arXiv is now an independent nonprofit! Learn more
License: arXiv.org perpetual non-exclusive license
arXiv:2608.19470v1 [math.DG] 19 Aug 2026

Polar and Torus Manifolds

Francisco C. Caramello Jr Address: Departamento de Matemática, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, R. Eng. Agr. Andrei Cristian Ferreira, 88040-900, Florianópolis - SC, Brazil Email address: francisco.caramello@ufsc.br and Dirk Töben Address: Dirk Töben, Departamento de Matemática, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Brazil Email address: dirktoben@ufscar.br
Abstract.

We show that quasitoric manifolds can be equipped with an invariant metric for which the torus action is polar. More generally, we show that an infinitesimally polar action of a torus admits an invariant Riemannian metric making it polar if and only if the real orbifold Euler class of its quotient vanishes. Because the orbit spaces of quasitoric manifolds are contractible simple polytopes, this cohomological obstruction trivially vanishes.

2020 Mathematics Subject Classification
Primary 57S12, 53C20

1. Introduction

A torus manifold is a closed, orientable 2n2n-dimensional manifold MM equipped with an effective TnT^{n}-action such that the fixed point set MTM^{T} is non-empty. These spaces occupy a central place in algebraic topology and geometry, providing a rich class of highly structured manifolds whose global properties are deeply governed by the toric symmetry. A prominent subclass consists of the so called quasitoric manifolds, where the torus action is furthermore locally standard and the orbit space is a simple polytope (see Definition 2.6). A fundamental question regarding such manifolds is whether their symmetries can be realized via highly rigid Riemannian metrics. In this context, an isometric action of a Lie group GG on a Riemannian manifold MM is called polar if there exists a section: an immersed submanifold that meets every orbit orthogonally. The existence of such a section reduces many deep geometric and analytic problems on MM to the lower-dimensional, often flat, geometry of the section itself. This makes polar actions a particularly rigid and geometrically rich class of isometric actions. The following result by Podestà and Thorbergsson connects them with Kähler geometry:

Theorem ([PT, Theorem 1.2]).

An effective isometric action of a torus TnT^{n} on a compact Kähler manifold MM with fixed points and complex dimension nn is always polar.

This is also intertwined with other results in symplectic and toric topology. First, since the action is isometric on a compact Kähler manifold, it is by holomorphic isometries [KN, p. 247]. The original statement of [PT, Theorem 1.2] supposes χ(M)>0\chi(M)>0, but this hypothesis is only used to guarantee fixed points. By results of Frankel, such a torus action is Hamiltonian [Fr, Lemmas 1 and 2], making MM a symplectic torus manifold. By Delzant’s classification, the image of the moment map is a simple convex polytope, naturally identified with the orbit space M/TnM/T^{n} [Del]. Furthermore, the action is locally standard [Del, Proof of Lemme 2.4]. In other words, under the Podestà and Thorbergsson hypotheses, MM is quasitoric.

A natural motivating question for our work is whether this connection extends to more general topological and Riemannian settings. Indeed, we show that the Kähler constraints are unnecessary:

Theorem A (Corollary 3.3).

Every quasitoric manifold admits an invariant polar metric.

This provides a canonical and rigid geometric realization for a broad class of spaces traditionally studied through the lens of algebraic topology. However, Theorem A is in fact a specific application of a much broader geometric principle. The infinitesimal counterpart of polarity is fundamentally local and representation-theoretic: an action is infinitesimally polar if all of its isotropy representations on the normal spaces to the orbits are polar. Under what conditions does an infinitesimally polar action admit an invariant Riemannian metric that makes it polar? We resolve this question completely for the case of torus actions. By investigating the natural principal TT-orbibundle associated with the Grassmannian blow-up of infinitesimal sections, we identify the precise cohomological obstruction to global polarity:

Theorem B (Theorem 3.2).

An infinitesimally polar TT-manifold is polar for some TT-invariant metric if and only if its real Euler class e(M,T)e_{\mathbb{R}}(M,T) vanishes.

Since simple polytopes are contractible, their real orbifold cohomology trivially vanishes, yielding Theorem A.

2. Polar actions and quasitoric manifolds

All actions are assumed to be differentiable. All manifolds are assumed to be connected. Let GG be a Lie group acting on MM. We denote by π:MM/G\pi\colon M\to M/G the canonical projection.

Definition 2.1.

Let MM be a Riemannian manifold on which GG acts by isometries. Let qq be the cohomogeneity. The action is called polar if there is an immersed submanifold Σ\Sigma of dimension qq that meets all orbits such that the intersection is everywhere orthogonal.

Example 2.2.

Examples of polar actions are conjugation of compact Lie groups, isotropy actions and Hermann actions on symmetric spaces.

Definition 2.3.

Let MM be a GG-manifold. The action is called infinitesimally polar if all isotropy representations Gx                                        TxM/TxGG_{x}\hbox to55.41pt{\vbox to22.16pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 39.87112pt\lower-9.93785pt\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke} \lxSVG@begingroup@{fill} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\nullfont\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {}{}{}{}{}{{}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {{}{}{{{}}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{}{{ {}{}}}{ {}{}} {{}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces }{{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-18.5347pt}{0.0pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{58}\lxSVG@closescope }}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}}}{{}}}} \lxSVG@closescope }}} { {}{}{}}{} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{}{}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{{}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{ {}{}{}}{}{{}}{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{{}}{}{{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{}{}{}{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{} }{}{}{{}}{}{}{}{{}}\lxSVG@stroke\lxSVG@drawpath@unclipped{M -13.92 -2.49 C -54.89 -13.47 -40.89 16.64 0.08 5.66}{fill:none} {{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96591}{0.2589}{-0.2589}{0.96591}{-10.06168pt}{-1.80177pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-6.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}{{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96593}{-0.25882}{0.25882}{0.96593}{0.06053pt}{4.09149pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-1.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces \lxSVG@closescope \lxSVG@closescope {{ {}{}{}}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\hss}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@closescope \hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}\hskip-9.0ptT_{x}M/T_{x}G are polar with respect to some inner product.

Originally an isometric action on a Riemannian manifold (M,g)(M,g) is said to be infinitesimally polar if all isotropy representations are polar with respect to the induced inner products [LT]. Our seemingly weaker, more topological definition is in fact equivalent for proper actions.

