. Kus127, E.S. Kuwertz169, M. Kuze157, J. Kvita115, T. Kwan169, D. Kyriazopoulos139, A. La Rosa49, J.L. La Rosa Navarro24d, L. La Rotonda37a,37b, C. Lacasta167, F. Lacava132a,132b, J. Lacey29, H. Lacker16, D. Lacour80, V.R. Lacuesta167, E. Ladygin65, R. Lafaye5, B. Laforge80, T. Lagouri176, S. Lai48, L. Lambourne78, S. Lammers61, C.L. Lampen7, W. Lampl7, E. Lançon136, U. Landgraf48, M.P.J. Landon76, V.S. Lang58a, J.C. Lange12, A.J. Lankford163, F. Lanni25, K. Lantzsch30, S. Laplace80, C. Lapoire30, J.F. Laporte136, T. Lari91a, F. Lasagni Manghi20a,20b, M. Lassnig30, P. Laurelli47, W. Lavrijsen15, A.T. Law137, P. Laycock74, T. Lazovich57, O. Le Dortz80, E. Le Guirriec85, E. Le Menedeu12, M. LeBlanc169, T. LeCompte6, F. Ledroit-Guillon55, C.A. Lee145b, S.C. Lee151, L. Lee1, G. Lefebvre80, M. Lefebvre169, F. Legger100, C. Leggett15, A. Lehan74, G. Lehmann Miotto30, X. Lei7, W.A. Leight29, A. Leisos154,w, A.G. Leister176, M.A.L. Leite24d, R. Leitner129, D. Lellouch172, B. Lemmer54, K.J.C. Leney78, T. Lenz21, B. Lenzi30, R. Leone7, S. Leone124a,124b, C. Leonidopoulos46, S. Leontsinis10, C. Leroy95, C.G. Lester28, M. Levchenko123, J. Levêque5, D. Levin89, L.J. Levinson172, M. Levy18, A. Lewis120, A.M. Leyko21, M. Leyton41, B. Li33b,x, H. Li148, H.L. Li31, L. Li45, L. Li33e, S. Li45, Y. Li33c,y, Z. Liang137, H. Liao34, B. Liberti133a, A. Liblong158, P. Lichard30, K. Lie165, J. Liebal21, W. Liebig14, C. Limbach21, A. Limosani150, S.C. Lin151,z, T.H. Lin83, F. Linde107, B.E. Lindquist148, J.T. Linnemann90, E. Lipeles122, A. Lipniacka14, M. Lisovyi58b, T.M. Liss165, D. Lissauer25, A. Lister168, A.M. Litke137, B. Liu151,aa, D. Liu151, H. Liu89, J. Liu85, J.B. Liu33b, K. Liu85, L. Liu165, M. Liu45, M. Liu33b, Y. Liu33b, M. Livan121a,121b, A. Lleres55, J. Llorente Merino82, S.L. Lloyd76, F. Lo Sterzo151, E. Lobodzinska42, P. Loch7, W.S. Lockman137, F.K. Loebinger84, A.E. Loevschall-Jensen36, A. Loginov176, T. Lohse16, K. Lohwasser42, M. Lokajicek127, B.A. Long22, J.D. Long89, R.E. Long72, K.A. Looper111, L. Lopes126a, D. Lopez Mateos57, B. Lopez Paredes139, I. Lopez Paz12, J. Lorenz100, N. Lorenzo Martinez61, M. Losada162, P. Loscutoff15, P.J. Lösel100, X. Lou33a, A. Lounis117, J. Love6, P.A. Love72, N. Lu89, H.J. Lubatti138, C. Luci132a,132b, A. Lucotte55, F. Luehring61, W. Lukas62, L. Luminari132a, O. Lundberg146a,146b, B. Lund-Jensen147, D. Lynn25, R. Lysak127, E. Lytken81, H. Ma25, L.L. Ma33d, G. Maccarrone47, A. Macchiolo101, C.M. Macdonald139, J. Machado Miguens122,126b, D. Macina30, D. Madaffari85, R. Madar34, H.J. Maddocks72, W.F. Mader44, A. Madsen166, S. Maeland14, T. Maeno25, A. Maevskiy99, E. Magradze54, K. Mahboubi48, J. Mahlstedt107, C. Maiani136, C. Maidantchik24a, A.A. Maier101, T. Maier100, A. Maio126a,126b,126d, S. Majewski116, Y. Makida66, N. Makovec117, B. Malaescu80, Pa. Malecki39, V.P. Maleev123, F. Malek55, U. Mallik63, D. Malon6, C. Malone143, S. Maltezos10, V.M. Malyshev109, S. Malyukov30, J. Mamuzic42, G. Mancini47, B. Mandelli30, L. Mandelli91a, I. Mandić75, R. Mandrysch63, J. Maneira126a,126b, A. Manfredini101, L. Manhaes de Andrade Filho24b, J. Manjarres Ramos159b, A. Mann100, P.M. Manning137, A. Manousakis-Katsikakis9, B. Mansoulie136, R. Mantifel87, M. Mantoani54, L. Mapelli30, L. March145c, G. Marchiori80, M. Marcisovsky127, C.P. Marino169, M. Marjanovic13, D.E. Marley89, F. Marroquim24a, S.P. Marsden84, Z. Marshall15, L.F. Marti17, S. Marti-Garcia167, B. Martin90, T.A. Martin170, V.J. Martin46, B. Martin dit Latour14, M. Martinez12,o, S. Martin-Haugh131, V.S. Martoiu26a, A.C. Martyniuk78, M. Marx138, F. Marzano132a, A. Marzin30, L. Masetti83, T. Mashimo155, R. Mashinistov96, J. Masik84, A.L. Maslennikov109,c, I. Massa20a,20b, L. Massa20a,20b, N. Massol5, P. Mastrandrea148, A. Mastroberardino37a,37b, T. Masubuchi155, P. Mättig175, J. Mattmann83, J. Maurer26a, S.J. Maxfield74, D.A. Maximov109,c, R. Mazini151, S.M. Mazza91a,91b, L. Mazzaferro133a,133b, G. Mc