arXiv is now an independent nonprofit! Learn more
License: arXiv.org perpetual non-exclusive license
arXiv:1105.0813v2 [math.DG] 08 Jun 2011

CONSTANT ANGLE SURFACES IN PRODUCT SPACESThanks: This research was supported by Research Grant G.0432.07 of the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO)

Franki Dillen Email address, F. Dillen : franki.dillen@wis.kuleuven.be and Daniel Kowalczyk Email address, D. Kowalczyk : daniel.kowalczyk@wis.kuleuven.be Address: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Departement Wiskunde
Celestijnenlaan 200 B, Box 2400
B-3001 Leuven
Belgium
Abstract.

We classify all the surfaces in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) for which the tangent space TpM2T_{p}M^{2} makes constant angles with Tp(M2(c1)×{p2})T_{p}(M^{2}(c_{1})\times\{p_{2}\}) (or equivalently with Tp({p1}×M2(c2))T_{p}(\{p_{1}\}\times M^{2}(c_{2})) for every point p=(p1,p2)p=(p_{1},p_{2}) of M2M^{2}. Here M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) and M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}) are 22-dimensional space forms, not both flat. As a corollary we give a classification of all the totally geodesic surfaces in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}).

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification
53B25

1. Introduction

In recent years a lot of people started the study of submanifolds in product spaces, in particular surfaces M2M^{2} in M2(c)×M^{2}(c)\times\mathbb{R}, where M2(c)M^{2}(c) is a 22-dimensional space form of curvature c0c\neq 0. This was initiated by the study of minimal surfaces in the product space 𝕄2×\mathbb{M}^{2}\times\mathbb{R} by Meeks and Rosenberg in [13] and by Rosenberg in [15]. In the papers [6] and [7] geometers began the study of constant angle surfaces in M2(c)×M^{2}(c)\times\mathbb{R}, i.e. surfaces for which the normal of the surface makes a constant angle with the vector field t\partial_{t} parallel to the second component of M2(c)×M^{2}(c)\times\mathbb{R} and hence also with the first component TpM2(c)T_{p}M^{2}(c) of Tp(M2(c)×)T_{p}(M^{2}(c)\times\mathbb{R}). They proved that they can construct all the constant angle surfaces in M2(c)×M^{2}(c)\times\mathbb{R} starting from an arbitrary curve in M2(c)M^{2}(c) and that these surfaces have constant Gaussian curvature. Here we would like to define and classify constant angle surfaces in a product space M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) of two 22-dimensional space forms, not both flat. We show that these constant angle surfaces have necessarily constant Gaussian curvature. In the classification theorem we show that some of the constant angle surfaces can be constructed from curves in M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) and M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}). In other cases, the constant angle surfaces in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) will be constructed from a solution of a Sine-(or Sinh-)Gordon equation and its Bäcklund transformation.

2. Preliminaries

2.1. Surfaces in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}).

Let M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) be the product of two 22-dimensional space forms of constant sectional curvature c1c_{1} and c2c_{2} with the standard product metric g~\widetilde{g}, with c1c_{1} and c2c_{2} not both 00. Denote by ~\widetilde{\nabla} the Levi-Civita connection of (M2(c1)×M2(c2),g~)(M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}),\widetilde{g}) and by FF the product structure of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}), see [16]. This is the (1,1)(1,1)-tensor of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) defined by

F(X1+X2)=X1X2,F(X_{1}+X_{2})=X_{1}-X_{2},

for any vector field X=X1+X2X=X_{1}+X_{2}, where X1X_{1} and X2X_{2} denote the parts of XX tangent to the first and second factors, respectively. By definition of the product structure FF, we see that I+F2(X)\frac{I+F}{2}(X) is the projection of the vector field XX on the first component and that the (1,1)(1,1)-tensor I+F2\frac{I+F}{2} has rank 22 everywhere. Analogously we have that IF2(X)\frac{I-F}{2}(X) is the projection of the vector field XX on the second component and that the (1,1)(1,1)-tensor IF2\frac{I-F}{2} has rank 22 everywhere. We note that the product structure has the following properties:

(1) F2=I(FI),\displaystyle F^{2}=I\>(F\neq I),
(2) g~(FX,Y)=g~(X,FY),\displaystyle\widetilde{g}(FX,Y)=\widetilde{g}(X,FY),

and

(~XF)(Y)=0,(\widetilde{\nabla}_{X}F)(Y)=0,

for any vector field XX and YY of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). The Riemann-Christoffel curvature tensor R~\widetilde{R} of (M2(c1)×M2(c2),g~)(M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}),\widetilde{g}) is given by

R~(X,Y)Z=c1(I+F2(X)I+F2(Y))Z+c2(IF2(X)IF2(Y))Z,\widetilde{R}(X,Y)Z=c_{1}\left(\frac{I+F}{2}(X)\wedge\frac{I+F}{2}(Y)\right)Z+c_{2}\left(\frac{I-F}{2}(X)\wedge\frac{I-F}{2}(Y)\right)Z,

where \wedge associates to two tangent vectors v,wTp(M2(c1)×M2(c2))v,w\in T_{p}(M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2})) the endomorphism defined by

(vw)u=g~(w,u)vg~(v,u)w,(v\wedge w)u=\widetilde{g}(w,u)v-\widetilde{g}(v,u)w,

for every uTp(M2(c1)×M2(c2))u\in T_{p}(M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2})).

Let us now consider a surface M2M^{2} immersed in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). We will denote by X,Y,Z,X,Y,Z,\dots tangent vector fields and by ξ,ξ1,ξ2,\xi,\xi_{1},\xi_{2},\dots vector fields normal to M2M^{2} in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). We can now let the product structure FF of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) act on a tangent vector field XX or on a normal vector field ξ\xi. We can consider the decomposition of FXFX and FξF\xi into a tangent component and a normal component as

FX=fX+hX,\displaystyle FX=fX+hX,
Fξ=sξ+tξ,\displaystyle F\xi=s\xi+t\xi,

where f:TM2TM2f:TM^{2}\rightarrow TM^{2}, h:TM2TM2h:TM^{2}\rightarrow T^{\perp}M^{2}, s:TM2TM2s:T^{\perp}M^{2}\rightarrow TM^{2} and t:TM2TM2t:T^{\perp}M^{2}\rightarrow T^{\perp}M^{2} are (1,1)(1,1)-tensors on M2M^{2}. It can be easily deduced from equations (1)(\ref{F^2}) and (2)(\ref{Sym}) that

(3) f is a symmetric (1,1)-tensor field on M2 such that f2X=XshX,\displaystyle f\textrm{ is a symmetric }(1,1)\textrm{-tensor field on }M^{2}\textrm{ such that }f^{2}X=X-shX,
(4) t is a symmetric (1,1)-tensor field on M2 such that t2ξ=ξhsξ,\displaystyle t\textrm{ is a symmetric }(1,1)\textrm{-tensor field on }M^{2}\textrm{ such that }t^{2}\xi=\xi-hs\xi,
(5) g~(hX,ξ)=g(X,sξ),\displaystyle\widetilde{g}(hX,\xi)=g(X,s\xi),
(6) fsξ+stξ=0 and hfX+thX=0,\displaystyle fs\xi+st\xi=0\textrm{ and }hfX+thX=0,

for every XTM2X\in TM^{2} and every ξTM2\xi\in T^{\perp}M^{2}. If we denote by RR the Riemann-Christoffel curvature tensor of M2M^{2}, then with the previous notations we obtain that Gauss, Codazzi and Ricci equations are written as follows in terms of ff and hh:

(7) R(X,Y)Z=Sσ(Y,Z)XSσ(X,Z)Y+a((XY)Z+CLOSEOPEN(fXfY)Z)+b(f(XY)Z+(XY)fZ),R(X,Y)Z=S_{\sigma(Y,Z)}X-S_{\sigma(X,Z)}Y+a((X\wedge Y)Z+\\ (fX\wedge fY)Z)+b(f(X\wedge Y)Z+(X\wedge Y)fZ),
(8) (σ)(X,Y,Z)(σ)(Y,X,Z)=a(g(fY,Z)hXg(fX,Z)hY)+b(g(Y,Z)hXg(X,Z)hY),(\nabla\sigma)(X,Y,Z)-(\nabla\sigma)(Y,X,Z)=a(g(fY,Z)hX-g(fX,Z)hY)+\\ b(g(Y,Z)hX-g(X,Z)hY),
(9) R(X,Y)ξ=a(g~(hY,ξ)hXg~(hX,ξ)hY)σ(SξX,Y)+σ(SξY,X),R^{\perp}(X,Y)\xi=a(\widetilde{g}(hY,\xi)hX-\widetilde{g}(hX,\xi)hY)-\sigma(S_{\xi}X,Y)+\sigma(S_{\xi}Y,X),

where a=c1+c24a=\frac{c_{1}+c_{2}}{4} and b=c1c24b=\frac{c_{1}-c_{2}}{4}. Since M2M^{2} is a surface immersed in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}), we have that equation (7) is equivalent to the fact that the Gaussian curvature KK is equal to

det(Sξ1)+det(Sξ2)+c1det(I+f2)+c2det(If2),\det(S_{\xi_{1}})+\det(S_{\xi_{2}})+c_{1}\det(\frac{I+f}{2})+c_{2}\det(\frac{I-f}{2}),

where {ξ1,ξ2}\{\xi_{1},\xi_{2}\} is an orthonormal basis of TM2T^{\perp}M^{2}. Moreover we have the following proposition that we can prove using the formulas of Gauss and Weingarten and the fact that ~F=0\widetilde{\nabla}F=0.

Proposition 1.

For every X,YTM2X,Y\in TM^{2} and every ξTM2\xi\in T^{\perp}M^{2}, we have that

(10) (Xf)(Y)=ShYX+s(σ(X,Y)),\displaystyle(\nabla_{X}f)(Y)=S_{hY}X+s(\sigma(X,Y)),
(11) XhYh(XY)=t(σ(X,Y))σ(X,fY),\displaystyle\nabla^{\perp}_{X}hY-h(\nabla_{X}Y)=t(\sigma(X,Y))-\sigma(X,fY),
(12) Xtξt(Xξ)=σ(sξ,X)h(SξX),\displaystyle\nabla^{\perp}_{X}t\xi-t(\nabla^{\perp}_{X}\xi)=-\sigma(s\xi,X)-h(S_{\xi}X),
(13) Xsξs(Xξ)=fSξX+StξX.\displaystyle\nabla_{X}s\xi-s(\nabla^{\perp}_{X}\xi)=-fS_{\xi}X+S_{t\xi}X.

We remark that the (1,1)(1,1)-tensor ss is, in some sense, a kind of transpose of the (1,1)(1,1)-tensor hh, because of equation (5). We can easily see that equations (11) and (13) are equivalent because of equation (5). Analogously we can see that the two equations of (6) are equivalent.

The equations (7), (8), (9), (10), (11) and (12) are called the compatibility equations of surfaces in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). The following theorems follow from more general results proven in [12].

Theorem 1.

Let (M2,g)(M^{2},g) be a simply connected Riemannian surface with Levi-Civita connection \nabla, ν\nu a Riemannian vector bundle over M2M^{2} of rank 22 with metric g~\widetilde{g}, \nabla^{\perp} a connection on ν\nu compatible with the metric g~\widetilde{g}, σ\sigma a symmetric (1,2)(1,2) tensor with values in ν\nu. Let f:TM2TM2f:TM^{2}\rightarrow TM^{2} , t:ννt:\nu\rightarrow\nu and h:TM2νh:TM^{2}\rightarrow\nu be (1,1)(1,1)-tensors over M2M^{2} that satisfy equations (3), (4) and (6). Define s:νTM2s:\nu\rightarrow TM^{2} by g(sξ,X)=g~(ξ,hX)g(s\xi,X)=\widetilde{g}(\xi,hX) for X,YTM2X,Y\in TM^{2} , ξν\xi\in\nu. Moreover I+F2\frac{I+F}{2} and IF2\frac{I-F}{2} are bundle maps of rank 22 defined such that FX=fX+hXFX=fX+hX and Fξ=sξ+tξF\xi=s\xi+t\xi. Assume that the compatibility equations for M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) are satisfied. Then there exists an isometric immersion ψ:M2M2(c1)×M2(c2)\psi:M^{2}\rightarrow M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) such that σ\sigma is the second fundamental form, ν\nu is isomorphic to the normal bundle of ψ(M2)\psi(M^{2}) in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) by an isomorphism ψ~:νTψ(M2)\widetilde{\psi}:\nu\rightarrow T^{\perp}\psi(M^{2}) and such that

(14) F~(ψX)=ψ(fX)+ψ~(hX),\widetilde{F}(\psi_{*}X)=\psi_{*}(fX)+\widetilde{\psi}(hX),

and

(15) F~(ψ~ξ)=ψ(sξ)+ψ~(tξ),\widetilde{F}(\widetilde{\psi}\xi)=\psi_{*}(s\xi)+\widetilde{\psi}(t\xi),

where F~\widetilde{F} is the product structure of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}).

Theorem 2.

Let ψ:M2M2(c1)×M2(c2)\psi:M^{2}\rightarrow M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}), resp. ψ:M2M2(c1)×M2(c2)\psi^{\prime}:M^{2}\rightarrow M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}), be isometric immersions, with corresponding second fundamental form σ\sigma, resp. σ\sigma^{\prime}, shape operator SS, resp. SS^{\prime}, normal space TM2T^{\perp}M^{2}, resp. TM2T^{\perp^{\prime}}M^{2}. Let ff and hh be (1,1)(1,1)-tensors on M2M^{2} defined by (14) and ff^{\prime} and hh^{\prime} similarly for ψ\psi^{\prime}. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

  1. (1)

    fX=fXfX=f^{\prime}X for every XTpM2X\in T_{p}M^{2} and pM2p\in M^{2}.

  2. (2)

    There exists an isometric bundle map ϕ~:TM2TM2\widetilde{\phi}:T^{\perp}M^{2}\rightarrow T^{\perp^{\prime}}M^{2} such that

    ϕ~(σ(X,Y))=σ(X,Y),\displaystyle\widetilde{\phi}(\sigma(X,Y))=\sigma^{\prime}(X,Y),
    ϕ~(Xξ)=Xϕ~(ξ)\displaystyle\widetilde{\phi}(\nabla^{\perp}_{X}\xi)=\nabla^{\perp^{\prime}}_{X}\widetilde{\phi}(\xi)

    and

    ϕ~(hX)=hX\widetilde{\phi}(hX)=h^{\prime}X

    for every XTpM2X\in T_{p}M^{2}, ξTpM2\xi\in T^{\perp}_{p}M^{2} and pM2p\in M^{2}.

Then there exists an isometry τ\tau of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) such that τψ=ψ\tau\circ\psi=\psi^{\prime} and τ|TMn=ϕ~\tau_{*|T^{\perp}M^{n}}=\widetilde{\phi}.

2.2. Curves in M2(c)M^{2}(c).

In this short subsection we will discuss curves in 22-dimensional space forms M2(c)M^{2}(c) with c0c\neq 0. It is known that M2(c)M^{2}(c) is isometric to the 22-dimensional sphere 𝕊2(c)\mathbb{S}^{2}(c) of radius 1c\frac{1}{\sqrt{c}} if c>0c>0, i.e.

𝕊2(c)={(p1,p2,p3)𝔼3|p12+p22+p32=1c},\mathbb{S}^{2}(c)=\{(p_{1},p_{2},p_{3})\in\mathbb{E}^{3}\;|\;p_{1}^{2}+p_{2}^{2}+p_{3}^{2}=\frac{1}{c}\},

endowed with the induced metric of 𝔼3\mathbb{E}^{3}. The tangent space Tp𝕊2(c)T_{p}\mathbb{S}^{2}(c) in every point pp is given by

𝕊2(c)={vTp𝔼3|p,v=0}.\mathbb{S}^{2}(c)=\{v\in T_{p}\mathbb{E}^{3}\;|\;\langle p,v\rangle=0\}.

Using the cross-product ×\times in 𝔼3\mathbb{E}^{3}, we define a complex structure JJ on T𝕊2(c)T\mathbb{S}^{2}(c) by

J:T𝕊2(c)T𝕊2(c):vpc(p×v)p.J:T\mathbb{S}^{2}(c)\rightarrow T\mathbb{S}^{2}(c):v_{p}\mapsto\sqrt{c}(p\times v)_{p}.

It is easy to see that if vTp𝕊2(c)v\in T_{p}\mathbb{S}^{2}(c) and v2=1\|v\|^{2}=1, then {v,Jv}\{v,Jv\} is an orthonormal basis of Tp𝕊2(c)T_{p}\mathbb{S}^{2}(c).

We can define in a similar manner a complex structure when c<0c<0. It is known that M2(c)M^{2}(c) is isometric to the hyperbolic plane 2(c)\mathbb{H}^{2}(c) if c<0c<0. We use here the Minkowski or the hyperboloid model of the hyperbolic plane. Denote by 13\mathbb{R}^{3}_{1} the Minkowski 33-space with standard coordinates p1,p2p_{1},p_{2} and p3p_{3}, endowed with the Lorentzian metric

.,.1=dp12+dp22+dp32.\langle.,.\rangle_{1}=-dp_{1}^{2}+dp_{2}^{2}+dp_{3}^{2}.

