arXiv is now an independent nonprofit! Learn more
License: CC BY 4.0
arXiv:2312.06572v2 [nucl-ex] 12 Dec 2023
\ShineTitle

Excess of charged over neutral K meson production
in high-energy collisions of atomic nuclei \PreprintIdNumberCERN-EP-2023-283 \ShineAbstractCollisions of atomic nuclei at relativistic velocities produce new particles, predominantly mesons containing one valence quark and one valence anti-quark. These particles are produced in strong interactions, which preserve an approximate symmetry between up (uu) and down (dd) quarks. In the case of KK meson production, if this symmetry were exact, it would result in equal numbers of charged (K+K^{+} and KK^{-}) and neutral (K0K^{0} and K¯0\overline{K}^{0}) mesons in the final state. In this Letter, we report a measurement of the relative abundance of charged over neutral KK meson production in collisions of argon and scandium nuclei at a center-of-mass energy of 11.9 GeV per nucleon pair. We find that production of K+\mathit{K^{+}} and K\mathit{K^{-}} mesons at mid-rapidity displays a significant excess of (23.3±5.7)%(23.3\pm 5.7)\% relative to that of the neutral KK mesons. The origin of this unexpected excess remains to be elucidated.

Keywords: quarks, strong interaction, isospin symmetry, nucleus-nucleus collisions, strange meson production

One of the main aims of basic research is the understanding of fundamental constituents and properties of matter, particularly the underlying fundamental interactions. Collisions of highly energetic atomic nuclei studied at large circular accelerators serve the specific purpose of understanding the short-range strong interaction occurring between the quarks, which build up the participating protons and neutrons.

At collision energies of several GeV (center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair) or more, it is generally assumed that the colliding nuclei form, on time scales of the order of 102310^{-23} seconds, an intermediate system of deconfined quarks, anti-quarks and gluons characteristic of the early universe about 10510^{-5} seconds after the Big Bang. Cooling down, this quark-gluon plasma ultimately “freezes out” into observable final state particles [1]. Studying these particle production phenomena is one of the main purposes of high-energy experiments located at CERN (Super Proton Synchrotron, Large Hadron Collider) and BNL (Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider).

These typically very abundant newly produced particles (hundreds or thousands per single nucleus-nucleus collision) are predominantly mesons containing one valence quark (q\mathit{q}) and one valence anti-quark (q¯\mathit{\overline{q}}). The most copiously produced are the up (u\mathit{u}) and down (d\mathit{d}) quarks, which also constitute protons and neutrons, but a large number of strange quarks (s\mathit{s}), belonging to the second quark family of the standard model of particle physics is produced as well. The same is true for the corresponding anti-quarks: u¯\mathit{\overline{u}}, d¯\mathit{\overline{d}}, and s¯\mathit{\overline{s}}.

The two colliding nuclei are made of protons and neutrons. These contain, respectively, (𝑢𝑢𝑑\mathit{uud}) and (𝑢𝑑𝑑\mathit{udd}) valence quarks. While initial-state valence quarks can also contribute to the production of new mesons, the dominant contribution to this process comes from creating new quark-anti-quark pairs. Generally, strong interactions are independent of quark type (flavor) in the limit of massless quarks. As such, exchanging the light uu and dd quarks (or u¯{\overline{u}} and d¯{\overline{d}} anti-quarks) should not significantly affect the result of the strong interaction. This feature is known as isospin symmetry. However, this symmetry does not apply to ss quarks. Their production remains suppressed due to their significantly higher mass (the corresponding quark masses are mu=2.160.26+0.49m_{\mathit{u}}=2.16^{+0.49}_{-0.26} MeV, md=4.670.17+0.48m_{\mathit{d}}=4.67^{+0.48}_{-0.17} MeV, and ms=93.43.4+8.6m_{\mathit{s}}=93.4^{+8.6}_{-3.4} MeV [2]). The same is valid for the heavy charm (cc), beauty (bb), and top (tt) quarks, which all remain very strongly suppressed in nuclear collisions.11 1 Units in this Letter follow the Particle Data Group (PDG) [2] convention: masses and energies are expressed in MeV (or GeV), whereas momenta in MeV/cc (or GeV/cc). The relative differences are given as the ratio of the difference to the mean.

Let us first consider the case when the two nuclei are made of an equal number of protons and neutrons (and therefore, also of an equal number of valence uu and dd quarks). Then, isospin symmetry implies that such collisions will result in closely equal abundances of u\mathit{u} and d\mathit{d} quarks and similarly, closely equal abundances of u¯\mathit{\overline{u}} and d¯\mathit{\overline{d}} anti-quarks.22 2 With rare exceptions, nuclei with an equal number of protons and neutrons are in the ground state singlets of isospin [3]. A discussion of phenomenological aspects of the (approximate) isospin symmetry in particle production can be found in Ref. [4]. This brings implications for particle production. It is commonly expected [5, 6, 7, 8, 9] that collisions of such “isospin-symmetric” nuclei will result in closely similar abundances of mesons of any particular type, for mesons containing u\mathit{u} quarks and those containing d\mathit{d} quarks. The same is expected for mesons containing u¯\mathit{\overline{u}} and d¯\mathit{\overline{d}} anti-quarks. A good example for this rule should be K\mathit{K} mesons. With their masses differing by less than 1% (mK+m_{K^{+}} = mKm_{K^{-}} = 493.677 ±\pm 0.016 MeV, mK0m_{K^{0}} = mK¯0m_{\bar{K}^{0}}= 497.611 ±\pm 0.013 MeV [2]), similar yields would be anticipated for the K+\mathit{K^{+}} (us¯\mathit{u\overline{s}}) and K 0\mathit{K}^{\,0} (ds¯\mathit{d\overline{s}}) states. Also, similar abundances would be expected for K\mathit{K^{-}} (su¯\mathit{s\overline{u}}) and K¯ 0\mathit{\overline{K}}^{\,0} (sd¯\mathit{s\overline{d}}).