Proposition 2.4.

Let (V,G)(V,G) be a polar representation with respect to an inner product ,\langle\ ,\ \rangle. Then any other GG-invariant inner product is also polar with the same sections.

Proof.

Let ,\mathopen{\hbox{${\langle}$}\kern-1.94444pt\hbox{${\langle}$}}\ ,\ \mathclose{\hbox{${\rangle}$}\kern-1.94444pt\hbox{${\rangle}$}} be another GG-invariant inner product on VV. The linear map A:VVA\colon V\to V defined by X,Y=AX,Y\langle X,Y\rangle=\mathopen{\hbox{${\langle}$}\kern-1.94444pt\hbox{${\langle}$}}AX,Y\mathclose{\hbox{${\rangle}$}\kern-1.94444pt\hbox{${\rangle}$}} is self-adjoint and positive definite with respect to ,\mathopen{\hbox{${\langle}$}\kern-1.94444pt\hbox{${\langle}$}}\ ,\ \mathclose{\hbox{${\rangle}$}\kern-1.94444pt\hbox{${\rangle}$}}. Therefore the decomposition V=EiV=\bigoplus E_{i} of VV into eigenspaces EiE_{i} of AA with eigenvalues λi\lambda_{i} is orthogonal with respect to ,\mathopen{\hbox{${\langle}$}\kern-1.94444pt\hbox{${\langle}$}}\ ,\ \mathclose{\hbox{${\rangle}$}\kern-1.94444pt\hbox{${\rangle}$}}, and consequently for ,\langle\ ,\ \rangle as well. The GG-invariance of both inner products implies that AA is GG-equivariant, i.e., gA=AggA=Ag for every gGg\in G. Thus the EiE_{i} are invariant under the action. We fix ii. The action on EiE_{i} is polar by [Da, Theorem 4(i)] with respect to the first inner product. Since A|Ei=λiidEiA|_{E_{i}}=\lambda_{i}\operatorname{id}_{E_{i}}, the second inner product is a scalar multiple of the first on EiE_{i}. Therefore, the representation (Ei,G)(E_{i},G) is also polar with respect to the second inner product, and the sections Σi\Sigma_{i} on EiE_{i} are identical.

We will now see that a section Σ\Sigma of (V,G)(V,G) is of the form Σ=Σi\Sigma=\oplus\Sigma_{i} for both scalar products. By [Da, Theorem 4(ii)], there are Lie groups HiH_{i} and polar representations (Ei,Hi)(E_{i},H_{i}) such that the representation (V,G0)(V,G_{0}) is orbit-equivalent to the product representation (Hi,Ei)\bigoplus(H_{i},E_{i}). In particular, (Ei,Hi)(E_{i},H_{i}) are orbit equivalent to (Ei,G0)(E_{i},G_{0}) and therefore have the same sections Σi\Sigma_{i}. Hence the sections of (V,G0)(V,G_{0}) and thus of (V,G)(V,G) are of the form Σ=Σi\Sigma=\oplus\Sigma_{i}. ∎

To conclude the equivalence of both definitions of infinitesimally polar actions for proper actions, we observe the following. Consider a proper GG-action that is infinitesimally polar in the sense of the above definition. Because the action is proper, the manifold admits a GG-invariant Riemannian metric gg, and the isotropy group GxG_{x} at any point is compact. By hypothesis, the isotropy representation of GxG_{x} on the normal space νx(Gx)\nu_{x}(Gx) is polar with respect to some inner product. Since gxg_{x} is a GxG_{x}-invariant inner product, Proposition 2.4 guarantees that the representation is also polar with respect to gxg_{x}. Thus, the action is infinitesimally polar in the original Riemannian sense.

Example 2.5 (Standard model).

The TnT^{n}-action on n\mathbb{C}^{n} by coordinatewise complex multiplication, called the standard representation of TnT^{n}, is polar with section n{\mathbb{R}}^{n} and Weyl group n{\mathbb{Z}}^{n} acting by reflections. The orbit space is the the good orbifold

n/n=n={xnxi0for alli}.\ {\mathbb{R}}^{n}/{\mathbb{Z}}^{n}=\mathbb{R}_{\geq}^{n}=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}\mid x_{i}\geq 0\ \text{for all}\ i\}.
Definition 2.6 ([DJ]).

An action of a torus TnT^{n} on a 2n2n-dimensional manifold M2nM^{2n} is locally standard if every point has a TnT^{n}-invariant neighborhood that is equivariantly diffeomorphic, up to an automorphism of TnT^{n}, to an open TnT^{n}-invariant subset of n\mathbb{C}^{n} with the standard linear TnT^{n}-action. More precisely, this means there exists a diffeomorphism ff and an automorphism ρAut(Tn)\rho\in\text{Aut}(T^{n}) such that f(tx)=ρ(t)f(x)f(tx)=\rho(t)f(x)). A quasitoric manifold is a closed 2n2n-dimensional manifold equipped with a locally standard TnT^{n}-action such that the orbit space M/TM/T is an nn-dimensional simple polytope.

Davis and Januszkiewicz introduced quasitoric manifolds as a purely topological analogue to smooth toric varieties. They showed that one can construct them directly from a combinatorial object: a simple convex polytope PP equipped with a characteristic function which assigns a subgroup of TnT^{n} to each facet of PP. The quasitoric manifold is then constructed by coherently gluing the data, in analogy with Delzant’s construction of toric varieties from fans.

Proposition 2.7.

Let M2nM^{2n} be a quasitoric manifold. Then Tn                                        M2nT^{n}\hbox to56.37pt{\vbox to22.5pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 40.39156pt\lower-10.11302pt\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke} \lxSVG@begingroup@{fill} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\nullfont\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {}{}{}{}{}{{}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {{}{}{{{}}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{}{{ {}{}}}{ {}{}} {{}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces }{{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-18.97905pt}{0.0pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{58}\lxSVG@closescope }}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}}}{{}}}} \lxSVG@closescope }}} { {}{}{}}{} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{}{}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{{}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{ {}{}{}}{}{{}}{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{{}}{}{{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{}{}{}{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{}{}{}{{}}{}{}{}{{}}\lxSVG@stroke\lxSVG@drawpath@unclipped{M -14.17 -2.61 C -55.61 -13.72 -41.52 16.86 -0.08 5.75}{fill:none} {{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96591}{0.25887}{-0.25887}{0.96591}{-10.23946pt}{-1.88556pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-6.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}{{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96593}{-0.2588}{0.2588}{0.96593}{-0.05475pt}{4.1581pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-1.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces \lxSVG@closescope \lxSVG@closescope {{ {}{}{}}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\hss}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@closescope \hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}\hskip-9.0ptM^{2n} is infinitesimally polar. Moreover, M/TM/T is a Coxeter orbifold.