The hyperbolic plane 2(c)\mathbb{H}^{2}(c) can be constructed as the upper sheet (p1>0p_{1}>0) of the hyperboloid

{(p1,p2,p3)13|p12+p22+p32=1c},\{(p_{1},p_{2},p_{3})\in\mathbb{R}^{3}_{1}\;|\;-p_{1}^{2}+p_{2}^{2}+p_{3}^{2}=\frac{1}{c}\},

endowed with the induced metric of 13\mathbb{R}^{3}_{1}. The tangent space Tp2(c)T_{p}\mathbb{H}^{2}(c) in every point pp is given by

Tp2(c)={vTp13|p,v1=0}.T_{p}\mathbb{H}^{2}(c)=\{v\in T_{p}\mathbb{R}^{3}_{1}\;|\;\langle p,v\rangle_{1}=0\}.

Using the Lorentzian cross-product \boxtimes in 13\mathbb{R}^{3}_{1} (see for example [7]), we define a complex structure JJ on T2(c)T\mathbb{H}^{2}(c) by

J:T2(c)T2(c):vpc(pv)p.J:T\mathbb{H}^{2}(c)\rightarrow T\mathbb{H}^{2}(c):v_{p}\mapsto\sqrt{-c}(p\boxtimes v)_{p}.

It is easy to see that if vTp2(c)v\in T_{p}\mathbb{H}^{2}(c) and v2=1\|v\|^{2}=1, then {v,Jv}\{v,Jv\} is an orthonormal basis of Tp2(c)T_{p}\mathbb{H}^{2}(c). In the following we will denote JJ as the complex structure of M2(c)M^{2}(c).

Let α:IM2(c)\alpha:I\rightarrow M^{2}(c) be an arc-length parameterized curve in M2(c)M^{2}(c). Denote by T(s)Tα(s)M2(c)T(s)\in T_{\alpha(s)}M^{2}(c) the tangent unit vector α(s)\alpha^{\prime}(s) and by N(s)Tα(s)M2(c)N(s)\in T_{\alpha(s)}M^{2}(c) the normal vector JT(s)JT(s). By direct calculations, one can show that

T=DTT=κNcα,N=DTN=κT,\displaystyle T^{\prime}=D_{T}T=\kappa N-c\alpha,N^{\prime}=D_{T}N=-\kappa T,

where DD is the Levi-Civita connection of 𝔼3\mathbb{E}^{3} or of 13\mathbb{R}^{3}_{1}. We call κ\kappa the geodesic curvature of α\alpha in M2(c)M^{2}(c). We will need the geodesic curvature of a curve in M2(c)M^{2}(c) in order to state our classification results of constant angle surfaces.

3. Constant angle surfaces

Since ff is a symmetric (1,1)(1,1)-tensor on M2M^{2}, there exist continuous functions λ1λ2\lambda_{1}\leq\lambda_{2} on M2M^{2} such that for every pp in M2M^{2} λ1(p)\lambda_{1}(p) and λ2(p)\lambda_{2}(p) are eigenvalues of ff at pp. Moreover λ1\lambda_{1} and λ2\lambda_{2} are differentiable functions in points where λ1\lambda_{1} and λ2\lambda_{2} are different. Assume that λ1<λ2\lambda_{1}<\lambda_{2}, then one can show that the distributions Tλ1={XTM2|fX=λ1X}T_{\lambda_{1}}=\{X\in TM^{2}|fX=\lambda_{1}X\} and Tλ2={XTM2|fX=λ2X}T_{\lambda_{2}}=\{X\in TM^{2}|fX=\lambda_{2}X\} are differentiable. From equations (3) and (5) it is easy to deduce that λi21\lambda_{i}^{2}\leq 1 for i=1,2i=1,2. Hence we have that for every point pp there exists a unique θ1(p)\theta_{1}(p) and θ2(p)\theta_{2}(p) in [0,π2][0,\frac{\pi}{2}] such that

λ1(p)=cos(2θ1(p))andλ2(p)=cos(2θ2(p)).\lambda_{1}(p)=\cos(2\theta_{1}(p))\qquad\textrm{and}\qquad\lambda_{2}(p)=\cos(2\theta_{2}(p)).

We call θ1\theta_{1} and θ2\theta_{2} the angle functions of M2M^{2} in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). This definition is inspired by the definition of angles between 22-dimensional linear subspaces of the Euclidean space 𝔼4\mathbb{E}^{4} given in [14] or [8], where θ1(p)\theta_{1}(p) and θ2(p)\theta_{2}(p) are the angles between TpM2T_{p}M^{2} and Tp(M2(c1)×{p2})T_{p}(M^{2}(c_{1})\times\{p_{2}\}), p=(p1,p2)Mp=(p_{1},p_{2})\in M. Moreover this definition of angle for surfaces in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) coincides with the definition of angle for surfaces in M2(c)×M^{2}(c)\times\mathbb{R}.

For Lagrangian surfaces in S2×S2S^{2}\times S^{2}, a similar notion for angle was introduced in [9]; since for Lagrangian surfaces λ1+λ2=0\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2}=0, see below, there is only one angle function. Lagrangian surfaces in S2×S2S^{2}\times S^{2} are also studied in [2].

Definition 1.

A surface in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) is a constant angle surface if θ1\theta_{1} and θ2\theta_{2} are constant.

This definition also makes sense for c1=c2=0c_{1}=c_{2}=0, but in this case it is better to call a surface in 𝔼4\mathbb{E}^{4} a constant angle surface if there is a fixed plane in 𝔼4\mathbb{E}^{4} such that TpMT_{p}M makes constant angles with this plane. This will be studied in a separate paper. Under additional conditions, a classification of those surfaces independently have been classified in [1].

3.1. Complex structures

Let J~\widetilde{J} and J¯\overline{J} be complex structures on M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) defined by

J~v=J~(v1,v2)=(J1v1,J2v2)=(J1I+F2v,J2IF2v)\widetilde{J}v=\widetilde{J}(v_{1},v_{2})=(J_{1}v_{1},J_{2}v_{2})=(J_{1}\frac{I+F}{2}v,J_{2}\frac{I-F}{2}v)

and

J¯v=J¯(v1,v2)=(J1v1,J2v2)=(J1I+F2v,J2IF2v),\overline{J}v=\overline{J}(v_{1},v_{2})=(J_{1}v_{1},-J_{2}v_{2})=(J_{1}\frac{I+F}{2}v,-J_{2}\frac{I-F}{2}v),

respectively, where J1J_{1} and J2J_{2} denote the standard complex structures on M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) and M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}). We obtain the following connection between the angle functions and the complex structures J~\widetilde{J} and J¯\overline{J}.

Proposition 2.

Consider a surface M2M^{2} in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) with angle functions θ1\theta_{1} and θ2\theta_{2}, then

(16) g(J~v,w)=cos(θ1θ2)ωM2(v,w)orcos(θ1+θ2)ωM2(v,w)g(\widetilde{J}v,w)=\cos(\theta_{1}-\theta_{2})\omega_{M^{2}}(v,w)\ \ \mathrm{or}\ \ \cos(\theta_{1}+\theta_{2})\omega_{M^{2}}(v,w)

and

(17) g(J¯v,w)=cos(θ1+θ2)ωM2(v,w)orcos(θ1θ2)ωM2(v,w),g(\overline{J}v,w)=\cos(\theta_{1}+\theta_{2})\omega_{M^{2}}(v,w)\ \ \mathrm{or}\ \ \cos(\theta_{1}-\theta_{2})\omega_{M^{2}}(v,w),

for all v,wTpM2v,w\in T_{p}M^{2} and pMp\in M and a suitable choice of volume form ωM2\omega_{M^{2}} of M2M^{2}.

Proof.

We only prove this proposition in the case that c1,c2>0c_{1},c_{2}>0. The other cases can be proved analogously. Let us consider an orthonormal basis {e1,e2}\{e_{1},e_{2}\} of TpM2T_{p}M^{2} that diagonalizes ff. Hence we have that fei=cos(2θi)eife_{i}=\cos(2\theta_{i})e_{i} for i=1,2i=1,2. Then

g(J~e1,e2)=c1(I+F2e1×I+F2e2)p1c2(IF2e1×IF2e2)p2=ϵ1(I+F2e1I+F2e2+ϵ2IF2e1IF2e2)=ϵ1cos(θ1θ2)orϵ1cos(θ1+θ2),\begin{split}g(\widetilde{J}e_{1},e_{2})&=-\sqrt{c_{1}}(\frac{I+F}{2}e_{1}\times\frac{I+F}{2}e_{2})\cdot p_{1}-\sqrt{c_{2}}(\frac{I-F}{2}e_{1}\times\frac{I-F}{2}e_{2})\cdot p_{2}\\ &=\epsilon_{1}(\|\frac{I+F}{2}e_{1}\|\|\frac{I+F}{2}e_{2}\|+\epsilon_{2}\|\frac{I-F}{2}e_{1}\|\|\frac{I-F}{2}e_{2}\|)\\ &=\epsilon_{1}\cos(\theta_{1}-\theta_{2})\ \ \mathrm{or}\ \ \epsilon_{1}\cos(\theta_{1}+\theta_{2}),\end{split}

where ϵ12=ϵ22=1\epsilon_{1}^{2}=\epsilon_{2}^{2}=1. This proves the first equation in the proposition. The second equation can be proved similarly and the proof of the proposition is finished. ∎

By direct computations, one can now easily prove the following theorem.

Theorem 3.

A surface MM in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) is a complex surface with respect to J~\widetilde{J} or J¯\overline{J} if and only if ff is proportional to the identity. M2M^{2} is Lagrangian with respect to J~\widetilde{J} or J¯\overline{J} if and only if the trace of ff vanishes.

3.2. Totally geodesic surfaces

We show now that totally geodesic surfaces in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) are constant angle surfaces in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}).

Proposition 3.

Suppose M2M^{2} is a totally geodesic surface of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}), then M2M^{2} is a constant angle surface in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}).

Proof.

As M2M^{2} is a totally geodesic surface, we have that (Xf)=0(\nabla_{X}f)=0 for any XTM2X\in TM^{2} and hence the eigenvalues of ff are constant. We give also the explicit values of λ1\lambda_{1} and λ2\lambda_{2}, because we will need these values in the classification of totally geodesic surfaces. Let pp be an arbitrary point in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) and {e1,e2}\{e_{1},e_{2}\} an orthonormal basis in TpM2T_{p}M^{2} such that fe1=λ1e1fe_{1}=\lambda_{1}e_{1} and fe2=λ2e2fe_{2}=\lambda_{2}e_{2}. Using the equation of Codazzi, we obtain

0=(aλ1+b)(1λ22)=(aλ2+b)(1λ12),0=(a\lambda_{1}+b)(1-\lambda^{2}_{2})=(a\lambda_{2}+b)(1-\lambda^{2}_{1}),

with a=c1+c24a=\frac{c_{1}+c_{2}}{4} and b=c1c24b=\frac{c_{1}-c_{2}}{4}. Hence we obtain that λ1=λ2=ba\lambda_{1}=\lambda_{2}=-\frac{b}{a} with c1c2>0c_{1}c_{2}>0, λ12=λ22=1\lambda^{2}_{1}=\lambda^{2}_{2}=1, λ12=1\lambda^{2}_{1}=1 and λ2=ba\lambda_{2}=-\frac{b}{a} with c1c2>0c_{1}c_{2}>0 or λ12=1\lambda_{1}^{2}=1 and λ2=cos(2θ)\lambda_{2}=\cos(2\theta) with c1c2=0c_{1}c_{2}=0 and θ[0,π2]\theta\in[0,\frac{\pi}{2}]. These conditions are equivalent to

  1. (1)

    λ1=λ2=ba\lambda_{1}=\lambda_{2}=-\frac{b}{a} with c1c2>0c_{1}c_{2}>0,

  2. (2)

    λ1=±1\lambda_{1}=\pm 1 and λ2=±1\lambda_{2}=\pm 1,

  3. (3)

    λ1=±1\lambda_{1}=\pm 1 and λ2=ba\lambda_{2}=-\frac{b}{a} with c1c2>0c_{1}c_{2}>0, and

  4. (4)

    λ1=1\lambda_{1}=1 and λ2[1,1]\lambda_{2}\in[-1,1] with c1=0c_{1}=0 or λ1=1\lambda_{1}=-1 and λ2[1,1]\lambda_{2}\in[-1,1] with c2=0c_{2}=0.

Since λ1\lambda_{1} and λ2\lambda_{2} are continuous, one of the above conditions must hold. Hence we obtain that totally geodesic surfaces of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) are constant angle surfaces, in which λ1\lambda_{1} and λ2\lambda_{2} have one of the above specific values. ∎

In this section we will give a local classification of totally geodesic surfaces for which λ1=λ2=ba\lambda_{1}=\lambda_{2}=-\frac{b}{a} with c1c2>0c_{1}c_{2}>0. The other cases will be treated in the next sections and will appear as special cases of constant angle surfaces. We classify the totally geodesic surfaces of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) in Theorem 7. Suppose that c1,c2>0c_{1},c_{2}>0, the other case can be treated analogously and the result of the second case is stated together with the first case in Proposition 4.

We can immerse M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) as a submanifold of codimension 22 in the Euclidean space 𝔼6\mathbb{E}^{6}. We also remark that we obtain, by using the equation of Gauss, that the surface M2M^{2} has constant Gaussian curvature c1c2c1+c2\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}. So let ψ:M2M2(c1)×M2(c2)\psi:M^{2}\rightarrow M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) be a totally geodesic surface in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) with λ1=λ2=ba\lambda_{1}=\lambda_{2}=-\frac{b}{a}. Let us fix a point pp in open set UU of M2M^{2} and let (u,v)(u,v) be Fermi coordinates of UU in M2M^{2}, there always exist such coordinates on an open set of a surface (see for example [11]). The metric gg of MM then has the form

du2+G(u,v)dv2du^{2}+G(u,v)dv^{2}

on the open set UU of MM, with G(0,v)=1G(0,v)=1 and uG(0,v)=0\frac{\partial}{\partial_{u}}G(0,v)=0 for every vv, in terms of the Fermi coordinates (u,v)(u,v). Since M2M^{2} has constant Gaussian curvature, we have that GG is uniquely determined by the partial differential equation

22uG=c1c2c1+c2G.\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial^{2}u}\sqrt{G}=-\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}\sqrt{G}.

So we find that GG is given by

(18) cos2(c1c2c1+c2u),\cos^{2}(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u),

because of the initial conditions G(0,v)=1G(0,v)=1 and uG(0,v)=0\frac{\partial}{\partial_{u}}G(0,v)=0 for every vv. Let us now consider M2M^{2} as a surface of codimension 44 immersed in 𝔼6\mathbb{E}^{6}. The formulas of Gauss are then given by

(19) Duu=c1c2c1+c2x,\displaystyle D_{\partial_{u}}\partial_{u}=-\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}\overrightarrow{x},
(20) Duv=Dvu=c1c2c1+c2tan(c1c2c1+c2u)v,\displaystyle D_{\partial_{u}}\partial_{v}=D_{\partial_{v}}\partial_{u}=-\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}\tan(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\partial_{v},
(21) Dvv=c1c2c1+c2cos(c1c2c1+c2u)sin(c1c2c1+c2u)uc1c2c1+c2cos2(c1c2c1+c2u)x,\displaystyle D_{\partial_{v}}\partial_{v}=\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}\cos(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\sin(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\partial_{u}-\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}\cos^{2}(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\overrightarrow{x},

where x\overrightarrow{x} is the position vector of M2M^{2} in 𝔼6\mathbb{E}^{6}. Solving equations (19) and (20) we find that ψ\psi is locally given by

(cos(c1c2c1+c2u)f~1(v)+sin(c1c2c1+c2u)g~1,,cos(c1c2c1+c2u)f~3(v)+sin(c1c2c1+c2u)g~3,OPENcos(c1c2c1+c2u)f¯1(v)+sin(c1c2c1+c2u)g¯1,,cos(c1c2c1+c2u)f¯3(v)+sin(c1c2c1+c2u)g¯3),(\cos(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\widetilde{f}_{1}(v)+\sin(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\widetilde{g}_{1},\dots,\cos(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\widetilde{f}_{3}(v)+\sin(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\widetilde{g}_{3},\\ \cos(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\overline{f}_{1}(v)+\sin(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\overline{g}_{1},\dots,\cos(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\overline{f}_{3}(v)+\sin(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\overline{g}_{3}),

where g~=(g~1,g~2,g~3)\widetilde{g}=(\widetilde{g}_{1},\widetilde{g}_{2},\widetilde{g}_{3}) and g¯=(g¯1,g¯2,g¯3)\overline{g}=(\overline{g}_{1},\overline{g}_{2},\overline{g}_{3}) are constant vectors in 3\mathbb{R}^{3}. Moreover we have the following conditions

g(ψu,ψu)=1,g(ψu,ψv)=0,g(ψv,ψv)=cos2(c1c2c1+c2u),\displaystyle g(\psi_{u},\psi_{u})=1,\;g(\psi_{u},\psi_{v})=0,\;g(\psi_{v},\psi_{v})=\cos^{2}(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u),
g(ψu,hu)=0,g(ψu,hv)=0,g(hu,hu)=4c1c2(c1+c2)2,g(hu,hv)=0,\displaystyle g(\psi_{u},h\partial_{u})=0,\;g(\psi_{u},h\partial_{v})=0,\;g(h\partial_{u},h\partial_{u})=\frac{4c_{1}c_{2}}{(c_{1}+c_{2})^{2}},\;g(h\partial_{u},h\partial_{v})=0,
g(ψv,hv)=0,g(ψv,hu)=0,g(hv,hv)=4c1c2(c1+c2)2cos2(c1c2c1+c2u),\displaystyle g(\psi_{v},h\partial_{v})=0,\;g(\psi_{v},h\partial_{u})=0,\;g(h\partial_{v},h\partial_{v})=\frac{4c_{1}c_{2}}{(c_{1}+c_{2})^{2}}\cos^{2}(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u),
g(ψu,ξ~)=0,g(ψv,ξ~)=0,g(ξ~,ξ~)=1c1,\displaystyle g(\psi_{u},\widetilde{\xi})=0,\;g(\psi_{v},\widetilde{\xi})=0,\;g(\widetilde{\xi},\widetilde{\xi})=\frac{1}{c_{1}},
g(ψu,ξ¯)=0,g(ψv,ξ¯)=0,g(ξ¯,ξ¯)=1c2,\displaystyle g(\psi_{u},\overline{\xi})=0,\;g(\psi_{v},\overline{\xi})=0,\;g(\overline{\xi},\overline{\xi})=\frac{1}{c_{2}},
g(hu,ξ~)=g(hv,ξ~)=g(hu,ξ¯)=g(hv,ξ¯)=0,\displaystyle g(h\partial_{u},\widetilde{\xi})=g(h\partial_{v},\widetilde{\xi})=g(h\partial_{u},\overline{\xi})=g(h\partial_{v},\overline{\xi})=0,

in which ξ~=(ψ1,ψ2,ψ3,0,0,0)\widetilde{\xi}=(\psi_{1},\psi_{2},\psi_{3},0,0,0) and ξ¯=(0,0,0,ψ4,ψ5,ψ6)\overline{\xi}=(0,0,0,\psi_{4},\psi_{5},\psi_{6}). This conditions are equivalent to

i=13f~i2=i=13g~i2=1c1,\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{3}\widetilde{f}_{i}^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{3}\widetilde{g}_{i}^{2}=\frac{1}{c_{1}},
j=13f¯j2=j=13g¯j2=1c2,\displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{3}\overline{f}_{j}^{2}=\sum_{j=1}^{3}\overline{g}_{j}^{2}=\frac{1}{c_{2}},
i=13f~ig~i=i=13f~ig~i=0,\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{3}\widetilde{f}_{i}\widetilde{g}_{i}=\sum_{i=1}^{3}\widetilde{f}^{\prime}_{i}\widetilde{g}_{i}=0,
j=13f¯jg¯j=j=13f¯jg¯j=0,\displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{3}\overline{f}_{j}\overline{g}_{j}=\sum_{j=1}^{3}\overline{f}^{\prime}_{j}\overline{g}_{j}=0,
i=13(f~i)2=c2c1+c2,\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{3}(\widetilde{f}^{\prime}_{i})^{2}=\frac{c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}},
j=13(f¯i)2=c1c1+c2.\displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{3}(\overline{f}^{\prime}_{i})^{2}=\frac{c_{1}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}.

