Errata
Verified (1)
RFC 9250 inline-errata
Source of RFC: dprive (int)
Errata-ID: 7883
- Status:
- Verified
- Type:
- Technical
- Publication Formats:
- TXT HTML
- Reported By:
- Lyra Naeseth
- Date Reported:
- 2024-04-05
- Verified by:
- Eric Vyncke
- Date Verified:
- 2024-04-23
Section 7.5 says:
Implementations SHOULD use the mechanisms defined in Section 5.4 to
mitigate this attack.
It should say:
Implementations MUST use the padding mechanisms defined in Section 5.4
to mitigate this attack.
Notes:
Section 5.4 states that "[i]mplementations MUST protect against the traffic analysis attacks described in Section 7.5", but Section 7.5 describes that obligation as a "SHOULD". "MUST" is correct, and the inconsistent "SHOULD" in Section 7.5 is an error.
-- Verifier (Eric Vyncke) note --
The short discussion on the DPRIVE WG list has indicated that 2 authors are in favour of verifying this errata.