Goldrick158, S.P. Mc Kee89, A. McCarn89, R.L. McCarthy148, T.G. McCarthy29, N.A. McCubbin131, K.W. McFarlane56,∗, J.A. Mcfayden78, G. Mchedlidze54, S.J. McMahon131, R.A. McPherson169,k, M. Medinnis42, S. Meehan145a, S. Mehlhase100, A. Mehta74, K. Meier58a, C. Meineck100, B. Meirose41, B.R. Mellado Garcia145c, F. Meloni17, A. Mengarelli20a,20b, S. Menke101, E. Meoni161, K.M. Mercurio57, S. Mergelmeyer21, P. Mermod49, L. Merola104a,104b, C. Meroni91a, F.S. Merritt31, A. Messina132a,132b, J. Metcalfe25, A.S. Mete163, C. Meyer83, C. Meyer122, J-P. Meyer136, J. Meyer107, R.P. Middleton131, S. Miglioranzi164a,164c, L. Mijović21, G. Mikenberg172, M. Mikestikova127, M. Mikuž75, M. Milesi88, A. Milic30, D.W. Miller31, C. Mills46, A. Milov172, D.A. Milstead146a,146b, A.A. Minaenko130, Y. Minami155, I.A. Minashvili65, A.I. Mincer110, B. Mindur38a, M. Mineev65, Y. Ming173, L.M. Mir12, T. Mitani171, J. Mitrevski100, V.A. Mitsou167, A. Miucci49, P.S. Miyagawa139, J.U. Mjörnmark81, T. Moa146a,146b, K. Mochizuki85, S. Mohapatra35, W. Mohr48, S. Molander146a,146b, R. Moles-Valls167, K. Mönig42, C. Monini55, J. Monk36, E. Monnier85, J. Montejo Berlingen12, F. Monticelli71, S. Monzani132a,132b, R.W. Moore3, N. Morange117, D. Moreno162, M. Moreno Llácer54, P. Morettini50a, M. Morgenstern44, M. Morii57, M. Morinaga155, V. Morisbak119, S. Moritz83, A.K. Morley147, G. Mornacchi30, J.D. Morris76, S.S. Mortensen36, A. Morton53, L. Morvaj103, M. Mosidze51b, J. Moss111, K. Motohashi157, R. Mount143, E. Mountricha25, S.V. Mouraviev96,∗, E.J.W. Moyse86, S. Muanza85, R.D. Mudd18, F. Mueller101, J. Mueller125, K. Mueller21, R.S.P. Mueller100, T. Mueller28, D. Muenstermann49, P. Mullen53, G.A. Mullier17, Y. Munwes153, J.A. Murillo Quijada18, W.J. Murray170,131, H. Musheghyan54, E. Musto152, A.G. Myagkov130,ab, M. Myska128, O. Nackenhorst54, J. Nadal54, K. Nagai120, R. Nagai157, Y. Nagai85, K. Nagano66, A. Nagarkar111, Y. Nagasaka59, K. Nagata160, M. Nagel101, E. Nagy85, A.M. Nairz30, Y. Nakahama30, K. Nakamura66, T. Nakamura155, I. Nakano112, H. Namasivayam41, R.F. Naranjo Garcia42, R. Narayan31, T. Naumann42, G. Navarro162, R. Nayyar7, H.A. Neal89, P.Yu. Nechaeva96, T.J. Neep84, P.D. Nef143, A. Negri121a,121b, M. Negrini20a, S. Nektarijevic106, C. Nellist117, A. Nelson163, S. Nemecek127, P. Nemethy110, A.A. Nepomuceno24a, M. Nessi30,ac, M.S. Neubauer165, M. Neumann175, R.M. Neves110, P. Nevski25, P.R. Newman18, D.H. Nguyen6, R.B. Nickerson120, R. Nicolaidou136, B. Nicquevert30, J. Nielsen137, N. Nikiforou35, A. Nikiforov16, V. Nikolaenko130,ab, I. Nikolic-Audit80, K. Nikolopoulos18, J.K. Nilsen119, P. Nilsson25, Y. Ninomiya155, A. Nisati132a, R. Nisius101, T. Nobe157, M. Nomachi118, I. Nomidis29, T. Nooney76, S. Norberg113, M. Nordberg30, O. Novgorodova44, S. Nowak101, M. Nozaki66, L. Nozka115, K. Ntekas10, G. Nunes Hanninger88, T. Nunnemann100, E. Nurse78, F. Nuti88, B.J. O’Brien46, F. O’grady7, D.C. O’Neil142, V. O’Shea53, F.G. Oakham29,d, H. Oberlack101, T. Obermann21, J. Ocariz80, A. Ochi67, I. Ochoa78, J.P. Ochoa-Ricoux32a, S. Oda70, S. Odaka66, H. Ogren61, A. Oh84, S.H. Oh45, C.C. Ohm15, H. Ohman166, H. Oide30, W. Okamura118, H. Okawa160, Y. Okumura31, T. Okuyama155, A. Olariu26a, S.A. Olivares Pino46, D. Oliveira Damazio25, E. Oliver Garcia167, A. Olszewski39, J. Olszowska39, A. Onofre126a,126e, P.U.E. Onyisi31,q, C.J. Oram159a, M.J. Oreglia31, Y. Oren153, D. Orestano134a,134b, N. Orlando154, C. Oropeza Barrera53, R.S. Orr158, B. Osculati50a,50b, R. Ospanov84, G. Otero y Garzon27, H. Otono70, M. Ouchrif135d, E.A. Ouellette169, F. Ould-Saada119, A. Ouraou136, K.P. Oussoren107, Q. Ouyang33a, A. Ovcharova15, M. Owen53, R.E. Owen18, V.E. Ozcan19a, N. Ozturk8, K. Pachal142, A. Pacheco Pages12, C. Padilla