In the realistic case of nucleus-nucleus reactions studied experimentally, the two colliding nuclei are most often made of non-equal numbers of protons and neutrons. However, even for heavy nuclei with a significant excess of neutrons (e.g. Pb) the number of valence u\mathit{u} and d\mathit{d} quarks in the initial state of the reaction differs only by 14%. As a consequence, it is expected that in general, all types of high-energy nucleus-nucleus collisions will bring similar abundances of u\mathit{u} and d\mathit{d} quarks, and also similar abundances of u¯\mathit{\overline{u}} and d¯\mathit{\overline{d}} anti-quarks in their final state. Correspondingly, one expects similar abundances for the produced mesons, and in particular, an approximate equality of charged and neutral KK meson yields (K+K 0\mathit{K^{+}}\approx\mathit{K}^{\,0}, KK¯ 0\mathit{K^{-}}\approx\mathit{\overline{K}}^{\,0}) is generally assumed. These expectations are supported by quantitative predictions of statistical models, which have been, up to now, very successful in the description of experimental data [10, 11].

In this Letter, we report a measurement of the relative abundance of charged (K+\mathit{K^{+}}, K\mathit{K^{-}}) over neutral (KS 0\mathit{K}^{\,0}_{S}) meson production in the 10% most central collisions of argon (Ar\mathrm{Ar}) and scandium (Sc\mathrm{Sc}) nuclei, at center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair equal to sNN=11.9\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=11.9 GeV. The Ar+Sc colliding system comprises 39 protons and 46 neutrons, which means that the corresponding number of uu and dd valence quarks differs by 5.5%. Notwithstanding, production of K+\mathit{K^{+}} and K\mathit{K^{-}} mesons displays an unexpected excess to that of the KS 0\mathit{K}^{\,0}_{S} meson. The KS 0\mathit{K}^{\,0}_{S} meson is a superposition of the two neutral states K 0\mathit{K}^{\,0} (ds¯\mathit{d\overline{s}}) and K¯ 0\mathit{\overline{K}}^{\,0} (sd¯\mathit{s\overline{d}}), and its yield in the final state is equal to half of the summed production of these two states from the strong interaction.33 3 The K 0\mathit{K}^{\,0} and K¯ 0\mathit{\overline{K}}^{\,0} states are produced in strong interactions, but they decay through weak interactions. Consequently, in the final state, one observes linear combinations of the latter known as K 0\mathit{K}^{\,0} “short” (KS 0\mathit{K}^{\,0}_{S}) and K 0\mathit{K}^{\,0} “long” (KL 0\mathit{K}^{\,0}_{L}), where “short” and “long” refer to their weak decay lifetime. For more details, see Ref. [2]. The corresponding excess is quantified in terms of the ratio of yields of the produced K\mathit{K} mesons:

RK=K++KK 0+K¯0=K++K2KS  0.\mathit{R_{K}}=\frac{\mathit{K}^{+}+\mathit{K}^{-}}{\mathit{K}^{\,0}+\mathit{{\overline{K}}}\penalty\ \hskip-2.27621pt^{0}}=\frac{\mathit{K}^{+}+\mathit{K}^{-}}{2\,\mathit{K}^{\penalty\ \hskip-2.84526pt\,0}_{S}}\penalty\ . (1)

This ratio remains above unity in the entire kinematic range available for measurement. Typically, the measured values exceed 1.2. Following our estimates, the observed surplus of production of K\mathit{K} mesons containing u\mathit{u} (u¯\mathit{\overline{u}}) over these containing d\mathit{d} (d¯\mathit{\overline{d}}) quarks and anti-quarks corresponds to about four additional charged K\mathit{K} particles per central Ar+Sc event.