From the above equations we can conclude that f~=(f~1,f~2,f~3)\widetilde{f}=(\widetilde{f}_{1},\widetilde{f}_{2},\widetilde{f}_{3}) and f¯=(f¯1,f¯2,f¯3)\overline{f}=(\overline{f}_{1},\overline{f}_{2},\overline{f}_{3}) are curves in M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) and M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}), respectively. Moreover we see that f~\widetilde{f} and f¯\overline{f} are curves of speed c2c1+c2\sqrt{\frac{c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}} and c1c1+c2\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}, respectively. The constant vector g~\widetilde{g} is perpendicular to the vectors f~\widetilde{f} and f~\widetilde{f}^{\prime} and the constant vector g¯\overline{g} is perpendicular to the vectors f¯\overline{f} and f¯\overline{f}^{\prime}. Hence we obtain that g~=±c1+c2c2f~×f~\widetilde{g}=\pm\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}+c_{2}}{c_{2}}}\widetilde{f}\times\widetilde{f}^{\prime} and g¯=±c1+c2c1f¯×f¯\overline{g}=\pm\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}+c_{2}}{c_{1}}}\overline{f}\times\overline{f}^{\prime}. Since g~\widetilde{g} and g¯\overline{g} are constant vectors we obtain that the curves f~\widetilde{f} and f¯\overline{f} are circles of radius 1c1\frac{1}{\sqrt{c_{1}}} and 1c2\frac{1}{\sqrt{c_{2}}}, respectively. We obtain the following proposition.

Proposition 4.

Let ψ:M2M2(c1)×M2(c2)\psi:M^{2}\rightarrow M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) be a totally geodesic surface with λ1=λ2=c2c1c1+c2\lambda_{1}=\lambda_{2}=\frac{c_{2}-c_{1}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}, then ψ\psi is locally congruent to

(22) (cos(c1c2c1+c2u)f~(v)+sin(c1c2c1+c2u)c1+c2c2f~(v)×f~(v),OPENcos(c1c2c1+c2u)f¯(v)+sin(c1c2c1+c2u)c1+c2c1f¯(v)×f¯(v)),(\cos(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\widetilde{f}(v)+\sin(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}+c_{2}}{c_{2}}}\widetilde{f}(v)\times\widetilde{f}^{\prime}(v),\\ \cos(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\overline{f}(v)+\sin(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}+c_{2}}{c_{1}}}\overline{f}(v)\times\overline{f}^{\prime}(v)),

where f~\widetilde{f} and f¯\overline{f} are geodesic circles in M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) and M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}), respectively, of constant speed c2c1+c2\sqrt{\frac{c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}} and c1c1+c2\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}} if c1,c2>0c_{1},c_{2}>0 or to

(23) (cosh(c1c2c1+c2u)f~(v)+sinh(c1c2c1+c2u)c1+c2c2f~(v)f~(v),OPENcosh(c1c2c1+c2u)f¯(v)+sinh(c1c2c1+c2u)c1+c2c1f¯(v)f¯(v)),(\cosh(\sqrt{-\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\widetilde{f}(v)+\sinh(\sqrt{-\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}+c_{2}}{c_{2}}}\widetilde{f}(v)\boxtimes\widetilde{f}^{\prime}(v),\\ \cosh(\sqrt{-\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\overline{f}(v)+\sinh(\sqrt{-\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}+c_{2}}{c_{1}}}\overline{f}(v)\boxtimes\overline{f}^{\prime}(v)),

where f~\widetilde{f} and f¯\overline{f} are geodesic curves in M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) and M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}), respectively, of constant speed c2c1+c2\sqrt{\frac{c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}} and c1c1+c2\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}} if c1,c2<0c_{1},c_{2}<0.

3.3. ff is proportional to the identity

Suppose now that f=λIf=\lambda I, and that λ=cos(2θ)\lambda=\cos(2\theta) is a constant. Using equations (3) and (5) we see that g~(hX,hY)=sin2(2θ)g(X,Y)\widetilde{g}(hX,hY)=\sin^{2}(2\theta)g(X,Y) for every X,YTM2X,Y\in TM^{2}. Moreover from equation (10) we immediately deduce that ShXY+s(σ(X,Y))=0S_{hX}Y+s(\sigma(X,Y))=0. Suppose first that sin2θ=0\sin{2\theta}=0 and hence we obtain that θ=0\theta=0 or θ=π2\theta=\frac{\pi}{2}. In the first case this means that the tangent vector fields along M2M^{2} are eigenvectors of FF with eigenvalue 11 and that the normal vector fields along M2M^{2} are eigenvectors of FF with eigenvalue 1-1. It can be shown then that M2M^{2} is an open part of M2(c1)×{p2}M^{2}(c_{1})\times\{p_{2}\}. Analogously we obtain that M2M^{2} is an open part of {p1}×M2(c2)\{p_{1}\}\times M^{2}(c_{2}) if θ=π2\theta=\frac{\pi}{2}.

Let θ\theta be now a constant in (0,π2)(0,\frac{\pi}{2}). Using the fact that ShXY+s(σ(X,Y))=0S_{hX}Y+s(\sigma(X,Y))=0 for every X,YTM2X,Y\in TM^{2}, we deduce that vv is an eigenvector of ShvS_{hv} with eigenvalue 00 for every vTpM2v\in T_{p}M^{2}, i.e. Shvv=0S_{hv}v=0. Take now an arbitrary orthonormal basis {e1,e2}TpM2\{e_{1},e_{2}\}\subset T_{p}M^{2}. Consider the shape operators She1S_{he_{1}} and She2S_{he_{2}} associated to he1he_{1} and he2he_{2}, respectively. We have then that She1e2=μ1e2S_{he_{1}}e_{2}=\mu_{1}e_{2} and She2e1=μ2e1S_{he_{2}}e_{1}=\mu_{2}e_{1}. Moreover we have that 0=Sh(e1+e2)(e1+e2)=μ1e2+μ2e10=S_{h(e_{1}+e_{2})}(e_{1}+e_{2})=\mu_{1}e_{2}+\mu_{2}e_{1} and hence we have that μ1=μ2=0\mu_{1}=\mu_{2}=0. We conclude that M2M^{2} is a totally geodesic surface in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}), because {he1,he2}\{he_{1},he_{2}\} is an orthogonal basis of TM2T^{\perp}M^{2} and She1=She2=0S_{he_{1}}=S_{he_{2}}=0. Using the equation of Codazzi, we obtain that

(c1cos2(θ)c2sin2(θ))sin(θ)cos(θ)=0.(c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta)-c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta))\sin(\theta)\cos(\theta)=0.

Since θ(0,π2)\theta\in(0,\frac{\pi}{2}) and c1c_{1} and c2c_{2} are not both 00, we obtain that c1c2>0c_{1}c_{2}>0 and tan2(θ)=c1c2\tan^{2}(\theta)=\frac{c_{1}}{c_{2}}. Hence we have that cos(2θ)=c2c1c1+c2\cos(2\theta)=\frac{c_{2}-c_{1}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}. Moreover we have that the Gaussian curvature of the surface equals c1c2c1+c2\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}. We summarize the previous in the following proposition.

Proposition 5.

Let M2M^{2} be a surface immersed in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). Suppose f=λIf=\lambda I with λ[1,1]\lambda\in[-1,1] and λ\lambda is a constant. Then M2M^{2} is a totally geodesic surface in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). Moreover we have that the λ\lambda equals 1,11,-1 or c2c1c1+c2\frac{c_{2}-c_{1}}{c_{1}+c_{2}} with c1c2>0c_{1}c_{2}>0 and that the Gaussian curvature of M2M^{2} equals c1,c2c_{1},\;c_{2} and c1c2c1+c2\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}. Hence the surface is an open part of M2(c1)×{p2}M^{2}(c_{1})\times\{p_{2}\}, {p1}×M2(c2)\{p_{1}\}\times M^{2}(c_{2}) or is locally given by (22) or (23).

3.4. ff is not proportional to the identity

We first consider the trivial case θ2=0\theta_{2}=0 and θ1=π2\theta_{1}=\frac{\pi}{2}. One can then easily prove that M2M^{2} is an open part of a Riemannian product of a curve in M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) and a curve of M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}).

Suppose now that θ1=π2\theta_{1}=\frac{\pi}{2} and θ2\theta_{2} is a constant in (0,π2)(0,\frac{\pi}{2}). Denote in the following θ2\theta_{2} by θ\theta. Consider an adapted orthonormal frame {e1,e2,ξ1,ξ2}\{e_{1},e_{2},\xi_{1},\xi_{2}\} such that fe1=e1,fe2=cos(2θ)e2,tξ1=ξ1fe_{1}=-e_{1},\,fe_{2}=\cos(2\theta)e_{2},\,t\xi_{1}=\xi_{1} and tξ2=cos(2θ)ξ2t\xi_{2}=-\cos(2\theta)\xi_{2}. Using equations (3), (5) and (6), we see that he2=±sin(2θ)ξ2he_{2}=\pm\sin(2\theta)\xi_{2}. We may suppose that he2=sin(2θ)ξ2he_{2}=\sin(2\theta)\xi_{2}. Moreover we can deduce from equations (3) and (5) that he1=0he_{1}=0. Using equations (10), (11) and (12), we obtain that

(24) 2cos2(θ)Xe2=sin(2θ)Sξ2X+s(σ(X,e2)),\displaystyle 2\cos^{2}(\theta)\nabla_{X}e_{2}=\sin(2\theta)S_{\xi_{2}}X+s(\sigma(X,e_{2})),
(25) sin(2θ)g(Xe1,e2)ξ2=t(σ(X,e1))+σ(X,e1),\displaystyle-\sin(2\theta)g(\nabla_{X}e_{1},e_{2})\xi_{2}=t(\sigma(X,e_{1}))+\sigma(X,e_{1}),
(26) 2cos2(θ)Xξ2=sin(2θ)σ(e2,X)+h(Sξ2X).\displaystyle 2\cos^{2}(\theta)\nabla_{X}^{\perp}\xi_{2}=\sin(2\theta)\sigma(e_{2},X)+h(S_{\xi_{2}}X).

From equations (24) and (25) we deduce that g(Sξ2X,e2)=g(Sξ1X,e1)=0g(S_{\xi_{2}}X,e_{2})=g(S_{\xi_{1}}X,e_{1})=0 for every XTM2X\in TM^{2}. Hence we obtain, using equations (24) and (26) and the fact that g(Sξ2X,e2)=g(Sξ1X,e1)=0g(S_{\xi_{2}}X,e_{2})=g(S_{\xi_{1}}X,e_{1})=0, that

g(Xe1,e2)=tan(θ)μ2g(X,e1),\displaystyle g(\nabla_{X}e_{1},e_{2})=-\tan(\theta)\mu_{2}g(X,e_{1}),
g~(Xξ1,ξ2)=tan(θ)μ1g(X,e2),\displaystyle\widetilde{g}(\nabla_{X}\xi_{1},\xi_{2})=-\tan(\theta)\mu_{1}g(X,e_{2}),

where μ1\mu_{1} is the eigenvalue of Sξ1S_{\xi_{1}} and μ2\mu_{2} is the eigenvalue of Sξ2S_{\xi_{2}}. Since we know the shape-operators Sξ1S_{\xi_{1}} and Sξ2S_{\xi_{2}} and the symmetric operator ff, we can find the Gaussian curvature KK of M2M^{2}. From the equation of Gauss we find that K=c2sin2(θ)K=c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta). From the equation of Ricci we obtain also easily that K=|g~(R(e1,e2)ξ2,ξ1)|=0K^{\perp}=|\widetilde{g}(R^{\perp}(e_{1},e_{2})\xi_{2},\xi_{1})|=0. We summarize the previous in the following proposition.

Proposition 6.

Let M2M^{2} be a constant angle surface immersed in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). Suppose that λ1=1\lambda_{1}=-1 and λ2\lambda_{2} is a constant in (1,1)(-1,1). Then we can find an adapted frame {e1,e2,ξ1,ξ2}\{e_{1},e_{2},\xi_{1},\xi_{2}\} such that fe1=e1,fe2=cos(2θ)e2,tξ1=ξ1fe_{1}=-e_{1},fe_{2}=\cos(2\theta)e_{2},\,t\xi_{1}=\xi_{1} and tξ2=cos(2θ)ξ2t\xi_{2}=-\cos(2\theta)\xi_{2}, where cos(2θ)=λ2\cos(2\theta)=\lambda_{2} and such that the shape operators Sξ1S_{\xi_{1}} and Sξ2S_{\xi_{2}} take the following form with respect to the orthonormal frame {e1,e2}:\{e_{1},e_{2}\}:

(27) Sξ1=(000μ1),Sξ2=(μ2000),S_{\xi_{1}}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&0\\ 0&\mu_{1}\\ \end{array}\right),\qquad S_{\xi_{2}}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}\mu_{2}&0\\ 0&0\\ \end{array}\right),

for some functions μ1\mu_{1} and μ2\mu_{2} on M2M^{2}. Moreover the Levi-Civita connection \nabla of M2M^{2} and the normal connection \nabla^{\perp} of M2M^{2} in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) are given by

(28) g(Xe1,e2)=tan(θ)μ2g(X,e1),\displaystyle g(\nabla_{X}e_{1},e_{2})=-\tan(\theta)\mu_{2}g(X,e_{1}),
(29) g~(Xξ1,ξ2)=tan(θ)μ1g(X,e2).\displaystyle\widetilde{g}(\nabla^{\perp}_{X}\xi_{1},\xi_{2})=-\tan(\theta)\mu_{1}g(X,e_{2}).

The Gaussian curvature KK is given by

K=c2sin2(θ),K=c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta),

and the normal curvature KK^{\perp} is equal to 00.

We obtain a similar proposition if λ1\lambda_{1} is a constant in (1,1)(-1,1) and λ2=1\lambda_{2}=1.

Proposition 7.

Let M2M^{2} be a constant angle surface immersed in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). Suppose that λ1\lambda_{1} is a constant in (1,1)(-1,1) and λ2=1\lambda_{2}=1. Then we can find an adapted frame {e1,e2,ξ1,ξ2}\{e_{1},e_{2},\xi_{1},\xi_{2}\} such that fe1=cos(2θ)e1,fe2=e2,tξ1=cos(2θ)ξ1fe_{1}=\cos(2\theta)e_{1},fe_{2}=e_{2},\,t\xi_{1}=-\cos(2\theta)\xi_{1} and tξ2=ξ2t\xi_{2}=-\xi_{2}, where cos(2θ)=λ1\cos(2\theta)=\lambda_{1}and such that the shape operators Sξ1S_{\xi_{1}} and Sξ2S_{\xi_{2}} take the following form with respect to the orthonormal frame {e1,e2}:\{e_{1},e_{2}\}:

Sξ1=(000μ1),Sξ2=(μ2000),S_{\xi_{1}}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&0\\ 0&\mu_{1}\\ \end{array}\right),\qquad S_{\xi_{2}}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}\mu_{2}&0\\ 0&0\\ \end{array}\right),

for some functions μ1\mu_{1} and μ2\mu_{2} on M2M^{2}. Moreover the Levi-Civita connection \nabla of M2M^{2} and the normal connection \nabla^{\perp} of M2M^{2} in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) are given by

(30) g(Xe1,e2)=cot(θ)μ1g(X,e2),\displaystyle g(\nabla_{X}e_{1},e_{2})=-\cot(\theta)\mu_{1}g(X,e_{2}),
(31) g~(Xξ1,ξ2)=cot(θ)μ2g(X,e1).\displaystyle\widetilde{g}(\nabla^{\perp}_{X}\xi_{1},\xi_{2})=-\cot(\theta)\mu_{2}g(X,e_{1}).