Proof.

If Tn                                        M2nT^{n}\hbox to55.41pt{\vbox to22.16pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 39.87112pt\lower-9.93785pt\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke} \lxSVG@begingroup@{fill} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\nullfont\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {}{}{}{}{}{{}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {{}{}{{{}}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{}{{ {}{}}}{ {}{}} {{}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces }{{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-18.5347pt}{0.0pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{58}\lxSVG@closescope }}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}}}{{}}}} \lxSVG@closescope }}} { {}{}{}}{} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{}{}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{{}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{ {}{}{}}{}{{}}{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{{}}{}{{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{}{}{}{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{}{}{}{{}}{}{}{}{{}}\lxSVG@stroke\lxSVG@drawpath@unclipped{M -13.92 -2.49 C -54.89 -13.47 -40.89 16.64 0.08 5.66}{fill:none} {{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96591}{0.2589}{-0.2589}{0.96591}{-10.06168pt}{-1.80177pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-6.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}{{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96593}{-0.25882}{0.25882}{0.96593}{0.06053pt}{4.09149pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-1.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces \lxSVG@closescope \lxSVG@closescope {{ {}{}{}}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\hss}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@closescope \hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}\hskip-9.0ptM^{2n} is locally standard, the isotropy representation at xx is equivalent to the isotropy representation at some corresponding point znz\in\mathbb{C}^{n}. Up to a permutation of coordinates, let z=(z1,,zn)nz=(z_{1},\dots,z_{n})\in\mathbb{C}^{n} be a point where the first kk coordinates are zero and the remaining nkn-k coordinates are non-zero. The isotropy group at zz is the standard coordinate torus TkTnT^{k}\subset T^{n}. The normal space νzTnz\nu_{z}T^{n}z splits as knk\mathbb{C}^{k}\oplus\mathbb{R}^{n-k}, where the nk\mathbb{R}^{n-k} factor corresponds to the radial directions of the non-zero complex coordinates.

The isotropy representation of TkT^{k} on this normal space acts in the standard way on k\mathbb{C}^{k} and trivially on nk\mathbb{R}^{n-k}. The standard Tk                                        kT^{k}\hbox to55.41pt{\vbox to22.16pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 39.87112pt\lower-9.93785pt\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke} \lxSVG@begingroup@{fill} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\nullfont\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {}{}{}{}{}{{}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {{}{}{{{}}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{}{{ {}{}}}{ {}{}} {{}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces }{{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-18.5347pt}{0.0pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{58}\lxSVG@closescope }}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}}}{{}}}} \lxSVG@closescope }}} { {}{}{}}{} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{}{}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{{}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{ {}{}{}}{}{{}}{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{{}}{}{{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{}{}{}{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{}{}{}{{}}{}{}{}{{}}\lxSVG@stroke\lxSVG@drawpath@unclipped{M -13.92 -2.49 C -54.89 -13.47 -40.89 16.64 0.08 5.66}{fill:none} {{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96591}{0.2589}{-0.2589}{0.96591}{-10.06168pt}{-1.80177pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-6.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}{{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96593}{-0.25882}{0.25882}{0.96593}{0.06053pt}{4.09149pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-1.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces \lxSVG@closescope \lxSVG@closescope {{ {}{}{}}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\hss}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@closescope \hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}\hskip-9.0pt\mathbb{C}^{k} is a classic polar representation with section k\mathbb{R}^{k}. Thus, the full isotropy representation on νz(Tnz)\nu_{z}(T^{n}z) is polar with section knkn\mathbb{R}^{k}\oplus\mathbb{R}^{n-k}\cong\mathbb{R}^{n}. Because every isotropy representation of M2nM^{2n} is equivalent to one of these polar representations, the action on M2nM^{2n} is infinitesimally polar.

Now let us show that M/TM/T is a Coxeter orbifold. Because the TnT^{n}-action on M2nM^{2n} is locally standard, the local structure of M/TM/T is entirely determined by the standard Tn                                        nT^{n}\hbox to55.41pt{\vbox to22.16pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 39.87112pt\lower-9.93785pt\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke} \lxSVG@begingroup@{fill} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\nullfont\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {}{}{}{}{}{{}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {{}{}{{{}}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{}{{ {}{}}}{ {}{}} {{}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces }{{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-18.5347pt}{0.0pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{58}\lxSVG@closescope }}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}}}{{}}}} \lxSVG@closescope }}} { {}{}{}}{} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{}{}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{{}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{ {}{}{}}{}{{}}{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{{}}{}{{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{}{}{}{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{}{}{}{{}}{}{}{}{{}}\lxSVG@stroke\lxSVG@drawpath@unclipped{M -13.92 -2.49 C -54.89 -13.47 -40.89 16.64 0.08 5.66}{fill:none} {{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96591}{0.2589}{-0.2589}{0.96591}{-10.06168pt}{-1.80177pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-6.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}{{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96593}{-0.25882}{0.25882}{0.96593}{0.06053pt}{4.09149pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-1.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces \lxSVG@closescope \lxSVG@closescope {{ {}{}{}}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\hss}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@closescope \hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}\hskip-9.0pt\mathbb{C}^{n}. The orbit map for the standard action, given by (z1,,zn)(|z1|2,,|zn|2)(z_{1},\dots,z_{n})\mapsto(|z_{1}|^{2},\dots,|z_{n}|^{2}), identifies n/Tn\mathbb{C}^{n}/T^{n} with

n={xnxi0for alli},\mathbb{R}_{\geq}^{n}=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}\mid x_{i}\geq 0\ \text{for all}\ i\},

which can be naturally viewed as the quotient of n\mathbb{R}^{n} by the canonical action of 2n\mathbb{Z}_{2}^{n} where the generators act by isometric reflections across the coordinate hyperplanes. Consequently, any open subset of n\mathbb{R}_{\geq}^{n} is modeled on the quotient of an open set in n\mathbb{R}^{n} by a finite group generated by reflections. Since every point in M/TM/T has a neighborhood homeomorphic to an open set in n\mathbb{R}_{\geq}^{n}, the local models of M/TM/T are quotients of Euclidean space by finite reflection groups. ∎

3. Grassmannian blow-ups

We start by noticing the following application of considerations by Lytchak in [Lyt]:

Proposition 3.1.

If a proper action G                                        MG\hbox to56.37pt{\vbox to22.5pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 40.39156pt\lower-10.11302pt\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke} \lxSVG@begingroup@{fill} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\nullfont\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {}{}{}{}{}{{}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {{}{}{{{}}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{}{{ {}{}}}{ {}{}} {{}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces }{{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-18.97905pt}{0.0pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{58}\lxSVG@closescope }}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}}}{{}}}} \lxSVG@closescope }}} { {}{}{}}{} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{}{}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{{}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{ {}{}{}}{}{{}}{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{{}}{}{{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{}{}{}{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{}{}{}{{}}{}{}{}{{}}\lxSVG@stroke\lxSVG@drawpath@unclipped{M -14.17 -2.61 C -55.61 -13.72 -41.52 16.86 -0.08 5.75}{fill:none} {{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96591}{0.25887}{-0.25887}{0.96591}{-10.23946pt}{-1.88556pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-6.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}{{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96593}{-0.2588}{0.2588}{0.96593}{-0.05475pt}{4.1581pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-1.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces \lxSVG@closescope \lxSVG@closescope {{ {}{}{}}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\hss}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@closescope \hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}\hskip-9.0ptM is infinitesimally polar, then M/GM/G is an orbifold.

Note that properness ensures there is a GG-invariant metric gg on MM. Then the infinitesimally polar action in our topological sense is infinitesimally polar in the Riemannan sense of Lytchak (with respect to gg), by Proposition 2.4.

We will now consider an effective, infinitesimally polar TnT^{n}-manifold MmM^{m}. At the moment not necessarily m=2nm=2n; we denote by qq the codimension mnm-n. Hence M/TM/T is an orbifold, as we just saw. We fix a TT-invariant metric gg on MM. The isotropy representations Tx                                        νxGxT_{x}\hbox to55.41pt{\vbox to22.16pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 39.87112pt\lower-9.93785pt\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke} \lxSVG@begingroup@{fill} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\nullfont\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {}{}{}{}{}{{}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {{}{}{{{}}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{}{{ {}{}}}{ {}{}} {{}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces }{{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-18.5347pt}{0.0pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{58}\lxSVG@closescope }}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}}}{{}}}} \lxSVG@closescope }}} { {}{}{}}{} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{}{}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{{}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{ {}{}{}}{}{{}}{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{{}}{}{{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{}{}{}{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{}{}{}{{}}{}{}{}{{}}\lxSVG@stroke\lxSVG@drawpath@unclipped{M -13.92 -2.49 C -54.89 -13.47 -40.89 16.64 0.08 5.66}{fill:none} {{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96591}{0.2589}{-0.2589}{0.96591}{-10.06168pt}{-1.80177pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-6.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}{{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96593}{-0.25882}{0.25882}{0.96593}{0.06053pt}{4.09149pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-1.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces \lxSVG@closescope \lxSVG@closescope {{ {}{}{}}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\hss}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@closescope \hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}\hskip-9.0pt\nu_{x}Gx on the normal bundles with respect to the chosen metric are polar. Its (linear) sections are called infinitesimal sections. Let M^{\hat{M}} be the set of all infinitesimal sections with respect to the chosen metric. If xx is a regular point, then the infinitesimal section through xx coincides with νxTx\nu_{x}Tx. We call M^{\hat{M}} the Grassmannian blow-up of (M,T,g)(M,T,g) and let ρ:M^M\rho\colon{\hat{M}}\to M be the projection. It is a closed submanifold of the Grassmannian Gq(M)G_{q}(M) of qq-planes of TMTM (see [Lyt, Section 4.2] for details). Up to diffeomorphism it is independent of the choice of an invariant metric. Then the natural action of TT on M^{\hat{M}} is differentiable and locally-free. The map ρ\rho is TT-equivariant, hence M^/T=M/T{\hat{M}}/T=M/T. The projection π^:M^M^/T=M/T\hat{\pi}\colon{\hat{M}}\to{\hat{M}}/T=M/T is a TT-orbibundle.

We will consider the Euler class

e=e(M,T)Horb2(M/T,n),e=e(M,T)\in H^{2}_{\text{orb}}(M/T,{\mathbb{Z}}^{n}),

which classifies the principal TT-orbibundle π^:M^M/T\hat{\pi}\colon{\hat{M}}\to M/T, and the real Euler class

eHorb2(M/T,n),e_{\mathbb{R}}\in H^{2}_{\text{orb}}(M/T,{\mathbb{R}}^{n}),

which is the image of ee via the natural coefficient homomorphism Horb2(M/T,n)Horb2(M/T,n)H^{2}_{\text{orb}}(M/T,{\mathbb{Z}}^{n})\to H^{2}_{\text{orb}}(M/T,{\mathbb{R}}^{n}). It is worth noticing that, by a standard result of Satake ([Sat, Theorem 1]), one has the isomorphism Horb2(M/T,n)H2(M/T,n)H^{2}_{\text{orb}}(M/T,{\mathbb{R}}^{n})\cong H^{2}(M/T,{\mathbb{R}}^{n}), between orbifold and singular cohomology with real coefficients. Thus, we may seamlessly view ee_{\mathbb{R}} as an element of Horb2(M/T,n)Horb2(M/T)nH^{2}_{\text{orb}}(M/T,{\mathbb{R}}^{n})\cong H^{2}_{\text{orb}}(M/T)\otimes{\mathbb{R}}^{n}.

Since the action is locally free, there is a TT-invariant 𝔱\mathfrak{t}-valued connection form ωΩ1(M^)𝔱\omega\in\Omega^{1}(\hat{M})\otimes\mathfrak{t} (see [GGK, Appendix A2, Section 3]). Since π^\hat{\pi}^{*} provides an isomorphism (of differential graded algebras) between Ω(M/T)𝔱\Omega^{*}(M/T)\otimes\mathfrak{t} and the complex Ωbas(M^,T)𝔱\Omega_{\text{bas}}({\hat{M}},T)\otimes\mathfrak{t} of 𝔱\mathfrak{t}-valued TT-basic forms on M^{\hat{M}}, and dωd\omega is TT-basic, there is a unique ΩΩ2(M/T)𝔱\Omega\in\Omega^{2}(M/T)\otimes\mathfrak{t} with πΩ=dω\pi^{*}\Omega=d\omega, called the curvature 22-form of the orbibundle π^\hat{\pi}. By classical Chern–Weil theory adapted to orbibundles,

e(M,T)=[Ω].e_{\mathbb{R}}(M,T)=[\Omega].

Remember that the TT-invariant connection form ω\omega corresponds one-to-one to a TT-invariant transverse distribution, the associated horizontal distribution which is integrable if and only if Ω=0\Omega=0. Moreover, if [Ω]=0[\Omega]=0, then there is a connection ω\omega such that the horizontal distribution kerω\ker\omega is integrable. We are now in position to state our main results.

Theorem 3.2.

An infinitesimal polar TT-manifold is polar for some TT-invariant metric if and only if its real Euler class vanishes.

We prove this theorem in Section 4.

Corollary 3.3.

A quasitoric manifold admits an invariant Riemannian metric for which the action is polar. Moreover, the orbit space is a Riemannian Coxeter orbifold with respect to the induced metric.

Proof.

A quasitoric manifold is locally standard, therefore infinitesimally polar, by Proposition 2.7. Since P=M/TP=M/T is contractible, Horb2(M/T,n)H2(M/T,n)=0H^{2}_{\text{orb}}(M/T,{\mathbb{R}}^{n})\cong H^{2}(M/T,{\mathbb{R}}^{n})=0 and consequently the real Euler class is trivial. ∎

4. Proof of Theorem 3.2

Before we come to the proof, we look at the tubular neighborhoods for the action of TT both on MM and M^{\hat{M}} and their local orbit spaces. Assume that T                                        MT\hbox to55.41pt{\vbox to22.16pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 39.87112pt\lower-9.93785pt\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke} \lxSVG@begingroup@{fill} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\nullfont\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {}{}{}{}{}{{}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {{}{}{{{}}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{}{{ {}{}}}{ {}{}} {{}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces }{{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-18.5347pt}{0.0pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{58}\lxSVG@closescope }}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}}}{{}}}} \lxSVG@closescope }}} { {}{}{}}{} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{}{}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{{}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{ {}{}{}}{}{{}}{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{{}}{}{{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{}{}{}{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{}{}{}{{}}{}{}{}{{}}\lxSVG@stroke\lxSVG@drawpath@unclipped{M -13.92 -2.49 C -54.89 -13.47 -40.89 16.64 0.08 5.66}{fill:none} {{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96591}{0.2589}{-0.2589}{0.96591}{-10.06168pt}{-1.80177pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-6.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}{{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96593}{-0.25882}{0.25882}{0.96593}{0.06053pt}{4.09149pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-1.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces \lxSVG@closescope \lxSVG@closescope {{ {}{}{}}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\hss}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@closescope \hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}\hskip-9.0ptM is infinitesimally polar and let gg be a TT-invariant metric on MM. Let εi>0\varepsilon_{i}>0 be so small that the normal exponential map exp:νεiTpiM\exp^{\perp}:\nu^{\varepsilon_{i}}Tp_{i}\to M of TpiTp_{i} is a diffeomorphism onto its image UiU_{i}. Here νεi\nu^{\varepsilon_{i}} denotes the normal vectors of length smaller than εi\varepsilon_{i}. The tubular neighborhood UiU_{i} of TpiTp_{i} is TT-equivariantly identified with the disc bundle νεiTpiT×TpiνpiεiTpi\nu^{\varepsilon_{i}}Tp_{i}\cong T\times_{T_{p_{i}}}\nu^{\varepsilon_{i}}_{p_{i}}Tp_{i}. We consider the Grassmannian blow-up M^{\hat{M}} with respect to gg. Let Σi\Sigma_{i} be a (flat) section in the slice νεiTpi\nu^{\varepsilon_{i}}Tp_{i} with respect to the inner product gpig_{p_{i}}. Let p^i\hat{p}_{i} be the corresponding element in M^{\hat{M}}. Let U^i:=ρ1(Ui)\hat{U}_{i}:=\rho^{-1}(U_{i}). We consider the following commutative diagram, where the vertical lines pass to the respective orbit spaces, which are locally equivalent to the orbit spaces of the slice representations:

p^iU^iM^{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\hat{p}_{i}\in\hat{U}_{i}\subset{\hat{M}}}MUipi{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces M\supset U_{i}\ni p_{i}}νp^iεi(Tp^i)/Tp^iM^/T{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\nu_{\hat{p}_{i}}^{\varepsilon_{i}}(T\hat{p}_{i})/T_{\hat{p}_{i}}\subset{\hat{M}}/T}M/TUi/TνεiTpi/TpiΣi/W(Σi).{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces M/T\supset U_{i}/T\cong\nu^{\varepsilon_{i}}Tp_{i}/T_{p_{i}}\cong\Sigma_{i}/W(\Sigma_{i}).}\leftarrow\rightarrowρ\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\rho}\leftarrow\rightarrowπ^\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\hat{\pi}}\leftarrow\rightarrowπ\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\pi}\leftarrow\rightarrowρ~\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\tilde{\rho}}

The equivariant map ρ\rho induces the map ρ~\tilde{\rho} on the quotients. Notice that Tp^i                                        νp^iTpiT_{\hat{p}_{i}}\hbox to55.41pt{\vbox to22.16pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 39.87112pt\lower-9.93785pt\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke} \lxSVG@begingroup@{fill} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\nullfont\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {}{}{}{}{}{{}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {{}{}{{{}}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{}{{ {}{}}}{ {}{}} {{}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces }{{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-18.5347pt}{0.0pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{58}\lxSVG@closescope }}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}}}{{}}}} \lxSVG@closescope }}} { {}{}{}}{} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{}{}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{{}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{ {}{}{}}{}{{}}{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{{}}{}{{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{}{}{}{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{}{}{}{{}}{}{}{}{{}}\lxSVG@stroke\lxSVG@drawpath@unclipped{M -13.92 -2.49 C -54.89 -13.47 -40.89 16.64 0.08 5.66}{fill:none} {{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96591}{0.2589}{-0.2589}{0.96591}{-10.06168pt}{-1.80177pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-6.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}{{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96593}{-0.25882}{0.25882}{0.96593}{0.06053pt}{4.09149pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-1.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces \lxSVG@closescope \lxSVG@closescope {{ {}{}{}}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\hss}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@closescope \hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}\hskip-9.0pt\nu_{\hat{p}_{i}}Tp_{i} and W(Σi)                                        ΣiW(\Sigma_{i})\hbox to55.41pt{\vbox to22.16pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 39.87112pt\lower-9.93785pt\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke} \lxSVG@begingroup@{fill} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\nullfont\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {}{}{}{}{}{{}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {{}{}{{{}}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{}{{ {}{}}}{ {}{}} {{}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces }{{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-18.5347pt}{0.0pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{58}\lxSVG@closescope }}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}}}{{}}}} \lxSVG@closescope }}} { {}{}{}}{} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{}{}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{{}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{ {}{}{}}{}{{}}{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{{}}{}{{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{}{}{}{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{}{}{}{{}}{}{}{}{{}}\lxSVG@stroke\lxSVG@drawpath@unclipped{M -13.92 -2.49 C -54.89 -13.47 -40.89 16.64 0.08 5.66}{fill:none} {{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96591}{0.2589}{-0.2589}{0.96591}{-10.06168pt}{-1.80177pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-6.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}{{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96593}{-0.25882}{0.25882}{0.96593}{0.06053pt}{4.09149pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-1.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces \lxSVG@closescope \lxSVG@closescope {{ {}{}{}}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\hss}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@closescope \hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}\hskip-9.0pt\Sigma_{i} are equivalent representations. To see this, observe that the element p^iM^\hat{p}_{i}\in{\hat{M}} corresponds to the section Σi\Sigma_{i}. Since TT is abelian, the stabilizer Tp^iT_{\hat{p}_{i}} consists of the elements tTt\in T that preserve Σi\Sigma_{i}, meaning Tp^i=NT(Σi)T_{\hat{p}_{i}}=N_{T}(\Sigma_{i}). Because the action on M^{\hat{M}} is locally free, Tp^iT_{\hat{p}_{i}} is discrete and thus identifies with the effective action of the generalized Weyl group W(Σi)=NT(Σi)/ZT(Σi)W(\Sigma_{i})=N_{T}(\Sigma_{i})/Z_{T}(\Sigma_{i}). Thus Tp^i=W(Σi)T_{\hat{p}_{i}}=W(\Sigma_{i}), because ZT(Σi)Z_{T}(\Sigma_{i}) is trivial by effectiveness of the TT-action. From this, we conclude that M^/TM/T\hat{M}/T\cong M/T, as orbifolds.

We will now prove Theorem 3.2.

Proof.

We claim that the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. (1)

    The real Euler class e(M,T)Horb2(M/T,n)e_{\mathbb{R}}(M,T)\in H^{2}_{\text{orb}}(M/T,{\mathbb{R}}^{n}) vanishes,

  2. (2)

    there is a flat TT-connection of the TT-orbibundle π^:M^M^/T=M/T\hat{\pi}\colon{\hat{M}}\to{\hat{M}}/T=M/T,

  3. (3)

    there is an integrable TT-invariant distribution transverse to the TT-orbits of M^{\hat{M}},

  4. (4)

    there is a TT-invariant set of transversals of (M^,T)({\hat{M}},T),

  5. (5)

    there is a polar metric for (M,T)(M,T).

Conditions (1) through (4) are equivalent by standard differential geometry: by Chern-Weil theory, the real Euler class vanishes if and only if the orbibundle admits a flat connection (giving (1)(2)(1)\Leftrightarrow(2)). Geometrically, a flat connection of a TT-orbibundle corresponds exactly to an integrable, TT-invariant horizontal distribution transverse to the fibers (which is (2)(3)(2)\Leftrightarrow(3)). By the Frobenius theorem, this distribution integrates to a TT-invariant foliation by transverse submanifolds (hence (3)(4)(3)\Leftrightarrow(4)).

To see that (5)(4)(5)\Rightarrow(4), assume there is a polar metric for (M,T)(M,T) and let M^{\hat{M}} be the corresponding Grassmannian blow-up. Because the metric is polar, it admits a family of global sections. The natural lifts of these sections Σ\Sigma into the Grassmannian, defined by Σ^={TpΣpΣ}\hat{\Sigma}=\{T_{p}\Sigma\mid p\in\Sigma\}, form horizontal leaves that are everywhere transverse to the TT-orbits on M^{\hat{M}}. Since the TT-action maps sections to sections, this family of horizontal leaves constitutes a TT-invariant set of transversals for (M^,T)({\hat{M}},T).

Finally, let us prove (4)(5)(4)\Rightarrow(5). For a leaf N^\hat{N} of the horizontal distribution, the projection N=ρ(N^)N=\rho(\hat{N}) is an immersed submanifold. In fact, for any p^N^\hat{p}\in\hat{N}, one has the direct sum Tp^N^Tp^(Tp^)=Tp^M^T_{\hat{p}}\hat{N}\oplus T_{\hat{p}}(T\hat{p})=T_{\hat{p}}{\hat{M}} and Tp^(Tp^)=𝔱p^𝔱pp^=kerdρp^T_{\hat{p}}(T\hat{p})=\mathfrak{t}\hat{p}\supset\mathfrak{t}_{p}\hat{p}=\ker d\rho_{\hat{p}}, where p:=ρ(p^)p:=\rho(\hat{p}), because ρ1(p)=Tpp^\rho^{-1}(p)=T_{p}\hat{p}, the orbit of the isotropy group TpT_{p} through p^\hat{p}. The mutual inclusion of the latter is a consequence on the one side of the equivariance of ρ\rho and on the other side of the transitivity of the TpT_{p}-action on the set of infinitesimal sections through pp. Thus Tp^N^kerdρp^={0}T_{\hat{p}}\hat{N}\cap\ker d\rho_{\hat{p}}=\{0\} and NN is an immersed submanifold of MM. Our aim is to construct a global TT-invariant metric gg for which NN is orthogonal to the orbits; the action of TT on (M,g)(M,g) will then be polar with section NN.

Choose a TT-invariant Riemannian metric on MM. Let {Ui}\{U_{i}\} be a locally finite TT-invariant covering of MM by tubular neighborhoods of orbits TpiTp_{i} as previously. Recall the TT-equivariant identification UiT×TpiνpiεiTpiU_{i}\cong T\times_{T_{p_{i}}}\nu^{\varepsilon_{i}}_{p_{i}}Tp_{i}. Since the action is infinitesimally polar, the representation Tpi                                        νpiεiTpiT_{p_{i}}\hbox to55.41pt{\vbox to22.16pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 39.87112pt\lower-9.93785pt\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke} \lxSVG@begingroup@{fill} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\nullfont\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {}{}{}{}{}{{}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {{}{}{{{}}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{}{{ {}{}}}{ {}{}} {{}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces }{{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-18.5347pt}{0.0pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{58}\lxSVG@closescope }}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}}}{{}}}} \lxSVG@closescope }}} { {}{}{}}{} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{}{}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{{}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{ {}{}{}}{}{{}}{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{{}}{}{{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{}{}{}{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{}{}{}{{}}{}{}{}{{}}\lxSVG@stroke\lxSVG@drawpath@unclipped{M -13.92 -2.49 C -54.89 -13.47 -40.89 16.64 0.08 5.66}{fill:none} {{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96591}{0.2589}{-0.2589}{0.96591}{-10.06168pt}{-1.80177pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-6.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}{{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96593}{-0.25882}{0.25882}{0.96593}{0.06053pt}{4.09149pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-1.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces \lxSVG@closescope \lxSVG@closescope {{ {}{}{}}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\hss}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@closescope \hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}\hskip-9.0pt\nu_{p_{i}}^{\varepsilon_{i}}Tp_{i} is polar with respect to the induced inner product. Let ΣiνpiεiTpi\Sigma_{i}\subset\nu_{p_{i}}^{\varepsilon_{i}}Tp_{i} be a section for this linear action. We equip νpiεiTpi\nu_{p_{i}}^{\varepsilon_{i}}Tp_{i} with the corresponding flat metric, and TT with an invariant metric. Because TpiT_{p_{i}} acts isometrically on the product T×νpiεiTpiT\times\nu_{p_{i}}^{\varepsilon_{i}}Tp_{i}, there is a unique TT-invariant Riemannian metric hih_{i} on the quotient UiT×TpiνpiεiTpiU_{i}\cong T\times_{T_{p_{i}}}\nu^{\varepsilon_{i}}_{p_{i}}Tp_{i} such that the natural projection is a Riemannian submersion. Crucially, because Σi\Sigma_{i} intersects the linear TpiT_{p_{i}}-orbits orthogonally, the tangent bundle of the product {1}×Σi\{1\}\times\Sigma_{i} consists entirely of horizontal vectors with respect to this submersion. Therefore, the projection of {1}×Σi\{1\}\times\Sigma_{i} yields a section that is everywhere orthogonal to the TT-orbits in UiU_{i}, meaning UiU_{i} is hih_{i}-polar. In fact, this section coincides with the section Σi\Sigma_{i} of νpiεiTpi\nu^{\varepsilon_{i}}_{p_{i}}Tp_{i} considered as contained in UiU_{i}.

Let N^\hat{N} be a horizontal leaf in M^{\hat{M}}. For each UiU_{i}, let p^iN^ρ1(pi)\hat{p}_{i}\in\hat{N}\cap\rho^{-1}(p_{i}) and let Σi\Sigma_{i} be the corresponding infinitesimal section. Let N^i\hat{N}_{i} be the connected component of N^\hat{N} in U^i\hat{U}_{i} containing p^i\hat{p}_{i}. We define the local open set U^i:=ρ1(Ui)\hat{U}_{i}:=\rho^{-1}(U_{i}) in M^{\hat{M}}. Let Σ^i={TpΣipΣi}\hat{\Sigma}_{i}^{\prime}=\{T_{p}\Sigma_{i}\mid p\in\Sigma_{i}\} be the canonical lift of the section Σi\Sigma_{i} to the blow-up U^i\hat{U}_{i}^{\prime} of UiU_{i} with respect to the metric hih_{i} and let Σ^i:=Ihig(Σ^i)\hat{\Sigma}_{i}:=I_{h_{i}g}(\hat{\Sigma}_{i}^{\prime}), where Ihi,gI_{h_{i},g} is as defined in [Lyt, Section 4.2], sending U^i\hat{U}_{i}^{\prime} to U^iM^\hat{U}_{i}\subset\hat{M}. Since both N^i\hat{N}_{i} and Σ^i\hat{\Sigma}_{i} are local transversals for the TT-orbits in U^i\hat{U}_{i}, there exists a unique, smooth TT-equivariant diffeomorphism φ^i:U^iU^i\hat{\varphi}_{i}\colon\hat{U}_{i}\to\hat{U}_{i} that maps N^i\hat{N}_{i} to Σ^i\hat{\Sigma}_{i} while preserving the orbits; in other words it’s a gauge transformation for π^|U^i\hat{\pi}|\hat{U}_{i}. Now, since the action on U^i\hat{U}_{i} is locally free, we can apply Theorem 3.1 of [HS]: it guarantees the existence of a smooth map Fi:U^i/TTF_{i}\colon\hat{U}_{i}/T\to T such that φ^i(x^)=Fi(π^(x^))x^\hat{\varphi}_{i}(\hat{x})=F_{i}(\hat{\pi}(\hat{x}))\hat{x}. Recall that the map FiF_{i} on the quotient space is called smooth if Fiπ^F_{i}\circ\hat{\pi} is smooth.