Figure 1: Comparison of rapidity spectrum of neutral (KS 0{}^{\mathbf{\,0}}_{S}) with the average spectrum of charged (K+ and K-) mesons. Total uncertainties, calculated as the square root of the sum of squared statistical and systematic uncertainties (stat2+sys2\sqrt{\text{stat}^{2}+\text{sys}^{2}}) are drawn. For charged KK mesons, the total uncertainties were calculated separately for positively and negatively charged, and then propagated.
statistical systematic    total
(dndy)y0(K+)\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}n}{\mathrm{d}y}\right)_{\hskip-0.28453pty\hskip 0.85358pt\approx\hskip 0.85358pt0}\mathit{(K^{+})} 3.968 ±\pm 0.041 ±\pm 0.078 ±\pm 0.088
(dndy)y0(K)\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}n}{\mathrm{d}y}\right)_{\hskip-0.28453pty\hskip 0.85358pt\approx\hskip 0.85358pt0}\mathit{(K^{-})} 2.034 ±\pm 0.016 ±\pm 0.021 ±\pm 0.026
(dndy)y0(KS 0)\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}n}{\mathrm{d}y}\right)_{\hskip-0.28453pty\hskip 0.85358pt\approx\hskip 0.85358pt0}\mathit{(K}^{\,0}_{S}{\mathit{)}} 2.433 ±\pm 0.027 ±\pm 0.102 ±\pm 0.106
charged-to-neutral K\mathit{K} meson ratio:
RK={R_{K}}= 1.233 ±\pm 0.016 ±\pm 0.054 ±\pm 0.057
Table 1: Densities of charged and neutral K mesons produced at mid-rapidity. The measurement was performed in the 10% most central Ar+Sc collisions at sNN=11.9\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=11.9 GeV, as described in Methods. The excess of charged over neutral mesons is quantified by the ratio RK{R_{K}} defined in Eq. (1).

Production of K mesons in central Ar+Sc collisions at the CERN SPS. The new experimental results presented in this Letter have been obtained by the NA61/SHINE fixed-target experiment at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron [12]. The measurements of K+\mathit{K^{+}} and K\mathit{K^{-}} production in the 10% most central Ar+Sc reactions at sNN=11.9\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=11.9 GeV have been published elsewhere [13]. This Letter presents the first measurement of KS 0\mathit{K}^{\,0}_{S} production in nucleus-nucleus collisions from NA61/SHINE. Earlier data from this experiment, obtained for KS 0\mathit{K}^{\,0}_{S} mesons in pp+C, π\pi^{-}+C, π+\pi^{+}+C, π+\pi^{+}+Be and pp+pp collisions can be found in Refs. [14, 15, 16, 17, 18].

The comparison of the rapidity distribution of KS 0\mathit{K}^{\,0}_{S} mesons to the average of rapidity distributions for K+\mathit{K^{+}} and K\mathit{K^{-}} mesons is presented in Fig. 1. The rapidity yy is a relativistic generalization of the particle’s longitudinal velocity vLv_{L}, along the direction of the incoming nuclei: where cc is the speed of light. In this Letter, we define rapidity in the collision center-of-mass system and positive yy corresponds to the direction of the Ar nucleus.

In the entire range of rapidity covered by the measurement, the averaged charged K\mathit{K} mesons prevail significantly over the neutral KS 0\mathit{K}^{\,0}_{S} mesons. To quantify this effect, Table 1 presents the densities of K+\mathit{K^{+}}, K\mathit{K^{-}} and KS 0\mathit{K}^{\,0}_{S} production measured at mid-rapidity (y0y\approx 0). Here, the relative excess of charged mesons is (23.3±5.7)\mathrm{(23.3\pm 5.7)}%. Integration of the two distributions in Fig. 1 over positive rapidity, y>0y>0, gives 4.33±0.084.33\pm 0.08 and 3.22±0.373.22\pm 0.37 for the production rates per collision of K++K2\mathit{\frac{K^{+}+K^{-}}{2}} and KS 0\mathit{K}^{\,0}_{S}, respectively (total uncertainties are given). The resulting difference of 1.11±0.381.11\pm 0.38 indicates that the surplus of charged (K+\mathit{K^{+}} and K\mathit{K^{-}}) over neutral (K 0\mathit{K}^{\,0} and K¯ 0\mathit{\overline{K}}^{\,0}) states is 2.22±0.762.22\pm 0.76 at positive rapidity. Under the assumption that the charged-to-neutral ratio would be similar also at negative rapidity, the total excess would amount to 4.4±\pm1.5 additional K+K^{+} or KK^{-} mesons per one central Ar+Sc collision.

A comparison of distributions of KS 0\mathit{K}^{\,0}_{S} with averaged K+\mathit{K^{+}} and K\mathit{K^{-}} mesons as a function of transverse momentum pTp_{T} (the momentum component perpendicular to the direction of the incoming nuclei) is shown in Fig. 2. Both distributions are integrated over the rapidity range 0<y<20<y<2. The prevalence of charged over neutral K\mathit{K} mesons is again evident. The insert in the figure shows the pTp_{T}-dependence of the ratio RK{R_{K}}. The corresponding excess of K\mathit{K} mesons containing u\mathit{u}, u¯\mathit{\overline{u}} over these containing d\mathit{d}, d¯\mathit{\overline{d}} quarks and anti-quarks remains in the range 6–36% over the considered range of pTp_{T}.

Figure 2: Comparison of transverse momentum spectrum of neutral (KS 0{}^{\mathbf{\,0}}_{S}) with the average spectrum of charged (K+ and K-) mesons. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the two distributions, as defined in Eq. (1). The meaning of the total uncertainties drawn is the same as in Fig. 1.
Figure 3: Ratio of charged to neutral K meson yields in nucleus-nucleus collisions as a function of collision energy. The measurement from NA61/SHINE is shown as a red dot. The remaining data points come from the compilation described in the text.