The Gaussian curvature KK is given by

(32) K=c1cos2(θ),K=c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta),

and the normal curvature KK^{\perp} is equal to 00.

Finally we consider the case for which λ1=cos(2θ1)\lambda_{1}=\cos(2\theta_{1}) and λ2=cos(2θ2)\lambda_{2}=\cos(2\theta_{2}) are constant, λ2λ1>0\lambda_{2}-\lambda_{1}>0 and λ1,λ2(1,1)\lambda_{1},\lambda_{2}\in(-1,1). Let {e1,e2,ξ1,ξ2}\{e_{1},e_{2},\xi_{1},\xi_{2}\} be an adapted frame such that fei=cos(2θi)eife_{i}=\cos(2\theta_{i})e_{i} and tξi=cos(2θi)ξit\xi_{i}=-\cos(2\theta_{i})\xi_{i} for i=1,2i=1,2. Using equations (10) and (12) and by similar reasoning as before, we obtain the next proposition.

Proposition 8.

Let M2M^{2} be a surface immersed in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). Suppose that λ1\lambda_{1} and λ2\lambda_{2} are constants in (1,1)(-1,1) and λ2λ1>0\lambda_{2}-\lambda_{1}>0. Then we can find an adapted orthonormal frame {e1,e2,ξ1,ξ2}\{e_{1},e_{2},\xi_{1},\xi_{2}\} such that fei=cos(2θi)eife_{i}=\cos(2\theta_{i})e_{i} and tξi=cos(2θi)ξit\xi_{i}=-\cos(2\theta_{i})\xi_{i}, where cos(2θi)=λi\cos(2\theta_{i})=\lambda_{i} for i=1,2i=1,2 and such that the shape operators Sξ1S_{\xi_{1}} and Sξ2S_{\xi_{2}} take the following form with respect to the orthonormal frame {e1,e2}\{e_{1},e_{2}\}:

Sξ1=(000μ1),Sξ2=(μ2000),S_{\xi_{1}}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&0\\ 0&\mu_{1}\\ \end{array}\right),\qquad S_{\xi_{2}}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}\mu_{2}&0\\ 0&0\\ \end{array}\right),

for some functions μ1\mu_{1} and μ2\mu_{2} on M2M^{2}. Moreover the Levi-Civita connection \nabla of M2M^{2} and the normal connection \nabla^{\perp} of M2M^{2} in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) are given by:

(33) g(Xe1,e2)=cos(θ1)sin(θ1)μ1g(X,e2)+cos(θ2)sin(θ2)μ2g(X,e1)cos2(θ1)cos2(θ2),\displaystyle g(\nabla_{X}e_{1},e_{2})=\frac{\cos(\theta_{1})\sin(\theta_{1})\mu_{1}g(X,e_{2})+\cos(\theta_{2})\sin(\theta_{2})\mu_{2}g(X,e_{1})}{\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})-\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})},
(34) g~(Xξ1,ξ2)=cos(θ1)sin(θ1)μ2g(X,e1)+cos(θ2)sin(θ2)μ1g(X,e2)cos2(θ1)cos2(θ2).\displaystyle\widetilde{g}(\nabla^{\perp}_{X}\xi_{1},\xi_{2})=\frac{\cos(\theta_{1})\sin(\theta_{1})\mu_{2}g(X,e_{1})+\cos(\theta_{2})\sin(\theta_{2})\mu_{1}g(X,e_{2})}{\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})-\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})}.

The Gaussian curvature KK is given by

(35) K=c1cos2(θ1)cos2(θ2)+c2sin2(θ1)sin2(θ2),K=c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})+c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta_{1})\sin^{2}(\theta_{2}),

and the normal curvature KK^{\perp} equals |c1+c24|sin(2θ1)sin(2θ2)|\frac{c_{1}+c_{2}}{4}|\sin(2\theta_{1})\sin(2\theta_{2}).

4. Existence results

We will need the following existence results in the next section.

Proposition 9.

Let c1,c2c_{1},c_{2}\in\mathbb{R}, not both 00, θ1,θ2(0,π2)\theta_{1},\theta_{2}\in(0,\frac{\pi}{2}) with θ1>θ2\theta_{1}>\theta_{2}. Define constants a1,a2,A1a_{1},a_{2},A_{1} and A2A_{2} by

a1=sin(2θ1)cos(2θ1)cos(2θ2),a2=sin(2θ2)cos(2θ2)cos(2θ1),a_{1}=\frac{\sin(2\theta_{1})}{\cos(2\theta_{1})-\cos(2\theta_{2})},\qquad a_{2}=\frac{\sin(2\theta_{2})}{\cos(2\theta_{2})-\cos(2\theta_{1})},
A1=(cos2(θ2)cos2(θ1))(c1cos2(θ2)c2sin2(θ2)),A_{1}=(\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})-\cos^{2}(\theta_{1}))(c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})-c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta_{2})),

and

A2=(cos2(θ1)cos2(θ2))(c1cos2(θ1)c2sin2(θ1)).A_{2}=(\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})-\cos^{2}(\theta_{2}))(c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})-c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta_{1})).

Let μ1=μ1(u,v)\mu_{1}=\mu_{1}(u,v) and μ2=μ2(u,v)\mu_{2}=\mu_{2}(u,v) be real-valued functions defined on a simply connected open subset of 2\mathbb{R}^{2} which satisfy

(36) a1μ22+A2=(μ1)uμ12+A1,a2μ12+A1=(μ2)vμ22+A2.-\frac{a_{1}}{\sqrt{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}}}=\frac{(\mu_{1})_{u}}{\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1}},\qquad-\frac{a_{2}}{\sqrt{\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1}}}=\frac{(\mu_{2})_{v}}{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}}.

Then the Riemannian manifold M2=(U,g)M^{2}=(U,g) with the Riemannian metric g=du2μ22+A2+dv2μ12+A1g=\frac{du^{2}}{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}}+\frac{dv^{2}}{\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1}} is a surface of constant curvature c1cos2(θ1)cos2(θ2)+c2sin2(θ1)sin2(θ2)c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})+c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta_{1})\sin^{2}(\theta_{2}). Define now on the vector bundle TUTU a second metric g~\widetilde{g} by sin2(2θ1)du2μ22+A2+sin2(2θ2)dv2μ12+A1\sin^{2}(2\theta_{1})\frac{du^{2}}{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}}+\sin^{2}(2\theta_{2})\frac{dv^{2}}{\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1}} and denote this Riemannian vector bundle by TM2T^{\perp}M^{2}. Let f:TM2TM2f:TM^{2}\rightarrow TM^{2}, t:TM2TM2t:T^{\perp}M^{2}\rightarrow T^{\perp}M^{2}, and h:TM2TM2h:TM^{2}\rightarrow T^{\perp}M^{2} be, respectively, (1,1)(1,1)-tensors over M2M^{2} defined by

(cos(2θ1)00cos(2θ2)),(cos(2θ1)00cos(2θ2)),(1001),\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}\cos(2\theta_{1})&0\\ 0&\cos(2\theta_{2})\\ \end{array}\right),\qquad\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}-\cos(2\theta_{1})&0\\ 0&-\cos(2\theta_{2})\\ \end{array}\right),\qquad\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}1&0\\ 0&1\\ \end{array}\right),

with respect to {u,v}\{\partial_{u},\partial_{v}\} and {~u,~v}\{\widetilde{\partial}_{u},\widetilde{\partial}_{v}\}, where ~u,~vTM2\widetilde{\partial}_{u},\widetilde{\partial}_{v}\in T^{\perp}M^{2} and dual to the forms dudu and dvdv. Finally define a symmetric (1,2)(1,2) tensor σ\sigma with values in TM2T^{\perp}M^{2} and a connection \nabla^{\perp} on TM2T^{\perp}M^{2} compatible with the metric by

(37) σ(u,u)=μ2μ12+A1sin(2θ2)(μ22+A2)hv,σ(u,v)=0,σ(v,v)=μ1μ22+A2sin(2θ1)(μ12)+A1hu,\begin{split}\sigma(\partial_{u},\partial_{u})=\frac{\mu_{2}\sqrt{\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1}}}{\sin(2\theta_{2})(\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2})}h\partial_{v},\>\sigma(\partial_{u},\partial_{v})=0,\\ \sigma(\partial_{v},\partial_{v})=\frac{\mu_{1}\sqrt{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}}}{\sin(2\theta_{1})(\mu_{1}^{2})+A_{1}}h\partial_{u},\end{split}
uhu=μ2(μ2)uμ22+A2hu+a1sin(2θ1)μ2μ12+A1sin(2θ2)(μ22+A2)hv,uhv=vhu=h(uv)=h(vu),vhv=a2sin(2θ2)μ1μ22+A2sin(2θ1)(μ12+A1)huμ1(μ1)vμ12+A1hv,\begin{split}\nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{u}}h\partial_{u}=-\frac{\mu_{2}(\mu_{2})_{u}}{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}}h\partial_{u}+\frac{a_{1}\sin(2\theta_{1})\mu_{2}\sqrt{\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1}}}{\sin(2\theta_{2})(\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2})}h\partial_{v},\\ \nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{u}}h\partial_{v}=\nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{v}}h\partial_{u}=h(\nabla_{\partial_{u}}\partial_{v})=h(\nabla_{\partial_{v}}\partial_{u}),\\ \nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{v}}h\partial_{v}=\frac{a_{2}\sin(2\theta_{2})\mu_{1}\sqrt{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}}}{\sin(2\theta_{1})(\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1})}h\partial_{u}-\frac{\mu_{1}(\mu_{1})_{v}}{\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1}}h\partial_{v},\end{split}

where \nabla is the Levi-Civita connection of M2M^{2}. Then (M2,g,TM2,g~,σ,f,h,t)(M^{2},g,T^{\perp}M^{2},\widetilde{g},\sigma,\nabla^{\perp}f,h,t) satisfies the compatibility equations of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) and hence there exists an isometric immersion of M2M^{2} in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) such that this surface is a constant angle surface and is unique up to isometries of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}).

Proof.

From (36) and a direct computation we know that the Riemannian metric gg has constant curvature c1cos2(θ1)cos2(θ2)+c2sin2(θ1)sin2(θ2)c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})+c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta_{1})\sin^{2}(\theta_{2}) and the Levi-Civita connection satisfies

uu=μ2(μ2)uμ22+A2ua2μ2μ12+A1μ22+A2v,uv=vu=a2μ2μ12+A1u+a1μ1μ22+A2v,vv=a1μ1μ22+A2μ12+A1μ1(μ1)vμ12+A1v.\begin{split}\nabla_{\partial_{u}}\partial_{u}=-\frac{\mu_{2}(\mu_{2})_{u}}{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}}\partial_{u}-\frac{a_{2}\mu_{2}\sqrt{\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1}}}{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}}\partial_{v},\\ \nabla_{\partial_{u}}\partial_{v}=\nabla_{\partial_{v}}\partial_{u}=\frac{a_{2}\mu_{2}}{\sqrt{\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1}}}\partial_{u}+\frac{a_{1}\mu_{1}}{\sqrt{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}}}\partial_{v},\\ \nabla_{\partial_{v}}\partial_{v}=-\frac{a_{1}\mu_{1}\sqrt{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}}}{\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1}}-\frac{\mu_{1}(\mu_{1})_{v}}{\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1}}\partial_{v}.\end{split}

We have already defined a second metric g~\widetilde{g} on the vector bundle TUTU, and denoted this Riemannian vector bundle by TM2T^{\perp}M^{2}, together with a connection \nabla^{\perp} that is compatible with this metric. Let f,tf,t and hh be (1,1)(1,1)-tensors as defined above and σ\sigma the symmetric (1,2)(1,2) tensor defined by (37). By direct straightforward computations we can see that (M2,g,TM2,g~,,σ,f,h,t)(M^{2},g,T^{\perp}M^{2},\widetilde{g},\nabla^{\perp},\sigma,f,h,t) satisfies the compatibility equations for M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). Hence there exists an isometric immersion of M2M^{2} into M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). Moreover, we can deduce from equation (14) that M2M^{2} is a constant angle surface in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). We can also conclude from Theorem 22 that this immersion with the given second fundamental form and normal connection is unique up to rigid motions of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). ∎

The next two propositions can be proven analogously as the previous one.

Proposition 10.

Let c1,c2c_{1},c_{2}\in\mathbb{R}, not both 00, θ1,θ2(0,π2)\theta_{1},\theta_{2}\in(0,\frac{\pi}{2}) with θ1>θ2\theta_{1}>\theta_{2}. Define constants a1,a2,A1a_{1},a_{2},A_{1} and A2A_{2} as in Proposition 9. Moreover we suppose that A1<0A_{1}<0. Let μ=μ(u,v)\mu=\mu(u,v) and G=G(u,v)G=G(u,v) be real-valued functions which satisfy

(38) a2G=(μ)vμ2+A2,a1A1μ2+A2=Gu2G.-a_{2}\sqrt{G}=\frac{(\mu)_{v}}{\mu^{2}+A_{2}},\qquad a_{1}\sqrt{\frac{-A_{1}}{\mu^{2}+A_{2}}}=\frac{G_{u}}{2G}.

Then the Riemannian manifold M2=(U,g)M^{2}=(U,g) with the Riemannian metric g=du2μ2+A2+Gdv2g=\frac{du^{2}}{\mu^{2}+A_{2}}+Gdv^{2} is a surface of constant curvature c1cos2(θ1)cos2(θ2)+c2sin2(θ1)sin2(θ2)c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})+c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta_{1})\sin^{2}(\theta_{2}). Define now on the vector bundle TUTU a second metric g~\widetilde{g} by sin2(2θ1)du2μ22+A2+sin2(2θ2)Gdv2\sin^{2}(2\theta_{1})\frac{du^{2}}{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}}+\sin^{2}(2\theta_{2})Gdv^{2} and denote this Riemannian vector bundle by TM2T^{\perp}M^{2}. Let f:TM2TM2f:TM^{2}\rightarrow TM^{2}, t:TM2TM2t:T^{\perp}M^{2}\rightarrow T^{\perp}M^{2}, and h:TM2TM2h:TM^{2}\rightarrow T^{\perp}M^{2} be (1,1)(1,1)-tensors over M2M^{2} as defined above in Proposition 9. Finally define a symmetric (1,2)(1,2) tensor σ\sigma with values in TM2T^{\perp}M^{2} and a connection \nabla^{\perp} on TM2T^{\perp}M^{2} compatible with the metric by

(39) σ(u,u)=μ2sin(2θ2)(μ22+A2)Ghv,σ(u,v)=0,σ(v,v)=GA1(μ22+A2)sin(2θ1)hu,\begin{split}\sigma(\partial_{u},\partial_{u})=\frac{\mu_{2}}{\sin(2\theta_{2})(\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2})\sqrt{G}}h\partial_{v},\>\sigma(\partial_{u},\partial_{v})=0,\\ \sigma(\partial_{v},\partial_{v})=\frac{G\sqrt{-A_{1}(\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2})}}{\sin(2\theta_{1})}h\partial_{u},\end{split}
uhu=μ2(μ2)uμ22+A2hu+a1sin(2θ1)μ2sin(2θ2)(μ22+A2)Ghv,uhv=vhu=h(uv)=h(vu),vhv=a2sin(2θ2)μ1A1(μ22+A2)Gsin(2θ1)hu+Gv2Ghv,\begin{split}\nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{u}}h\partial_{u}=-\frac{\mu_{2}(\mu_{2})_{u}}{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}}h\partial_{u}+\frac{a_{1}\sin(2\theta_{1})\mu_{2}}{\sin(2\theta_{2})(\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2})\sqrt{G}}h\partial_{v},\\ \nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{u}}h\partial_{v}=\nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{v}}h\partial_{u}=h(\nabla_{\partial_{u}}\partial_{v})=h(\nabla_{\partial_{v}}\partial_{u}),\\ \nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{v}}h\partial_{v}=\frac{a_{2}\sin(2\theta_{2})\mu_{1}\sqrt{-A_{1}(\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2})}G}{\sin(2\theta_{1})}h\partial_{u}+\frac{G_{v}}{2G}h\partial_{v},\end{split}

where \nabla is the Levi-Civita connection of M2M^{2}. Then (M2,g,TM2,g~,σ,,f,h,t)(M^{2},g,T^{\perp}M^{2},\widetilde{g},\sigma,\nabla^{\perp},f,h,t) satisfies the compatibility equations of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) and hence there exists an isometric immersion of M2M^{2} in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) such that this surface is a constant angle surface and is unique up to isometries of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}).

Proposition 11.

Let c1,c2c_{1},c_{2}\in\mathbb{R}, not both 00, θ1,θ2(0,π2)\theta_{1},\theta_{2}\in(0,\frac{\pi}{2}) with θ1>θ2\theta_{1}>\theta_{2}. Define constants a1,a2,A1a_{1},a_{2},A_{1} and A2A_{2} as in Proposition 9. Moreover we suppose that A1,A2<0A_{1},A_{2}<0. Let E=E(u,v)E=E(u,v) and G=G(u,v)G=G(u,v) be positive real-valued functions which satisfy

(40) a2A2G=Ev2E,a1A1E=Gu2G.a_{2}\sqrt{-A_{2}G}=\frac{E_{v}}{2E},\qquad a_{1}\sqrt{-A_{1}E}=\frac{G_{u}}{2G}.

