Steward requests/Checkuser/2021-03

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Group 1: 絆愛0630, 空友, 芭, 給爺爬
•   Confirmed Group 2: とある科学の血小板, 血小板0615, 吃书
•   Likely 哆啦美的壁橱 and Group 2
•   Likely 自由联盟的血小板 and Group 2

---

•   Unrelated Group 1 and 2
• They used VPN or OPs.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 05:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Unlikely Ankeitte, BalkaNGameS

From a technical point of view. There is insufficient data, but the data so far are as above. --Sotiale (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

  Possible at best, no other accounts showing. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! --Yining Chen (Talk) 09:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

  Confirmed RightRight001, Sallywong2021, Randykobe2020, Johncena736, Vds1216. See also Special:Permalink/21161296#Randykobe2020@zh.wikipedia -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

It looks like a duck. Do they claim that they are not related to each other? --Sotiale (talk) 21:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

@Sotiale: No. But I want to be sure. --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 09:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

@NGC 54: The need for an investigation is necessary to proceed with this. If their behavior patterns are the same, it is enough to block them. Or are you suspicious that they created another account? --Sotiale (talk) 12:11, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

@Sotiale: It would be possible to exist another sockpuppet(s). --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 12:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Blocau darius, Blocaud, Blocau

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Emir2893, Adnan2223, WikiPisac119, Ado2215, WikiPisac, Adnan3451, Adnan7758, Ado11744 (bs wiki), Ado11744, Policajci nisu zli, Korisnik33, Korisnik11, Pomažem wikipediji, Bosanac 112, Bosanac 114, Suradničko ime 2, Drug 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 21:55, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Group 1: Every Time Wiki, WikiPanti
•   Confirmed Group 2: Auramstate, Micromadmonkey, Ozoes, Rwpravaz

---

•   Unlikely Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 22:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much. --SM7^--talk-- 14:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Unrelated Max CHT, JudyVA4052, Jennylauk

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

I am not sure what this request is asking for. Are you requesting that this investigation be conducted to classify who the accounts are? --Sotiale (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Yes. It is conducted to classify who Z2569875 is. Itcfangye (talk) 21:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

  Confirmed 1341041963296005radix, Z2569875, 彤蜜妡璃647. One of those is locked by Alaa as Xayahrainie43. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

For the record, the only reason I ran this check was because of the impersonation aspect. Otherwise I would have declined. Also I did only check the user Z2569875 and found the accounts there, I did not go further and didn't see any need to. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 12:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

• Thanks, Amanda. And I apologize for none of us from local wiki having explained why we suspect Z2569875 as a sock of X43 or 114.27. They showed similar edit pattern, especially interest in math articles. I also apologize for none of us having explained who 672shhs188w4 and 胡蝶47しのぶ are. The former is a confirmed sock of 114.27 and the latter of X43. Itcfangye (talk) 13:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Possible John Caspian & Trym WS
•   Unlikely Sappho Norge
•   Unrelated Kappaqq

from a technical standpoint. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 14:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

@AmandaNP: Thanks! Jon Harald Søby (talk) 15:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

The account Cwithskin shared some similarities with SCP-458, another sockpuppet of PXD. These are a) made their first edits on the Draft namespace, b) editing Singapore-related articles. Furthermore, SCP-458 was omitted in CU results but later confirmed. I have suspected that it can be another sockpuppet of SiuMai (though no consensus has been made to compare Cwithskin and SiuMai).--Spring Roll Conan ( Teahouse · Contributions ) 13:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Possible Cwithskin and PXD

From a technical point of view. It could not be judged as   Likely because it had different characteristics from previous data. PXD may have changed their patterns, or may be a different person. --Sotiale (talk) 13:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! --海の向こうは敵だ！ 13:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Confirmed 張慧如老師, 黃玉桂 陳玉雪
•   Unrelated 劉彥緯

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 12:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  Declined It's too obvious to need a check. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 22:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  Confirmed--Sakretsu (炸裂) 12:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