Comparison to previous experiments. Figure 3 shows the comparison between the present measurement of the ratio RK{R_{K}} at mid-rapidity, Table 1, and our compilation based on existing experimental results on K+K^{+}​​​, KK^{-}​​​, and KS0K^{0}_{S} production from the CERES [19], STAR BES [20, 21], STAR [22, 23, 24, 25], ALICE [26, 27], NA35 [28, 29, 30], NA49 [31], HADES [32, 33, 34, 35] and FOPI [36, 37] collaborations. We note that the latter compilation includes not only measurements at mid-rapidity, but also these of total multiplicities. This may increase the overall spread between the data points. We also note the sizeable uncertainties of the earlier measurements. These probably explain the fact that the aforementioned charged-over-neutral anomaly was never reported before as an experimental observation. Despite these uncertainties, a consistent picture emerges in the energy range 5<sNN<2005<\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}<200 GeV. With the unique exception of the NA35 experiment, all the data points correspond to an excess of charged over neutral K\mathit{K} mesons. This excess may fade out at much higher energies, as suggested by ALICE data at sNN=2760\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2760 GeV.

Discussion of the observed excess. It is to be remarked that given the prevalence of neutrons (𝑢𝑑𝑑\mathit{udd}) over protons (𝑢𝑢𝑑\mathit{uud}) in the two colliding nuclei, the contribution of valence quarks to K\mathit{K} meson production would favour a small excess of d\mathit{d} over u\mathit{u} quarks. Consequently, it would bring the ratio RKR_{K} below unity, which is opposite to the observed result. Thus in this context, our observation remains an unexpected effect. At the same time, it goes against the expectations based on statistical models of particle production [10, 11].

A known effect of violation of equivalence of charged and neutral K\mathit{K} states is the ϕ(1020)\mathit{\phi(1020)} resonance, which decays more often to charged (K+K\mathit{K^{+}K^{-}}) than neutral (KS 0KL0\mathit{K}^{\,0}_{S}\mathit{K}^{0}_{{L}}) mesons. However, the contribution of the ϕ(1020)\mathit{\phi(1020)} to KK meson production at NA61/SHINE energies is known from measurements performed in pp+pp and Pb+Pb collisions [38, 39, 40, 41]. The interpolation to the Ar+Sc system shows that this contribution is insufficient to explain the observed excess.

In summary, we have found an unexpected excess of charged over neutral K\mathit{K} meson production in central Ar+Sc collisions at 11.9 GeV center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair. The experimental data show prevalence in production of K\mathit{K} mesons containing u\mathit{u}, u¯\mathit{\overline{u}} over these containing d\mathit{d}, d¯\mathit{\overline{d}} quarks and anti-quarks, in the entire kinematic range available to the measurement. The measured excess corresponds to about two additional K+K^{+} or KK^{-} mesons produced at positive rapidity. Under reasonable assumptions, this gives about four additional charged K\mathit{K} mesons per central Ar+Sc collision. At mid-rapidity, the relative excess of charged mesons is (23.3±5.7)\mathrm{(23.3\pm 5.7)}%. Although with large uncertainties, earlier data from other experiments in the collision energy range 5<sNN<2005<\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}<200 GeV are consistent with the present result.

The origin of this unexpected excess remains to be elucidated.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the CERN EP, BE, HSE and EN Departments for the strong support of NA61/SHINE. We also gratefully acknowledge discussions with Claudia Ahdida, Wojciech Broniowski, Marco van Leeuwen, Francesco Giacosa, Krzysztof Golec-Biernat and Stanisław Mrówczyński at various stages of preparation of this Letter.

This work was supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (grant NKFIH 138136/137812/138152 and TKP2021-NKTA-64), the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (DIR/WK/2016/2017/10-1, WUT ID-UB), the National Science Centre Poland (grants 2014/14/E/ST2/00018, 2016/21/D/ST2/01983, 2017/25/N/ST2/02575, 2018/29/N/ST2/02595, 2018/30/A/ST2/00226, 2018/31/G/ST2/03910, 2020/39/O/ST2/00277), the Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2014–2021 (grant 2019/34/H/ST2/00585), the Polish Minister of Education and Science (contract No. 2021/WK/10), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 871072, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (grants 18071005, 19034011, 19740162, 20740160 and 20039012,22H04943), the German Research Foundation DFG (grants GA 1480/8-1 and project 426579465), the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science within the National Roadmap for Research Infrastructures 2020–2027, contract No. D01-374/18.12.2020, Serbian Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation (grant OI171002), Swiss Nationalfonds Foundation (grant 200020117913/1), ETH Research Grant TH-01 07-3, National Science Foundation grant PHY-2013228 and the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab), a U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, HEP User Facility managed by Fermi Research Alliance, LLC (FRA), acting under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359 and the IN2P3-CNRS (France).

The data used in this Letter were collected before February 2022.