Then the Riemannian manifold M2=(U,g)M^{2}=(U,g) with the Riemannian metric g=Edu2+Gdv2g=Edu^{2}+Gdv^{2} is a surface of constant curvature c1cos2(θ1)cos2(θ2)+c2sin2(θ1)sin2(θ2)c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})+c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta_{1})\sin^{2}(\theta_{2}). Define now on the vector bundle TUTU a second metric g~\widetilde{g} by sin2(2θ1)Edu2+sin2(2θ2)Gdv2\sin^{2}(2\theta_{1})Edu^{2}+\sin^{2}(2\theta_{2})Gdv^{2} and denote this Riemannian vector bundle by TM2T^{\perp}M^{2}. Let f:TM2TM2f:TM^{2}\rightarrow TM^{2}, t:TM2TM2t:T^{\perp}M^{2}\rightarrow T^{\perp}M^{2}, and h:TM2TM2h:TM^{2}\rightarrow T^{\perp}M^{2} be (1,1)(1,1)-tensors over M2M^{2} as defined in Proposition 9. Finally define a symmetric (1,2)(1,2) tensor σ\sigma with values in TM2T^{\perp}M^{2} and a connection \nabla^{\perp} on TM2T^{\perp}M^{2} compatible with the metric by

σ(u,u)=A2Esin(2θ2)Ghv,σ(u,v)=0,σ(v,v)=A1Gsin(2θ1)Ehu,\begin{split}\sigma(\partial_{u},\partial_{u})=\frac{\sqrt{-A_{2}}E}{\sin(2\theta_{2})\sqrt{G}}h\partial_{v},\>\sigma(\partial_{u},\partial_{v})=0,\\ \sigma(\partial_{v},\partial_{v})=\frac{\sqrt{-A_{1}}G}{\sin(2\theta_{1})\sqrt{E}}h\partial_{u},\end{split}
uhu=Eu2Ehu+a1sin(2θ1)A2EGhv,uhv=vhu=h(uv)=h(vu),vhv=a2sin(2θ2)A1GEhu+Gv2Ghv,\begin{split}\nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{u}}h\partial_{u}=\frac{E_{u}}{2E}h\partial_{u}+\frac{a_{1}\sin(2\theta_{1})\sqrt{-A_{2}}E}{\sqrt{G}}h\partial_{v},\\ \nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{u}}h\partial_{v}=\nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{v}}h\partial_{u}=h(\nabla_{\partial_{u}}\partial_{v})=h(\nabla_{\partial_{v}}\partial_{u}),\\ \nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{v}}h\partial_{v}=\frac{a_{2}\sin(2\theta_{2})\sqrt{-A_{1}}G}{\sqrt{E}}h\partial_{u}+\frac{G_{v}}{2G}h\partial_{v},\end{split}

where \nabla is the Levi-Civita connection of M2M^{2}. Then (M2,g,TM2,g~,σ,,f,h,t)(M^{2},g,T^{\perp}M^{2},\widetilde{g},\sigma,\nabla^{\perp},f,h,t) satisfies the compatibility equations of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) and hence there exists an isometric immersion of M2M^{2} in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) such that this surface is a constant angle surface and is unique up to isometries of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}).

4.1. Sine-Gordon and Sinh-Gordon equations

We would like to make some remarks on the equations (36). Suppose that A1,A2>0A_{1},A_{2}>0. If we define functions θ~i\widetilde{\theta}_{i} such that μi=Aicot(θi~)\mu_{i}=\sqrt{A_{i}}\cot(\widetilde{\theta_{i}}), then the equations (36) are equivalent to

(41) a1A1A2sin(θ~2)=(θ~1)u,a2A2A1sin(θ~1)=(θ~2)v.\begin{split}-a_{1}\sqrt{\frac{A_{1}}{A_{2}}}\sin(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})=(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})_{u},\\ -a_{2}\sqrt{\frac{A_{2}}{A_{1}}}\sin(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})=(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})_{v}.\end{split}

Differentiating the first equation with respect to vv and second equation with respect to uu gives us

(42) (θ1~)uv=a1A1A2cos(θ~2)(θ~2)v=a1a2cos(θ~2)sin(θ~1),\displaystyle(\widetilde{\theta_{1}})_{uv}=-a_{1}\sqrt{\frac{A_{1}}{A_{2}}}\cos(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})_{v}=a_{1}a_{2}\cos(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})\sin(\widetilde{\theta}_{1}),
(43) (θ2~)vu=a2A2A1cos(θ~1)(θ~1)u=a1a2cos(θ~1)sin(θ~2).\displaystyle(\widetilde{\theta_{2}})_{vu}=-a_{2}\sqrt{\frac{A_{2}}{A_{1}}}\cos(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})_{u}=a_{1}a_{2}\cos(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})\sin(\widetilde{\theta}_{2}).

The operations (42)+(43)(\ref{tussen})+(\ref{tussensec}) and (42)(43)(\ref{tussen})-(\ref{tussensec}) yield

(θ1~+θ~2)uv=a1a2sin(θ1~+θ~2),\displaystyle(\widetilde{\theta_{1}}+\widetilde{\theta}_{2})_{uv}=a_{1}a_{2}\sin(\widetilde{\theta_{1}}+\widetilde{\theta}_{2}),
(θ1~θ~2)uv=a1a2sin(θ1~θ~2).\displaystyle(\widetilde{\theta_{1}}-\widetilde{\theta}_{2})_{uv}=a_{1}a_{2}\sin(\widetilde{\theta_{1}}-\widetilde{\theta}_{2}).

Hence we have found a correspondence between some constant angle surfaces in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) and the Sine-Gordon equation. We would like to remark that the equations (41) are the Bäcklund transformations for this Sine-Gordon equation. So we obtain a big range of surfaces with constant angle in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}).

With similar reasoning we find a correspondence with the Sinh-Gordon equation and some constant angle surfaces in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) if A1,A2<0A_{1},A_{2}<0. We define functions θ~i:U(0,)\widetilde{\theta}_{i}:U\rightarrow(0,\infty), such that μi=Aicoth(θ~i)\mu_{i}=\sqrt{-A_{i}}\coth(\widetilde{\theta}_{i}), then the equations (36) are equivalent to

a1A1A2sinh(θ~2)=(θ~1)u,a2A2A1sinh(θ~1)=(θ~2)v.\begin{split}-a_{1}\sqrt{\frac{A_{1}}{A_{2}}}\sinh(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})=(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})_{u},\\ -a_{2}\sqrt{\frac{A_{2}}{A_{1}}}\sinh(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})=(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})_{v}.\end{split}

Differentiating the first equation with respect to vv and second equation with respect to uu gives us

(44) (θ1~)uv=a1A1A2cosh(θ~2)(θ~2)v=a1a2cosh(θ~2)sinh(θ~1),\displaystyle(\widetilde{\theta_{1}})_{uv}=-a_{1}\sqrt{\frac{A_{1}}{A_{2}}}\cosh(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})_{v}=a_{1}a_{2}\cosh(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})\sinh(\widetilde{\theta}_{1}),
(45) (θ2~)vu=a2A2A1cosh(θ~1)(θ~1)u=a1a2cosh(θ~1)sinh(θ~2).\displaystyle(\widetilde{\theta_{2}})_{vu}=-a_{2}\sqrt{\frac{A_{2}}{A_{1}}}\cosh(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})_{u}=a_{1}a_{2}\cosh(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})\sinh(\widetilde{\theta}_{2}).

The operations (44)+(45)(\ref{tussen1})+(\ref{tussensec1}) and (44)(45)(\ref{tussen1})-(\ref{tussensec1}) yield

(46) (θ1~+θ~2)uv=a1a2sinh(θ1~+θ~2),\displaystyle(\widetilde{\theta_{1}}+\widetilde{\theta}_{2})_{uv}=a_{1}a_{2}\sinh(\widetilde{\theta_{1}}+\widetilde{\theta}_{2}),
(47) (θ1~θ~2)uv=a1a2sinh(θ1~θ~2).\displaystyle(\widetilde{\theta_{1}}-\widetilde{\theta}_{2})_{uv}=a_{1}a_{2}\sinh(\widetilde{\theta_{1}}-\widetilde{\theta}_{2}).

Finally we suppose that A1<0A_{1}<0 and A2>0A_{2}>0. We define functions θ~1:U(0,)\widetilde{\theta}_{1}:U\rightarrow(0,\infty), such that μ1=A1coth(θ~i)\mu_{1}=\sqrt{-A_{1}}\coth(\widetilde{\theta}_{i}), and θ~2:U(0,π)\widetilde{\theta}_{2}:U\rightarrow(0,\pi), such that μ2=A2cot(θ~2)\mu_{2}=\sqrt{A_{2}}\cot(\widetilde{\theta}_{2}), then the equations (36) are equivalent to

a1A1A2sin(θ~2)=(θ~1)u,a2A2A1sinh(θ~1)=(θ~2)v.\begin{split}-a_{1}\sqrt{-\frac{A_{1}}{A_{2}}}\sin(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})=(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})_{u},\\ -a_{2}\sqrt{-\frac{A_{2}}{A_{1}}}\sinh(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})=(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})_{v}.\end{split}

Differentiating the first equation with respect to vv and the second equation with respect to uu gives us

(48) (θ1~)uv=a1A1A2cos(θ~2)(θ~2)v=a1a2cos(θ~2)sinh(θ~1),\displaystyle(\widetilde{\theta_{1}})_{uv}=-a_{1}\sqrt{-\frac{A_{1}}{A_{2}}}\cos(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})_{v}=a_{1}a_{2}\cos(\widetilde{\theta}_{2})\sinh(\widetilde{\theta}_{1}),
(49) (θ2~)vu=a2A2A1cosh(θ~1)(θ~1)u=a1a2cosh(θ~1)sin(θ~2).\displaystyle(\widetilde{\theta_{2}})_{vu}=-a_{2}\sqrt{-\frac{A_{2}}{A_{1}}}\cosh(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})_{u}=a_{1}a_{2}\cosh(\widetilde{\theta}_{1})\sin(\widetilde{\theta}_{2}).

The operations (48)+i(49)(\ref{tussen2})+i(\ref{tussensec2}) and (48)i(49)(\ref{tussen2})-i(\ref{tussensec2}) yield

(θ1~+iθ~2)uv=a1a2sinh(θ1~+iθ~2),\displaystyle(\widetilde{\theta_{1}}+i\widetilde{\theta}_{2})_{uv}=a_{1}a_{2}\sinh(\widetilde{\theta_{1}}+i\widetilde{\theta}_{2}),
(θ1~iθ~2)uv=a1a2sinh(θ1~iθ~2).\displaystyle(\widetilde{\theta_{1}}-i\widetilde{\theta}_{2})_{uv}=a_{1}a_{2}\sinh(\widetilde{\theta_{1}}-i\widetilde{\theta}_{2}).

5. Main Theorems

In this final section we will classify all the constant angle surfaces in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). We split the classification in several subcases. Suppose first that λ1=1\lambda_{1}=-1 and λ2=cos(2θ)\lambda_{2}=\cos(2\theta) is a constant in (1,1)(-1,1). We will prove the following theorem.

Theorem 4.

A surface M2M^{2} isometrically immersed in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) is a constant angle surface with angles θ\theta and π2\frac{\pi}{2} if and only if the immersion ψ\psi is locally given by

ψ(u,v)=(f~(v),cos(c2sin(θ)v)f¯(u)+sin(c2sin(θ)v)f¯(u)×f¯(u)) if c2>0,\psi(u,v)=(\widetilde{f}(v),\cos(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v)\bar{f}(u)+\sin(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v)\bar{f}(u)\times\bar{f}^{\prime}(u))\hbox{ if }c_{2}>0,

where f~\widetilde{f} is a curve in M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) of constant speed cos(θ)\cos(\theta) and f¯\bar{f} is a unit speed curve in M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}); by

ψ(u,v)=(f~(v),cosh(c2sin(θ)v)f¯(u)+sinh(c2sin(θ)v)f¯(u)f¯(u)) if c2<0,\psi(u,v)=(\widetilde{f}(v),\cosh(\sqrt{-c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v)\bar{f}(u)+\sinh(\sqrt{-c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v)\bar{f}(u)\boxtimes\bar{f}^{\prime}(u))\hbox{ if }c_{2}<0,

where f~\widetilde{f} is a curve in M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) of constant speed cos(θ)\cos(\theta) and f¯\bar{f} is a unit speed curve in M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}),

(50) ψ(u,v)=(f~(v),u,sin(θ)v)orψ(u,v)=(f~(v),vsin(θ)f¯(u)+g¯(u)) if c2=0;orby\psi(u,v)=(\widetilde{f}(v),u,\sin(\theta)v)\>or\>\psi(u,v)=(\widetilde{f}(v),v\sin(\theta)\bar{f}(u)+\bar{g}(u))\hbox{ if }c_{2}=0;orby

where f~\widetilde{f} is a curve in M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) of constant speed cos(θ)\cos(\theta), f¯(u)=(cos(u),sin(u))\bar{f}(u)=(\cos(u),\sin(u)) and g¯(u)=cos(θ)C(u)(sin(u),cos(u))\bar{g}^{\prime}(u)=\cos(\theta)C(u)(-\sin(u),\cos(u)), where CC is a function on an interval II.

Proof.

After a straight-forward computation, one can verify that the surfaces listed in the theorem are constant angle surfaces in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) with angles θ\theta and π2\frac{\pi}{2}.

Conversely, let ψ:M2M2(c1)×M2(c2)\psi:M^{2}\rightarrow M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) be a constant angle surface, with λ1=1\lambda_{1}=-1 and λ2=cos(2θ)\lambda_{2}=\cos(2\theta). Then Proposition (6) tells us that we can find an adapted orthonormal frame {e1,e2,ξ1,ξ2}\{e_{1},e_{2},\xi_{1},\xi_{2}\} such that fe1=e1,fe2=λ2e2,tξ1=ξ1fe_{1}=-e_{1},\>fe_{2}=\lambda_{2}e_{2},\>t\xi_{1}=\xi_{1} and tξ2=λ2ξ2t\xi_{2}=-\lambda_{2}\xi_{2} and such that the shape operators associated to ξ1\xi_{1} and ξ2\xi_{2} with respect to e1e_{1} and e2e_{2} are given by

Sξ1=(000μ1),Sξ2=(μ2000),S_{\xi_{1}}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&0\\ 0&\mu_{1}\\ \end{array}\right),\qquad S_{\xi_{2}}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}\mu_{2}&0\\ 0&0\\ \end{array}\right),

for some functions μ1\mu_{1} and μ2\mu_{2} on M2M^{2}. Using (28) we obtain that the Levi-Civita connection satisfies

(51) e1e1=tan(θ)μ2e2,\displaystyle\nabla_{e_{1}}e_{1}=\tan(\theta)\mu_{2}e_{2},
(52) e1e2=tan(θ)μ2e1,\displaystyle\nabla_{e_{1}}e_{2}=-\tan(\theta)\mu_{2}e_{1},
(53) e2e1=0,\displaystyle\nabla_{e_{2}}e_{1}=0,
(54) e2e2=0.\displaystyle\nabla_{e_{2}}e_{2}=0.

From equations (52) and (53) and the fact that [u,v]=0[\partial_{u},\partial_{v}]=0, we can deduce that there exist locally coordinates (u,v)(u,v) on M2M^{2} such that u=αe1\partial_{u}=\alpha e_{1} and v=e2\partial_{v}=e_{2} with

(55) αv=αμ2tan(θ).\alpha_{v}=\alpha\mu_{2}\tan(\theta).

Hence the metric takes the form

ds2=α2du2+dv2ds^{2}=\alpha^{2}du^{2}+dv^{2}

and the Levi-Civita connection is given by

uu=αuαuααvv,\displaystyle\nabla_{\partial_{u}}\partial_{u}=\frac{\alpha_{u}}{\alpha}\partial_{u}-\alpha\alpha_{v}\partial_{v},
uv=vu=tan(θ)μ2u,\displaystyle\nabla_{\partial_{u}}\partial_{v}=\nabla_{\partial_{v}}\partial_{u}=\tan(\theta)\mu_{2}\partial_{u},
vv=0.\displaystyle\nabla_{\partial_{v}}\partial_{v}=0.

We can also calculate the normal connection \nabla^{\perp} of M2M^{2} using (29):

uξ1=uξ2=0,\displaystyle\nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{u}}\xi_{1}=\nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{u}}\xi_{2}=0,
vξ1=tan(θ)μ1ξ2,\displaystyle\nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{v}}\xi_{1}=-\tan(\theta)\mu_{1}\xi_{2},
vξ2=tan(θ)μ1ξ1.\displaystyle\nabla^{\perp}_{\partial_{v}}\xi_{2}=\tan(\theta)\mu_{1}\xi_{1}.

The Codazzi equation gives us now that

(56) (μ1)u=0,\displaystyle(\mu_{1})_{u}=0,
(57) (μ2)v=μ22tan(θ)cos(θ)sin(θ)c2.\displaystyle(\mu_{2})_{v}=-\mu_{2}^{2}\tan(\theta)-\cos(\theta)\sin(\theta)c_{2}.

We immediately see that μ1\mu_{1} is a function that depends only on vv. We solve now equations (55) and (57). From equation (57) we see that μ2\mu_{2} must satisfy the following PDE:

(μ2)v=tan(θ)(c2cos2(θ)+μ22).(\mu_{2})_{v}=-\tan(\theta)(c_{2}\cos^{2}(\theta)+\mu_{2}^{2}).

