Errata

Verified (1)

RFC 9250 inline-errata

Source of RFC: dprive (int)

Errata-ID: 7883

Status:
Verified
Type:
Technical
Publication Formats:
TXT HTML
Reported By:
Lyra Naeseth
Date Reported:
2024-04-05
Verified by:
Eric Vyncke
Date Verified:
2024-04-23

Section 7.5 says:

Implementations SHOULD use the mechanisms defined in Section 5.4 to
mitigate this attack.

It should say:

Implementations MUST use the padding mechanisms defined in Section 5.4
to mitigate this attack.

Notes:

Section 5.4 states that "[i]mplementations MUST protect against the traffic analysis attacks described in Section 7.5", but Section 7.5 describes that obligation as a "SHOULD". "MUST" is correct, and the inconsistent "SHOULD" in Section 7.5 is an error.

-- Verifier (Eric Vyncke) note --

The short discussion on the DPRIVE WG list has indicated that 2 authors are in favour of verifying this errata.
Report New Erratum