Aranda12, M. Pagáčová48, S. Pagan Griso15, E. Paganis139, C. Pahl101, F. Paige25, P. Pais86, K. Pajchel119, G. Palacino159b, S. Palestini30, M. Palka38b, D. Pallin34, A. Palma126a,126b, Y.B. Pan173, E. Panagiotopoulou10, C.E. Pandini80, J.G. Panduro Vazquez77, P. Pani146a,146b, S. Panitkin25, D. Pantea26a, L. Paolozzi49, Th.D. Papadopoulou10, K. Papageorgiou154, A. Paramonov6, D. Paredes Hernandez154, M.A. Parker28, K.A. Parker139, F. Parodi50a,50b, J.A. Parsons35, U. Parzefall48, E. Pasqualucci132a, S. Passaggio50a, F. Pastore134a,134b,∗, Fr. Pastore77, G. Pásztor29, S. Pataraia175, N.D. Patel150, J.R. Pater84, T. Pauly30, J. Pearce169, B. Pearson113, L.E. Pedersen36, M. Pedersen119, S. Pedraza Lopez167, R. Pedro126a,126b, S.V. Peleganchuk109,c, D. Pelikan166, H. Peng33b, B. Penning31, J. Penwell61, D.V. Perepelitsa25, E. Perez Codina159a, M.T. Pérez García-Estañ167, L. Perini91a,91b, H. Pernegger30, S. Perrella104a,104b, R. Peschke42, V.D. Peshekhonov65, K. Peters30, R.F.Y. Peters84, B.A. Petersen30, T.C. Petersen36, E. Petit42, A. Petridis146a,146b, C. Petridou154, E. Petrolo132a, F. Petrucci134a,134b, N.E. Pettersson157, R. Pezoa32b, P.W. Phillips131, G. Piacquadio143, E. Pianori170, A. Picazio49, E. Piccaro76, M. Piccinini20a,20b, M.A. Pickering120, R. Piegaia27, D.T. Pignotti111, J.E. Pilcher31, A.D. Pilkington84, J. Pina126a,126b,126d, M. Pinamonti164a,164c,ad, J.L. Pinfold3, A. Pingel36, B. Pinto126a, S. Pires80, M. Pitt172, C. Pizio91a,91b, L. Plazak144a, M.-A. Pleier25, V. Pleskot129, E. Plotnikova65, P. Plucinski146a,146b, D. Pluth64, R. Poettgen146a,146b, L. Poggioli117, D. Pohl21, G. Polesello121a, A. Poley42, A. Policicchio37a,37b, R. Polifka158, A. Polini20a, C.S. Pollard53, V. Polychronakos25, K. Pommès30, L. Pontecorvo132a, B.G. Pope90, G.A. Popeneciu26b, D.S. Popovic13, A. Poppleton30, S. Pospisil128, K. Potamianos15, I.N. Potrap65, C.J. Potter149, C.T. Potter116, G. Poulard30, J. Poveda30, V. Pozdnyakov65, P. Pralavorio85, A. Pranko15, S. Prasad30, S. Prell64, D. Price84, L.E. Price6, M. Primavera73a, S. Prince87, M. Proissl46, K. Prokofiev60c, F. Prokoshin32b, E. Protopapadaki136, S. Protopopescu25, J. Proudfoot6, M. Przybycien38a, E. Ptacek116, D. Puddu134a,134b, E. Pueschel86, D. Puldon148, M. Purohit25,ae, P. Puzo117, J. Qian89, G. Qin53, Y. Qin84, A. Quadt54, D.R. Quarrie15, W.B. Quayle164a,164b, M. Queitsch-Maitland84, D. Quilty53, S. Raddum119, V. Radeka25, V. Radescu42, S.K. Radhakrishnan148, P. Radloff116, P. Rados88, F. Ragusa91a,91b, G. Rahal178, S. Rajagopalan25, M. Rammensee30, C. Rangel-Smith166, F. Rauscher100, S. Rave83, T. Ravenscroft53, M. Raymond30, A.L. Read119, N.P. Readioff74, D.M. Rebuzzi121a,121b, A. Redelbach174, G. Redlinger25, R. Reece137, K. Reeves41, L. Rehnisch16, H. Reisin27, M. Relich163, C. Rembser30, H. Ren33a, A. Renaud117, M. Rescigno132a, S. Resconi91a, O.L. Rezanova109,c, P. Reznicek129, R. Rezvani95, R. Richter101, S. Richter78, E. Richter-Was38b, O. Ricken21, M. Ridel80, P. Rieck16, C.J. Riegel175, J. Rieger54, M. Rijssenbeek148, A. Rimoldi121a,121b, L. Rinaldi20a, B. Ristić49, E. Ritsch30, I. Riu12, F. Rizatdinova114, E. Rizvi76, S.H. Robertson87,k, A. Robichaud-Veronneau87, D. Robinson28, J.E.M. Robinson84, A. Robson53, C. Roda124a,124b, S. Roe30, O. Røhne119, S. Rolli161, A. Romaniouk98, M. Romano20a,20b, S.M. Romano Saez34, E. Romero Adam167, N. Rompotis138, M. Ronzani48, L. Roos80, E. Ros167, S. Rosati132a, K. Rosbach48, P. Rose137, P.L. Rosendahl14, O. Rosenthal141, V. Rossetti146a,146b, E. Rossi104a,104b, L.P. Rossi50a, R. Rosten138, M. Rotaru26a, I. Roth172, J. Rothberg138, D. Rousseau117, C.R. Royon136, A. Rozanov85, Y. Rozen152, X. Ruan145c, F. Rubbo143, I. Rubinskiy42, V.I. Rud99, C. Rudolph44, M.S. Rudolph158, F. Rühr48, A. Ruiz-Martinez30, Z. Rurikova48, N.A. Rusakovich65, A. Ruschke100, H.L. Russell138, J.P. Rutherfoord7, N. Ruthmann48, Y.F. Ryabov123, M. Rybar165, G. Rybkin117, N.C. Ryder120, A.F. Saavedra150, G. Sabato107, S. Sacerdoti27, A. Saddique3, H.F-W. Sadrozinski137, R. Sadykov65, F. Safai