In addition, maybe you will find some accounts in the name of "CCF IP 123 456". As such accounts have been oversighted in zhwiki, you can take a note instead of listing them. --Easterlies (talk) 11:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Group 1: C2569875, CCF KUAIXIATAI, CCF QUANWEIJIZUICHADEGUANLIYUAN, CCF LANYONGKUILEI, CCF XIATAI, BurebuNeko, WikiCatNews, LClightcat., 你 是 自 由 的, 糟糕蟲蟲, 蟲蟲進飛鼻孔怎麼辦?, 葉品緯陳彥霖, LClightcat., 自新世界, 光猫猫, 维猫报, 勇猛な猫, (some OSed accounts)

---

• Group 1 used VPN.
• Accounts not listed above are not listed separately because they belong to different users(seems   Unrelated) or do not have sleepers accounts.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:42, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. But User:葉品緯陳彥霖 was blocked locally as zh:LTA:蘇俞安. I wonder if this group has any relationships with the LTA. --Easterlies (talk) 12:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Well, it looks like a different guy. --Sotiale (talk) 12:12, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

When summarizing your request, please at least explain how they are similar and why you doubt. From your explanation, we don't know why the community is suspicious of them. --Sotiale (talk) 09:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

In SRCU#R125463268@zh.wikipedia,they can create page via fake Taiwan episodes,TV station,TV company,edit similar to F0936244201 and Huang Mingyi (Their confirmed in last two SRCU request in this year),see their log,also,R125463268 can see in last two SRCU request in this year.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:38, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Moved by Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 15:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

• I have taken a look at this case. Earlier CU confirmed Huang Mingyi and R125463268. R125463268, F0911659798, S0963678577 share similar usernames. Doris980302 edited w:zh:黃銘義 (that is, Huang Mingyi) and share similar idiomatic wording and username with Huang Mingyi 980302. Local admin ducked Doris980302 and Neil like Nicole by their deleted user contribution and suspected they are w:zh:LTA:XC. Itcfangye (talk) 18:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Confirmed 1996 PTV, Neil980302, R125463268, 1998 鳳梨, 2021 PTV, 980302黃銘義, Doris980302, Nicole and Niccy, Neil like Nicole, Huang Mingyi Doraemon, Huang Mingyi 980302, S0963678577, F0911659798, TiMi980302, Huang Mingyi, F0936244201

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

• Also, could steward check for sleeper?--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 12:08, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
• In addition, according to the discussion of the local community, please check Sleepers. Thanks!--海の向こうは敵だ！ 12:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Unrelated 温大善人 and YCLowB

However, it is judged that 温大善人 has used both the IP and the account. From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

• Thanks. Itcfangye (talk) 13:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

To process your request, the admin of sqwiki needs to confirm your claim. Would you do that? --Sotiale (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@Sotiale: Unfortunately, most admins are inactive there, so this disruptive user can keep continuing his edit-wars. Do you know an admin whom you can inform? One user informed admins Klein Muçi and Liridon on their respective discussion pages in the Albanian wikipedia.--Franz Kasulke (talk) 10:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@Sotiale: I'm an admin of SqWiki. The problem is deeper than what we're seeing described here. Udha and Hatake are 2 users who have been edit warring in different IPs and accounts for more than 5 years now in our community. We have blocked more than 20 accounts of them and they keep coming back in different ways. The truth is they do help expanding articles but the disruption they bring forth in the community far outweighs the gain from that. No one from our community, normal user or administrator, wants to deal with them anymore now and they've started bringing their fights here. I'm 90% sure that the aforementioned user above Franz Kasulke is, again, just Hatake. If you check this page, you'll see some of his blocked accounts and I can confirm the list there is far from being complete because it hasn't been updated in a while. The real list is bigger than that. Even if he's not, this user most likely is. I do believe that the other user is in fact Udha but I'd like to have a deeper discussion in regard to this problem with the global community because as I said, what we're doing here is just an extension of what we have been doing all this time at SqWiki, one user is just using his chess moves to block the other one, and I don't know if this is the right place to have that discussion. I do mention the global community because more than 4 admins and bureaucrats have tried to solve this persisting problem in different ways over the years, even communicating with the 2 users privately, and the results have been totally unfulfilling as they always keep coming back in different ways and start the cycle all over again. On the other hand we always welcome them back for a short while somehow because of the help they bring in articles (before the cycle restarts). I can guarantee Liridon, one of the oldest users in our community, will say more or less the same when he sees the mentioning. - Klein Muçi (talk) 11:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@Sotiale: Nope, I am not him but I noticed that several open proxies are used there. I know that Udha is known as Turkophobic and Islamophobic.--Franz Kasulke (talk) 11:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

The problem is easier than Klein likes to bring it here: Hatake and Udha are two blocked users along with their sockets, having consumed all of the means to come to an agreement - as Klein stated - and given that it is so, it's a closed discussion. As it seems Kleini forgets his being practical in English and likes to romanize as if scrutinazation and retrospective solves things. The nowadays topic is regarding an avalange of mass-reverting IPs since the 5th of March: edit-warring, calling names and WP:Battlegrounding everything regarding their simingly "prefered" articles: being the writer's Ismail Kadare's page, his works, and his feuds alimented by his minions. Easily verifiable simply putting together the IPs editation maps and everybody will see the pattern clearly. And even if your leave these aside, last night in the most undignified way offending defunct individuals of our culture and then some (the verb për të ngordhur in Albanian is used only for animals, pretty much like the informal croak in English; alluding towards me being Nazimi's son ("kopil" used by him means bastard, he expressively uses one of the most offensive verbs in Albanian "i shkërdhyer", as most verbs in English can be used as adjectives, having an area of meanings nit mostly used instead of the 4th in this list) and the admin just stood there and yet has't blocked the IP for this undecent language. It is my first time writing here (here meaning in the Checkuser section, because I did write to our colleagues and neighbours) after 4 months of various contributions in Sq.Wiki, not as this old timer that keeps baby-sitting and dramatizing his editings, but it seems inevitable bringing things here due to the passivity of the admins in our community in the decision-making process and not having the lucidity to discern an honest contributor from a biased, most probably payed, curator of a writer's image.--Ikranjani (talk) 11:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

This again is just another chess move to divert attention to his original aim which is to block his "archnemesis". We've been playing this game as a community for years now, dealing with each complain separately by both parties until we understood that the list couldn't ever be exhausted. I didn't want to have this discussion here, not wanting to pollute the checkusers requests but given that it is happening anyway, I'm going on. What we are looking for as a community is either for technical advice on how to deal with cases like these where multiple accounts and proxies are used throughout the years or for help on the social manner on conflict/edit warring solving situations. Throughout the time we've failed in achieving satisfactory results in any of those subjects in regard to this conflict. Not only this but the conflict has escalated far outside of WikiWorld where me and other admins have been continuously emailed and messaged multiple times on social media and more in regard to this situation, the most problematic case being a whole list of emails making threats of suicide in regard to one of the blocks the community made in the past. The threats lasted for several hours in many emails straight and I was forced to contact the Wikimedia Foundation for them as mentioned here. I strongly insist on having a deeper conversation on the subject with 1 or more Stewards interested that covers the whole range of events, all the accounts included and their contributions while keeping in mind the off-wiki events. This is not only about 1 or 2, or 5 small edit wars but about giving a definitive solution to a bigger, persistent problem we've been having throughout the years as a community. - Klein Muçi (talk) 12:16, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@Klein Muçi: Thanks. This request is a space for checkuser, so I'd like to make sure that what I understand is correct for you. Do you think this request is from one user in the dispute to investigate a user on the other? Also, do you think the handling of this request is inappropriate? For the solution to your community, it's a good to find a suitable place after concluding this checkuser request. --Sotiale (talk) 12:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@Sotiale: I believe so, yes. As for the request handling, this is where we step into a grey area. There's nothing wrong per se in using checkuser powers on one of the users mentioned (or even on all parties involved). The problem is that we sort of are already sure of their existence. We can block them even now for community disruption. But unfortunately, we've done that thing many times in the past and the problem persists. Given that we are discussing it on a global level now, I'd hope for a more definite solution of which, checkuser examination may just be one of the steps involved. If we are to be concise, then the best solution would be to have a checkuser examination performed even on user Ikranjani in regard to it being Hatake/his other accounts (which I mentioned above). This would make way for a double blocking. (Of which, unfortunately, I'm not to fond of because as I've said, we've already traveled that road many times now but what to do...) - Klein Muçi (talk) 13:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@Klein Muçi: Thanks. This request is a space for checkuser, so I'd like to make sure that what I understand is correct for you. Do you think this request is from one user in the dispute to investigate a user on the other? Also, do you think the handling of this request is inappropriate? For the solution to your community, it's a good to find a suitable place after concluding this checkuser request. --Sotiale (talk) 12:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

I see you've taken a liking in board games during this last year Klein, mentioning chess moves twice that is. In my four months of editing I didn't have one single enemy, and I dare say that some of my editings are exceptional for the Sq.Wiki standards, so at least a "thanks" or "good job pal" would be at order before implying me having an alleged archnemesis. But giving the Aristotelian subtrate the discussion is having, from nemesis comes catharsis; but we should expect a miracle for the admin staff tackling hubris. I'm sorry for the suicide threat e-mails you had, as it seems you have a honorable namus, but this whole year was a trying time for the human kind, so gayret. For it is in the times of need that we need courage and not wailing individuals. And if this wailing individual is the abovementioned Udha, in this case we have a 6 year old baby-sitting user. But I am curious, in that string theory of yours caretaking off-wiki events, what is the recommanded approach towards a defunct moral compass such as the one that offended a defunct individual? Or do you need technical advice here for that? --Ikranjani (talk) 13:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

The emails were sent before the pandemic started. As I mentioned yesterday in my talkpage, throughout the years I've grown forcibly used to this kind of rhetoric with both of you so I won't delve too much in addressing your overall message above or the irony on it. As for the specific approach to be taken, as established, this is not the place to discuss it. If @Sotiale: can help address the whole conversation in a more suitable place, I'd be happy to elaborate further. - Klein Muçi (talk) 13:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Well, how would I know when you had the e-mails, I simply said I'm sorry, because I perceive you as sentimental guy. I guess that if the wailing individual would have needed a tissue or handkerchief in off-wiki situation, you would have lended one. But we are in-wiki Klein, not off, and in here you have some tools, so you have to take responsability towards that kind of language and use them. Given that the IP reestablished his PUSH-POV again for today.--Ikranjani (talk) 15:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Please keep in mind that this is not a forum. What matters here is whether this checkuser request is suitable or not. First of all, looking at the comments of sqwiki admin, I don't think the handling of this request is appropriate. Therefore, I mark this request as   Not done. Klein Muçi, you can make separate checkuser requests for both users, if necessary, with appropriate rationale. It's up to you. --Sotiale (talk) 12:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Please describe why you suspect them, as I requested further clarification in the request below. Explain how their behavior patterns are similar. --Sotiale (talk) 09:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

In SRCU#Sikakah800@zh.wikipedia,first two users and two IP 14.161.8.97,223.197.33.75 vandal in zh:User Talk:CRHK128[1][2],and 223.197.33.75 edit summary (Wrong infomation.) same to ชนไดร้ท์ฆ่าเอ็มซีซี214 (Comfirmed in January request,Yage Wu),in history via 母親,you can see WOO124 edit on it (Confirmed Yage Wu sock in last year),also,红细胞3803 edit similar to 223.197.33.75,and you can see 223.197.33.75 write edit summary is ㄎㄎㄎㄎ,白细胞3806 user name similar to 红细胞3803,+ㄢ user name similar to ㄎㄎㄎㄎ.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Moved by Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 15:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

• I have taken a look at why MCC214 suspected these users: Sikakah800 triggered an abuse filter for w:zh:LTA:LC99 when writing a comment on CRHK128's talk page; Hefaj70340 wrote a suspicious comment on CRHK128's talk page, which may relate them to Yage Wu; 红细胞3803 wrote 爬爬爬爬爬爬爬 in his user page right after account creation, and this relates them to ㄎㄎㄎㄎ. 白细胞3806 shares a similar username to 红细胞3803, and got global locked along with C2569875 and CCF IP. All of the above were created around 3rd to 5th, March. (I did not see why Sikakah800/Hefaj70340 may be related to 红细胞3803/白细胞3806/ㄎㄎㄎㄎ/+ㄢ, though.)

  Note that the name 红细胞3803 is in Simplified Chinese, not Traditional. Itcfangye (talk) 18:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

If there are two groups in one request, they must be separated. If you request two groups in one request, you need to request them separately from each other. Please answer if it really is. --Sotiale (talk) 13:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

• It is actually in one group, which could categorize into 2 sub-groups: Sikakah800,Hefaj70340,ㄎㄎㄎㄎ and ㄎㄎㄎㄎ,红细胞3803,白细胞3806,+ㄢ when ㄎㄎㄎㄎ in common.--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 13:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
• @Sotiale: According to MCC214, this does not only relate 红细胞3803 to ㄎㄎㄎㄎ, but also 223.197.33.75, and another edit of 223.197.33.75 relates them to Hefaj70340. Itcfangye (talk) 13:31, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Confirmed 白细胞3806, C2569875, WikiCatNews
•   Likely HA123HAHAHA, ㄎㄎㄎㄎ
•   Unlikely 红细胞3803, +ㄢ
•   Possible Sikakah800, Hefaj70340

---

•   Confirmed,   Likely,   Unlikely and   Possible are all individual groups and all   Unrelated to each other.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@CyberTroopers: Hello, this check cannot be performed because ms:User:BukanTeamBiasa's CU data is expired (i.e.:   Stale), as his last edit was done on May 2020. As such, we cannot compare whether Meandkancil2020 is technically related or not. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:41, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

@MarcoAurelio Yeah that is because he has been blocked but I'm afraid that user is a same user, which he created another new account after being blocked. So, is it can't be done because of technical or guildliness? 13:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Because of technical limitations. We literally don't have the data anymore, it would have been wiped. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 14:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

@AmandaNP That is very unfortunate. Thank you then. CyberTroopers (talk) 17:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

  Not done The first two accounts have already been handled by a previous result. SRCU is not a global CU of sorts, but an individual CU request page for those wikis that don't have enough CUs. Given Numwide and LocusSolus2 edit on wikis with checkusers, it would be best to go through the local processes to get confirmation as checkusers have a mailing list they can confer on. If they need any data from enwq, I can gladly assist them on the list with that. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Note: Page of LTA at User talk:Xsaorapa (linked above) containing information on this case is being blanked by sock of LTA, the same information has been copied here [6] --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 11:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Group 1: Ekesyogi, Leantack, Hmdo9, Spaswent, Toneworth
•   Confirmed Group 2: Virusammo, Rabbit2003, Masksmarsh, Sinotrans9

---

•   Possible Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 14:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 14:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 14:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Confirmed श्रीमान् गम्भीर, पाकिस्तान हिन्दू, History of Rajasthan, Pseudo Nihilist, भारत का प्रतिहार, Bheem singh 6969, Monarcho-fascist, F4E1C0, Niger banda, Aditya_Yadav2376

From a technical point of view. @1997kB: Here you are. --Sotiale (talk) 14:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Sotiale. @SM7: for blocks on hiwiki. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

  Confirmed XavierSachse, Inconn

--Alaa :)..! 08:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  Note: I have sent an additional question to the requester. This is a question for evidence as to why Vonfort is associated with the user. --Sotiale (talk) 10:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Addition: I believe accounts are associated, because of the similar views, the same patterns of behavior on the server, even both use a stereotypical Discord avatar. Vinfort even made some POV edits on-wiki like this one on sh.wiki. Thanks in advance. – Aca ^💬 11:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

@Aca: Please explain in more detail. If they have similar views, I think it will appear in the editing pattern. Can you compare the links and let me know? Thank you. --Sotiale (talk) 11:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

  Not done srwiki has 3 checkusers. Therefore, this request must be processed locally, so it is marked as not done. --Sotiale (talk) 11:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

• Itcfangye, I fixed incorrect discussion link and placed additional account names in the SRCU template for you. --LuciferianThomas．Talk 01:10, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

  Plus: 方文雪 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

  Seemingly related to the above groups, and the mix in use of Trad and Simp Chinese also seems suspicious. LuciferianThomas．Talk 03:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Confirmed 方文雪, Vivian Lim Fdyg, Vickson ng, 一刀无情, Wen Ng Ng, Yun Ng Ng, Ken Ng Ng, Gen Ng Ng, Qen ng ng, Ten ng ng, Zhe Ng Ng, Hen party, Hen hen jen, Ren ng ng, Kenssnub, Geldducts, Beansmuse, Revsbooms, Ruffsberta
•   Unrelated to above and each other: MarieChong, Lau Yoke Ying
•   Declined given my confidence with the above results: Duygobyy, Don0393

-- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

@AmandaNP: Thank you for handing the above request! --LuciferianThomas．Talk 05:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

May I know what exactly does declined mean in this case? Unrelated or unprocessed? LuciferianThomas．Talk 05:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Declined means unhandled or not checkusered. I felt the evidence wasn't strong enough given finding the large sock group and the other two being unrelated. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 10:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

  Confirmed plus Riyaz903. All locked. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:55, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks AmandaNP--Ts12rAc (talk) 18:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

@AmandaNP:, can you run another cu as a another user Infohab got active[14] today and removing afd templates from promotional pages on hiwiki.--Ts12rAc (talk) 18:51, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Ya it's them and I locked. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 23:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

  Not done frwiki has it's own local checkusers and we can't intervene in that process. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 12:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Everyone is blocked, I'm not seeing the need for a CU. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

@AmandaNP: Please find sleepers and block an IP range to prevent them from creating more accounts if possible. Ivi104 (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I can see the point of sleeper checks since they are SPAs, and likely have more burried.   Doing... -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

All are coming back either within the same country (with different information/networks) or are using proxies. CU will not be of help here. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

  Not done If it is a duck, and there is no chance at sleepers, and they are already blocked, I see no reason to check it. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 22:57, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

The use of proxies makes this difficult. I would say there is a chance they are related to the last check. Itsfine201 may also be related. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 14:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

• Nilsdustin   Confirmed Leucohydro
• Nilsdustin   Possible C0800095590d
• Andythongchong   Unrelated to anything, I did not check 2503 as it was obvious and had no edits.
• Miosturge   Confirmed Webstercam
• Miosturge   Likely Nilsdustin

-- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:07, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Group 1: ARTC2024 and PRC1927 account group
•   Confirmed Group 2: 黃景翔125463, Eric125463268, Doris980302125463268, Neil125463268, 1998 Neil, previous confirmed group

---

•   Unlikely Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Also please check users Kaficrazgovor (villagepump-talk) and Ssuuradnik (Uuuser) on hrwiki and their connections with these accounts. We also suspect this is the work of a previous hrwiki LTA, user Lordluka99. User Lordluka is known for his open support of glocked hrwiki ex-admin Kubura, as well as creating numerous socks and disruptive behaviour, and his world-views reflect personal attack statements posted in hrwiki village pump by user Kaficrazgovor. Please verify and prevent this behaviour. Ivi104 (talk) 14:59, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

EDIT: I had to add another user to the request. It seems like another far-right SPA appeared and there is a chance that this account belongs to an LTA-user. --Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 16:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

I've merged these requests, and will update the results as I go through them. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:36, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Group 1: Kuburin fan, Nima boljeg od Kubure, Kubura je najbolji, Vratite nam Kuburu, Naprijed Kuburo, ŽIVIO KUBURAAA KRALJINA
•   Confirmed on a proxy, Group 2: Ssuuradnik, Kaficrazgovor, Luk&češnjak
•   Confirmed Group 3: Smrdiskroz, Objektivno
•   Confirmed Group 4: Istina500, Bambus44, Istina200.   Likely Istina250, VOLIM KUBURUU to this group.
•   Possible Group 1 & 4
•   Unlikely Group 3 to Group 1 & 4
•   Inconclusive Group 2 to anything else, due to proxy
• Sorry for the mess in results, but there was a lot of users to process. @Martin Urbanec: who may have input here. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:36, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello AmandaNP, thank you very much for your time and the results. Is it possible to have those compared to these previous ones? Best regards, Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 11:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Honestly, I don't think that would provide much information of help. I would only be able to give you   Possible or less to them if I checked them. I would have seen them if they were on the same network. Hope this helps. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:32, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

•   Confirmed 喵了个好, AiNvZhuang, 黃嘉祺, 人俩关系, Hfvn, 叫我小仙女, 可採才以, ネスアイス, Honglvpo, Hmsosndjxndj, Fvbhhcghvfg, 攻めです, Ynsjd, Gfshbfgjfhhfgj, 迷路的鳄鱼, 重温一飞, 不知道是, 君が好きだ, Ghcgvdgcfxghdg, 即係點啊, 鹿茸茸, 克人儿, おっさんずラブ, 蓝鼠鼠

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)