By integration we obtain that μ2\mu_{2} must be equal to

{c2cos(θ)tan(c2sin(θ)v+C(u)) if c2>0,0 or 1tan(θ)v+C(u) if c2=0,±c2cos(θ) or c2cos(θ)tanh(c2sin(θ)v+C(u)) if c2<0,\begin{cases}-\sqrt{c_{2}}\cos(\theta)\tan(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v+C(u))&\textrm{ if }c_{2}>0,\\ 0\>\textrm{ or }\>\frac{1}{\tan(\theta)v+C(u)}&\textrm{ if }\>c_{2}=0,\\ \pm\sqrt{-c_{2}}\cos(\theta)\>\textrm{ or }\>\sqrt{-c_{2}}\cos(\theta)\tanh(\sqrt{-c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v+C(u))&\textrm{ if }\>c_{2}<0,\end{cases}

where CC is some function depending on uu. Now, solving (55) we see that α\alpha equals

{D(u)cos(c2sin(θ)v+C(u)) if c2>0,D(u) or D(u)(tan(θ)v+C(u)) if c2=0,D(u)exp(±c2sin(θ)v) or D(u)cosh(c2sin(θ)v+C(u)) if c2<0,\begin{cases}D(u)\cos(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v+C(u))&\textrm{ if }\>c_{2}>0,\\ D(u)\>\textrm{ or }\>D(u)(\tan(\theta)v+C(u))&\textrm{ if }\>c_{2}=0,\\ D(u)\exp{(\pm\sqrt{-c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v)}\>\textrm{ or }\>D(u)\cosh(\sqrt{-c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v+C(u))&\textrm{ if }\>c_{2}<0,\end{cases}

where DD is some strictly positive function depending on uu.

We will only consider the case for which c2>0c_{2}>0. The other cases can be treated analogously and the results of the other cases are stated in Theorem 4. So we can consider M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) as a submanifold of 𝔼5,𝔼16\mathbb{E}^{5},\mathbb{E}^{6}_{1} or 𝔼6\mathbb{E}^{6} of codimension 11 or 22 and denote by DD the connection of 𝔼5,𝔼16\mathbb{E}^{5},\mathbb{E}^{6}_{1} or 𝔼6\mathbb{E}^{6}. Hence M2M^{2} is an immersed surface in 𝔼5,𝔼16\mathbb{E}^{5},\mathbb{E}^{6}_{1} or 𝔼6\mathbb{E}^{6}. Remark now that ξ1\xi_{1}, ξ2\xi_{2}, which are tangent to M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}), and ξ¯=(0,0,0,ψ4,ψ5,ψ6)\bar{\xi}=(0,0,0,\psi_{4},\psi_{5},\psi_{6}) are normals of M2M^{2} in 𝔼5\mathbb{E}^{5} if c1=0c_{1}=0 and that ξ1,ξ2,ξ~=(ψ1,ψ2,ψ3,0,0,0)\xi_{1},\xi_{2},\widetilde{\xi}=(\psi_{1},\psi_{2},\psi_{3},0,0,0) and ξ¯\bar{\xi} are normals of M2M^{2} in 𝔼16\mathbb{E}^{6}_{1} or 𝔼6\mathbb{E}^{6} if c10c_{1}\neq 0. Moreover we have that Fξ1=ξ1F\xi_{1}=\xi_{1} and hence ξ1\xi_{1} is parallel to the first component of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). One can verify that we have for every XTpM2X\in T_{p}M^{2},

(58) DXξ~=(I+F2)X=(I+f2)X+hX2D_{X}\widetilde{\xi}=\left(\frac{I+F}{2}\right)X=\left(\frac{I+f}{2}\right)X+\frac{hX}{2}

and

(59) DXξ¯=(IF2)X=(If2)XhX2,D_{X}\bar{\xi}=\left(\frac{I-F}{2}\right)X=\left(\frac{I-f}{2}\right)X-\frac{hX}{2},

where FF is the product structure of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). Moreover the formulas of Gauss and Weingarten give that:

(60) DXY=XY+σ(X,Y)c12g((I+f2)X,Y)ξ~c22g((If2)X,Y)ξ¯,\displaystyle D_{X}Y=\nabla_{X}Y+\sigma(X,Y)-\frac{c_{1}}{2}g(\left(\frac{I+f}{2}\right)X,Y)\widetilde{\xi}-\frac{c_{2}}{2}g(\left(\frac{I-f}{2}\right)X,Y)\bar{\xi},
(61) DXξ1=Sξ1X+Xξ1,\displaystyle D_{X}\xi_{1}=-S_{\xi_{1}}X+\nabla^{\perp}_{X}\xi_{1},
(62) DXξ2=Sξ2X+Xξ2c12g~(hX,ξ2)ξ~+c22g~(hX,ξ2)ξ¯.\displaystyle D_{X}\xi_{2}=-S_{\xi_{2}}X+\nabla^{\perp}_{X}\xi_{2}-\frac{c_{1}}{2}\widetilde{g}(hX,\xi_{2})\widetilde{\xi}+\frac{c_{2}}{2}\widetilde{g}(hX,\xi_{2})\bar{\xi}.

In the following we will consider the case for which c1>0c_{1}>0. The case for which c10c_{1}\leq 0 can be treated analogously. Since u=αe1\partial_{u}=\alpha e_{1} we find using equation (58) that

(ψ1,ψ2,ψ3,0,0,0)u=Duξ~=0,(\psi_{1},\psi_{2},\psi_{3},0,0,0)_{u}=D_{\partial_{u}}\widetilde{\xi}=0,

and hence we obtain that ψi(u,v)=f~i(v)\psi_{i}(u,v)=\widetilde{f}_{i}(v) for i=1,,3i=1,\dots,3. Analogously we find that

(ξ2)i=tan(θ)(ψi)v for i=1,,3;\displaystyle(\xi_{2})_{i}=\tan(\theta)(\psi_{i})_{v}\hbox{ for }i=1,\dots,3;
(ξ2)j=cot(θ)(ψj)v for j=4,,6.\displaystyle(\xi_{2})_{j}=-\cot(\theta)(\psi_{j})_{v}\hbox{ for }j=4,\dots,6.

We now use the formula of Gauss and the previous equations to find that

(63) (ψj)uu=αuα(ψj)uααv(ψj)vcot(θ)μ2α2(ψj)vc2α2ψj,\displaystyle(\psi_{j})_{uu}=\frac{\alpha_{u}}{\alpha}(\psi_{j})_{u}-\alpha\alpha_{v}(\psi_{j})_{v}-\cot(\theta)\mu_{2}\alpha^{2}(\psi_{j})_{v}-c_{2}\alpha^{2}\psi_{j},
(64) (ψj)uv=αvα(ψj)u=tan(θ)μ2(ψj)u,\displaystyle(\psi_{j})_{uv}=\frac{\alpha_{v}}{\alpha}(\psi_{j})_{u}=\tan(\theta)\mu_{2}(\psi_{j})_{u},
(65) (ψj)vv=c2sin2(θ)ψj\displaystyle(\psi_{j})_{vv}=-c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta)\psi_{j}

for j=4,5,6j=4,5,6. Integrating equation (64), we find that

(ψj)u=cos(c2v+C(u))Hj(u)(\psi_{j})_{u}=\cos(\sqrt{c_{2}}v+C(u))H_{j}(u)

and hence we obtain that

ψj=u0ucos(c2v+C(τ))Hj(τ)𝑑τ+Ij(v)\psi_{j}=\int_{u_{0}}^{u}\cos(\sqrt{c_{2}}v+C(\tau))H_{j}(\tau)d\tau+I_{j}(v)

for j=4,5,6j=4,5,6 and with HjH_{j} and IjI_{j} arbitrary functions. Moreover, using equation (65) we find that the functions IjI_{j} must satisfy

Ij(v)=Kjcos(c2sinθv)+Ljsin(c2sin(θ)v),I_{j}(v)=K_{j}\cos(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin{\theta}v)+L_{j}\sin(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v),

where KjK_{j} and LjL_{j} are constant. We summarize the previous and see that our immersion ψ\psi is given by

ψ=(f~1(v),f~2(v),f~3(v),(K4+u0uH4(τ)cos(C(τ))dτ)cos(c2sin(θ)v)OPEN+(L4u0uH4(τ)sin(C(τ))dτ)sin(c2sin(θ)v),).\psi=(\widetilde{f}_{1}(v),\widetilde{f}_{2}(v),\widetilde{f}_{3}(v),\\ \left(K_{4}+\int_{u_{0}}^{u}H_{4}(\tau)\cos(C(\tau))d\tau\right)\cos(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v)\\ +\left(L_{4}-\int_{u_{0}}^{u}H_{4}(\tau)\sin(C(\tau))d\tau\right)\sin(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v),\dots).

We define now the functions

f¯j(u)=Kj+u0uHj(τ)cos(C(τ))𝑑τ,\displaystyle\bar{f}_{j}(u)=K_{j}+\int_{u_{0}}^{u}H_{j}(\tau)\cos(C(\tau))d\tau,
g¯j(u)=Lju0uHj(τ)sin(C(τ))𝑑τ.\displaystyle\bar{g}_{j}(u)=L_{j}-\int_{u_{0}}^{u}H_{j}(\tau)\sin(C(\tau))d\tau.

We use now some conditions to find a relation between f¯(u)=(f¯1(u),f¯2(u),f¯3(u))\bar{f}(u)=(\bar{f}_{1}(u),\bar{f}_{2}(u),\bar{f}_{3}(u)) and g¯(u)=(g¯1(u),g¯2(u),g¯3(u))\bar{g}(u)=(\bar{g}_{1}(u),\bar{g}_{2}(u),\bar{g}_{3}(u)):

g(ψu,ψu)=α2,g(ψv,ψv)=1,g(ψu,ψv)=0,\displaystyle g(\psi_{u},\psi_{u})=\alpha^{2},\>g(\psi_{v},\psi_{v})=1,\>g(\psi_{u},\psi_{v})=0,
g(ξ1,ψu)=0,g(ξ1,ψv)=0,g(ξ1,ξ1)=1,\displaystyle g(\xi_{1},\psi_{u})=0,\>g(\xi_{1},\psi_{v})=0,\>g(\xi_{1},\xi_{1})=1,
g(ξ2,ψu)=0,g(ξ2,ψv)=0,g(ξ2,ξ2)=1,\displaystyle g(\xi_{2},\psi_{u})=0,\>g(\xi_{2},\psi_{v})=0,\>g(\xi_{2},\xi_{2})=1,
g(ξ~,ψu)=0,g(ξ~,ψv)=0,g(ξ~,ξ~)=1c1,\displaystyle g(\widetilde{\xi},\psi_{u})=0,\>g(\widetilde{\xi},\psi_{v})=0,\>g(\widetilde{\xi},\widetilde{\xi})=\frac{1}{c_{1}},
g(ξ¯,ψu)=0,g(ξ¯,ψv)=0,g(ξ¯,ξ¯)=1c2,\displaystyle g(\bar{\xi},\psi_{u})=0,\>g(\bar{\xi},\psi_{v})=0,\>g(\bar{\xi},\bar{\xi})=\frac{1}{c_{2}},
g(ξ1,ξ2)=0,g(ξ1,ξ~)=0,g(ξ2,ξ~)=0,g(ξ1,ξ¯)=0,g(ξ2,ξ¯)=0,\displaystyle g(\xi_{1},\xi_{2})=0,\>g(\xi_{1},\widetilde{\xi})=0,\>g(\xi_{2},\widetilde{\xi})=0,\>g(\xi_{1},\bar{\xi})=0,\>g(\xi_{2},\bar{\xi})=0,

which are equivalent to

i=13f~i2=1c1,\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{3}\widetilde{f}_{i}^{2}=\frac{1}{c_{1}},
j=13f¯j2=1c2,j=13g¯j2=1c2,\displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{3}\bar{f}_{j}^{2}=\frac{1}{c_{2}},\sum_{j=1}^{3}\bar{g}_{j}^{2}=\frac{1}{c_{2}},
j=13f¯jg¯j=0,j=13f¯jg¯j=0,\displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{3}\bar{f}_{j}\bar{g}_{j}=0,\sum_{j=1}^{3}\bar{f}^{\prime}_{j}\bar{g}_{j}=0,
i=13(f~i)2=cos2(θ),\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{3}(\widetilde{f}^{\prime}_{i})^{2}=\cos^{2}(\theta),
(66) j=13(f¯j)2cos2(c2sin(θ)v)+(g¯j)2sin2(c2sin(θ)v)+2f¯jg¯jcos(c2sin(θ)v)sin(c2sin(θ)v)=D2(u)cos2(c2sin(θ)v+C(u)).\sum_{j=1}^{3}(\bar{f}_{j}^{\prime})^{2}\cos^{2}(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v)+(\bar{g}_{j}^{\prime})^{2}\sin^{2}(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v)+\\ 2\bar{f}_{j}^{\prime}\bar{g}_{j}^{\prime}\cos(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v)\sin(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v)=D^{2}(u)\cos^{2}(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v+C(u)).

From the above equations we see that f¯(u)=(f¯1(u),f¯2(u),f¯3(u))\bar{f}(u)=(\bar{f}_{1}(u),\bar{f}_{2}(u),\bar{f}_{3}(u)) and g¯(u)=(g¯1(u),g¯2(u),g¯3(u))\bar{g}(u)=(\bar{g}_{1}(u),\bar{g}_{2}(u),\bar{g}_{3}(u)) are curves in M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}). Moreover if we change the uu-coordinate such that f¯\bar{f} is a unit speed curve, which corresponds to the fact that D2(u)=sec2(C(u))D^{2}(u)=\sec^{2}(C(u)), we see then from the previous equations that g¯\bar{g} is a curve in M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}) that is perpendicular to the vectors f¯\bar{f} and f¯\bar{f}^{\prime}. Hence we obtain that g¯=±f¯×f¯\bar{g}=\pm\bar{f}\times\bar{f}^{\prime} and we can choose that g¯=f¯×f¯\bar{g}=\bar{f}\times\bar{f}^{\prime}. The immersion ψ\psi is then given by

ψ(u,v)=(f~(v),cos(c2sin(θ)v)f¯(u)+sin(c2sin(θ)v)f¯(u)×f¯(u)).\psi(u,v)=(\widetilde{f}(v),\cos(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v)\bar{f}(u)+\sin(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v)\bar{f}(u)\times\bar{f}^{\prime}(u)).

Let us remark that since g¯=f¯×f¯\overline{g}=\overline{f}\times\overline{f}^{\prime}, we obtain that g¯=1c2(Jf¯)=κ¯c2f¯\overline{g}^{\prime}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{c_{2}}}(J\overline{f}^{\prime})^{\prime}=-\frac{\overline{\kappa}}{\sqrt{c_{2}}}\overline{f}^{\prime} and hence we have f¯g¯=κ¯c2\overline{f}^{\prime}\cdot\overline{g}^{\prime}=-\frac{\overline{\kappa}}{\sqrt{c_{2}}}. Using equation (66), we obtain that κ¯c2=tan(C(u))\frac{\overline{\kappa}}{\sqrt{c_{2}}}=\tan(C(u)). ∎

The case for which λ1=cos(2θ)\lambda_{1}=\cos(2\theta) and λ2=1\lambda_{2}=1 can be treated analogously as the previous case. We summarize this case in the next theorem:

Theorem 5.

A surface M2M^{2} isometrically immersed in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) is a constant angle surface with angles 00 and θ\theta if and only if the immersion ψ\psi is locally given by

OPENψ(u,v)=(cos(c1cos(θ)u)f~(v)+sin(c1cosθ)u)f~(v)×f~(v),f¯(u)) if c1>0,\psi(u,v)=(\cos(\sqrt{c_{1}}\cos(\theta)u)\widetilde{f}(v)+\sin(\sqrt{c_{1}}\cos\theta)u)\widetilde{f}(v)\times\widetilde{f}^{\prime}(v),\bar{f}(u))\hbox{ if }c_{1}>0,

where f¯\bar{f} is a curve in M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}) of constant speed sin(θ)\sin(\theta) and f~\widetilde{f} is a unit speed curve in M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}); by

ψ(u,v)=(cosh(c1cos(θ)u)f~(v)+sinh(c1cos(θ)u)f~(v)f~(v),f¯(u)) if c1<0\psi(u,v)=(\cosh(\sqrt{-c_{1}}\cos(\theta)u)\widetilde{f}(v)+\sinh(\sqrt{-c_{1}}\cos(\theta)u)\widetilde{f}(v)\boxtimes\ \widetilde{f}^{\prime}(v),\bar{f}(u))\hbox{ if }c_{1}<0

where f¯\bar{f} is a curve in M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}) of constant speed sin(θ)\sin(\theta) and f~\widetilde{f} is a unit speed curve in M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}); or by

(67) ψ(u,v)=(cos(θ)u,v,f¯(u))orψ(u,v)=(ucos(θ)f~(v)+g~(v),f¯(u)) if c1=0,\psi(u,v)=(\cos(\theta)u,v,\bar{f}(u))\>or\>\psi(u,v)=(u\cos(\theta)\widetilde{f}(v)+\widetilde{g}(v),\bar{f}(u))\hbox{ if }c_{1}=0,

where f¯\bar{f} is a curve in M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}) of constant speed sin(θ)\sin(\theta), f~(v)=(cos(v),sin(v))\widetilde{f}(v)=(\cos(v),\sin(v)) and g~(v)=sin(θ)C(v)\widetilde{g}^{\prime}(v)=-\sin(\theta)C(v) (sin(v),cos(v))(-\sin(v),\cos(v)), where CC is a function on an interval II.

