Steward requests/Checkuser/2022-06

At least I can't conduct this investigation. @علاء: Could you please check it? --Sotiale (talk) 06:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

  Insufficient data. Sorry, and please count on behavior --Alaa :)..! 10:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Ουμαν 1, Nekst, Ekiela, Vasiliki Nansi, Γατόνι Σ, ZEN PREMIE, Γκέκας, Ntako, Olerios, ΜΙΝΛ, Δημήτρης Στεργιούδης, Serafim265, KLMNJ, Goutsie, Frakta, Bantola, Αντώνης ΖΚ, ThIOP, Fatirga, Cicharón, Γιώργος Καλφιόπουλος, Redrigo 14, Kampack, Στέφανος Σ, Aeljno, Isan 00, Μαγιατι, Fernando Lo S, Νίκος Φωκίδα, Kingote, Edo76, Καντιρησ, Artist8888, G77777

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Group 1: 47gkwkdii, L9gptJQlz5v
•   Likely Amnidjoetahs99586 and Group 1

---

• They used VPN in some cases.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 01:49, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Ttaajq, FEgHF, Within512

Sorry, I guess I don't have to do what you requested for. As you know.. if IP socking is suspected, semi-protect is recommended to prevent new accounts and IPs from editing. --Sotiale (talk) 02:17, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Mihai3993, Mihai4801, Mihai4800, MihaiQuote, MihaiPower3, MihaiSource

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:59, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Could you explain the evidence of their similarity in behavior to support your request? --Sotiale (talk) 02:07, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Sotiale, hi. The people on the blocked accounts were doing paid editor and PR, and so they insisted that their unsignificant articles not be deleted. Although the user account is 8 years old, however, the other 2 accounts started to contribute after blocking them respectively. The way they talk in the discussions is exactly the same. Can you check? Thanks. Lavici (talk) 02:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

What does it mean to say that a talk in the discussion is exactly the same? Does that mean they make the same claim on the same pages? Please make your explaination a little more specific. --Sotiale (talk) 02:40, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Sotiale, so that is, both of them make the same arguments that the pages they created should not be deleted. In particular, he wrote that I am more experienced than you in these matters. The person on the blocked account said the same thing at the time. And can you check in on account 4? The activity on that account consists only of the AFD page. He always supported the articles that he did not want to delete the other two accounts. The account does not function normally. But that's it. Lavici (talk) 02:54, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Sotiale, there is currently an open discussion on Az Wikipedia. The last 2 accounts I added commented that only the article that came in was left. The contributions of these 2 users are mostly on this page. Lavici (talk) 03:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Well, account is still being presented. I will review it again when you finish editing. It would be good to organize which pages the added accounts submitted comments on. For reference, the only accounts that can currently be investigated are Erzuman gia, Elnur Neciyev, and Azimoffff. Other accounts have expired data. --Sotiale (talk) 03:19, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

In other words, please summarize what similarities they have on AFD. It is too broad to be suspected of being the same user simply because they have the same opinion on AFD. --Sotiale (talk) 03:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Sotiale, first of all, sorry for the bad english. Maybe that's why I can't explain. Mentioned users do not have normal contributions, they are only on this page. And they express their opinion that it should remain a pole without any arguments. Don't you think this is weird? Lavici (talk) 03:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Sotiale, I'm worried that there are other accounts as well. Can you perform the necessary actions? Lavici (talk) 14:18, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Your explanation is not enough for me, but based on what you said, I proceeded to investigate, looking for evidence of suspicion. --Sotiale (talk) 11:26, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Group 1: Erzuman gia, Rizvanoghlu
•   Confirmed Group 2: Elnur Neciyev, Gunay M.E.
•   Unrelated Azimoffff

---

•   Unrelated Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. This is an investigation based solely on logged data, so whether or not they are the same user should be judged based on their similarity in behavior within azwiki. --Sotiale (talk) 11:26, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Unless you suspect that two users on azwiki are using sockpuppets, this request should be directed to trwiki checkuser or ombuds. The data on azwiki may be different from the trwiki data judged by the trwiki checkuser, and the only thing we can check is the data comparison of the two accounts on azwiki. If you think there is a problem with their decision, contact them directly, and if you have any doubts about their explanation, file a complaint with the ombuds. --Sotiale (talk) 00:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

@Sotiale hi, these users are mainly active in the Azerbaijani Wikipedia. If this is the case, it would be good to know about it in the Azerbaijani Wikipedia. Because they participate in joint discussions. This check is also needed for use in other discussions. Turkmen ^talk 17:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

If they have already been confirmed on trwiki, your community may accept it or reject it. If your community believes that the trwiki checkuser result is not valid, you can leave them as they are, without blocking them. It seems you already have a decision on this. If this investigation is necessary, please give specific reasons why you should investigate them on azwiki, and give reasons why you think they are socks. --Sotiale (talk) 08:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Please request again if necessary. --Sotiale (talk) 01:52, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

  Doing... --Alaa :)..! 08:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

  Confirmed ArijitSinghoffcial = Indiansingers89799

--Alaa :)..! 09:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed LUCfest and Chiaoyay

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 21:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Group 1: Qwertyuiosdghjk, Rft2ghu, Fttujk83li, 432wedcvg, Fkigtetqax, Kstreov463, W3ertygh
•   Confirmed Group 2: Pipimi and pipijiow, Mimoo and jiowmoo

---

•   Confirmed Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 21:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Lambocomrade and Villeum

--Sotiale (talk) 21:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

While there is no abuse occuring on zh.wikiversity, these two are   Confirmed on zhwiki where their edit timelines overlap. -- Amanda (she/her) 09:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Reported back to zh.wiki community as well. ${\displaystyle \int }$ （☎） 14:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Status:    Done

List of users

Asiadolls (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

28winning (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Asiadolls

Reason(s): Within 24 hours after Asiadolls's local block, 28winning was created and editing like how Asiadolls behave; I suspect there could be additional sleepers. Please perform a check and let the community know if 28winning is indeed Asiadolls and if there are additional sleepers that would require local sysop action. ${\displaystyle \int }$ （☎） 14:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed 28winning, Asiadolls, Feelsoulgood, Writingfast, Tokyohot

--Sotiale (talk) 11:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Status:    Done

List of users

Pipimi and pipijiow (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Rrtu437 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Kcc02 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/Pipimi_and_pipijiow#2022年6月8日

Reason(s): A follow-up request regarding a previous check. Local admin suspected these two accounts are socks for the first account; the accounts are created right before the previous check results reported back to the community (6:27 am the next day after the check is completed, local time. The second account was created on 6:07 am, next day after the check completed, local time). Another sock, which later identified, claims that the third account listed is his or her classmate at school; therefore, local admin also requested for sleeper check and possible blocking IP of the school per zh:WP:CUP#1. ${\displaystyle \int }$ （☎） 15:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Group 1: Kcc02, Kcc0101

---

•   Likely Rrtu437 and previous confirmed
•   Possible Group 1 and previous confirmed

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 00:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Dggdfyhf6477, Fhshhh6774, Dfhhufr75478, Jfhfoafa 25244, Dfhfhfjj8+43222, Fyddgggd456357

---

• They used VPN.

--Sotiale (talk) 00:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

The wikis you provided(fawiki, idwiki, itwiki, ruwiki, wikidatawiki) are where local checkusers exist, so we have to cooperate with them and can't do it ourselves. Therefore, it was set as global, and for convenience, the language code was modified to lv. --Sotiale (talk) 00:17, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Likely(MARdF) KirjuxaB, Bahareza
•   Possible(MARdF) NicoloRaul, Rantemariana
•   Stale Shpynov

But the hidden account could not be found. I lock them because their behavior patterns is exactly the same. --Sotiale (talk) 00:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

  Possible -- Amanda (she/her) 20:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Status:    Done

List of users

折毛 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

好學的菜鳥 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

湖湘夜市 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

• CU log
• Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/折毛

Reason(s): Chinese Wikipedia user 折毛 is recently found to have created over 200 articles on the project that have been found to be completely made-up hoaxes, and is now indefinitely blocked. Local admins blocked five other accounts apart from the main account, being 折毛猫, 炸毛鸡, 雨木枫华 (these three accounts are probably long   Stale) and the two other listed accounts for request. However local community also has concerns on the identification of 好學的菜鳥 as a sock of 折毛, with a major difference being 折毛 and the other accounts uses Simplified Chinese, and 好學的菜鳥 uses Traditional Chinese, yet the tones are similar. A check is requested to confirm on the relationship of these user accounts, and a check for further sleepers is requested to help with further identification of hoax content. Thank you! --LuciferianThomas 15:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 23:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Likely 折毛, 好學的菜鳥, 湖湘夜市

---

• Since these were edited in public facilities, they may be the same user or users with the same purpose.
• Except for IPs assigned to public facilities, most were IPs used as VPN or Tor exits.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 23:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

  On hold --Sotiale (talk) 23:42, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Possible 妍萱
•   Unlikely Westdollar

First of all, the data on zhwiki does not confirm their relationship. AtttttttF who posted the file on commonswiki seems to be Ttaajq's account(based on zhwiki data), but the data held by the two accounts above does not strongly imply that they are the same user. --Sotiale (talk) 00:26, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed MosiaCinevaOfficial9, MosiaCinevaOfficial8, MosiaCinevaOfficial7, MosiaCinevaOfficial6, MosiaCinevaOfficial4, MosiaCinevaOfficial2, MosiaCinevaOfficial, VictorSugePulaLuiNGCsiAndrei, VictorBlacusPorcNesimtitJavraTampeet, GikuMaSuge

---

•   Confirmed Mihai4801

@NGC 54: Here you are. --Sotiale (talk) 23:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Rusha Datta Syr, Subhah Shirin, Shakil Raksam (Chief Boy), WIKIYRI, Zack Kilbi, SORIF B. MAHMUD

All locked as cross-wiki spam. And this should be marked as global(including metawiki, wikidatawiki, etc), not loginwiki. If it's loginwiki, you can't use two of the accounts you provided for investigation. --Sotiale (talk) 23:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Noted that. Thanks! NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 23:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Possible 詹姆斯008 and Fanxingtuan
•   Unlikely 破隐成锋
•   Unrelated 鲸小鱼儿
•   Stale 垃圾清

---

• They used VPN.

The technical data gave little evidence to support their relationship. For   Possible, I recommend that you make a decision by carefully analyzing their behavior patterns and contributions. --Sotiale (talk) 08:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 01:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed HienProWiki, NewHenry2022

All locked now. --Sotiale (talk) 01:42, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Confirmed Chinet1124 and Ttaajq(2022-06)

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:38, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! --LuciferianThomas 14:39, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Unlikely 潔西卡情緒 and Beryl88701985
•   Unrelated C-entwikieditor

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

•   Likely Absbjdjdi, MM0968543904, Aidneif
•   Unlikely Professor John William B1234, BoronBeryllium
•   Unrelated Winkylo8189

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:32, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! (This is a test edit for the zhwiki SPI clerk bot, please ignore)--LuciferianThomas 14:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)