References

Methods

Experimental setup. The SPS Heavy Ion and Neutrino Experiment (SHINE) is a fixed-target detector operating at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS). It is a multi-purpose spectrometer optimised to study hadron production in various collisions (hadron-proton, hadron-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus). The detection setup in its configuration used for the measurements reported here is described below. Its details and a description of the detector’s performance can be found in Ref. [12].

The beamline is equipped with an array of beam detectors upstream and downstream of the target, used to identify and measure the trajectory of the beam particles and trigger the spectrometer data acquisition. The tracking devices of the NA61/SHINE spectrometer are Time Projection Chambers (TPCs). Two Vertex TPCs are placed inside a magnetic field. Two large-volume Main TPCs measure the charged particle trajectories downstream of the 4.5 Tm magnetic field. The latter provides the bending power for a precise determination of particle momenta. The information about the energy losses (dE/dx\mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}x) of the charged particles in the TPCs, together with Time-of-Flight (ToF) measurements, allows for particle identification in a wide momentum range. The most downstream detector on the beamline is the Projectile Spectator Detector (PSD). It is used to measure the energy of the “spectator” remnant of the projectile nucleus, which is closely related to the collision centrality in nucleus-nucleus reactions.

Physics objects. This Letter compares the production of charged and neutral K\mathit{K} mesons in Ar+Sc collisions at a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair of 11.9 GeV. The Ar1840{}^{40}_{18}\mathrm{Ar} beam had a momentum of 75AGeV/c75A\,\mbox{Ge\kern-1.00006ptV}\!/\!c. The stationary target consisted of six Sc2145{}^{45}_{21}\mathrm{Sc} plates, with a total thickness of 6 mm.

A detailed account on the extraction of charged (K+\mathit{K^{+}}, K\mathit{K^{-}}) yields can be found in Ref. [13]. Only the neutral KS0K^{0}_{S} mesons are considered in the present analysis. They can be detected via their weak decay into two charged pions (KS0π+π)(K^{0}_{S}\rightarrow\pi^{+}\pi^{-}). The mean lifetime (cτ)(c\tau) for this decay is 2.7 cm.

Analysis. Before the analysis of KS0K^{0}_{S} mesons, the recorded Ar+Sc collision data undergo event and track selection procedures. Event selection uses information from the beam detectors to ensure the quality of the measured beam trajectory. It rejects events where more than one beam-target interaction occurred during the trigger-time window. It also reduces the background from off-target interactions based on information about the quality of the main interaction vertex. Finally, it selects the 10% most central collisions using the information from the PSD. This is realized by selection of the 10% lowest energy deposits from the spectator remnant of the Ar nucleus. The total number of recorded collisions (events) was 2.81062.8\cdot 10^{6}, from which 1.11061.1\cdot 10^{6} (39%) remained after all cuts. For more details, especially the centrality selection, see Ref. [13].

The next step is the reconstruction of the charged particle tracks in the TPCs. Pattern recognition algorithms combine space points recorded in the TPCs into tracks. Their curvature and the magnetic field are used to compute the momenta of the corresponding particles. The minimum number of reconstructed space points in the VTPCs must be more than 10, and the computed momenta must be larger than 400 MeV/c\mbox{Me\kern-1.00006ptV}/c (in the laboratory frame). The latter selection excludes a large fraction of low-momentum electrons from the analysis. The known positions of the target and the most probable intersection point of measured tracks defines the position of the primary vertex.

KS𝟎{}^{\mathbf{0}}_{S} reconstruction. Unlike the charged particles, the neutral K\mathit{K} mesons do not leave a measurable track in the detectors. They are measured by reconstructing their oppositely charged decay products (daughter particles). The two-body decays of KS0K^{0}_{S} create characteristic VV-shaped particle pairs originating at the decay vertex. This topology is called V0V^{0}. It is searched for with a dedicated V0V^{0}-finder algorithm that looks for track pairs of particles with opposite charges. These track pairs are extrapolated backwards until their mutual distance of closest approach is reached. If this distance is smaller than a given limit value, the track pair becomes a V0V^{0} candidate with its origin at the decay vertex.

Two further cuts are placed on the track pairs. The first cut imposes a minimum value on the angle between the direction of the line joining the primary and decay vertices and the direction given by the vector sum of the momenta of the decay daughters. The second condition requires a minimum distance between the primary and decay vertex (a minimum length of the decaying particle). The corresponding cut requirements depend on KS0K^{0}_{S} rapidity, and are listed in Extended Data Table 2. Starting with the approximate decay point, a V0V^{0}-fitter program optimises the decay point position and the momenta of the decay daughters. Assuming that the daughter particles are pions, it is straightforward to reconstruct the invariant mass of the decaying particle (the invariant mass is defined as minv=(Ei)2(pi)2m_{inv}=\sqrt{(\sum{E_{i}})^{2}-(\sum{\overrightarrow{p_{i}}})^{2}}, where EiE_{i} are the energies of the decay products, pi\overrightarrow{p_{i}} are their momenta, and c1c\equiv 1 is assumed).

