Abstract

This record presents The Identity–Recursion–Consciousness Hypothesis, a falsifiable account of consciousness that inverts the standard explanatory order. Rather than treating consciousness as foundational, the hypothesis treats identity as primary, recursion as an instrumental regime of identity maintenance, and consciousness as a conditional, tertiary phenomenon that arises only under specific structural and substrate constraints. Identity is defined as the persistence of organized structure under perturbation. Recursion is defined as a regime in which identity-maintenance becomes self-conditioning under environmental underdetermination. Consciousness is defined as phenomenological surplus arising when recursive identity is instantiated on substrates capable of supporting such surplus. Consciousness is therefore not guaranteed by complexity, integration, or intelligence alone. The hypothesis makes explicit predictions, specifies threshold and regime conditions, and enumerates falsification criteria at each explanatory layer. It is compatible with multiple existing theories of consciousness but reorders them by explanatory dependency rather than competition.