Tehrani132a, M. Saimpert136, H. Sakamoto155, Y. Sakurai171, G. Salamanna134a,134b, A. Salamon133a, M. Saleem113, D. Salek107, P.H. Sales De Bruin138, D. Salihagic101, A. Salnikov143, J. Salt167, D. Salvatore37a,37b, F. Salvatore149, A. Salvucci106, A. Salzburger30, D. Sampsonidis154, A. Sanchez104a,104b, J. Sánchez167, V. Sanchez Martinez167, H. Sandaker119, R.L. Sandbach76, H.G. Sander83, M.P. Sanders100, M. Sandhoff175, C. Sandoval162, R. Sandstroem101, D.P.C. Sankey131, M. Sannino50a,50b, A. Sansoni47, C. Santoni34, R. Santonico133a,133b, H. Santos126a, I. Santoyo Castillo149, K. Sapp125, A. Sapronov65, J.G. Saraiva126a,126d, B. Sarrazin21, O. Sasaki66, Y. Sasaki155, K. Sato160, G. Sauvage5,∗, E. Sauvan5, G. Savage77, P. Savard158,d, C. Sawyer131, L. Sawyer79,n, J. Saxon31, C. Sbarra20a, A. Sbrizzi20a,20b, T. Scanlon78, D.A. Scannicchio163, M. Scarcella150, V. Scarfone37a,37b, J. Schaarschmidt172, P. Schacht101, D. Schaefer30, R. Schaefer42, J. Schaeffer83, S. Schaepe21, S. Schaetzel58b, U. Schäfer83, A.C. Schaffer117, D. Schaile100, R.D. Schamberger148, V. Scharf58a, V.A. Schegelsky123, D. Scheirich129, M. Schernau163, C. Schiavi50a,50b, C. Schillo48, M. Schioppa37a,37b, S. Schlenker30, E. Schmidt48, K. Schmieden30, C. Schmitt83, S. Schmitt58b, S. Schmitt42, B. Schneider159a, Y.J. Schnellbach74, U. Schnoor44, L. Schoeffel136, A. Schoening58b, B.D. Schoenrock90, E. Schopf21, A.L.S. Schorlemmer54, M. Schott83, D. Schouten159a, J. Schovancova8, S. Schramm49, M. Schreyer174, C. Schroeder83, N. Schuh83, M.J. Schultens21, H.-C. Schultz-Coulon58a, H. Schulz16, M. Schumacher48, B.A. Schumm137, Ph. Schune136, C. Schwanenberger84, A. Schwartzman143, T.A. Schwarz89, Ph. Schwegler101, H. Schweiger84, Ph. Schwemling136, R. Schwienhorst90, J. Schwindling136, T. Schwindt21, F.G. Sciacca17, E. Scifo117, G. Sciolla23, F. Scuri124a,124b, F. Scutti21, J. Searcy89, G. Sedov42, E. Sedykh123, P. Seema21, S.C. Seidel105, A. Seiden137, F. Seifert128, J.M. Seixas24a, G. Sekhniaidze104a, K. Sekhon89, S.J. Sekula40, D.M. Seliverstov123,∗, N. Semprini-Cesari20a,20b, C. Serfon30, L. Serin117, L. Serkin164a,164b, T. Serre85, M. Sessa134a,134b, R. Seuster159a, H. Severini113, T. Sfiligoj75, F. Sforza30, A. Sfyrla30, E. Shabalina54, M. Shamim116, L.Y. Shan33a, R. Shang165, J.T. Shank22, M. Shapiro15, P.B. Shatalov97, K. Shaw164a,164b, S.M. Shaw84, A. Shcherbakova146a,146b, C.Y. Shehu149, P. Sherwood78, L. Shi151,af, S. Shimizu67, C.O. Shimmin163, M. Shimojima102, M. Shiyakova65, A. Shmeleva96, D. Shoaleh Saadi95, M.J. Shochet31, S. Shojaii91a,91b, S. Shrestha111, E. Shulga98, M.A. Shupe7, S. Shushkevich42, P. Sicho127, O. Sidiropoulou174, D. Sidorov114, A. Sidoti20a,20b, F. Siegert44, Dj. Sijacki13, J. Silva126a,126d, Y. Silver153, S.B. Silverstein146a, V. Simak128, O. Simard5, Lj. Simic13, S. Simion117, E. Simioni83, B. Simmons78, D. Simon34, R. Simoniello91a,91b, P. Sinervo158, N.B. Sinev116, G. Siragusa174, A.N. Sisakyan65,∗, S.Yu. Sivoklokov99, J. Sjölin146a,146b, T.B. Sjursen14, M.B. Skinner72, H.P. Skottowe57, P. Skubic113, M. Slater18, T. Slavicek128, M. Slawinska107, K. Sliwa161, V. Smakhtin172, B.H. Smart46, L. Smestad14, S.Yu. Smirnov98, Y. Smirnov98, L.N. Smirnova99,ag, O. Smirnova81, M.N.K. Smith35, R.W. Smith35, M. Smizanska72, K. Smolek128, A.A. Snesarev96, G. Snidero76, S. Snyder25, R. Sobie169,k, F. Socher44, A. Soffer153, D.A. Soh151,af, C.A. Solans30, M. Solar128, J. Solc128, E.Yu. Soldatov98, U. Soldevila167, A.A. Solodkov130, A. Soloshenko65, O.V. Solovyanov130, V. Solovyev123, P. Sommer48, H.Y. Song33b, N. Soni1, A. Sood15, A. Sopczak128, B. Sopko128, V. Sopko128, V. Sorin12, D. Sosa58b, M. Sosebee8, C.L. Sotiropoulou124a,124b, R. Soualah164a,164c, A.M. Soukharev109,c, D. South42, B.C. Sowden77, S. Spagnolo73a,73b, M. Spalla124a,124b, F. Spanò77, W.R. Spearman57, F. Spettel101, R. Spighi20a, G. Spigo30, L.A. Spiller88, M. Spousta129, T. Spreitzer158, R.D. St. Denis53,∗, S. Staerz44, J. Stahlman122, R. Stamen58a, S. Stamm16, E. Stanecka39, C. Stanescu134a, M. Stanescu-Bellu42, M.M. Stanitzki42, S. Stapnes119, E.A. Starchenko130, J. Stark55, P. Staroba127, P. Starovoitov42, R. Staszewski39, P. Stavina144a,∗, P. Steinberg25, B. Stelzer142, H.J. Stelzer30, O. Stelzer-Chilton159a, H. Stenzel52, S. Stern101, G.A. Stewart53, J.A. Stillings21, M.C. Stockton87, M. Stoebe87, G. Stoicea26a, P. Stolte54, S. Stonjek101, A.R. Stradling8, A. Straessner44, M.E. Stramaglia17, J. Strandberg147, S. Strandberg146a,146b, A. Strandlie119, E. Strauss143, M. Strauss113, P. Strizenec144b, R. Ströhmer174, D.M. Strom116, R. Stroynowski40, A. Strubig106, S.A. Stucci17, B. Stugu14, N.A. Styles42, D. Su143, J. Su125, R. Subramaniam79, A. Succurro12, Y. Sugaya118, C. Suhr108, M. Suk128, V.V. Sulin96, S. Sultansoy4c, T. Sumida68, S. Sun57, X. Sun33a, J.E. Sundermann48, K. Suruliz149, G. Susinno37a,37b, M.R. Sutton149, S. Suzuki66, Y. Suzuki66, M. Svatos127, S. Swedish168, M. Swiatlowski143, I. Sykora144a, T. Sykora129, D. Ta90, C. Taccini134a,134b, K. Tackmann42, J. Taenzer158, A. Taffard163, R. Tafirout159a, N. Taiblum153, H. Takai25, R. Takashima69, H. Takeda67, T. Takeshita140, Y. Takubo66, M. Talby85, A.A. Talyshev109,c, J.Y.C. Tam174, K.G. Tan88, J. Tanaka155, R. Tanaka117, S. Tanaka66, B.B. Tannenwald111, N. Tannoury21, S. Tapprogge83, S. Tarem152, F. Tarrade29, G.F. Tartarelli91a, P. Tas129, M. Tasevsky127, T. Tashiro68, E. Tassi37a,37b, A. Tavares Delgado126a,126b, Y. Tayalati135d, F.E. Taylor94, G.N. Taylor88, W. Taylor159b, F.A. Teischinger30, M. Teixeira Dias Castanheira76, P. Teixeira-Dias77, K.K. Temming48, H. Ten Kate30, P.K. Teng151, J.J. Teoh118, F. Tepel175, S. Terada66, K. Terashi155, J. Terron82, S. Terzo101, M. Testa47, R.J. Teuscher158,k, J. Therhaag21, T. Theveneaux-Pelzer34, J.P. Thomas18, J. Thomas-Wilsker77, E.N. Thompson35, P.D. Thompson18, R.J. Thompson84, A.S. Thompson53, L.A. Thomsen176, E. Thomson122, M. Thomson28, R.P. Thun89,∗, M.J. Tibbetts15, R.E. Ticse Torres85, V.O. Tikhomirov96,ah, Yu.A. Tikhonov109,c, S. Timoshenko98, E. Tiouchichine85, P. Tipton176, S. Tisserant85, T. Todorov5, S. Todorova-Nova129, J. Tojo70, S. Tokár144a, K. Tokushuku66, K. Tollefson90, E. Tolley57, L. Tomlinson84, M. Tomoto103, L. Tompkins143,ai, K. Toms105, E. Torrence116, H. Torres142, E. Torró Pastor167, J. Toth85,aj, F. Touchard85, D.R. Tovey139, T. Trefzger174, L. Tremblet30, A. Tricoli30, I.M. Trigger159a, S. Trincaz-Duvoid80, M.F. Tripiana12, W. Trischuk158, B. Trocmé55, C. Troncon91a, M. Trottier-McDonald15, M. Trovatelli169, P. True90, L. Truong164a,164c, M. Trzebinski39, A. Trzupek39, C. Tsarouchas30, J.C-L. Tseng120, P.V. Tsiareshka92, D. Tsionou154, G. Tsipolitis10, N. Tsirintanis9, S. Tsiskaridze12, V. Tsiskaridze48, E.G. Tskhadadze51a, I.I. Tsukerman97, V. Tsulaia15, S. Tsuno66, D. Tsybychev148, A. Tudorache26a, V. Tudorache26a, A.N. Tuna122, S.A. Tupputi20a,20b, S. Turchikhin99,ag, D. Turecek128, R. Turra91a,91b, A.J. Turvey40, P.M. Tuts35, A. Tykhonov49, M. Tylmad146a,146b, M. Tyndel131, I. Ueda155, R. Ueno29, M. Ughetto146a,146b, M. Ugland14, M. Uhlenbrock21, F. Ukegawa160, G. Unal30, A. Undrus25, G. Unel163, F.C. Ungaro48, Y. Unno66, C. Unverdorben100, J. Urban144b, P. Urquijo88, P. Urrejola83, G. Usai8, A. Usanova62, L. Vacavant85, V. Vacek128, B. Vachon87, C. Valderanis83, N. Valencic107, S. Valentinetti20a,20b, A. Valero167, L. Valery12, S. Valkar129, E. Valladolid Gallego167, S. Vallecorsa49, J.A. Valls Ferrer167, W. Van Den Wollenberg107, P.C. Van Der Deijl107, R. van der Geer107, H. van der Graaf107, R. Van Der Leeuw107, N. van Eldik152, P. van Gemmeren6, J. Van Nieuwkoop142, I. van Vulpen107, M.C. van Woerden30, M. Vanadia132a,132b, W. Vandelli30, R. Vanguri122, A. Vaniachine6, F. Vannucci80, G. Vardanyan177, R. Vari132a, E.W. Varnes7, T. Varol40, D. Varouchas80, A. Vartapetian8, K.E. Varvell150, V.I. Vassilakopoulos56, F. Vazeille34, T. Vazquez Schroeder87, J. Veatch7, L.M. Veloce158, F. Veloso126a,126c, T. Velz21, S. Veneziano132a, A. Ventura73a,73b, D. Ventura86, M. Venturi169, N. Venturi158, A. Venturini23, V. Vercesi121a, M. Verducci132a,132b, W. Verkerke107, J.C. Vermeulen107, A. Vest44, M.C. Vetterli142,d, O. Viazlo81, I. Vichou165, T. Vickey139, O.E. Vickey Boeriu139, G.H.A. Viehhauser120, S. Viel15, R. Vigne62, M. Villa20a,20b, M. Villaplana Perez91a,91b, E. Vilucchi47, M.G. Vincter29, V.B. Vinogradov65, I. Vivarelli149, F. Vives Vaque3, S. Vlachos10, D. Vladoiu100, M. Vlasak128, M. Vogel32a, P. Vokac128, G. Volpi124a,124b, M. Volpi88, H. von der Schmitt101, H. von Radziewski48, E. von Toerne21, V. Vorobel129, K. Vorobev98, M. Vos167, R. Voss30, J.H. Vossebeld74, N. Vranjes13, M. Vranjes Milosavljevic13, V. Vrba127, M. Vreeswijk107, R. Vuillermet30, I. Vukotic31, Z. Vykydal128, P. Wagner21, W. Wagner175, H. Wahlberg71, S. Wahrmund44, J. Wakabayashi103, J. Walder72, R. Walker100, W. Walkowiak141, C. Wang151, F. Wang173, H. Wang15, H. Wang40, J. Wang42, J. Wang33a, K. Wang87, R. Wang6, S.M. Wang151, T. Wang21, X. Wang176, C. Wanotayaroj116, A. Warburton87, C.P. Ward28, D.R. Wardrope78, M. Warsinsky48, A. Washbrook46, C. Wasicki42, P.M. Watkins18, A.T. Watson18, I.J. Watson150, M.F. Watson18, G. Watts138, S. Watts84, B.M. Waugh78, S. Webb84, M.S. Weber17, S.W. Weber174, J.S. Webster31, A.R. Weidberg120, B. Weinert61, J. Weingarten54, C. Weiser48, H. Weits107, P.S. Wells30, T. Wenaus25, T. Wengler30, S. Wenig30, N. Wermes21, M. Werner48, P. Werner30, M. Wessels58a, J. Wetter161, K. Whalen116, A.M. Wharton72, A. White8, M.J. White1, R. White32b, S. White124a,124b, D. Whiteson163, F.J. Wickens131, W. Wiedenmann173, M. Wielers131, P. Wienemann21, C. Wiglesworth36, L.A.M. Wiik-Fuchs21, A. Wildauer101, H.G. Wilkens30, H.H. Williams122, S. Williams107, C. Willis90, S. Willocq86, A. Wilson89, J.A. Wilson18, I. Wingerter-Seez5, F. Winklmeier116, B.T. Winter21, M. Wittgen143, J. Wittkowski100, S.J. Wollstadt83, M.W. Wolter39, H. Wolters126a,126c, B.K. Wosiek39, J. Wotschack30, M.J. Woudstra84, K.W. Wozniak39, M. Wu55, M. Wu31, S.L. Wu173, X. Wu49, Y. Wu89, T.R. Wyatt84, B.M. Wynne46, S. Xella36, D. Xu33a, L. Xu33b,ak, B. Yabsley150, S. Yacoob145b,al, R. Yakabe67, M. Yamada66, Y. Yamaguchi118, A. Yamamoto66, S. Yamamoto155, T. Yamanaka155, K. Yamauchi103, Y. Yamazaki67, Z. Yan22, H. Yang33e, H. Yang173, Y. Yang151, W-M. Yao15, Y. Yasu66, E. Yatsenko5, K.H. Yau Wong21, J. Ye40, S. Ye25, I. Yeletskikh65, A.L. Yen57, E. Yildirim42, K. Yorita171, R. Yoshida6, K. Yoshihara122, C. Young143, C.J.S. Young30, S. Youssef22, D.R. Yu15, J. Yu8, J.M. Yu89, J. Yu114, L. Yuan67, A. Yurkewicz108, I. Yusuff28,am, B. Zabinski39, R. Zaidan63, A.M. Zaitsev130,ab, J. Zalieckas14, A. Zaman148, S. Zambito57, L. Zanello132a,132b, D. Zanzi88, C. Zeitnitz175, M. Zeman128, A. Zemla38a, K. Zengel23, O. Zenin130, T. Ženiš144a, D. Zerwas117, D. Zhang89, F. Zhang173, H. Zhang33c, J. Zhang6, L. Zhang48, R. Zhang33b, X. Zhang33d, Z. Zhang117, X. Zhao40, Y. Zhao33d,117, Z. Zhao33b, A. Zhemchugov65, J. Zhong120, B. Zhou89, C. Zhou45, L. Zhou35, L. Zhou40, N. Zhou163, C.G. Zhu33d, H. Zhu33a, J. Zhu89, Y. Zhu33b, X. Zhuang33a, K. Zhukov96, A. Zibell174, D. Zieminska61, N.I. Zimine65, C. Zimmermann83, S. Zimmermann48, Z. Zinonos54, M. Zinser83, M. Ziolkowski141, L. Živković13, G. Zobernig173, A. Zoccoli20a,20b, M. zur Nedden16, G. Zurzolo104a,104b, L. Zwalinski30.

1 Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

2 Physics Department, SUNY Albany, Albany NY, United States of America

3 Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB, Canada

4 (a) Department of Physics, Ankara University, Ankara; (b) Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul; (c) Division of Physics, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara, Turkey

5 LAPP, CNRS/IN2P3 and Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Annecy-le-Vieux, France

6 High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne IL, United States of America

7 Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ, United States of America

8 Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington TX, United States of America

9 Physics Department, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

10 Physics Department, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou, Greece

11 Institute of Physics, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan

12 Institut de Física d’Altes Energies and Departament de Física de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

13 Institute of Physics, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

14 Department for Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

15 Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of California, Berkeley CA, United States of America

16 Department of Physics, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany

17 Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics and Laboratory for High Energy Physics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

18 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

19 (a) Department of Physics, Bogazici University, Istanbul; (b) Department of Physics Engineering, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep; (c) Department of Physics, Dogus University, Istanbul, Turkey

20 (a) INFN Sezione di Bologna; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

21 Physikalisches Institut, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

22 Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston MA, United States of America

23 Department of Physics, Brandeis University, Waltham MA, United States of America

24 (a) Universidade Federal do Rio De Janeiro COPPE/EE/IF, Rio de Janeiro; (b) Electrical Circuits Department, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora; (c) Federal University of Sao Joao del Rei (UFSJ), Sao Joao del Rei; (d) Instituto de Fisica, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

25 Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton NY, United States of America

26 (a) National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest; (b) National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, Physics Department, Cluj Napoca; (c) University Politehnica Bucharest, Bucharest; (d) West University in Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania

27 Departamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

28 Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

29 Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa ON, Canada

30 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

31 Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago IL, United States of America

32 (a) Departamento de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago; (b) Departamento de Física, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, Chile

33 (a) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; (b) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui; (c) Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Jiangsu; (d) School of Physics, Shandong University, Shandong; (e) Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai; (f) Physics Department, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

34 Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, Clermont Université and Université Blaise Pascal and CNRS/IN2P3, Clermont-Ferrand, France

35 Nevis Laboratory, Columbia University, Irvington NY, United States of America

36 Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark

37 (a) INFN Gruppo Collegato di Cosenza, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Università della Calabria, Rende, Italy

38 (a) AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Krakow; (b) Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

39 Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland

40 Physics Department, Southern Methodist University, Dallas TX, United States of America

41 Physics Department, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson TX, United States of America

42 DESY, Hamburg and Zeuthen, Germany

43 Institut für Experimentelle Physik IV, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany

44 Institut für Kern- und Teilchenphysik, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany

45 Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham NC, United States of America

46 SUPA - School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

47 INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy

48 Fakultät für Mathematik und Physik, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg, Germany

49 Section de Physique, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland

50 (a) INFN Sezione di Genova; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Genova, Genova, Italy

51 (a) E. Andronikashvili Institute of Physics, Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi; (b) High Energy Physics Institute, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia

52 II Physikalisches Institut, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Giessen, Germany

53 SUPA - School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom

54 II Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany

55 Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie, Université Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS/IN2P3, Grenoble, France

56 Department of Physics, Hampton University, Hampton VA, United States of America

57 Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge MA, United States of America

58 (a) Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg; (b) Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg; (c) ZITI Institut für technische Informatik, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany

59 Faculty of Applied Information Science, Hiroshima Institute of Technology, Hiroshima, Japan

60 (a) Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong; (b) Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; (c) Department of Physics, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

61 Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington IN, United States of America

62 Institut für Astro- und Teilchenphysik, Leopold-Franzens-Universität, Innsbruck, Austria

63 University of Iowa, Iowa City IA, United States of America

64 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames IA, United States of America

65 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, JINR Dubna, Dubna, Russia

66 KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tsukuba, Japan

67 Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan

68 Faculty of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

69 Kyoto University of Education, Kyoto, Japan

70 Department of Physics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

71 Instituto de Física La Plata, Universidad Nacional de La Plata and CONICET, La Plata, Argentina

72 Physics Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom

73 (a) INFN Sezione di Lecce; (b) Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università del Salento, Lecce, Italy

74 Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

75 Department of Physics, Jožef Stefan Institute and University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

76 School of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom

77 Department of Physics, Royal Holloway University of London, Surrey, United Kingdom

78 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom

79 Louisiana Tech University, Ruston LA, United States of America

80 Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Hautes Energies, UPMC and Université Paris-Diderot and CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France

81 Fysiska institutionen, Lunds universitet, Lund, Sweden

82 Departamento de Fisica Teorica C-15, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

83 Institut für Physik, Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany

84 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

85 CPPM, Aix-Marseille Université and CNRS/IN2P3, Marseille, France

86 Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA, United States of America

87 Department of Physics, McGill University, Montreal QC, Canada

88 School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

89 Department of Physics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, United States of America

90 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI, United States of America

91 (a) INFN Sezione di Milano; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano, Milano, Italy

92 B.I. Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Republic of Belarus

93 National Scientific and Educational Centre for Particle and High Energy Physics, Minsk, Republic of Belarus

94 Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA, United States of America

95 Group of Particle Physics, University of Montreal, Montreal QC, Canada

96 P.N. Lebedev Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

97 Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP), Moscow, Russia

98 National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russia

99 D.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

100 Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany

101 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut), München, Germany

102 Nagasaki Institute of Applied Science, Nagasaki, Japan

103 Graduate School of Science and Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan

104 (a) INFN Sezione di Napoli; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Napoli, Napoli, Italy

105 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque NM, United States of America

106 Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics, Radboud University Nijmegen/Nikhef, Nijmegen, Netherlands

107 Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

108 Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb IL, United States of America

109 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia

110 Department of Physics, New York University, New York NY, United States of America

111 Ohio State University, Columbus OH, United States of America

112 Faculty of Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan

113 Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, United States of America

114 Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater OK, United States of America

115 Palacký University, RCPTM, Olomouc, Czech Republic

116 Center for High Energy Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene OR, United States of America

117 LAL, Université Paris-Sud and CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France

118 Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

119 Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

120 Department of Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom

121 (a) INFN Sezione di Pavia; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy

122 Department of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA, United States of America

123 National Research Centre ”Kurchatov Institute” B.P.Konstantinov Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia

124 (a) INFN Sezione di Pisa; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica E. Fermi, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy

125 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA, United States of America

126 (a) Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas - LIP, Lisboa; (b) Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa; (c) Department of Physics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra; (d) Centro de Física Nuclear da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa; (e) Departamento de Fisica, Universidade do Minho, Braga; (f) Departamento de Fisica Teorica y del Cosmos and CAFPE, Universidad de Granada, Granada (Spain); (g) Dep Fisica and CEFITEC of Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal

127 Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Praha, Czech Republic

128 Czech Technical University in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic

129 Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic

130 State Research Center Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino, Russia

131 Particle Physics Department, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom

132 (a) INFN Sezione di Roma; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy

133 (a) INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy

134 (a) INFN Sezione di Roma Tre; (b) Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università Roma Tre, Roma, Italy

135 (a) Faculté des Sciences Ain Chock, Réseau Universitaire de Physique des Hautes Energies - Université Hassan II, Casablanca; (b) Centre National de l’Energie des Sciences Techniques Nucleaires, Rabat; (c) Faculté des Sciences Semlalia, Université Cadi Ayyad, LPHEA-Marrakech; (d) Faculté des Sciences, Université Mohamed Premier and LPTPM, Oujda; (e) Faculté des sciences, Université Mohammed V-Agdal, Rabat, Morocco

136 DSM/IRFU (Institut de Recherches sur les Lois Fondamentales de l’Univers), CEA Saclay (Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives), Gif-sur-Yvette, France

137 Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz CA, United States of America

138 Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle WA, United States of America

139 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

140 Department of Physics, Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan

141 Fachbereich Physik, Universität Siegen, Siegen, Germany

142 Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby BC, Canada

143 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford CA, United States of America

144 (a) Faculty of Mathematics, Physics & Informatics, Comenius University, Bratislava; (b) Department of Subnuclear Physics, Institute of Experimental Physics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Kosice, Slovak Republic

145 (a) Department of Physics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town; (b) Department of Physics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg; (c) School of Physics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

146 (a) Department of Physics, Stockholm University; (b) The Oskar Klein Centre, Stockholm, Sweden

147 Physics Department, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

148 Departments of Physics & Astronomy and Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook NY, United States of America

149 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom

150 School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

151 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

152 Department of Physics, Technion: Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

153 Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

154 Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

155 International Center for Elementary Particle Physics and Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

156 Graduate School of Science and Technology, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan

157 Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan

158 Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto ON, Canada

159 (a) TRIUMF, Vancouver BC; (b) Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto ON, Canada

160 Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

161 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford MA, United States of America

162 Centro de Investigaciones, Universidad Antonio Narino, Bogota, Colombia

163 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Irvine, Irvine CA, United States of America

164 (a) INFN Gruppo Collegato di Udine, Sezione di Trieste, Udine; (b) ICTP, Trieste; (c) Dipartimento di Chimica, Fisica e Ambiente, Università di Udine, Udine, Italy

165 Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana IL, United States of America

166 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden

167 Instituto de Física Corpuscular (IFIC) and Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear and Departamento de Ingeniería Electrónica and Instituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona (IMB-CNM), University of Valencia and CSIC, Valencia, Spain

168 Department of Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada

169 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria BC, Canada

170 Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom

171 Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan

172 Department of Particle Physics, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel

173 Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison WI, United States of America

174 Fakultät für Physik und Astronomie, Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Würzburg, Germany

175 Fachbereich C Physik, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany

176 Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven CT, United States of America

177 Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia

178 Centre de Calcul de l’Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules (IN2P3), Villeurbanne, France

a Also at Department of Physics, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom

b Also at Institute of Physics, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan

c Also at Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia

d Also at TRIUMF, Vancouver BC, Canada

e Also at Department of Physics, California State University, Fresno CA, United States of America

f Also at Department of Physics, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland

g Also at Departamento de Fisica e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciencias, Universidade do Porto, Portugal

h Also at Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia

i Also at CPPM, Aix-Marseille Université and CNRS/IN2P3, Marseille, France

j Also at Universita di Napoli Parthenope, Napoli, Italy

k Also at Institute of Particle Physics (IPP), Canada

l Also at Particle Physics Department, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom

m Also at Department of Physics, St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University, St. Petersburg, Russia

n Also at Louisiana Tech University, Ruston LA, United States of America

o Also at Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avancats, ICREA, Barcelona, Spain

p Also at Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan

q Also at Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX, United States of America

r Also at Institute of Theoretical Physics, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia

s Also at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

t Also at Georgian Technical University (GTU),Tbilisi, Georgia

u Also at Ochadai Academic Production, Ochanomizu University, Tokyo, Japan

v Also at Manhattan College, New York NY, United States of America

w Also at Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece

x Also at Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

y Also at LAL, Université Paris-Sud and CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France

z Also at Academia Sinica Grid Computing, Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

aa Also at School of Physics, Shandong University, Shandong, China

ab Also at Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology State University, Dolgoprudny, Russia

ac Also at Section de Physique, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland

ad Also at International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy

ae Also at Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of South Carolina, Columbia SC, United States of America

af Also at School of Physics and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

ag Also at Faculty of Physics, M.V.Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

ah Also at National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russia

ai Also at Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford CA, United States of America

aj Also at Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary

ak Also at Department of Physics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, United States of America

al Also at Discipline of Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

am Also at University of Malaya, Department of Physics, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Deceased