The invariant mass distribution of V0V^{0} candidates is populated by KS0K^{0}_{S} and Λ\Lambda decays, photon conversion in some detector material, and spurious particle crossings. A KS0K^{0}_{S} signal will appear as a peak on a slowly varying background. For a double-differential KS0K^{0}_{S} analysis, the momentum space was divided into seven rapidity bins ranging from -1.5 to 2 and nine bins in transverse momentum from 0 to 2.7 GeV/c\mbox{Ge\kern-1.00006ptV}\!/\!c. The raw number of KS0K^{0}_{S} in a given kinematic bin is obtained from fits of appropriate signal and background functions to the invariant mass distribution of the corresponding V0V^{0} candidates. The fitted signal function is taken as a Lorentzian and the background function is a third-order Chebychev polynomial. The integral of the signal function divided by the bin width is equal to the raw (uncorrected) number of the reconstructed KS0K^{0}_{S} in a given kinematic bin. Two typical invariant mass distributions with signal and background fits are shown in Extended Data Fig. 4.

Corrections. To correct the results for losses due to detection and data processing inefficiencies, detailed Monte Carlo simulations were performed. These simulations consisted of Ar+Sc collisions generated by the EPOS model [42] and particles propagated in the NA61/SHINE detector using the GEANT framework [43]. The charged particle tracks were reconstructed and analysed using the same software as used for the experimental data. The branching ratio of KS0K^{0}_{S} decays was considered in the GEANT framework. The final output of the simulation consisted of reconstructed KS0K^{0}_{S} multiplicities. The ratio of the number of KS0K^{0}_{S} simulated and reconstructed was used as a correction factor in each yypTp_{T} bin.

Systematic uncertainties of the measured data points were estimated from the comparison of the results of the entire analysis (including Monte Carlo simulations and corrections) obtained with varying cut values. The reliability of the V0V^{0} reconstruction and KS0K^{0}_{S} fitting procedures can be scrutinised by studying the KS0K^{0}_{S} lifetime. Extended Data Fig. 5 shows the computed mean lifetime of KS0K^{0}_{S} in seven rapidity bins. Good agreement with the average value provided by the PDG [2] is observed.

Transverse momentum distributions. The distributions shown in Extended Data Fig. 6 represent the final results of the KS0K^{0}_{S} analysis. The KS0K^{0}_{S} yields are shown as a function of transverse momentum in seven bins of rapidity. The data points are fitted with the function:

f(pT)=ApTexp(pT2+m02T),f(p_{T})=A\cdot p_{T}\cdot\exp\left(-\penalty\ \frac{\sqrt{p_{T}^{2}+m_{0}^{2}}}{T}\right), (2)

in which AA is a normalisation factor, TT is the inverse slope parameter, and m0m_{0} is the KS0K^{0}_{S} mass taken from Ref. [2]. The formula assumes c1c\equiv 1 for simplicity. The fit functions are plotted as red curves, and the inverse slope parameters obtained from the fits are reported in the figure’s legend.

The transverse momentum distributions of charged and neutral KK mesons drawn in Fig. 2 (of the main text) are also fitted with the function defined by Eq. (2). The bottom panel of the figure presents the ratio of the two fitted curves, with its uncertainty band obtained by propagation of the total uncertainties of the data points.

Rapidity distribution. The final KS0K^{0}_{S} yields in each bin of rapidity were obtained as the integrals of the curves fitted to the respective transverse momentum spectra, Eq. (2), including extrapolations to unmeasured regions. Comparison to the alternative method of replacing integrals in the measured regions by sums of data points brought only a negligible contribution to the systematic uncertainty. As apparent in Extended Data Fig. 6, extrapolations were needed only in the first and last rapidity bin. They amount to 88% and 6.2%, respectively. The large extrapolation in the first bin of rapidity results in the increase of the total uncertainty of the corresponding data point shown in Fig. 1 (of the main text). In this figure, the obtained rapidity distribution of the KS0K^{0}_{S} has been fitted with a function consisting of two Gaussians with centers displaced by a value of ±Δy\pm\Delta y with respect to y=0y=0. These Gaussians have the same widths but may have different amplitudes. The resulting small asymmetry of the fitted rapidity distribution originates from a combined effect of the mass asymmetry of the colliding target and projectile nuclei (Atarget=45A_{\mathrm{target}}=45 and Aprojectile=40A_{\mathrm{projectile}}=40) and the selection of central collisions by the energy measured in the kinematic region of the projectile spectator remnants. The former favours backward and the latter forward rapidities. The yields of charged KK mesons at mid-rapidity listed in Table 1 (of the main text) were taken from Ref. [13]. They were determined in the interval 0.0<y<0.20.0<y<0.2 as discussed therein. The yield of neutral KS0K^{0}_{S} mesons at mid-rapidity was determined at y=0y=0 from the aforementioned fit. Its systematic uncertainty was estimated the same way as for the data points (see above), and its statistical uncertainty was obtained by propagation of the statistical errors of the fit. Both statistical and systematic uncertainties of charged and neutral KK yields were propagated into the ratio RKR_{K}. The additional uncertainty of RKR_{K} resulting from the difference in the mid-rapidity definition for charged and neutral mesons was estimated to be 0.5%, which is about 10% of the total systematic uncertainty.

