There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
There is no distinction between any AI program and some existent game.
Moved to cloud? Now pay the stupidity tax. (Score:3)
Which is what happens when you let MBAs make decisions instead of engineers.
MBAs hear the magic words "CAPEX vs OPEX" and their tiny myopic brains turn off as do the compliance officers with wet dreams of shifting liability elsewhere.
lt all works (with ever rising costs), until it doesn't.
Re: Moved to cloud? Now pay the stupidity tax. (Score:2)
But what is the tax? These services are down and no one is blaming the companies, they just say it's an Amazon problem. No one is penalizing a company because their Internet services went down just like most of their competitors
Re: (Score:2)
But what is the tax?
Decrease in traffic, which reduces revenues. Was that supposed to be a trick question?
Re: (Score:2)
Question to what extent was revenue reduced versus deferred. If 90% of their customers couldn't reach competitors either, was revenue lost or did it just happen later?
The thing is that this is terrible for all the outages to be aligned for the internet users, but for the providers, the thought that outages are likely to align with competitor outages might be a pretty solid mitigation, so long as the outage doesn't exceed what they might incur themselves. Even a longer outage common with competitors may be
Re: (Score:3)
The tax, aside from lost revenue, are inevitable security breaches and uncontrollable outages. If a state actor decides to take down AWS or Azure, literally thousands of businesses would be down for an indefinite period.
This incident was nothing, a glitch. That doesn't mean the next one will be.