We consider now the case for which λ1,λ2(1,1)\lambda_{1},\lambda_{2}\in(-1,1) and λ2λ10\lambda_{2}-\lambda_{1}\geq 0 and show the following theorem.

Theorem 6.

Let M2M^{2} be a constant angle surface with θ1,θ2(0,π2)\theta_{1},\theta_{2}\in(0,\frac{\pi}{2}). Then there are 22 possibilities:

  1. (1)

    M2M^{2} is an open part of the surfaces parameterized by

    (cos(c1c2c1+c2u)f~(v)+sin(c1c2c1+c2u)1cos(θ)f~(v)×f~(v);OPENcos(c1c2c1+c2u)f¯(v)+sin(c1c2c1+c2u)1sin(θ)f¯(v)×f¯(v)) if c1,c2>0,\displaystyle\begin{split}(\cos(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\widetilde{f}(v)+\sin(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\frac{1}{\cos(\theta)}\widetilde{f}(v)\times\widetilde{f}^{\prime}(v);\\ \cos(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\bar{f}(v)+\sin(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\frac{1}{\sin(\theta)}\bar{f}(v)\times\bar{f}^{\prime}(v))\end{split}\text{ if $c_{1},c_{2}>0$},
    (cosh(c1c2c1+c2u)f~(v)+sinh(c1c2c1+c2u)1cos(θ)f~(v)f~(v);OPENcosh(c1c2c1+c2u)f¯(v)+sinh(c1c2c1+c2u)1sin(θ)f¯(v)f¯(v)) if c1,c2<0,\displaystyle\begin{split}(\cosh(\sqrt{-\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\widetilde{f}(v)+\sinh(\sqrt{-\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\frac{1}{\cos(\theta)}\widetilde{f}(v)\boxtimes\widetilde{f}^{\prime}(v);\\ \cosh(\sqrt{-\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\bar{f}(v)+\sinh(\sqrt{-\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\frac{1}{\sin(\theta)}\bar{f}(v)\boxtimes\bar{f}^{\prime}(v))\end{split}\text{ if $c_{1},c_{2}<0$},

    where θ\theta is equal to θ1\theta_{1} or θ2\theta_{2} and θ2\theta_{2} or θ1\theta_{1} is a real number in (0,π2)(0,\frac{\pi}{2}) such that cos2(θ2)\cos^{2}(\theta_{2}) or cos2(θ1)\cos^{2}(\theta_{1}) is equal to c2c1+c2\frac{c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}} and f~\widetilde{f} is a curve in M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) of constant speed cos(θ)\cos(\theta) and geodesic curvature κ~\widetilde{\kappa} and f¯\bar{f} is a curve in M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}) of constant speed sin(θ)\sin(\theta) and geodesic curvature κ¯\overline{\kappa}, such that κ~|c1|=κ¯|c2|\frac{\widetilde{\kappa}}{\sqrt{|c_{1}|}}=\frac{\overline{\kappa}}{\sqrt{|c_{2}|}},

  2. (2)

    a constant angle surface in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) given by Proposition 9,10\ref{Exis1},\ref{Exis2} or 11.

Proof.

After a straight-forward computation, one can deduce that the surfaces listed in the theorem are constant angle surfaces in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). Conversely, let us assume that M2M^{2} is a constant angle surface in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) with angles θ1,θ2(0,π2)\theta_{1},\theta_{2}\in(0,\frac{\pi}{2}). Suppose first that θ1=θ2\theta_{1}=\theta_{2}. Then M2M^{2} is a totally geodesic surface in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) and λ1=λ2=c2c1c1+c2\lambda_{1}=\lambda_{2}=\frac{c_{2}-c_{1}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}. Hence M2M^{2} is locally congruent to (22) and (23). So we are in the special case of case 11 of the theorem. Let us now suppose that θ1θ2\theta_{1}\neq\theta_{2}. Then there is an adapted orthonormal frame {e1,e2,ξ1,ξ2}\{e_{1},e_{2},\xi_{1},\xi_{2}\} such that fei=cos(2θi)eife_{i}=\cos(2\theta_{i})e_{i} and tξi=cos(2θi)ξit\xi_{i}=-\cos(2\theta_{i})\xi_{i}, where cos(2θi)=λi\cos(2\theta_{i})=\lambda_{i}, for i=1,2i=1,2. Moreover we have that the shape operators Sξ1S_{\xi_{1}} and Sξ2S_{\xi_{2}} have the same form as (27) with respect to {e1,e2}\{e_{1},e_{2}\}. Moreover the Levi-Civita connection is given by

(68) e1e1=sin(θ2)cos(θ2)μ2cos2(θ1)cos2(θ2)e2,\displaystyle\nabla_{e_{1}}e_{1}=\frac{\sin(\theta_{2})\cos(\theta_{2})\mu_{2}}{\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})-\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})}e_{2},
(69) e1e2=sin(θ2)cos(θ2)μ2cos2(θ2)cos2(θ1)e1,\displaystyle\nabla_{e_{1}}e_{2}=\frac{\sin(\theta_{2})\cos(\theta_{2})\mu_{2}}{\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})-\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})}e_{1},
(70) e2e1=sin(θ1)cos(θ1)μ1cos2(θ1)cos2(θ2)e2,\displaystyle\nabla_{e_{2}}e_{1}=\frac{\sin(\theta_{1})\cos(\theta_{1})\mu_{1}}{\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})-\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})}e_{2},
(71) e2e2=sin(θ1)cos(θ1)μ1cos2(θ2)cos2(θ1)e1.\displaystyle\nabla_{e_{2}}e_{2}=\frac{\sin(\theta_{1})\cos(\theta_{1})\mu_{1}}{\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})-\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})}e_{1}.

We also know the normal connection \nabla^{\perp} of M2M^{2} in M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}):

e1ξ1=sin(θ1)cos(θ1)μ2cos2(θ1)cos2(θ2)ξ2,\displaystyle\nabla^{\perp}_{e_{1}}\xi_{1}=\frac{\sin(\theta_{1})\cos(\theta_{1})\mu_{2}}{\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})-\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})}\xi_{2},
e1ξ2=sin(θ1)cos(θ1)μ2cos2(θ2)cos2(θ1)ξ1,\displaystyle\nabla^{\perp}_{e_{1}}\xi_{2}=\frac{\sin(\theta_{1})\cos(\theta_{1})\mu_{2}}{\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})-\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})}\xi_{1},
e2ξ1=sin(θ2)cos(θ2)μ1cos2(θ1)cos2(θ2)ξ2,\displaystyle\nabla^{\perp}_{e_{2}}\xi_{1}=\frac{\sin(\theta_{2})\cos(\theta_{2})\mu_{1}}{\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})-\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})}\xi_{2},
e2ξ2=sin(θ2)cos(θ2)μ1cos2(θ2)cos2(θ1)ξ1.\displaystyle\nabla^{\perp}_{e_{2}}\xi_{2}=\frac{\sin(\theta_{2})\cos(\theta_{2})\mu_{1}}{\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})-\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})}\xi_{1}.

Using the expressions for the Levi-Civita connection and the normal connection, we find that the Codazzi equations are given by

(72) e1[μ1]+sin(θ1)cos(θ1)cos2(θ1)cos2(θ2)μ12=(c1cos2(θ2)c2sin2(θ2))sin(θ1)cos(θ1),\displaystyle e_{1}[\mu_{1}]+\frac{\sin(\theta_{1})\cos(\theta_{1})}{\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})-\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})}\mu_{1}^{2}=(c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})-c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta_{2}))\sin(\theta_{1})\cos(\theta_{1}),
(73) e2[μ2]+sin(θ2)cos(θ2)cos2(θ2)cos2(θ1)μ22=(c1cos2(θ1)c2sin2(θ1))sin(θ2)cos(θ2).\displaystyle e_{2}[\mu_{2}]+\frac{\sin(\theta_{2})\cos(\theta_{2})}{\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})-\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})}\mu_{2}^{2}=(c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})-c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta_{1}))\sin(\theta_{2})\cos(\theta_{2}).

Case 1: μ1=μ2=0\mu_{1}=\mu_{2}=0. From the equations of Codazzi (72) and (73) we obtain that c1cos2(θ1)c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})
c2sin2(θ1)-c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta_{1}) =c1cos2(θ2)c2sin2(θ2)=0=c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})-c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta_{2})=0, because θ1,θ2(0,π2)\theta_{1},\theta_{2}\in(0,\frac{\pi}{2}) and hence we obtain that cos(2θ1)=cos(2θ2)=c2c1c1+c2\cos(2\theta_{1})=\cos(2\theta_{2})=\frac{c_{2}-c_{1}}{c_{1}+c_{2}} with c1c2>0c_{1}c_{2}>0. Since cos(2θ2)>cos(2θ1)\cos(2\theta_{2})>\cos(2\theta_{1}) by assumption, we have a contradiction.

Case 2: μ1=0,μ20\mu_{1}=0,\mu_{2}\neq 0. As before, using the equation of Codazzi, we obtain that c1cos2(θ2)c2sin2(θ2)=0c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta_{2})-c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta_{2})=0 and hence we obtain that cos(2θ2)=c2c1c1+c2\cos(2\theta_{2})=\frac{c_{2}-c_{1}}{c_{1}+c_{2}} with c1c2>0c_{1}c_{2}>0. Denote in the following θ1\theta_{1} by θ\theta. We will work out only the case for which c1>0c_{1}>0 and c2>0c_{2}>0. The other case can be treated analogously. From the expressions for the Levi-Civita connection, we find that e2e1=e2e2=0\nabla_{e_{2}}e_{1}=\nabla_{e_{2}}e_{2}=0. Let us take now coordinates on M2M^{2} with u=αe1\partial_{u}=\alpha e_{1} and v=βe2\partial_{v}=\beta e_{2}. Using the condition [u,v]=0[\partial_{u},\partial_{v}]=0 and the expressions for the Levi-Civita connection we find that

(74) αv=c1c2c2sin2(θ)c1cos2(θ)αβμ2,\displaystyle\alpha_{v}=\frac{\sqrt{c_{1}c_{2}}}{c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta)-c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta)}\alpha\beta\mu_{2},
(75) βu=0.\displaystyle\beta_{u}=0.

Equation (75) implies that, after a change of the uu-coordinate, we can assume that β=1\beta=1 and hence the metric takes the form

g=α2du2+dv2,g=\alpha^{2}du^{2}+dv^{2},

and so the Levi-Civita connection becomes:

uu=αuαuααvv,\displaystyle\nabla_{\partial_{u}}\partial_{u}=\frac{\alpha_{u}}{\alpha}\partial_{u}-\alpha\alpha_{v}\partial_{v},
uv=vu=c1c2c2sin2(θ)c1cos2(θ)μ2u,\displaystyle\nabla_{\partial_{u}}\partial_{v}=\nabla_{\partial_{v}}\partial_{u}=\frac{\sqrt{c_{1}c_{2}}}{c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta)-c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta)}\mu_{2}\partial_{u},
vv=0.\displaystyle\nabla_{\partial_{v}}\partial_{v}=0.

The equation of Codazzi (73) can now be rewritten as

(76) (μ2)v=c1c2c1cos2(θ)c2sin2(θ)((c1cos2(θ)c2sin2(θ))2c1+c2+μ22).(\mu_{2})_{v}=\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta)-c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta)}\left(\frac{(c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta)-c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta))^{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}+\mu_{2}^{2}\right).

Integrating equations (74) and (76) we find

μ2=c1cos2(θ)c2sin2(θ)c1+c2tan(c1c2c1+c2v+C(u)),\displaystyle\mu_{2}=\frac{c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta)-c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta)}{\sqrt{c_{1}+c_{2}}}\tan(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}v+C(u)),
α=D(u)cos(c1c2c1+c2v+C(u)).\displaystyle\alpha=D(u)\cos(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}v+C(u)).

We consider now the surface M2M^{2} as a codimension 4 immersed surface in the Euclidean space 𝔼6\mathbb{E}^{6}. By DD we will denote the Euclidean connection. We remark that ξ1,ξ2,ξ~=(ψ1,ψ2,ψ3,0,0,0)\xi_{1},\xi_{2},\widetilde{\xi}=(\psi_{1},\psi_{2},\psi_{3},0,0,0) and ξ¯=(0,0,0,ψ4,ψ5,ψ6)\overline{\xi}=(0,0,0,\psi_{4},\psi_{5},\psi_{6}) are normals of M2M^{2} in 𝔼6\mathbb{E}^{6}. We still have that the equations (58) and (59) hold. Moreover the equations of Gauss and Weingarten are given by

DXY=XY+σ(X,Y)c12g((I+f2)X,Y)ξ~c22g((If2)X,Y)ξ¯,,\displaystyle D_{X}Y=\nabla_{X}Y+\sigma(X,Y)-\frac{c_{1}}{2}g(\left(\frac{I+f}{2}\right)X,Y)\widetilde{\xi}-\frac{c_{2}}{2}g(\left(\frac{I-f}{2}\right)X,Y)\bar{\xi},,
DXξ1=Sξ1X+Xξ1c12g~(hX,ξ1)+c22g~(hX,ξ1),\displaystyle D_{X}\xi_{1}=-S_{\xi_{1}}X+\nabla^{\perp}_{X}\xi_{1}-\frac{c_{1}}{2}\widetilde{g}(hX,\xi_{1})+\frac{c_{2}}{2}\widetilde{g}(hX,\xi_{1}),
DXξ2=Sξ2X+Xξ2c12g~(hX,ξ2)+c22g~(hX,ξ2).\displaystyle D_{X}\xi_{2}=-S_{\xi_{2}}X+\nabla^{\perp}_{X}\xi_{2}-\frac{c_{1}}{2}\widetilde{g}(hX,\xi_{2})+\frac{c_{2}}{2}\widetilde{g}(hX,\xi_{2}).

Now applying the formula Gauss and the previous equations we find

(77) Duu=αuαuααvv+μ2α2ξ2c1cos2(θ1)α2ξ~c2sin2(θ1)α2ξ¯,\displaystyle D_{\partial_{u}}\partial_{u}=\frac{\alpha_{u}}{\alpha}\partial_{u}-\alpha\alpha_{v}\partial_{v}+\mu_{2}\alpha^{2}\xi_{2}-c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta_{1})\alpha^{2}\widetilde{\xi}-c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta_{1})\alpha^{2}\bar{\xi},
(78) Duv=Dvu=c1c2c1+c2tan(c1c2c1+c2v+C(u))u,\displaystyle D_{\partial_{u}}\partial_{v}=D_{\partial_{v}}\partial_{u}=-\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}\tan(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}v+C(u))\partial_{u},
(79) Dvv=c1c2c1+c2(ξ~+ξ¯),\displaystyle D_{\partial_{v}}\partial_{v}=-\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}(\widetilde{\xi}+\bar{\xi}),

where

(ξ2)i=c1c2(ψi)v for i=1,2,3,\displaystyle(\xi_{2})_{i}=\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}}{c_{2}}}(\psi_{i})_{v}\>\textrm{ for }\>i=1,2,3,
(ξ2)j=c1c2(ψj)v for j=4,5,6.\displaystyle(\xi_{2})_{j}=-\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}}{c_{2}}}(\psi_{j})_{v}\>\textrm{ for }\>j=4,5,6.

Integrating the last two formulas of Gauss, i.e. (78) and (79), we obtain analogously as before that

ψ(u,v)=(cos(c1c2c1+c2u)f~(v)+sin(c1c2c1+c2u)g~(v),cos(c1c2c1+c2u)f¯(v)+sin(c1c2c1+c2u)g¯(v)),\psi(u,v)=(\cos(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\widetilde{f}(v)+\sin(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\widetilde{g}(v),\cos(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\bar{f}(v)+\sin(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}u)\bar{g}(v)),

where f~(v)=(f~1(v),f~2(v),f~3(v)),g~(v)=(g~1(v),g~2(v),g~3(v)),f¯(v)=(f¯1(v),f¯2(v),f¯3(v))\widetilde{f}(v)=(\widetilde{f}_{1}(v),\widetilde{f}_{2}(v),\widetilde{f}_{3}(v)),\widetilde{g}(v)=(\widetilde{g}_{1}(v),\widetilde{g}_{2}(v),\widetilde{g}_{3}(v)),\bar{f}(v)=(\bar{f}_{1}(v),\bar{f}_{2}(v),\bar{f}_{3}(v)) and g¯(v)=(g¯1(v),g¯2(v),g¯3(v))\bar{g}(v)=(\bar{g}_{1}(v),\bar{g}_{2}(v),\bar{g}_{3}(v)) and

f~i(v)=K~i+v0vH~i(τ)cos(C(τ))𝑑τ,\displaystyle\widetilde{f}_{i}(v)=\widetilde{K}_{i}+\int_{v_{0}}^{v}\widetilde{H}_{i}(\tau)\cos(C(\tau))d\tau,
g~i(v)=L~iv0vH~i(τ)sin(C(τ))𝑑τ,\displaystyle\widetilde{g}_{i}(v)=\widetilde{L}_{i}-\int_{v_{0}}^{v}\widetilde{H}_{i}(\tau)\sin(C(\tau))d\tau,
f¯j(v)=K¯j+v0vH¯j(τ)cos(C(τ))𝑑τ,\displaystyle\overline{f}_{j}(v)=\overline{K}_{j}+\int_{v_{0}}^{v}\overline{H}_{j}(\tau)\cos(C(\tau))d\tau,
g¯j(v)=L¯jv0vH¯j(τ)sin(C(τ))𝑑τ,\displaystyle\overline{g}_{j}(v)=\overline{L}_{j}-\int_{v_{0}}^{v}\overline{H}_{j}(\tau)\sin(C(\tau))d\tau,

for i,j=1,,3i,j=1,\dots,3. Moreover we have the following equations

g(ψu,ψu)=α2,g(ψv,ψv)=1,g(ψu,ψv)=0,\displaystyle g(\psi_{u},\psi_{u})=\alpha^{2},\>g(\psi_{v},\psi_{v})=1,\>g(\psi_{u},\psi_{v})=0,
g(ξ1,ψu)=0,g(ξ1,ψv)=0,g(ξ1,ξ1)=1,\displaystyle g(\xi_{1},\psi_{u})=0,\>g(\xi_{1},\psi_{v})=0,\>g(\xi_{1},\xi_{1})=1,
g(ξ2,ψu)=0,g(ξ2,ψv)=0,g(ξ2,ξ2)=1,\displaystyle g(\xi_{2},\psi_{u})=0,\>g(\xi_{2},\psi_{v})=0,\>g(\xi_{2},\xi_{2})=1,
g(ξ~,ψu)=0,g(ξ~,ψv)=0,g(ξ~,ξ~)=1c1,\displaystyle g(\widetilde{\xi},\psi_{u})=0,\>g(\widetilde{\xi},\psi_{v})=0,\>g(\widetilde{\xi},\widetilde{\xi})=\frac{1}{c_{1}},
g(ξ¯,ψu)=0,g(ξ¯,ψv)=0,g(ξ¯,ξ¯)=1c2,\displaystyle g(\bar{\xi},\psi_{u})=0,\>g(\bar{\xi},\psi_{v})=0,\>g(\bar{\xi},\bar{\xi})=\frac{1}{c_{2}},
g(ξ1,ξ2)=0,g(ξ1,ξ~)=0,g(ξ2,ξ~)=0,g(ξ1,ξ¯)=0,g(ξ2,ξ¯)=0,\displaystyle g(\xi_{1},\xi_{2})=0,\>g(\xi_{1},\widetilde{\xi})=0,\>g(\xi_{2},\widetilde{\xi})=0,\>g(\xi_{1},\bar{\xi})=0,\>g(\xi_{2},\bar{\xi})=0,

which are equivalent to

i=13f~i2=1c1=i=13g~i2,\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{3}\widetilde{f}_{i}^{2}=\frac{1}{c_{1}}=\sum_{i=1}^{3}\widetilde{g}_{i}^{2},
j=13f~j2=1c2=j=13g¯j2,\displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{3}\widetilde{f}_{j}^{2}=\frac{1}{c_{2}}=\sum_{j=1}^{3}\bar{g}_{j}^{2},
i=13f~ig~i=0=i=13f~ig~i,\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{3}\widetilde{f}_{i}\widetilde{g}_{i}=0=\sum_{i=1}^{3}\widetilde{f}^{\prime}_{i}\widetilde{g}_{i},
j=13f¯jg¯j=0=j=13f¯jg¯j,\displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{3}\bar{f}_{j}\bar{g}_{j}=0=\sum_{j=1}^{3}\bar{f}^{\prime}_{j}\bar{g}_{j},
i=13((f~i)2cos2(c1c2c1+c2v)+(g~i)2sin2(c1c2c1+c2v)+2f~ig~icos(c1c2c1+c2v)sin(c1c2c1+c2v))=cos2(θ)D2(u)cos2(c1c2c1+c2v+C(u)),\sum_{i=1}^{3}\left((\widetilde{f}_{i}^{\prime})^{2}\cos^{2}(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}v)+(\widetilde{g}_{i}^{\prime})^{2}\sin^{2}(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}v)+2\widetilde{f}_{i}^{\prime}\widetilde{g}_{i}^{\prime}\cos(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}v)\sin(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}v)\right)\\ =\cos^{2}(\theta)D^{2}(u)\cos^{2}(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}v+C(u)),
j=13((f¯j)2cos2(c1c2c1+c2v)+(g¯j)2sin2(c1c2c1+c2v)+2f¯jg¯jcos(c1c2c1+c2v)sin(c1c2c1+c2v))=sin2(θ)D2(u)cos2(c2sin(θ)v+C(u)).\sum_{j=1}^{3}\left((\bar{f}_{j}^{\prime})^{2}\cos^{2}(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}v)+(\bar{g}_{j}^{\prime})^{2}\sin^{2}(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}v)+2\bar{f}_{j}^{\prime}\bar{g}_{j}^{\prime}\cos(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}v)\sin(\sqrt{\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}}v)\right)\\ =\sin^{2}(\theta)D^{2}(u)\cos^{2}(\sqrt{c_{2}}\sin(\theta)v+C(u)).

We obtain from the above equations that f~\widetilde{f} and g~\widetilde{g} are curves in M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}), that f¯\bar{f} and g¯\bar{g} are curves in M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}). If we change the vv-coordinate such that f~\widetilde{f} and f¯\bar{f} have constant speed cos(θ)\cos(\theta) and sin(θ)\sin(\theta), which corresponds to the fact that D2(v)=sec2(C(v))D^{2}(v)=\sec^{2}(C(v)), we see then from the previous equations that g~=±1cos(θ)f~×f~\widetilde{g}=\pm\frac{1}{\cos(\theta)}\widetilde{f}\times\widetilde{f}^{\prime} and g¯=±1sin(θ)f¯×f¯\bar{g}=\pm\frac{1}{\sin(\theta)}\bar{f}\times\bar{f}^{\prime} and we can choose g~=1cos(θ)f~×f~\widetilde{g}=\frac{1}{\cos(\theta)}\widetilde{f}\times\widetilde{f}^{\prime} and g¯=1sin(θ)f¯×f¯\bar{g}=\frac{1}{\sin(\theta)}\bar{f}\times\bar{f}^{\prime}. From the last two equations we also deduce that f~g~cos2(θ)=f¯g¯sin2(θ)\frac{\widetilde{f}^{\prime}\cdot\widetilde{g}^{\prime}}{\cos^{2}(\theta)}=\frac{\bar{f}^{\prime}\cdot\bar{g}^{\prime}}{\sin^{2}(\theta)} and g~g~cos2(θ)=g¯g¯sin2(θ)\frac{\widetilde{g}^{\prime}\cdot\widetilde{g}^{\prime}}{\cos^{2}(\theta)}=\frac{\bar{g}^{\prime}\cdot\bar{g}^{\prime}}{\sin^{2}(\theta)}. This is equivalent to κ~c1=κ¯c2\frac{\widetilde{\kappa}}{\sqrt{c_{1}}}=\frac{\overline{\kappa}}{\sqrt{c_{2}}}, where κ~\widetilde{\kappa} and κ¯\overline{\kappa} are the geodesic curvatures of respectively f~\widetilde{f} and f¯\overline{f}. So we obtain the first case of the theorem.

Case 3: μ10,μ20\mu_{1}\neq 0,\mu_{2}\neq 0. Let (u,v)(u,v) be coordinates on M2M^{2} such that u=αe1\partial_{u}=\alpha e_{1} and v=βe2\partial_{v}=\beta e_{2}. From the expression of the Levi-Civita connection, i.e. equation (68) and the condition [u,v]=0[\partial_{u},\partial_{v}]=0, we obtain

(80) a2μ2=αvαβ,\displaystyle a_{2}\mu_{2}=\frac{\alpha_{v}}{\alpha\beta},
(81) a1μ1=βuαβ,\displaystyle a_{1}\mu_{1}=\frac{\beta_{u}}{\alpha\beta},

where a1a_{1} and a2a_{2} are constants as in Proposition 9. Using the previous equations, we can rewrite the equations of Codazzi (72) and (73) as follows

(α2(μ22+A2))v=0,\displaystyle(\alpha^{2}(\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}))_{v}=0,
(β2(μ12+A1))u=0,\displaystyle(\beta^{2}(\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1}))_{u}=0,

where A1A_{1} and A2A_{2} are constants as in Proposition 9 and hence we obtain that α2(μ22+A2)=C2(u)\alpha^{2}(\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2})=C_{2}(u) and β2(μ12+A1)=C1(v)\beta^{2}(\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1})=C_{1}(v). We have to consider now several subcases.

Case 3.a.: C10C_{1}\neq 0, C20C_{2}\neq 0. After a transformation of the uu-coordinate and the vv-coordinate we can suppose that α2=1μ22+A2\alpha^{2}=\frac{1}{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}} and β2=1μ12+A1\beta^{2}=\frac{1}{\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1}}. Substituting this in equations (80) and (81) we obtain equations (36). We can conclude that the isometric immersion ψ\psi is locally congruent to the surface of Proposition 9.

Case 3.b.: C1=0C_{1}=0, C20C_{2}\neq 0. Since C1=0C_{1}=0, we have that μ12+A1=0\mu_{1}^{2}+A_{1}=0. So we have that A1<0A_{1}<0, because μ10\mu_{1}\neq 0. We conclude that μ1=±A1\mu_{1}=\pm\sqrt{-A_{1}} and without loss of generalization we can suppose that μ1=A1\mu_{1}=\sqrt{-A_{1}} . After a transformation of the uu-coordinate, we can suppose that α2=1μ22+A2\alpha^{2}=\frac{1}{\mu_{2}^{2}+A_{2}}. Substituting the last two equations into equations (80) and (81) we obtain equations (38). We can conclude that the isometric immersion ψ\psi is locally congruent to the surface of Proposition 10.

Case3.b.: C1=C2=0C_{1}=C_{2}=0. Analogously as before we conclude that ψ\psi is locally congruent to the surface of Proposition 11. ∎

We end this paper with a classification of the totally geodesic surfaces of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). We have seen that a totally geodesic surface of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) is a constant angle surfaces of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). We will use the classification of the constant angle surfaces to give the classification of the totally geodesic surfaces of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}).

Theorem 7.

Let M2M^{2} be a totally geodesic surface of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}). Then there are four possibilities

  1. (1)

    M2M^{2} is locally congruent to the immersion given by (22) or by (23);

  2. (2)

    M2M^{2} is a product of two geodesic curves;

  3. (3)

    M2M^{2} is an open part of M2(c1)×{p2}M^{2}(c_{1})\times\{p_{2}\} or {p1}×M2(c2)\{p_{1}\}\times M^{2}(c_{2});

  4. (4)

    M2M^{2} is locally congruent to the first immersion of (50), in which the curve f~\widetilde{f} is a geodesic curve of M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) if c2=0c_{2}=0, or to the first immersion of (67), in which the curve f¯\overline{f} is a geodesic curve of M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}) if c1=0c_{1}=0.

Proof.

Proposition 3 tells us that a totally geodesic surface of M2(c1)×M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{1})\times M^{2}(c_{2}) is a constant angle surface. Moreover in the proof of Proposition 3, we have seen that there are four possible situations. In the first case we have seen that the angle functions λ1\lambda_{1} and λ2\lambda_{2} are equal and have value ba-\frac{b}{a}, in which a=c1+c24a=\frac{c_{1}+c_{2}}{4} , b=c1c24b=\frac{c_{1}-c_{2}}{4} and c1c2>0c_{1}c_{2}>0. We have classified these totally geodesic surfaces in Proposition 4 and showed that they are locally congruent to (22) if c1,c2>0c_{1},c_{2}>0 or to (23) if c1,c2<0c_{1},c_{2}<0. The second case says that the angle functions are equal to ±1\pm 1. If the angle functions have opposite sign then one can easily show that the surface is a Riemannian product of curves of M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) and M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}) and that this surface is totally geodesic if and only if both curves are geodesic curves of M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) and M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}). If both angle functions have the same sign then one can easily deduce that the surface is an open part of M2(c1)×{p2}M^{2}(c_{1})\times\{p_{2}\} if the angle functions are equal to 11 or an open part of {p1}×M2(c2)\{p_{1}\}\times M^{2}(c_{2}) if the angle functions are equal to 1-1. The third case in the proof tells us that one of the angle functions is ±1\pm 1 and the other angle function is equal to ba-\frac{b}{a}. We show that in this case there exist only totally geodesic surfaces in the case that c1=0c_{1}=0 or c2=0c_{2}=0. Suppose therefore that c10c_{1}\neq 0 and c20c_{2}\neq 0. Remark that ba±1-\frac{b}{a}\neq\pm 1, because c10c_{1}\neq 0 and c20c_{2}\neq 0. In Propositions 6 and 7 we have showed that the curvature of the surface is c2sin2(θ)c_{2}\sin^{2}(\theta) if one of the angle functions is 1-1 or c1cos2(θ)c_{1}\cos^{2}(\theta) if one of the angle functions is 11. So if the other angle function is equal to ba-\frac{b}{a}, then we obtain that in both cases the curvature is equal to c1c2c1+c2\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}. But the surface is totally geodesic and hence we obtain form equations (28) and (30) that the surface is flat. Finally we obtain that c1c2c1+c2=0\frac{c_{1}c_{2}}{c_{1}+c_{2}}=0 and hence c1=0c_{1}=0 or c2=0c_{2}=0. This is of course a contradiction, because we have assumed that c10c_{1}\neq 0 and c20c_{2}\neq 0. Hence we obtain that in the third case c1=0c_{1}=0 or c2=0c_{2}=0 and so the angle functions in this case are ±1\pm 1. This brings us back to the second case and hence we are finished. In the fourth case we have that one of the angle functions is equal to 11 and the other angle function is a constant in [1,1][-1,1] if c1=0c_{1}=0 or that one of the angle functions is equal to 1-1 and the other angle functions is a constant in [1,1][-1,1] if c2=0c_{2}=0. We can suppose that the other angle function is a constant in (1,1)(-1,1). We can easily deduce from the classification theorems 4 and 5, that M2M^{2} is indeed locally congruent to the first immersion of (50), in which the curve f~\widetilde{f} is a geodesic curve of M2(c1)M^{2}(c_{1}) if c2=0c_{2}=0, or to the first immersion of (67), in which the curve f¯\overline{f} is a totally geodesic curve of M2(c2)M^{2}(c_{2}) if c1=0c_{1}=0. ∎

Remark.

The special case when c1=c2=2c_{1}=c_{2}=2 of Theorem 7 was also considered in the paper [3] where totally geodesic surfaces in QnQ^{n} (in particular, in Q2=S2(2)×S2(2)Q^{2}=S^{2}(2)\times S^{2}(2)) were classified. In particular, they proved that a totally geodesic surface of QnQ^{n} is one of the following three kinds:

  1. (1)

    a totally geodesic totally real surface,

  2. (2)

    a totally geodesic complex surface,

  3. (3)

    a totally geodesic surface of curvature 1/5 in QnQ^{n} which is neither totally real nor complex. This case occurs only when n3n\geq 3.

Since the third case doesn’t occur for n=2n=2, this is consistent with our results. It is interesting to remark that the third case was missing in [4] and [5]. This was remarked by S. Klein in [10], who didn’t notice that the missing case did occur in the earlier paper [3]. The authors would like to thank B.-Y. Chen for drawing our attention to [3].

References

  • [1] P. Bayard, A. Di Scala, G. Ruiz-Hernandez, O. Osuna Castro, Surfaces in 4\mathbb{R}^{4} with constant principal angles with respect to a plane, preprint 2011.
  • [2] I. Castro, F. Urbano, Minimal Lagrangian surfaces in 𝕊2×𝕊2\mathbb{S}^{2}\times\mathbb{S}^{2}, Comm. Anal. Geom. 15 (2007), 217–248.
  • [3] B.-Y. Chen and H.-S. Lue, Differential geometry of SO(n+2)/SO(2)×SO(n)SO(n+2)/SO(2)\times SO(n), I, Geom. Dedicata 4 (1975), 253-261.
  • [4] B.-Y. Chen and T. Nagano, Totally geodesic submanifolds of symmetric spaces, I, Duke Math. J. 44 (1977), no. 4, 745–755.
  • [5] B.-Y. Chen and T. Nagano, Totally geodesic submanifolds of symmetric spaces, II, Duke Math. J. 45 (1978), 405–425.
  • [6] F. Dillen, J. Fastenakels, J. Van der Veken and L. Vrancken, Constant Angle Surfaces in 𝕊2×\mathbb{S}^{2}\times\mathbb{R}, Monaths. Math., 152(2) (2007), 89–96.
  • [7] F. Dillen, M.I. Munteanu, Constant angle surfaces in 2×\mathbb{H}^{2}\times\mathbb{R}, Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 40(1) (2009), 85–97.
  • [8] C. Jordan, Essais sur la géométrie à nn dimensions, Bull. Soc. Math. France 3 (1875), 103-174
  • [9] M. Kimura and K.Suizu, Fundamental theorems of Lagrangian surfaces in S2×S2S^{2}\times S^{2}, Osaka J. Math. 44 (2007), 829–850.
  • [10] S. Klein, Totally geodesic submanifolds of the complex quadric, Differential Geom. Appl. 26 (2008), 79–96.
  • [11] W. Kühnel, Differential geometry. Curves—surfaces—manifolds, Student Mathematical Library, 16. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002.
  • [12] D. Kowalczyk, Isometric immersions into product of space forms, Geom. Dedicata, 151 (2011), 1-8.
  • [13] W. Meeks, H. Rosenberg, Stable minimal surfaces in M2×M^{2}\times\mathbb{R}, J. Differential Geom., 68 (2004), 515-534.
  • [14] Y.C. Wong, Linear geometry in Euclidean 4-space, SEAMS Monograph, No. 1. Southeast Asian Mathematical Society, Singapore, 1977.
  • [15] H. Rosenberg, Minimal surfaces in M2×M^{2}\times\mathbb{R}, Illinois J. Math., 46 (2002), 1177-1195.
  • [16] K. Yano and M. Kon, Structures on manifolds, Series in Pure Mathematics, 3. World Scientific Publishing Co.