Extended Data

 
rapidity bin (1.5,1)(-1.5,-1) (1,0.5)(-1,-0.5) (0.5,0)(-0.5,0) (0,0.5)(0,0.5) (0.5,1)(0.5,1) (1,1.5)(1,1.5) (1.5,2)(1.5,2)
cut value cosine of angle >>0.999 >>0.9995 >>0.9995 >>0.9995 >>0.9995 >>0.9999 >>0.9999
distance >>5 cm >>5 cm >>7.5 cm >>12.5 cm >>12.5 cm >>15 cm >>12.5 cm
Table 2: Track pair cuts. Values of the cuts on (top row) the cosine of the angle between the line joining the primary and decay vertex and the direction of the vector sum of decay daughter momenta, and (bottom row) the distance between the primary and decay vertex.
Figure 4: Examples of fitted invariant mass distributions. Two studied bins in rapidity yy and transverse momentum pTp_{T} of the KS0K^{0}_{S} are presented, left: y(1.0,0.5)y\in(-1.0,-0.5), pT(1.2,1.5)p_{T}\in(1.2,1.5)GeV/c\mbox{Ge\kern-0.92505ptV}\!/\!c, right: y(0.5,1.0)y\in(0.5,1.0), pT(1.2,1.5)p_{T}\in(1.2,1.5) GeV/c\mbox{Ge\kern-0.92505ptV}\!/\!c. The bottom panels show the difference between the experimental data and the fitted (Signal+Background) distribution, divided by the experimental uncertainty.
Figure 5: Mean lifetime of KS𝟎{}^{\mathbf{0}}_{S} mesons as a function of rapidity. The values obtained by NA61/SHINE are divided by the PDG value [2]. Statistical uncertainties are shown by vertical bars and systematic ones by shaded boxes.
Figure 6: KS𝟎{}^{\mathbf{0}}_{S} transverse momentum spectra in rapidity bins. Statistical uncertainties are shown by vertical bars and systematic ones by shaded boxes. Red curves represent fits of the data with the function defined in Eq. (2).