Identifying U^i/T=Ui/T\hat{U}_{i}/T=U_{i}/T, we define a map φi:UiUi\varphi_{i}\colon U_{i}\to U_{i} on the base manifold by φi(x)=Fi(π(x))x\varphi_{i}(x)=F_{i}(\pi(x))x. Because FiF_{i} and the orbit projection π\pi are smooth, φi\varphi_{i} is a well-defined, smooth TT-equivariant diffeomorphism. Furthermore, because π^=πρ\hat{\pi}=\pi\circ\rho, we have ρφ^i=φiρ\rho\circ\hat{\varphi}_{i}=\varphi_{i}\circ\rho. Since φ^i\hat{\varphi}_{i} maps N^i\hat{N}_{i} to Σ^i\hat{\Sigma}_{i}, it follows that φi\varphi_{i} maps NiN_{i}, the projection of the plaque N^i\hat{N}_{i}, smoothly to the section Σi\Sigma_{i}. This follows from ρφ^i=φiρ\rho\circ\hat{\varphi}_{i}=\varphi_{i}\circ\rho and ρ(Σ^i)=ρ(Ihig(Σ^i))=ρ(Σ^i)=Σi\rho(\hat{\Sigma}_{i})=\rho(I_{h_{i}g}(\hat{\Sigma}_{i}^{\prime}))=\rho(\hat{\Sigma}_{i}^{\prime})=\Sigma_{i}.

We now define a new local metric on UiU_{i} by the pullback gi:=φihig_{i}:=\varphi_{i}^{*}h_{i}. Because φi(Ni)=Σi\varphi_{i}(N_{i})=\Sigma_{i}, and Σi\Sigma_{i} is hih_{i}-orthogonal to the TT-orbits in UiU_{i} by construction, it follows that NiN_{i} is gig_{i}-orthogonal to the TT-orbits. Finally, let {ϕi}\{\phi_{i}\} be a TT-invariant partition of unity subordinate to {Ui}\{U_{i}\}. We define the global TT-invariant metric g:=iϕigig:=\sum_{i}\phi_{i}g_{i}. Because NN is orthogonal to the TT-orbits with respect to every individual metric gig_{i}, it remains orthogonal to the orbits with respect to gg. The transversal NN meets every orbit, and this intersection is everywhere orthogonal, proving that T                                        MT\hbox to55.41pt{\vbox to22.16pt{\pgfpicture\makeatletter\hbox{\hskip 39.87112pt\lower-9.93785pt\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke} \lxSVG@begingroup@{fill} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\nullfont\hbox to0.0pt{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {}{}{}{}{}{{}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} {{}{}{{{}}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{}{{ {}{}}}{ {}{}} {{}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{}{{}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces }{{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-18.5347pt}{0.0pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{58}\lxSVG@closescope }}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}}}{{}}}} \lxSVG@closescope }}} { {}{}{}}{} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{}{}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{{}} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{{}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{{}{}}{}}{{{}}{{}}}{ {}{}{}}{}{{}}{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{{}}{}{{{{{{}}{ {}{}}{}{}{{}{}}}}}{}{}{}{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@setlinewidth{\the\pgflinewidth}\lxSVG@begingroup@{stroke-width} \lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{}{}{}{}{{}}{}{}{}{{}}\lxSVG@stroke\lxSVG@drawpath@unclipped{M -13.92 -2.49 C -54.89 -13.47 -40.89 16.64 0.08 5.66}{fill:none} {{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96591}{0.2589}{-0.2589}{0.96591}{-10.06168pt}{-1.80177pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-6.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}{{}{{}}{}{}{{}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{0.96593}{-0.25882}{0.25882}{0.96593}{0.06053pt}{4.09149pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} {\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@discardpath@clipped{M 0 -5.96 h 5.36 v 11.92 h -5.36 Z} {{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}\lxSVG@begingroup@{_scopebegin} \lxSVG@transformcm{1.0}{0.0}{0.0}{1.0}{-1.12506pt}{-2.5pt}\lxSVG@begingroup@{transform} \pgfsys@hbox{55}\lxSVG@closescope }\lxSVG@closescope }}{{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}}}}\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces \lxSVG@closescope \lxSVG@closescope {{ {}{}{}}}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces}\hss}\lxSVG@discardpath\lxSVG@closescope \hss}}\lxSVG@closescope\endpgfpicture}}\hskip-9.0ptM is polar with respect to gg.∎

References
  • [Da] J. Dadok, Polar Coordinates Induced by Actions of Compact Lie Groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 288(1) (1985), no. 1, 125–137.
  • [DJ] M. W. Davis and T. Januszkiewicz, Convex polytopes, Coxeter orbifolds and torus actions, Duke Math. J. 62 (1991), no. 2, 417–451.
  • [Del] T. Delzant, Hamiltoniens périodiques et images convexes de l’application moment, Bulletin de la S. M. F. 116(3) (1988), 315–339.
  • [Fr] T. Frankel, Fixed points and torsion on Kähler manifolds, Annals of Mathematics, 70(1) (1959), 1–8.
  • [GGK] V. Guillemin, V.L. Ginzburg, Y. Karshon, Moment maps, cobordisms, and Hamiltonian group actions, American Mathematical Soc., 2002.
  • [HS] A. Haefliger, E. Salem, Actions of tori on orbifolds, Ann. Global Anal. Geom., 9(1) (1991), 37–59.
  • [KN] S. Kobayashi, K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, vol. I, Interscience Publishers, J. Wiley & Sons, 1963.
  • [LT] A. Lytchak, G. Thorbergsson, Curvature explosion in quotients and applications, J. Differential Geom. 85 (2010), no. 1, 117–140.
  • [Lyt] A. Lytchak, Geometric resolution of singular Riemannian foliations, Geom. Dedicata 149 (2010), 379–391.
  • [MP] M. Masuda, T. Panov, On the cohomology of torus manifolds, Osaka J. Math. 43 (2006), 711–746.
  • [PT] F. Podestà, G. Thorbergsson, Polar and coisotropic actions on Kähler manifolds, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 354(5) (2002), 1759–1781.
  • [Sat] I. Satake: On a generalization of the notion of manifold, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 42(6) (1956), 359–363.
  • [Yo] T. Yoshida, Local torus actions modeled on the standard representation, Advances in Mathematics 227 (2011), 1914–1955.