The NA61/SHINE Collaboration

H. Adhikary [Uncaptioned image] 13, P. Adrich [Uncaptioned image] 15, K.K. Allison [Uncaptioned image] 26, N. Amin [Uncaptioned image] 5, E.V. Andronov [Uncaptioned image] 22, I.-C. Arsene [Uncaptioned image] 12, M. Bajda [Uncaptioned image] 16, Y. Balkova [Uncaptioned image] 18, D. Battaglia [Uncaptioned image] 25, A. Bazgir [Uncaptioned image] 13, S. Bhosale [Uncaptioned image] 14, M. Bielewicz [Uncaptioned image] 15, A. Blondel [Uncaptioned image] 4, M. Bogomilov [Uncaptioned image] 2, Y. Bondar [Uncaptioned image] 13, A. Brandin 22, W. Bryliński [Uncaptioned image] 21, J. Brzychczyk [Uncaptioned image] 16, M. Buryakov [Uncaptioned image] 22, A.F. Camino 28, M. Ćirković [Uncaptioned image] 23, M. Csanád [Uncaptioned image] 8, J. Cybowska [Uncaptioned image] 21, T. Czopowicz [Uncaptioned image] 13, C. Dalmazzone [Uncaptioned image] 4, N. Davis [Uncaptioned image] 14, A. Dmitriev [Uncaptioned image] 22, P. von Doetinchem [Uncaptioned image] 27, W. Dominik [Uncaptioned image] 19, J. Dumarchez [Uncaptioned image] 4, R. Engel [Uncaptioned image] 5, G.A. Feofilov [Uncaptioned image] 22, L. Fields [Uncaptioned image] 25, Z. Fodor [Uncaptioned image] 7,20, M. Friend [Uncaptioned image] 9, M. Gaździcki [Uncaptioned image] 13, O. Golosov [Uncaptioned image] 22, V. Golovatyuk [Uncaptioned image] 22, M. Golubeva [Uncaptioned image] 22, K. Grebieszkow [Uncaptioned image] 21, F. Guber [Uncaptioned image] 22, S.N. Igolkin 22, S. Ilieva [Uncaptioned image] 2, A. Ivashkin [Uncaptioned image] 22, A. Izvestnyy [Uncaptioned image] 22, N. Kargin 22, N. Karpushkin [Uncaptioned image] 22, E. Kashirin [Uncaptioned image] 22, M. Kiełbowicz [Uncaptioned image] 14, V.A. Kireyeu [Uncaptioned image] 22, R. Kolesnikov [Uncaptioned image] 22, D. Kolev [Uncaptioned image] 2, Y. Koshio 10, V.N. Kovalenko [Uncaptioned image] 22, S. Kowalski [Uncaptioned image] 18, B. Kozłowski [Uncaptioned image] 21, A. Krasnoperov [Uncaptioned image] 22, W. Kucewicz [Uncaptioned image] 17, M. Kuchowicz [Uncaptioned image] 20, M. Kuich [Uncaptioned image] 19, A. Kurepin [Uncaptioned image] 22, A. László [Uncaptioned image] 7, M. Lewicki [Uncaptioned image] 20, G. Lykasov [Uncaptioned image] 22, V.V. Lyubushkin [Uncaptioned image] 22, M. Maćkowiak-Pawłowska [Uncaptioned image] 21, Z. Majka [Uncaptioned image] 16, A. Makhnev [Uncaptioned image] 22, B. Maksiak [Uncaptioned image] 15, A.I. Malakhov [Uncaptioned image] 22, A. Marcinek [Uncaptioned image] 14, A.D. Marino [Uncaptioned image] 26, H.-J. Mathes [Uncaptioned image] 5, T. Matulewicz [Uncaptioned image] 19, V. Matveev [Uncaptioned image] 22, G.L. Melkumov [Uncaptioned image] 22, A. Merzlaya [Uncaptioned image] 12, Ł. Mik [Uncaptioned image] 17, S. Morozov [Uncaptioned image] 22, Y. Nagai [Uncaptioned image] 8, T. Nakadaira [Uncaptioned image] 9, M. Naskret [Uncaptioned image] 20, S. Nishimori [Uncaptioned image] 9, A. Olivier [Uncaptioned image] 25, V. Ozvenchuk [Uncaptioned image] 14, O. Panova [Uncaptioned image] 13, V. Paolone [Uncaptioned image] 28, O. Petukhov [Uncaptioned image] 22, I. Pidhurskyi [Uncaptioned image] 13, R. Płaneta [Uncaptioned image] 16, P. Podlaski [Uncaptioned image] 19, B.A. Popov [Uncaptioned image] 22,4, B. Pórfy [Uncaptioned image] 7,8, D.S. Prokhorova [Uncaptioned image] 22, D. Pszczel [Uncaptioned image] 15, S. Puławski [Uncaptioned image] 18, J. Puzović 23, R. Renfordt [Uncaptioned image] 18, L. Ren [Uncaptioned image] 26, V.Z. Reyna Ortiz [Uncaptioned image] 13, D. Röhrich 11, E. Rondio [Uncaptioned image] 15, M. Roth [Uncaptioned image] 5, Ł. Rozpłochowski [Uncaptioned image] 14, B.T. Rumberger [Uncaptioned image] 26, M. Rumyantsev [Uncaptioned image] 22, A. Rustamov [Uncaptioned image] 1, M. Rybczynski [Uncaptioned image] 13, A. Rybicki [Uncaptioned image] 14, D. Rybka 15, K. Sakashita [Uncaptioned image] 9, K. Schmidt [Uncaptioned image] 18, A.Yu. Seryakov [Uncaptioned image] 22, P. Seyboth [Uncaptioned image] 13, U.A. Shah [Uncaptioned image] 13, Y. Shiraishi 10, A. Shukla [Uncaptioned image] 27, M. Słodkowski [Uncaptioned image] 21, P. Staszel [Uncaptioned image] 16, G. Stefanek [Uncaptioned image] 13, J. Stepaniak [Uncaptioned image] 15, M. Strikhanov 22, H. Ströbele 6, T. Šuša [Uncaptioned image] 3, Ł. Świderski [Uncaptioned image] 15, J. Szewiński [Uncaptioned image] 15, R. Szukiewicz [Uncaptioned image] 20, A. Taranenko [Uncaptioned image] 22, A. Tefelska [Uncaptioned image] 21, D. Tefelski [Uncaptioned image] 21, V. Tereshchenko 22, R. Tsenov [Uncaptioned image] 2, L. Turko [Uncaptioned image] 20, T.S. Tveter [Uncaptioned image] 12, M. Unger [Uncaptioned image] 5, M. Urbaniak [Uncaptioned image] 18, F.F. Valiev [Uncaptioned image] 22, D. Veberič [Uncaptioned image] 5, V.V. Vechernin [Uncaptioned image] 22, O. Vitiuk [Uncaptioned image] 20, V. Volkov [Uncaptioned image] 22, A. Wickremasinghe [Uncaptioned image] 24, K. Witek [Uncaptioned image] 17, K. Wójcik [Uncaptioned image] 18, O. Wyszyński [Uncaptioned image] 13, A. Zaitsev [Uncaptioned image] 22, E. Zherebtsova [Uncaptioned image] 20, E.D. Zimmerman [Uncaptioned image] 26, A. Zviagina [Uncaptioned image] 22, and R. Zwaska [Uncaptioned image] 24
 
deceased

1 National Nuclear Research Center, Baku, Azerbaijan
2 Faculty of Physics, University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
3 Ruder Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia
4 LPNHE, Sorbonne University, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
5 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
6 University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
7 HUN-REN Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary
8 Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
9 Institute for Particle and Nuclear Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
10 Okayama University, Japan
11 University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
12 University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
13 Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
14 Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow, Poland
15 National Centre for Nuclear Research, Warsaw, Poland
16 Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland
17 AGH - University of Science and Technology, Cracow, Poland
18 University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
19 University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
20 University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland
21 Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
22 Affiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
23 University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
24 Fermilab, Batavia, USA
25 University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, USA
26 University of Colorado, Boulder, USA
27 University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, USA
28 University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA