PaperThe following article is Free article

Carnegie Supernova Project-II: Extending the Near-infrared Hubble Diagram for Type Ia Supernovae to z ∼ 0.1

, , , , , , , , ,

Published 2018 November 27 © 2018. The Astronomical Society of the Pacific. All rights reserved.
, , Citation M. M. Phillips et al 2019 PASP 131 014001DOI 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8bd

1538-3873/131/995/014001

Abstract

The Carnegie Supernova Project-II (CSP-II) was an NSF-funded, four-year program to obtain optical and near-infrared observations of a “Cosmology” sample of ∼100 Type Ia supernovae located in the smooth Hubble flow (0.03 ≲ z ≲ 0.10). Light curves were also obtained of a “Physics” sample composed of 90 nearby Type Ia supernovae at z ≤ 0.04 selected for near-infrared spectroscopic timeseries observations. The primary emphasis of the CSP-II is to use the combination of optical and near-infrared photometry to achieve a distance precision of better than 5%. In this paper, details of the supernova sample, the observational strategy, and the characteristics of the photometric data are provided. In a companion paper, the near-infrared spectroscopy component of the project is presented.

Export citation and abstractBibTeXRIS

1. Introduction

A key goal of observational cosmology is to constrain the nature of dark energy through the detailed, accurate, and unbiased measurement of the expansion history of the universe. Einstein’s cosmological constant, for which the dark energy equation of state parameter, w, is precisely −1, is entirely consistent with the most recent results (Betoule et al. 2014; Scolnic et al. 2018); however, so are several competing models that are as fundamentally different from each other as they are to the cosmological constant (e.g., see the review by Yoo & Watanabe 2012). Currently, the tightest limits on the value of w come from combining observations of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) with data from other probes, such as the cosmic microwave background and galaxy clustering. Excluding SNe Ia from these analyses results in considerably weaker constraints on w (e.g., Sullivan et al. 2011; Betoule et al. 2014). Nevertheless, the power of experiments such as the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS; Dawson et al. 2013) and its successor, the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI; DESI Collaboration et al. 2016), to constrain w is expected to soon match and perhaps exceed the power of the current state-of-the-art SNe Ia experiments.

Improving the experiments with SNe Ia is not just a question of observing more SNe Ia, as any survey, no matter how large, will ultimately be limited by systematic errors related to both the photometric calibration and the physical nature of SNe Ia (e.g., Conley et al. 2011; Scolnic et al. 2018). In the optical, SNe Ia are not perfect standard candles. Rather, their successful use in cosmology is due to the discovery of empirical relations between luminosity, light-curve decline rate, and color that dramatically decrease the dispersion in peak luminosities (Pskovskii 1977; Phillips 1993; Tripp 1998). These relationships reduce the intrinsic Hubble diagram scatter typically to ∼0.15 mag (∼7% in distance). A luminosity correction dependent on host-galaxy mass has also been introduced (Kelly et al. 2010; Lampeitl et al. 2010; Sullivan et al. 2010). Recently, this effect has been confirmed by Uddin et al. (2017) using a sample of 1338 SNe Ia. Interestingly, those authors found that SNe Ia in hosts with high specific star formation rates display the lowest intrinsic dispersion (0.08 ± 0.01 mag) in luminosity after correction for light-curve decline rate and host-galaxy mass (see also Rigault et al. 2013).

Reducing the Hubble diagram scatter even further is highly desirable, as it directly leads to tighter cosmological constraints. However, at optical wavelengths, reducing the scatter has proved difficult, despite many years of effort. Fortunately, observations in the near-infrared (NIR) offer a way forward. This is because extinction from dust is reduced in the NIR, and because SNe Ia in the NIR are intrinsically better standard candles (Elias et al. 1985; Meikle 2000). NIR observations may also avoid possible dimming by dust in the intergalactic medium, currently only poorly constrained with optical observations (Goobar et al. 2018). The potential of SNe Ia as distance indicators in the NIR has been clearly demonstrated by Krisciunas et al. (2004b), Wood-Vasey et al. (2008), Mandel et al. (2011), Barone-Nugent et al. (2012), and (Stanishev et al. 2018), and by the extensive observations of the first phase of the Carnegie Supernova Project (CSP-I; Folatelli et al. 2010; Kattner et al. 2012; Phillips 2012; Burns et al. 2014, 2018).

The CSP-I was an NSF-funded project initiated in 2004 September to establish a fundamental data set of optical and NIR light curves of SNe Ia in a well-defined and understood photometric system (Hamuy et al. 2006). The CSP-I optical imaging was obtained over 1000 nights with the Las Campanas Observatory (LCO) Henrietta Swope 1 m telescope in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey ugri filters and Johnson BV filters. The NIR imaging was obtained with the Swope telescope and the LCO 2.5 m du Pont telescope, mostly in the YJH bandpasses. Over the five-year duration of the project, optical light curves were obtained for 123 SNe Ia, 83 SNe II, and 34 SNe Ib/Ic/IIb, with NIR photometry having been obtained for ∼85% of these. In addition, over 250 SNe of all types (including 129 SNe Ia) were monitored via optical spectroscopy. We have found that the data set for the Type Ia events has allowed us to improve dust-extinction corrections (Burns et al. 2014, 2018) and to investigate systematic effects in absolute magnitudes possibly due to differences in either age or metallicity, or both. The CSP-I observations are also being used to gain a deeper understanding of the physics of SNe Ia (e.g., Höflich et al. 2010; Hoeflich et al. 2017; Gall et al. 2018).

The CSP-I SN Ia optical and NIR light curves were published in three data release papers (Contreras et al. 2010; Stritzinger et al. 2011b; Krisciunas et al. 2017), and most of the optical spectra have also been published (Folatelli et al. 2013). In a recent paper by Burns et al. (2018), we have presented a full analysis of the uBgVriYJH Hubble diagrams for the CSP-I sample using new intrinsic color relations as a function of the sBV color-stretch parameter (Burns et al. 2014). Excluding the u band, which is affected by Ca ii H & K absorption features (Burns et al. 2014), we found peculiar-velocity-corrected dispersions of 5%–7% in distance for the full sample of 120 SNe, and 4%–6% for the subset of events with sBV > 0.5 and (B − V) < 0.5 mag. However, the median sample redshift of the CSP-I SNe Ia is z = 0.024, where the root mean square (rms) effect due to peculiar velocities is ∼4% in distance, and therefore is comparable to the intrinsic dispersion that we are attempting to measure. This limitation can be overcome by extending observations further into the smooth Hubble flow as shown by Barone-Nugent et al. (2012), who found a dispersion of 0.08 mag (a distance error of 4%) for a sample of a dozen SNe Ia that had redshifts 0.03 < z < 0.09. A similar result was obtained more recently by Stanishev et al. (2018) for a sample of 16 SNe Ia in the redshift range z = 0.037–0.183. Improving NIR K-corrections offers an additional refinement in precision because poorly understood K-corrections directly impact the peak magnitudes of the SNe and inflate both statistical and systematic errors (Boldt et al. 2014).

In 2011, we began a second phase of the Carnegie Supernova Project (CSP-II) to obtain optical and NIR observations of SNe Ia in the smooth Hubble flow. Over a four-year period, light curves were obtained for 214 SNe Ia at redshifts 0.004 < z < 0.137. NIR spectra were also obtained for 157 SNe Ia. This unique data set should provide an essential test of the ultimate precision of SNe Ia as distance indicators for determining the local value of the Hubble constant and constraining the nature of dark energy. The NIR spectra will also be a valuable resource for studying the physics and progenitors of SNe Ia (e.g., see Wheeler et al. 1998).

In this paper, details of the photometric portion of the CSP-II are presented. In Section 2, the CSP-II “Cosmology” and “Physics” SNe Ia subsamples are described in more detail, along with a third homogenous subsample discovered by the La Silla-QUEST (LSQ) supernova survey. Next, in Section 3, the observing strategy is presented. This is followed in Sections 4 and 5 with details of the photometric reductions. In Section 6, sample optical and NIR light curves representative of the full data set are given, followed by a summary of conclusions in Section 7.

2. Supernova Subsamples

The CSP-II covered four observing seasons spanning 7–8 months each and centered on the Chilean summer, beginning in 2011 October and ending in 2015 May. A final total of 214 SNe Ia was observed with redshifts in the range 0.004 < z < 0.137. Table 1 provides basic information for each SN including coordinates, host-galaxy identifications, and heliocentric redshifts. Also listed are the discovery programs from which the SNe were drawn and the sources of the classification spectra that identified these events as SNe Ia. In cases of multiple discoveries of the same SN, the name of the survey that first posted the discovery is listed first, and the SN is identified by the name given by the first discoverer. The horizontal lines in the table separate the SNe into the main survey groups (ASASSN, CRTS, KISS, LSQ, etc.).

Table 1.  CSP-II SNe Ia

SN Name R.A. (2000) Decl. (2000) Host Galaxy zhelioa Discoveryb Classificationb Subsamplec
ASASSN-14ad 12:40:11.10 +18:03:32.80 KUG 1237+183 0.0264 ASASSN (14) P
ASASSN-14hp 21:30:31.42 −70:38:34.35 2MASX J21303015-7038489 0.0389 ASASSN CSP C
ASASSN-14 hr 01:50:41.27 −14:31:06.37 2MASX J01504127-1431032 0.0336 ASASSN CSP C
ASASSN-14hu 06:43:26.92 −69:38:14.70 ESO 058- G 012 0.0216d ASASSN CSP P
ASASSN-14jc 07:35:35.29 −62:46:12.64 2MASX J07353554-6246099 0.0113 ASASSN PESSTO P
ASASSN-14jg 23:33:13.90 −60:34:11.50 2MASX J23331223-6034201 0.0148 ASASSN LCOGT P
ASASSN-14jz 18:44:44.34 −52:48:05.48 GALEXASC J184443.33-524819.2 0.0158d ASASSN PESSTO  
ASASSN-14kd 22:53:24.95 +04:47:57.30 2MASX J22532475+0447583 0.0242d ASASSN PESSTO  
ASASSN-14kq 23:45:15.51 −29:47:01.14 2MASX J23451480-2947009 0.0336 ASASSN CSP C
ASASSN-14lo 11:51:53.11 +18:32:29.00 UGC 06837 0.0199 ASASSN LCOGT P
ASASSN-14lp 12:45:09.10 −00:27:32.49 NGC 4666 0.0051 ASASSN ASASSN P
ASASSN-14lq 22:57:19.41 −20:58:00.76 2MASX J22571481-2058014 0.0262 ASASSN (15) P
ASASSN-14lt 03:11:02.54 −13:06:38.76 IC 0299 0.0320 ASASSN Asiago C
ASASSN-14lw 01:06:49.17 −46:58:59.96 GALEXASC J010647.95-465904.1 0.0209d ASASSN CSP P
ASASSN-14me 01:26:40.08 −57:59:49.31 ESO 113- G 047 0.0178d ASASSN ASASSN P
ASASSN-14mf 00:04:54.46 −32:26:14.63 GALEXASC J000454.54-322615.3 0.0311 ASASSN ASASSN C
ASASSN-14mw 01:41:25.16 −65:37:01.26 AM 0139-655 NED02 0.0274 ASASSN,OGLE ASASSN C,P
ASASSN-14my 11:38:29.98 −08:58:35.79 NGC 3774 0.0205 ASASSN,PS1 CSP P
ASASSN-15aj 10:52:53.26 −32:55:34.86 NGC 3449 0.0109 ASASSN CSP P
ASASSN-15al 04:57:49.63 −21:35:34.11 GALEXASC J045749.46-213526.3 0.0338d ASASSN,Gaia PESSTO C
ASASSN-15as 09:39:16.55 +06:25:48.53 SDSS J093916.69+062551.1 0.0286d ASASSN CSP C,P
ASASSN-15ba 14:04:55.09 +08:55:14.53 SDSS J140455.12+085514.0 0.0231 ASASSN,CRTS CfA P
ASASSN-15be 02:52:46.39 −34:18:52.52 GALEXASC J025245.83-341850.6 0.0219 ASASSN ASASSN P
ASASSN-15bm 15:05:51.58 −05:37:37.05 LCRS B150313.2-052600 0.0208d ASASSN ASASSN P
ASASSN-15cb 12:39:50.23 +03:47:49.77 VCC 1810 0.0400 ASASSN,PS1 PESSTO C
ASASSN-15 cd 09 59 14.75 +12 59 20.53 CGCG 064-017 0.0344 ASASSN PESSTO C
ASASSN-15 da 05:23:51.88 −24:42:08.38 2MASX J05235106-2442201 0.055e ASASSN ASASSN C
ASASSN-15db 15:46:58.69 +17:53:02.55 NGC 5996 0.0110 ASASSN (16)  
ASASSN-15dd 15:43:59.07 +19:12:40.74 CGCG 107-031 0.0244 ASASSN ASASSN  
ASASSN-15eb 08:06:07.40 −22:33:48.86 ESO 561- G 012 0.0165 ASASSN SMT P
ASASSN-15fr 09:20:20.44 −07:38:26.78 2MASX J09202045-0738229 0.0334 ASASSN Asiago C,P
ASASSN-15ga 12:59:27.29 +14:10:15.79 NGC 4866 0.0066 ASASSN (17) P
ASASSN-15go 06:11:30.50 −16:29:03.52 2MASX J06113048-1629085 0.0189 ASASSN SMT P
ASASSN-15gr 06:45:20.58 −34:53:38.11 ESO 366- G 015 0.0243d ASASSN PESSTO P
ASASSN-15hf 10:29:31.00 −35:15:35.60 ESO 375- G 041 0.0062 ASASSN PESSTO P
ASASSN-15hg 09:53:48.62 +09:11:37.78 CGCG 063-098 0.0298 ASASSN (18) C
ASASSN-15hx 13:43:16.69 −31:33:21.55 GALEXASC J134316.80-313318.2 0.0083d ASASSN PESSTO P
PSN J13471211-2422171 13:47:12.11 −24:22:17.10 ESO 509- G 108 0.0199 BOSS,ASASSN CSP P
SN2014ao 08:34:33.32 −02:32:36.10 NGC 2615 0.0141 LOSS,ASASSN Asiago P
SN2014I 05:42:19.80 −25:32:39.90 ESO 487-G36 0.0300 BOSS,ASASSN SMT C,P
SN2014eg 02:45:09.27 −55:44:16.90 ESO 154- G 010 0.0186 (1),ASASSN PESSTO P
CSS111231:145323+025743 (SN2011jt) 14:53:23.01 +02:57:43.10 CGCG 048-051 0.0278 CRTS LOSS P
CSS120224:145405+220541 (SN2012aq) 14:54:05.13 +22:05:40.60 SDSS J145405.13+220540.7 0.052e CRTS Asiago C
CSS120301:162036-102738 (SN2012ar) 16:20:36.02 −10:27:38.30 2MASX J16203650-1028061 0.0283 CRTS Asiago C,P
CSS120325:123816-150632 12:38:16.19 −15:06:32.15 Anonymous 0.0972d CRTS CRTS C
CSS121114:090202+101800 09:02:02.34 +10:18:00.10 SDSS J090202.18+101759.7 0.0371 CRTS (19) C
CSS130215:033841+101827 (SN2013ad) 03:38:41.04 +10:18:27.22 Anonymous 0.0363d CRTS CSP C
CSS130303:105206-133424 10:52:06.06 −13:34:24.70 GALEXASC J105206.27-133420.2 0.0789d CRTS PESSTO C
CSS130315:115252-185920 (SN2013as) 11:52:52.34 −18:59:19.90 Anonymous 0.0685d CRTS PESSTO C
CSS131031:095508+064831 09:55:08.22 +06:48:31.40 SDSS J095510.00+064830.3 0.0777 CRTS PESSTO C
CSS140126:120307-010132 12:03:06.88 −01:01:31.70 SDSS J120306.76-010132.4 0.0772d CRTS PESSTO C
CSS140218:095739+123318 09:57:39.11 +12:33:17.70 SDSS J095738.31+123308.5 0.0773d CRTS PESSTO C
CSS140914:010107-101840 01:01:07.04 −10:18:39.90 Anonymous 0.03e CRTS PESSTO C
CSS140925:162946+083831 (SN2014dl) 16:29:46.09 +08:38:30.60 UGC 10414 0.0330 CRTS CSP C
CSS150214:140955+173155 (SN2015bo) 14:09:55.13 +17:31:55.60 NGC 5490 0.0162 CRTS PESSTO P
SNhunt161 (SN2012hl) 00:50:17.76 +24:31:52.20 CSS J005017.69+243154.4 0.0332d CRTS (20)  
SNhunt177 (SN2013az) 05:39:52.13 −40:30:28.10 ESO 306-016 0.0373 CRTS PESSTO C
SNhunt178 (SN2013bc) 13:10:21.31 −07:10:24.10 IC 4209 0.0225 CRTS CSP P
SNhunt188 (SN2013bz) 13:26:51.32 −10:01:32.20 2MASX J13265081-1001263 0.0192 CRTS (21) P
SNhunt229 (SN2014D) 12:10:36.76 +18:49:35.40 UGC 07170 0.0082 CRTS,PS1 CSP P
SNhunt281 (SN2015bp) 15:05:30.07 +01:38:02.40 NGC 5839 0.0041 CRTS (22) P
SSS111226:125715-172401 (SN2011jn) 12:57:14.79 −17:24:00.50 2MASX J12571157-1724344 0.0475 CRTS (23) C
MASTER OT J093953.18+165516.4 09:39:53.18 +16:55:16.40 CGCG 092-024 0.0478 MASTER,CRTS PESSTO C
SN2014du 02:26:23.31 +27:39:34.80 UGC 01899 0.0325 ISSP,CRTS Asiago C,P
KISS13j (SN2013Y) 12:09:39.70 +16:12:14.30 SDSS J120939.62+161212.2 0.0766 KISS KISS C
KISS13l (SN2013al) 11:14:54.07 +29:35:06.00 SDSS J111454.06+293508.7 0.1321 KISS (24) C
KISS13v (SN2013ba) 13:52:56.63 +21:56:21.70 SDSS J135256.58+215621.1 0.080e KISS KISS C
KISS15m 12:06:00.83 +20:36:18.40 NGC 4098 0.0243 KISS,CRTS CSP  
SN2015M 13:00:32.33 +27:58:41.00 GALEXMSC J130032.33+275842.3 ? 0.0231g KISS,CRTS,PS1 CSP P
LSQ11bk 04:20:44.25 −08:35:55.75 Anonymous 0.0403d LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ11ot 05:15:48.34 +06:46:39.36 CGCG 421-013 0.0273 LSQ (25) C,P,L
LSQ11pn (SN2011jq) 05:16:41.54 +06:29:29.40 2MASX J05164149+0629376 0.0327 LSQ SNF C,P,L
LSQ12ca 05:31:03.62 −19:47:59.28 2MASX J05310364-1948063 0.0994d LSQ LCOGT L
LSQ12agq 10:17:41.67 −07:24:54.45 GALEXASC J101741.80-072452.2 0.0642d LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ12aor 10:55:17.64 −14:18:01.38 GALEXASC J105517.85-141757.2 0.0934d LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ12bld 13:42:44.03 +08:05:33.74 SDSS J134244.72+080531.7 0.0837 LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ12blp 13:36:05.59 −11:37:16.87 LCRS B133326.3-112212 0.0743 LSQ,CRTS CSP C,L
LSQ12btn 09:21:30.47 −09:41:29.86 2MASX J09213114-0941331 0.0542 LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ12cda 13:50:02.32 +09:37:47.10 SDSS J135002.40+093755.1 0.1376 LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ12cdl 12:53:39.96 −18:30:26.16 GALEXASC J125339.85-183025.6 0.1081d LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ12fuk 04:58:15.88 −16:17:58.03 GALEXASC J045815.88-161800.7 0.0206d LSQ,CRTS SNF P,L
LSQ12fvl 05:00:50.04 −38:39:11.51 MCG -06-12-002 0.0560 LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ12fxd 05:22:17.02 −25:35:47.01 ESO 487- G 004 0.0312 LSQ,CRTS PESSTO C,P,L
LSQ12gdj 23:54:43.32 −25:40:34.09 ESO 472- G 007 0.0303 LSQ SNF C,P,L
LSQ12gef 01:40:33.70 +18:30:36.38 2MASX J01403375+1830406 0.0642d LSQ SNF L
LSQ12gln 05:22:59.41 −33:27:51.32 GALEXASC J052259.58-332755.3 0.1021d LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ12gpw 03:12:58.24 −11:42:40.13 2MASX J03125885-1142402 0.0506d LSQ PESSTO L
LSQ12gxj 02:52:57.38 +01:36:24.25 2MASX J02525699+0136231 0.0355f LSQ PESSTO L
LSQ12gyc 02:45:50.07 −17:55:45.74 Anonymous 0.0932f LSQ PESSTO L
LSQ12gzm 02:40:43.61 −34:44:25.87 GALEXASC J024043.58-344425.0 0.1001d LSQ PESSTO L
LSQ12hjm 03:10:28.72 −16:29:37.08 2MASX J03102844-1629333 0.0714d LSQ SNF L
LSQ12hno 03:42:43.25 −02:40:09.76 GALEXASC J034243.43-024007.7 0.0473d LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ12hnr 10:43:14.77 −08:46:40.89 Anonymous 0.135f LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ12hvj 11:07:38.62 −29:42:40.96 GALEXASC J110738.65-294235.5 0.0713d LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ12hxx 03:19:44.23 −27:00:25.68 2MASX J03194423-2700201 0.0694 LSQ SNF C,L
LSQ12hzj 09:59:12.43 −09:00:08.25 2MASX J09591230-0900095 0.0334d LSQ SNF C,P,L
LSQ12hzs 04:01:53.21 −26:39:50.15 2MASXi J0401529-263947 0.0721 LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ13lq 13:44:10.81 +03:03:43.42 SDSS J134410.77+030345.3 0.0757d LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ13pf 13:48:14.35 −11:38:38.58 LCRS B134534.3-112338 0.0861d LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ13ry 10:32:48.00 +04:11:51.75 SDSS J103247.83+041145.5 0.0299 LSQ CSP C,P,L
LSQ13vy 16:06:55.85 +03:00:15.23 2MASX J16065563+0300046 0.0418d LSQ LCOGT C,L
LSQ13abo 14:59:21.20 −17:09:09.34 2MASX J14592124-1709138 0.0675 LSQ SNF C,L
LSQ13aiz (SN2013cs) 13:15:14.81 −17:57:55.65 ESO 576- G 017 0.0092 LSQ,CRTS (26) P,L
LSQ13cwp 04:03:50.65 −02:39:17.98 2MASX J04035024-0239275 0.0666 LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ13dby 03:26:42.84 −34:38:05.49 Anonymous 0.100e LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ13dcy 04:55:16.42 −20:00:05.40 LCSB S0801P 0.0801d LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ13dhj 02:12:34.48 −37:20:22.81 GALEXMSC J021234.60-372019.1 0.0935d LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ13dkp 03:10:09.97 −36:37:44.91 2MASX J03101094-3638017 0.0690 LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ13dpm 10:29:08.32 −17:06:50.19 GALEXASC J102908.61-170654.2 0.0509d LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ13dqh 04:22:05.90 −02:53:24.24 Anonymous 0.1038d LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ13dsm 03:33:12.83 −26:12:24.02 APMUKS(BJ) B033105.19-262232.9 0.0424d LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ14q 08:53:57.58 +17:19:38.19 SDSS J085357.19+171942.6 0.0667 LSQ,PS1 PESSTO C,L
LSQ14ba 11:01:23.01 −15:37:10.29 GALEXASC J110123.17-153706.2 0.0776d LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ14ie 12:55:33.46 −32:56:40.37 Anonymous 0.0896d LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ14ip 09:44:20.22 +04:35:52.56 2MASX J09442084+0435319 0.0613 LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ14jp 12:57:21.51 −15:47:33.42 2MASX J12572166-1547411 0.0454 LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ14mc 09:02:13.45 +17:03:37.01 SDSS J090213.35+170335.4 0.0567 LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ14wp 10:14:05.72 +06:40:30.54 SDSS J101405.83+064032.5 0.0695d LSQ,CRTS PESSTO C,L
LSQ14xi 12:30:41.17 −13:46:21.91 2MASX J12304088-1346236 0.0508 LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ14act 15:59:44.65 −10:26:40.80 2MASX J15594429-1026396 0.0591 LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ14age 13:24:08.62 −13:26:26.00 GALEXASC J132408.58-132629.0 0.0806d LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ14ahc 13:43:48.25 −32:54:35.12 2MASX J13434760-3254381 0.0509d LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ14ahm 11:41:22.44 −12:23:57.69 GALEXASC J114122.65-122354.9 0.0498d LSQ,CRTS PESSTO C,L
LSQ14ajn (SN2014ah) 11:55:30.88 +11:55:25.88 CGCG 068-091 0.0210 LSQ,PS1 Asiago P,L
LSQ14asu 11:11:35.95 −21:27:59.63 2MASX J11113635-2127597 0.0684 LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ14auy 14:28:11.30 −04:03:17.50 2MASX J14281171-0403150 0.0825 LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ14azy 11:12:34.73 +12:04:24.83 2MASX J11123493+1204206 0.0458 LSQ (27) L
LSQ14bbv 19:59:33.12 −56:59:27.84 2MASS J19593264-5659334 0.0588d LSQ CSP L
LSQ14bjj 14:20:49.08 −05:15:02.25 APMUKS(BJ) B141811.91-050120.8 0.0812d LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ14fms 00:14:59.82 −51:12:39.54 2MASX J00145929-5112380 0.078d LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ14foj 00:26:34.67 −32:48:33.09 GALEXASC J002634.59-324825.5 0.0461 LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ14fom 21:59:49.73 −30:16:15.56 2MASX J21594968-3016187 0.0563 LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ14gfb 05:10:05.76 −36:18:43.57 2MASX J05100559-3618388 0.0527 LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ14gfn 03:28:32.16 −04:12:14.22 2MASX J03283205-0412113 0.1217d LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ14ghv 03:23:44.15 −31:35:03.17 2MASX J03234449-3135101 0.0667 LSQ LCOGT C,L
LSQ14gov 04:06:01.33 −16:01:41.49 GALEXMSC J040601.67-160139.7 0.0896d LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ15bv 10:59:47.29 −16:49:10.63 2MASX J10594717-1649070 0.0689 LSQ (28) C,L
LSQ15aae 16:30:15.70 +05:55:58.73 2MASX J16301506+0555514 0.0516d LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ15agh 10:52:54.78 +23:27:41.65 2MASX J10525434+2335518 0.0603 LSQ CSP C,L
LSQ15aja 17:03:08.92 +12:27:41.65 SDSS J170308.90+122741.5 0.0700d LSQ PESSTO C,L
LSQ15alq 13:09:18.56 −25:52:20.24 ESO 508- G 016 0.0471 LSQ,PS1 CSP C,L
MASTER OT J030559.89+043238.2 03:05:59.89 +04:32:38.20 SDSS J030559.63+043246.0 0.0282d MASTER CfA P
OGLE-2012-SN-040 06:07:01.59 −69:21:17.10 2MASX J06070178-6921180 0.0147 OGLE PESSTO  
OGLE-2013-SN-015 02:02:21.56 −65:44:08.66 2MASX J02022241-6544090 0.0890d OGLE CSP C
OGLE-2013-SN-109 01:46:09.34 −67:28:00.10 2MASX J01460987-6727579 0.0868d OGLE PESSTO C
OGLE-2013-SN-118 05:14:47.50 −66:50:29.10 2MASX J05144615-6650292 0.0750d OGLE PESSTO C
OGLE-2013-SN-123 05:58:30.38 −63:33:38.30 2MASX J05583036-6333386 0.0614d OGLE PESSTO C
OGLE-2013-SN-126 04:19:47.21 −63:43:22.04 Anonymous 0.0597d OGLE PESSTO C
OGLE-2013-SN-148 06:38:06.97 −75:43:37.21 2MASX J06380745-7543288 0.0404d OGLE PESSTO C
OGLE-2014-SN-019 06:13:48.04 −67:55:15.00 2MASX J06134795-6755146 0.0359 OGLE PESSTO C
OGLE-2014-SN-021 05:48:23.49 −66:47:29.70 Anonymous 0.0422d OGLE SMT C
OGLE-2014-SN-107 00:42:28.75 −64:45:51.00 APMUKS(BJ) B004021.02-650219.5 0.0664d OGLE PESSTO C
OGLE-2014-SN-141 05:37:18.64 −75:43:17.00 2MASX J05371898-7543157 0.0625d OGLE PESSTO C
SN 2015F 07:36:15.76 −69:30:23.00 NGC 2442 0.0049 (2),OGLE PESSTO P
PS1-13eao 03:29:56.35 −28:46:17.70 ESO 418- G 007 0.0378 PS1 PESSTO C
PS1-14ra 14:41:28.44 +09:25:58.70 IC 1044 0.0281 PS1 PESSTO C,P
PS1-14rx 12:46:53.35 +14:47:50.10 SDSS J124653.32+144748.4 0.0666 PS1 PESSTO C
PS1-14xw 16:52:57.93 +02:23:36.50 NGC 6240 0.0245 PS1 PESSTO  
PS15sv 16:13:11.74 +01:35:31.10 GALEXASC J161311.68+013532.2 0.0333d PS1 PESSTO C,P
SN2013ct 01:12:54.92 +00:58:45.70 NGC 428 0.0038 BOSS,PS1 CSP P
SN2013gy 03:42:16.88 −04:43:18.48 NGC 1418 0.0140 LOSS,PS1,CRTS Asiago P
PTF11pbp (SN2011hb) 23:27:55.52 +08:46:45.00 NGC 7674 0.0289 PTF,CRTS PTF C,P
PTF11ppn 21:35:21.93 +26:56:04.70 2MASX J21352164+2656051 0.0673d PTF PTF C
PTF11pra (SN2011hk) 02:18:45.81 −06:38:31.00 NGC 881 0.0176 PTF PTF  
PTF11qnr (SN2011im) 22:44:25.45 −00:10:02.00 NGC 7364 0.0162 PTF PTF P
iPTF13ez 12:09:51.30 +19:47:15.70 SDSS J120951.25+194716.5 0.0436 iPTF iPTF C
iPTF13anh 13:06:50.45 +15:34:32.36 SDSS J130650.44+153432.7 0.0614d iPTF,CRTS iPTF C
iPTF13duj 21:13:44.78 +13:34:33.10 NGC 7042 0.0170 iPTF LCOGT P
iPTF13dwl 21:16:49.05 +12:00:50.80 GALEXASC J211648.97+120052.8 0.0875d iPTF iPTF C
iPTF13dym 23:24:30.19 +14:39:04.00 SDSS J232430.20+143903.6 0.0422 iPTF iPTF C
iPTF13ebh 02:21:59.98 +33:16:13.70 NGC 0890 0.0133 iPTF CSP P
iPTF13efe 08:43:39.30 +16:10:37.30 SDSS J084339.26+161037.5 0.0751d iPTF,CRTS iPTF C
iPTF14fpg (SN2014dk) 00:28:12.00 +07:09:43.50 SDSS J002812.09+070940.0 0.034e iPTF,PS1,CRTS Asiago C,P
iPTF14yw (SN2014aa) 11:45:03.58 +19:58:25.40 NGC 3861 0.0170 iPTF Asiago P
iPTF14w 12:03:31.29 +02:02:34.00 UGC 07034 0.0189 iPTF Asiago P
iPTF14uo 13:18:57.69 +09:42:40.30 GALEXASC J131857.37+094244.0 0.0913d iPTF iPTF C
iPTF14yy 12:26:09.17 +09:58:44.20 SDSS J122608.78+095847.1 0.0431 iPTF iPTF C
iPTF14aje 15:25:12.07 −01:48:51.50 SDSS J152512.43-014840.1 0.0276 iPTF iPTF C
iPTF14gnl 00:23:48.33 −03:51:27.90 LCSB S0066P 0.0537 iPTF iPTF C
ROTSE3 J123935.1+163512 (SN2012G) 12:39:35.10 +16:35:11.90 IC 0803 NED01 0.0258d ROTSE-III,MASTER (29) P
SMT J03253351-5344190 03:25:33.51 −53:44:19.00 Anonymous 0.0592d SMT SMT C
SN 2011iv 03:38:51.34 −35:35:32.00 NGC 1404 0.0065 BOSS (30) P
SN2011iy 13:08:58.38 −15:31:04.00 NGC 4984 0.0043 (3) (31) P
SN2011jh 12:47:14.42 −10:03:47.30 NGC 4682 0.0078 (4) Asiago P
SN2012E 02:33:22.79 +09:35:05.60 NGC 975 0.0203 (5) Asiago P
SN2012U 02:06:04.33 −55:11:37.50 ESO 153- G 020 0.0197 BOSS (32) P
SN2012ah 23:25:59.63 −81:54:33.30 NGC 7637 0.0124 BOSS (33) P
SN2012bl 20:23:55.28 −48:21:17.30 ESO 234-019 0.0187 CHASE (34) P
SN2012bo 12:50:45.23 −14:16:08.50 NGC 4726 0.0254 (6) Asiago P
SN 2012fr 03:33:36.10 −36:07:34.00 NGC 1365 0.0055 TAROT SMT P
SN2012gm 23:17:37.03 +14:00:08.90 NGC 7580 0.0148 (7) Asiago P
SN2012hd 01:14:07.46 −32:39:07.70 IC 1657 0.0120 BOSS PESSTO P
SN2012hr 06:21:38.46 −59:42:50.60 ESO 121- G 026 0.0076 BOSS CSP P
SN 2012ht 10:53:22.75 +16:46:34.90 NGC 3447 0.0036 (8) (8) P
SN2012id 04:42:41.14 +18:34:59.70 2MASX J04424248+1835003 0.0157 (9) Asiago P
SN2012ij 11:40:15.84 +17:27:22.20 CGCG 097-050 0.0110 TNTS (35) P
SN2013E 10:00:05.52 −34:14:01.30 IC 2532 0.0094 BOSS CSP P
SN2013H 09:06:30.70 −75:49:01.50 ESO 036- G 019 0.0155 BOSS CSP P
SN2013M 13:59:56.68 −37:51:49.40 ESO 325- G 043 0.0350 BOSS (36) C,P
SN2013U 10:01:12.00 +00:19:42.30 CGCG 008-023 0.0345 (10) Asiago C,P
SN2013aa 14:32:33.88 −44:13:27.80 NGC 5643 0.0040 BOSS (37) P
SN2013aj 13:54:00.68 −07:55:43.80 NGC 5339 0.0091 (11) (11) P
SN2013ay 18:42:37.86 −64:56:13.50 IC 4745 0.0157 CHASE CSP P
SN2013cg 09:26:56.77 −24:46:59.60 NGC 2891 0.0080 CHASE (38) P
SN2013fy 21:37:27.12 −47:01:54.80 ESO 287- G 040 0.0309 BOSS PESSTO C,P
SN2013fz 04:23:46.44 −51:35:46.30 NGC 1578 0.0206 BOSS PESSTO P
SN2013gv 03:09:57.31 +19:12:49.20 IC 1890 0.0341 (12) Asiago C,P
SN2013hh 11:29:04.37 +17:14:09.50 UGC 06483 0.0130 TAROT SMT P
SN2013hn 13:48:59.17 −30:17:26.50 IC 4329 0.0151 (13) LCOGT P
SN2014Z 01:44:07.99 −61:07:07.40 ESO 114- G 004 0.0213 BOSS CSP P
SN2014at 21:46:14.82 −46:31:21.10 NGC7119 0.0322 BOSS PESSTO C,P
SN2014ba 22:55:01.97 −39:39:34.50 NGC 7410 0.0058 BOSS (39) P
SN2014bz 13:56:04.19 −43:35:09.90 2MASX J13560316-4334319 0.0225 TAROT SMT  
SN2014dn 04:17:54.27 −56:36:45.20 IC 2060 0.0222 BOSS CSP  

Notes.

aHeliocentric redshift are from the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) unless otherwise indicated. bASASSN (Shappee et al. 2014; Holoien et al. 2017); Asiago (Tomasella et al. 2014); BOSS (http://bosssupernova.com/); CHASE (Pignata et al. 2009); CfA (https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/supernova//RecentSN.html); CRTS (Djorgovski et al. 2011); CSP (this paper); iPTF (Kulkarni 2013); ISSP (http://italiansupernovae.org/en/project/description.html); Gaia (Altavilla et al. 2012); KISS (Morokuma et al. 2014); LCOGT (Howell et al. 2014); LOSS (Filippenko et al. 2001); LSQ (Baltay et al. 2013); MASTER (Gorbovskoy et al. 2013); OGLE (Wyrzykowski et al. 2014); PESSTO (Smartt et al. 2015); PS1 (Kaiser et al. 2010; Scolnic et al. 2018); PTF (Law et al. 2009); ROTSE-III (Akerlof et al. 2003); SMT (Scalzo et al. 2017); SNF (Wood-Vasey et al. 2004); TAROT (Klotz et al. 2008); TNTS (Yao et al. 2015). cC = “Cosmology”; P = “Physics”; L = “LSQ”. dRedshift measured by CSP-II. eApproximate redshift derived from SN spectrum. fPeter Nugent (private communication). gRedshift of Coma Cluster.

References. (1) Kangas et al. (2014); (2) Monard et al. (2015); (3) Itagaki et al. (2011); (4) Nakano et al. (2011); (5) Cox et al. (2012); (6) Itagaki et al. (2012); (7) Rich et al. (2012); (8) Nishiyama et al. (2012); (9) Yusa et al. (2012); (10) Gagliano et al. (2013);(11) Cortini et al. (2013); (12) Kiyota et al. (2013); (13) Kot et al. (2013); (14) Zhang et al. (2014) (15) Zhang & Wang (2014b); (16) Zhang & Wang (2015); (17) Piascik & Steele (2015); (18) Falco et al. (2015); (19) Graham et al. (2012); (20) Howerton et al. (2012); (21) Howerton et al. (2013); (22) Jha et al. (2015); (23) Foley & Fong (2011); (24) Tanaka et al. (2013); (25) Hadjiyska et al. (2011); (26) Walker et al. (2013); (27) Galbany et al. (2014); (28) Hodgkin et al. (2015); (29) Odewahn (2012); (30) Stritzinger et al. (2011a); Chen et al. (2011b); (31) Chen et al. (2011a); Yamanaka et al. (2011); (32) Anderson et al. (2012); (33) Dennefeld et al. (2012); (34) Prieto (2012); (35) Wang et al. (2013); (36) Parker et al. (2013a); (37) Parker et al. (2013b); (38) Pignata et al. (2013); (39) Milisavljevic et al. (2014).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2 3 4 5 6

We divide the full sample of 214 SNe Ia into three subsamples, as illustrated in Figure 1, and described in the remainder of this section.

Figure 1. Refer to the following caption and surrounding text.

Figure 1. Venn diagram illustrating the subsamples into which the 214 SNe Ia observed by the CSP-II are divided. Note the significant overlap between the Cosmology, Physics, and LSQ subsamples.

Standard image High-resolution image

2.1. Cosmology Subsample

The primary goal of the CSP-II was to obtain optical and NIR light curves of a sample of at least 100 SNe Ia located in the smooth Hubble flow out to a redshift of z ∼ 0.1. These SNe, which comprise the CSP-II “Cosmology” subsample, were selected for photometric follow-up via the following criteria:

  • Discovered before maximum light at optical wavelengths. One of the few disadvantages of observing SNe Ia in the NIR is that maximum brightness occurs 3–5 days before B maximum. Hence, to ensure that NIR photometry was obtained within a few days of NIR maximum, SNe discovered before optical maximum light were given highest priority for follow-up observations.
  • Spectroscopically confirmed to be a normal SNe Ia.27 Surveys such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II Supernova Survey, the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS), and the Supernova Cosmology Project (SCP) have shown that combining magnitude and color information allows an “educated” guess to be made as to the SN type (Sako et al. 2011; Bazin et al. 2011; Suzuki et al. 2012). Nevertheless, spectroscopy is vital for confirmation purposes and determining the approximate light-curve phase, as well as for eventual sub-typing.
  • Discovered preferably in an untargeted search. A weakness of the CSP-I SNe Ia sample is that nearly 90% of the events were found in targeted searches that are strongly biased toward luminous host galaxies (e.g., Kelly et al. 2010). Hence, for the CSP-II, preference was given to SNe Ia discovered in untargeted searches to ensure that the sample was as complete and unbiased as possible concerning host-galaxy type, luminosity, and metallicity.
  • Host-galaxy redshift in the range 0.03 ≲ z ≲ 0.10. Many of the SNe Ia in the CSP-II Cosmology subsample appeared in host galaxies with cataloged redshifts. However, approximately one-third of the events were discovered in distant or low-luminosity hosts whose redshifts were unknown. In these cases, we relied on the redshift estimated from the classification spectrum with software tools such as SNID (Blondin & Tonry 2007), SUPERFIT (Howell et al. 2005), and GELATO (Harutyunyan et al. 2008) in deciding whether to obtain follow-up photometry. We have since obtained redshifts for nearly all of these host galaxies (see Section 3.6).

The 125 SNe Ia comprising the Cosmology subsample cover a redshift range of 0.027 < z < 0.137, with a median redshift of z = 0.056. Table 2 summarizes the various supernova surveys from which these SNe were drawn. Fully 96% came from untargeted searches, with nearly half (48%) of the subsample having been discovered by the La Silla-QUEST Low Redshift Supernova Survey (Baltay et al. 2013). The individual SNe belonging to the Cosmology subsample are identified in the final column of Table 1 by the letter “C”.

Table 2.  CSP-II Cosmology Subsample Sources

Source Untargeted? # of SNe Percentage
LSQa Yes 60 48.0%
CRTSb Yes 15 12.0%
ASASSNc Yes 14 11.2%
PTF/iPTFd Yes 12 9.6%
OGLEe Yes 10 8.0%
PS1f Yes 4 3.2%
KISSg Yes 3 2.4%
SMTh Yes 1 0.8%
MASTERi Yes 1 0.8%
   
    120 96.0%
BOSSj No 3 2.4%
Otherl No 2 1.6%
   
    5 4.0%

Notes.

aLa Silla-Quest Low Redshift Survey (Baltay et al. 2013). bCatalina Real Time Transit Survey (Djorgovski et al. 2011). cAll-Sky Automated Survey for SuperNovae (Shappee et al. 2014; Holoien et al. 2017). dPalomar Transient Factory (Law et al. 2009)/Intermediate Palomar Transient Factory (Kulkarni 2013). eOGLE-IV Real-Time Transient Search (Wyrzykowski et al. 2014). fPan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey (Kaiser et al. 2010; Scolnic et al. 2018). gKiso Supernova Survey (Morokuma et al. 2014). hSkyMapper Transient Survey (Scalzo et al. 2017). iMobile Astronomy System of TElescope Robots (Gorbovskoy et al. 2013). jBackyard Observatory Supernova Search http://bosssupernova.com/. kItalian Supernovae Search Project http://italiansupernovae.org/en/project/description.html. lGagliano et al. (2013); Kiyota et al. (2013).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

The top panel of Figure 2 shows a histogram of the heliocentric redshifts of the Cosmology subsample. The arrow indicates the median redshift of the CSP-I sample. In Figure 3, histograms of the epoch with respect to the date of B maximum of the first imaging observations in the optical and the NIR for the Cosmology subsample are displayed. As may be seen, optical imaging was obtained for half of the subsample at −4 days or earlier, and −2 days or earlier in the NIR.

Figure 2. Refer to the following caption and surrounding text.

Figure 2. Top: histogram of heliocentric redshifts of the 125 SNe Ia comprising the Cosmology subsample. Bottom: the 90 SNe Ia in the Physics subsample. In the top panel, the median redshift of the CSP-I sample is indicated by an arrow. The middle panel displays a histogram of the redshifts of the LSQ subsample.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 3. Refer to the following caption and surrounding text.

Figure 3. Top: histogram of the epoch with respect to the date of B maximum of the first optical imaging observations of the 125 SNe Ia comprising the Cosmology subsample. Bottom: similar histogram for the first NIR imaging observations. The arrows in each panel indicate the medians of the histograms corresponding to −4 days for the first optical photometry and −2 days for the first NIR observation.

Standard image High-resolution image

2.2. Physics Subsample

To realize the full potential of SNe Ia as distance indicators at NIR wavelengths, we must determine accurate K-corrections, which account for the effect of cosmological expansion upon the measured magnitudes (Oke & Sandage 1968). Poorly understood K-corrections directly impact the peak magnitudes of the SNe and inflate both statistical and systematic errors. Prior to the CSP-II, NIR spectra had been published for only 33 SNe Ia, with the total number of useful spectra amounting to 75. Boldt et al. (2014) used this sample to study the errors inherent in NIR K-corrections. Their main finding was that uncertainties due to the diversity of spectral features from object to object are the dominant source of error at maximum light. Boldt et al. demonstrated that, with the small number of spectra in hand, K-correction uncertainties in the Y, J, and H bands amounted to 0.04, 0.06, and 0.10 mag for a SN Ia at z = 0.08. For a sample of 59 spectra of 10 SNe Ia—35 spectra of which overlapped with the Boldt et al. sample—Stanishev et al. (2018) recently found somewhat smaller dispersions of 0.03 and 0.04 mag in the J and H K-corrections at z = 0.08. Much of the diversity in the spectral features is known to correlate with the light-curve decline rate (Hsiao 2009), but to quantify this requires a much larger NIR spectral sample.

To attack the NIR K-correction problem, the CSP-II, in conjunction with the Harvard Center for Astrophysics Supernova Group, initiated in 2012 a program of NIR spectroscopic observations of a large “Physics” subsample28 of nearby SNe Ia at z ≤ 0.04. This collaboration is described in detail in an accompanying paper (Hsiao et al. 2018). In order to quantify the light-curve properties of this subsample, it was necessary to obtain optical imaging with a cadence and signal-to-noise ratio comparable to (or better than) that obtained for the Cosmology subsample. Although imaging in the NIR was not a requirement for the Physics subsample, it was nonetheless obtained for 89% of the SNe. The same basic criteria used for the Cosmology subsample were also applied in selecting the SNe to be included in the Physics subsample, although at these lower redshifts, a higher fraction (39%) of the events were discovered in targeted searches. The Physics subsample also includes several fast-declining, SN 1991bg-like (Filippenko et al. 1992a; Leibundgut et al. 1993; Ruiz-Lapuente et al. 1993) events that, because of their low luminosities, are not well represented in the Cosmology subsample.

A total of 90 SNe Ia with a median redshift of z = 0.021 comprise the Physics subsample. Table 3 provides information on the supernova surveys from which these SNe were drawn, and Table 1 lists the individual SNe (identified by the letter “P” in the final column). Their distribution as a function of redshift is plotted in the bottom panel of Figure 2. Note that there is some overlap between the Physics and Cosmology subsamples, with 21 of the SNe (23%) in the Physics subsample also forming part of the Cosmology subsample.

Table 3.  CSP-II Physics Subsample Sources

Source Untargeted? # of SNe Percentage
ASASSNa Yes 27 30.0%
LSQb Yes 9 10.0%
CRTSc Yes 8 8.9%
PTF/iPTFd Yes 7 7.8%
PS1e Yes 4 4.4%
KISSf Yes 1 1.1%
MASTERg Yes 1 1.1%
OGLEh Yes 1 1.1%
ROTSE-IIIi Yes 1 1.1%
   
    59 65.6%
BOSSj No 14 15.6%
CHASEk No 3 3.3%
TAROTl No 2 2.2%
TNTSm No 1 1.1%
Othern No 11 12.2%
   
    31 34.4%

Notes.

aAll-Sky Automated Survey for SuperNovae (Shappee et al. 2014; Holoien et al. 2017). bLa Silla-Quest Low Redshift Survey (Baltay et al. 2013). cCatalina Real Time Transit Survey (Djorgovski et al. 2011). dPalomar Transient Factory (Law et al. 2009)/Intermediate Palomar Transient Factory (Kulkarni 2013). ePan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey (Kaiser et al. 2010; Scolnic et al. 2018). fKiso Supernova Survey (Morokuma et al. 2014). gMobile Astronomy System of TElescope Robots (Gorbovskoy et al. 2013). hOGLE-IV Real-Time Transient Search (Wyrzykowski et al. 2014). iRobotic Optical Transient Search Experiment III (Akerlof et al. 2003). jBackyard Observatory Supernova Search http://bosssupernova.com/. kCHilean Automatic Supernova sEarch (Pignata et al. 2009). lTélescopes à Action Rapide pour les Objets Transitoires (Klotz et al. 2008). mTHU-NAOC Transient Survey (Zhang et al. 2015). nItagaki et al. (2011); Nakano et al. (2011); Cox et al. (2012); Itagaki et al. (2012); Rich et al. (2012); Nishiyama et al. (2012); Yusa et al. (2012); Gagliano et al. (2013); Cortini et al. (2013); Kiyota et al. (2013); Kot et al. (2013).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

2.3. La Silla-QUEST Subsample

The La Silla-QUEST supernova survey was fundamental to the success of the CSP-II, contributing nearly half of the SNe Ia making up the Cosmology subsample. The LSQ subsample is particularly important because it was an untargeted search with homogeneous selection criteria. The recent dark energy analysis of the Pantheon sample of SNe Ia by Scolnic et al. (2018) found that systematic errors are still a serious problem, particularly in modeling the low-redshift sample because of the uncertainty of whether it is volume or magnitude limited. Calibration errors, which in the Pantheon sample are twice as large for the low-redshift events compared to the high-redshift SNe, also continue to be a significant additional source of systematic error. The LSQ subsample observed by the CSP-II addresses both of these issues.

The CSP-II obtained light curves of a total of 72 SNe Ia discovered by the LSQ survey, spanning a redshift range of 0.009 ≤ z ≤ 0.137. Preliminary photometry of 31 of these SNe was published by Walker et al. (2015). The LSQ subsample is identified in Table 1 by the letter “L” in the last column. Their redshift distribution is plotted in the middle panel of Figure 2. Note that 83% of the LSQ events are also members of the Cosmology subsample, and 13% overlap with the Physics subsample. NIR photometry was obtained for 85% of the LSQ subsample.

2.4. Other SNe Ia

Table 1 also includes 11 SNe Ia for which photometric observations were obtained, but which do not fit into any of the three aforementioned subsamples. These objects are identified by a blank entry in the “Subsample” column of the table. All have redshifts too small (z ≤ 0.026) to be included in the Cosmology subsample, and as NIR spectroscopy was not obtained they do not qualify for the Physics subsample. However, the light curves for these SNe are still of value, and so we include them in the full sample of CSP-II SNe Ia.

2.5. Other Types of SNe

The emphasis of the CSP-II was on observing the light curves and spectra of normal SNe Ia. Nevertheless, data were obtained for other types, including peculiar SNe Ia (five SN 2002cx-like events and four possible “super-Chandrasekhar” SNe), four super-luminous SNe, and several core-collapse and stripped core-collapse events. The CSP-II observations of these SNe will be presented in future papers.

3. Observing Strategy

3.1. Optical Imaging

As was the case for the CSP-I, nearly all of the optical imaging during the CSP-II was obtained with the LCO Swope telescope. Generally speaking, for redshifts less than ≲0.04, the same complement of ugriBV filters used by the CSP-I was also employed. For redshifts greater than this, a subset consisting of the BVri filters was normally used. Each SN was typically observed every 2–3 days from discovery until at least 2–3 weeks past maximum to sample the light-curve maxima and early decline rates as thoroughly as possible. Optical imaging of candidate SNe was often initiated before a classification spectrum was obtained. A quick reduction of the photometry was made the morning after each observation, allowing a nearly “real-time” update of the light curves on the CSP-II webpage, with the calibration improving as data were obtained on more photometric nights. If spectral observations subsequently showed that the target was not a SN Ia, we usually discontinued the optical imaging.

As was also done for the CSP-I, the LCO 2.5 m du Pont telescope was used to obtain most of the host-galaxy reference images in ugriBV. This telescope was also used to obtain a small amount of imaging of SNe being actively followed during scheduled nights.

3.2. NIR Imaging

SNe Ia are excellent standard candles in the NIR when observed at maximum light (e.g., Krisciunas et al. 2004a; Kattner et al. 2012). When combined with optical photometry, NIR observations at maximum also afford the most precise measurement of the host-galaxy dust reddening (Krisciunas et al. 2000; Mandel et al. 2011; Burns et al. 2014, 2018). While the strength of the prominent NIR secondary maximum is a strong function of the decline rate (Hamuy et al. 1996b), there is significant scatter in the correlation (Krisciunas et al. 2001; Burns et al. 2014). Hence, to ensure the highest precision for measuring both the host extinction and distance from optical and NIR observations, it is best that NIR photometry be obtained within ∼1 week of optical (B-band) maximum if at all possible (Krisciunas et al. 2004b). As shown in Figure 3, only a small fraction (11/125) of the SNe in the Cosmology subsample do not meet this condition.

The SNe in the CSP-I sample were sufficiently nearby and bright enough that all of the optical and most of the NIR imaging could be obtained with the Swope telescope. However, extending NIR observations to z ∼ 0.1 requires a larger telescope, and so a more economical approach was necessary for the CSP-II. We requested approximately one week of NIR imaging each bright run with the du Pont 2.5 m telescope during the CSP-II observing campaigns to cover the primary maxima of ∼5 SNe Ia per bright run. For SNe at z ≲ 0.07, imaging was generally obtained in the Y, J, and H bands, while for more distant targets, observations were typically restricted to the Y and J filters. In a few cases (<10%), only the Y filter was used. At least four epochs of NIR imaging were obtained for 66% of the SNe in the Cosmology subsample, and at least three epochs were obtained for 82%. Sparse sampling of the NIR maximum of SNe Ia has been successfully employed in the past by Krisciunas et al. (2004a); Freedman et al. (2009); Barone-Nugent et al. (2012), and Weyant et al. (2014, 2018).

Although most of the NIR photometry for the CSP-II was acquired with the du Pont telescope, we obtained a few epochs of additional imaging (1–2 epochs) with the LCO Magellan Baade 6.5 m telescope for nine SNe Ia. Many of the NIR host-galaxy images were also acquired with Magellan Baade.

3.3. Optical Spectroscopy

Optical spectroscopy near maximum light provides an essential tool for characterizing the diversity of SNe Ia which, in turn, is related to the progenitor systems and explosion mechanism (e.g., Blondin et al. 2012; Folatelli et al. 2013). In total, 308 optical spectra were obtained of more than 100 of the SNe Ia in the Cosmology and Physics subsamples. These spectra were acquired with the du Pont and Magellan telescopes at LCO and with the 2.5 m Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) at the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos with the principal aim of determining the type, phase, and approximate redshift of the SN targets. Through these observations and the NIR spectroscopy described in Section 3.5 and Hsiao et al. (2018), the CSP-II was able to classify ∼20% of the SNe in both the Cosmology and Physics subsamples (listed as “CSP” in the Classification column of Table 1). Many of the remaining targets were classified by the Public ESO Spectroscopic Survey of Transient Objects (PESSTO) with the ESO La Silla 3.6 m NTT (Smartt et al. 2015). With the CSP-II, PESSTO, and other publicly available spectra, 114 of the SNe in the Cosmology and Physics subsamples were observed within ±4 days of maximum light. These data will be presented and analyzed in a future paper (N. Morrell et al., in preparation).

3.4. Optical Integral Field Spectroscopy

The pioneering work of the Calán/Tololo Project showed that SNe Ia luminosities are correlated with host-galaxy morphologies and colors (Hamuy et al. 1995, 1996a, 2000). More recently, evidence has been presented that SNe Ia Hubble diagram residuals correlate with global host-galaxy parameters such as total mass and star formation rate (Kelly et al. 2010; Lampeitl et al. 2010; Sullivan et al. 2010; Rigault et al. 2013; Uddin et al. 2017). To examine these effects for the CSP-II sample of SNe Ia, a program of integral field unit (IFU) host-galaxy spectroscopy is being carried out with both the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) on the ESO VLT (Bacon et al. 2010) as part of the All-weather MUse Supernova Integral-field Nearby Galaxies (AMUSING) survey (Galbany et al. 2016), and the Potsdam Multi-Aperture Spectrophotometer (PMAS) on the 3.5 m Calar Alto telescope within the PMAS/PPak Integral-field Supernova hosts COmpilation (PISCO) program (Galbany et al. 2018) for those targets in the northern hemisphere. In addition to the global host properties, these IFU data will provide spectral information on the immediate environments of the SNe—e.g., line-of sight gas-phase and stellar metallicity, stellar age, and star formation rates—allowing a detailed study of the correlations between the SNe Ia Hubble diagram residuals and the local environmental properties.

3.5. NIR Spectroscopy

NIR spectroscopy was a new and vital component of the CSP-II. During the four campaigns, NIR spectra were obtained of 157 different SNe Ia. These observations were carried out using the Folded-port IR Echellette (FIRE) on the LCO Magellan Baade telescope and through target of opportunity (ToO) time obtained principally with the Gemini North and South 8.1 m telescopes, the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF), and the ESO Very Large Telescope (VLT). This set of NIR spectra is more than 15 times larger than the previous largest sample (Marion et al. 2009). The FIRE spectra account for 80% of the total spectra obtained, but the ToO observations were crucial for obtaining spectral coverage at the earliest epochs. More than 70% of the SNe Ia observed have at least 3 epochs of NIR spectral observations, and more than 10 epochs were obtained for 15 SNe. Whenever possible, we also attempted to obtain simultaneous optical spectroscopy to match the NIR observations. The NIR spectroscopy part of the CSP-II is presented in detail in the accompanying paper by Hsiao et al. (2018).

3.6. Host-galaxy Redshifts

The majority of the SNe Ia in both the Cosmology and Physics subsamples were discovered in untargeted searches. Approximately one-third of the events selected for follow-up appeared in distant or low-luminosity hosts whose redshifts were unknown. A program of host-galaxy spectroscopy was initiated to measure redshifts for these SNe. Spectra of 40 of the hosts were obtained with the Wide-Field CCD (WFCCD) spectrograph on the du Pont telescope. For the faintest galaxies, it was necessary to use the Magellan telescopes. Spectra of 19 hosts were taken with the Inamori Magellan Areal Camera and Spectrograph (IMACS) on the Baade telescope, and another five galaxies were observed with the Low-Dispersion Survey Spectrograph (LDSS3-C) on the Clay telescope. Redshifts were obtained for an additional 11 host galaxies from our optical integral-field spectroscopy program.

The resulting redshifts are listed in Table 4, which gives the number of absorption and emission lines used to calculate the redshifts for each host-galaxy spectrum, and the rms errors of the final redshift values. These redshifts are also included in Table 1. Note that there are eight galaxies in Table 1 for which a redshift has not yet been measured.

Table 4.  CSP-II Measurements of Host-galaxy Redshifts

SN Host Galaxy Instrument(s)a zHeliob Linesc
        a e
ASASSN-14hu ESO 058- G 012 1 0.0216 ± 0.0001 1 5
ASASSN-14jz GALEXASC J184443.33-524819.2 1 0.0158 ± 0.0001 8
ASASSN-14kd 2MASX J22532475+0447583 2 0.0242 ± 0.0002 1 3
ASASSN-14lw GALEXASC J010647.95-465904.1 2 0.0209 ± 0.0001 3
ASASSN-14me ESO 113- G 047 4 0.0178 ± 0.0001 5
ASASSN-15al GALEXASC J045749.46-213526.3 1 0.0338 ± 0.0001 2 3
ASASSN-15as SDSS J093916.69+062551.1 1 0.0286 ± 0.0001 3
ASASSN-15bm LCRS B150313.2-052600 1 0.0208 ± 0.0003 1 4
ASASSN-15gr ESO 366- G 015 1 0.0243 ± 0.0002 5
ASASSN-15hx GALEXASC J134316.80-313318.2 4 0.0083 ± 0.0002 4
CSS120325:123816-150632 Anonymous 2 0.0972 ± 0.0002 5
CSS130215:033841+101827 (SN2013ad) Anonymous 2 0.0363 ± 0.0001 4
CSS130303:105206-133424 GALEXASC J105206.27-133420.2 1 0.0789 ± 0.0004 1
CSS130315:115252-185920 (SN2013as) Anonymous 1 0.0685 ± 0.0001 7
CSS140126:120307-010132 SDSS J120306.76-010132.4 2 0.0772 ± 0.0001 4
CSS140218:095739+123318 SDSS J095738.31+123308.5 2 0.0773 ± 0.0002 1
LSQ11bk Anonymous 2 0.0403 ± 0.0001 5
LSQ12ca 2MASX J05310364-1948063 4 0.0994 ± 0.0003 3
LSQ12agq GALEXASC J101741.80-072452.2 3 0.0642 ± 0.0001 6
LSQ12aor GALEXASC J105517.85-141757.2 3 0.0934 ± 0.0001 8
LSQ12cdl GALEXASC J125339.85-183025.6 2 0.1081 ± 0.0001 6
LSQ12fuk GALEXASC J045815.88-161800.7 1 0.0206 ± 0.0002 4
LSQ12gef 2MASX J01403375+1830406 1 0.0642 ± 0.0004 6 3
LSQ12gln GALEXASC J052259.58-332755.3 3 0.1021 ± 0.0001 8
LSQ12gpw 2MASX J03125885-1142402 1 0.0506 ± 0.0002 1 4
LSQ12gzm GALEXASC J024043.58-344425.0 4 0.1001 ± 0.0002 5
LSQ12hjm 2MASX J03102844-1629333 1 0.0714 ± 0.0002 2 6
LSQ12hno GALEXASC J034243.43-024007.7 1 0.0473 ± 0.0001 7
LSQ12hvj GALEXASC J110738.65-294235.5 1 0.0713 ± 0.0001 4
LSQ12hzj 2MASX J09591230-0900095 2,4 0.0334 ± 0.0002 4
LSQ13lq SDSS J134410.77+030345.3 1 0.0757 ± 0.0002 4
LSQ13pf LCRS B134534.3-112338 2 0.0861 ± 0.0001 1 3
LSQ13vy 2MASX J16065563+0300046 1 0.0418 ± 0.0004 4 4
LSQ13dcy LCSB S0801P 1,4 0.0801 ± 0.0003 7
LSQ13dhj GALEXMSC J021234.60-372019.1 1,4 0.0935 ± 0.0001 5
LSQ13dpm GALEXASC J102908.61-170654.2 1 0.0509 ± 0.0003 4
LSQ13dqh Anonymous 2 0.1038 ± 0.0001 4
LSQ13dsm APMUKS(BJ) B033105.19-262232.9 1 0.0424 ± 0.0002 5
LSQ14ba GALEXASC J110123.17-153706.2 1 0.0776 ± 0.0001 4
LSQ14ie Anonymous 1 0.0896 ± 0.0001 5
LSQ14wp SDSS J101405.83+064032.5 2 0.0695 ± 0.0001 4
LSQ14age GALEXASC J132408.58-132629.0 1 0.0806 ± 0.0003 5
LSQ14ahc 2MASX J13434760-3254381 2 0.0509 ± 0.0001 3
LSQ14ahm GALEXASC J114122.65-122354.9 1 0.0498 ± 0.0001 4
LSQ14bbv 2MASS J19593264-5659334 1 0.0588 ± 0.0006 7
LSQ14bjj APMUKS(BJ) B141811.91-050120.8 1 0.0812 ± 0.0001 7
LSQ14fms 2MASX J00145929-5112380 1 0.078 ± 0.001 3 2
LSQ14gfn 2MASX J03283205-0412113 2 0.1217 ± 0.0004 6
LSQ14gov GALEXMSC J040601.67-160139.7 1 0.0896 ± 0.0002 5
LSQ15aae 2MASX J16301506+0555514 1 0.0516 ± 0.0001 1 2
LSQ15aja SDSS J170308.90+122741.5 2 0.0700 ± 0.0001 4
MASTER OT J030559.89+043238.2 SDSS J030559.63+043246.0 1 0.0282 ± 0.0009 3
OGLE-2013-SN-015 2MASX J02022241-6544090 1,4 0.0890 ± 0.0002 4
OGLE-2013-SN-109 2MASX J01460987-6727579 1,4 0.0868 ± 0.0001 5
OGLE-2013-SN-118 2MASX J05144615-6650292 1 0.0750 ± 0.0002 5
OGLE-2013-SN-123 2MASX J05583036-6333386 1 0.0614 ± 0.0002 9
OGLE-2013-SN-126 Anonymous 2 0.0597 ± 0.0002 3
OGLE-2013-SN-148 2MASX J06380745-7543288 1 0.0404 ± 0.0002 6
OGLE-2014-SN-021 Anonymous 3 0.0422 ± 0.0002 6
OGLE-2014-SN-107 APMUKS(BJ) B004021.02-650219.5 1 0.0664 ± 0.0001 3
OGLE-2014-SN-141 2MASX J05371898-7543157 1 0.0625 ± 0.0002 1 8
PS15sv GALEXASC J161311.68+013532.2 1 0.0333 ± 0.0003 5
PTF11ppn 2MASX J21352164+2656051 1 0.0673 ± 0.0002 8
iPTF13anh SDSS J130650.44+153432.7 2 0.0614 ± 0.0001 6
iPTF13dwl GALEXASC J211648.97+120052.8 1 0.0875 ± 0.0002 6
iPTF13efe SDSS J084339.26+161037.5 2 0.0751 ± 0.0001 4
iPTF14uo GALEXASC J131857.37+094244.0 2 0.0913 ± 0.0001 7
ROTSE3 J123935.1+163512 IC 0803 NED01 (SN2012G) 4 0.0258 ± 0.0002 5
SMT J03253351-5344190 Anonymous 2,3 0.0592 ± 0.0002 5
SNhunt161 (SN2012hl) CSS J005017.69+243154.4 5 0.0332 ± 0.0002 6

Notes.

a1: du Pont+WFCCD, 2: Magellan Baade+IMACS, 3: Magellan Clay+LDSS3, 4: VLT+MUSE, 5: Calar Alto 3.5 m+PMAS/PPak. bThe heliocentric redshift measurement was derived from the equivalent-width-weighted average of the features listed in final column. A minimum error of 0.0001 is adopted from instrumental resolution considerations. cNumber of absorption (a) and emission (e) lines used to measure the redshift. Wavelengths of the features used to calculate the redshift are taken from Table 2 of Sandage (1978).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

4. Optical Photometry

4.1. Swope 1 m Telescope

As detailed in Krisciunas et al. (2017), the CSP-I employed the “SITe3” CCD camera and a set of Sloan Digital Sky Survey ugri and Johnson BV filters on the LCO Swope telescope to obtain optical light curves of the target SNe. The same setup was used for the first two campaigns of the CSP-II.29 However, for the third and fourth campaigns, the SITe3 camera was replaced with a new camera housing an e2V 4112 × 4096 pixel, deep depletion CCD with 15 μm pixels, four read-out amplifiers, and a two-layer anti-etalon, anti-reflection coating. At the focal plane of the Swope telescope, this corresponds to a 30′ × 30′ field with 0farcs435 pixels. This is a larger field than was required for the CSP-II observations, so we used only quadrant 3 of the detector since it had the best linearity characteristics.

The relative throughputs of the ugriBV passbands with the new e2V CCD were measured in 2013 October using a monochromator and calibrated detectors (Rheault et al. 2014). As expected, the quantum efficiency of the e2V CCD was found to be more uniform and sensitive, both in the blue and the red, than the SITe3 CCD. The response functions (telescope + filter + CCD camera + atmosphere) for the SITe3 camera are plotted in cyan in Figure 4. These are based on measurements made at the telescope in 2010 January and July using the same monochromator (see Stritzinger et al. 2011b for the calibration details). Plotted in red in Figure 4 are the response functions for the e2V camera. The curves for both detectors have been normalized using the r band. The B, g, V, and i filters with the e2V CCD show increased sensitivity compared to the r filter than was the case with the SITe3 detector.

Figure 4. Refer to the following caption and surrounding text.

Figure 4. Cyan: optical filter response functions for the Swope telescope and SITe3 CCD camera used during the first two campaigns of the CSP-II. This is the same system used during the CSP-I. Red: optical filter response functions for the Swope telescope and e2V CCD camera used during the final two campaigns of the CSP-II. The B and V curves are plotted with dashed lines to aid in their discrimination. Note that the curves give the total relative throughput (telescope + filter + CCD camera + atmosphere) for an airmass of 1.2.

Standard image High-resolution image

The methodology of the CSP photometric reductions is explained in detail in Krisciunas et al. (2017), but we briefly reproduce it here for completeness. First, we solve for color terms and extinction based on observations on photometric nights of Landolt (1992) and Smith et al. (2002) standard stars. We then fit the instrumental magnitudes, ugribv, via the following equations:

Equation (1)

Equation (2)

Equation (3)

Equation (4)

Equation (5)

Equation (6)

where ugriBV correspond to magnitudes in the standard system, kλ are the extinction coefficients, X is the airmass, epsilonλ are the color terms, and ζλ are the zero-points. During the CSP-I project, ∼10 standard stars were observed per photometric night to determine the extinction and color terms. These were found to be highly stable over five years (see Figures 4 and 5 of Krisciunas et al. 2017). Hence, a slightly different calibration strategy was implemented for the CSP-II. The number of standard stars observed per night was decreased to ∼4–5, but standard-star observations were taken on as many clear nights as possible. As a result, data for determining extinction and color terms were obtained on considerably more nights during the CSP-II compared to the CSP-I.

Figure 5 displays the evolution of the nightly values of the zero-points during the CSP-II. As mentioned above, the detector in use for the first two years was the same SITe3 CCD used during the CSP-I. The significant jump in sensitivity at the end of year 2 is due to two nearly equal effects. The first is the washing of the primary mirror (indicated by the vertical gray dashed line), and the second is the higher quantum efficiency of the e2v CCD, which was put into operation immediately following the mirror washing. Each of these effects separately appears to have produced an increase in sensitivity of ∼50%. The steady decline in sensitivity observed for both detectors is due to the accumulation of dust and aerosols, principally on the primary mirror. The periodic dips in sensitivity correspond to the Chilean midsummer and most likely are due to an increase in atmospheric haze that is typical at this time of the year (Krisciunas et al. 2017).

Figure 5. Refer to the following caption and surrounding text.

Figure 5. Nightly photometric zero-points derived from observations of local standard stars observed on clear nights with the LCO Swope telescope during the four years of the CSP-II. The solid vertical gray line corresponds to when the primary mirror of the telescope was aluminized; the dashed vertical gray line indicates when the primary mirror was washed, and also when the SITe3 detector was replaced by an e2v CCD. The few points falling below the general trend correspond to nights that appeared cloudless, but were not photometric. See the text for further details.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 5 compares the final mean extinction and color coefficients for the Swope+e2V system with those of the Swope+SITe3. As was observed for the CSP-I (Krisciunas et al. 2017), the extinction terms were remarkably consistent during the four years of the CSP-II, testifying to the photometric stability of the atmosphere above LCO. As expected, some small differences are observed between the color coefficients, with the largest changes being in the blue (the u and B filters) and the red (the i filter).

Table 5.  Optical Photometric Reduction Terms: SITe3 versus e2V

Filter Swope+SITe3 Swope+e2V
Extinction Coefficientsa
u 0.511 ± 0.057 0.509 ± 0.060
B 0.242 ± 0.022 0.233 ± 0.027
g 0.191 ± 0.021 0.186 ± 0.027
V 0.144 ± 0.018 0.135 ± 0.026
r 0.103 ± 0.019 0.094 ± 0.022
i 0.059 ± 0.020 0.057 ± 0.020
Color Termsb
u 0.046 ± 0.017 0.030 ± 0.020
B 0.061 ± 0.012 0.091 ± 0.015
g −0.014 ± 0.011 −0.005 ± 0.014
V −0.058 ± 0.011 −0.062 ± 0.015
r −0.016 ± 0.015 −0.001 ± 0.022
i −0.002 ± 0.015 0.021 ± 0.018

Notes.

aMeasured in magnitudes per airmass. All uncertainties in this table are the “standard deviations of the distributions,” not the standard deviations of the means. bSee Equations (1)–(6) for which standard colors are used in combination with these coefficients to obtain the color correction terms for the optical photometry.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

To measure final light curves for the SNe, we first established local sequence stars in each of the SN fields from observations of Landolt (1992) and Smith et al. (2002) standard stars. The underlying host-galaxy light was then subtracted from each SN image using host-galaxy reference images acquired after the SN had disappeared. These images were obtained mostly with the SITe2 CCD imager on the du Pont telescope. However, reference images for a number of SNe were acquired with the SITe3 CCD on the Swope telescope in good seeing (<1″) conditions. Magnitudes for the SN were then measured differentially with respect to the local sequence stars using point-spread-function (PSF) photometry (for further details, see Krisciunas et al. 2017). As a matter of policy, the CSP has been publishing all of its optical (and NIR) light curves in the natural photometric system of each telescope/instrument/filter combination, which is the “purest” form of the data (see Section 5.1 of Krisciunas et al. 2017).

4.2. du Pont 2.5 m Telescope

The LCO du Pont 2.5 m telescope was used with the facility Tek5 CCD camera to obtain host-galaxy reference images as well as a small amount of SN follow-up photometry. As discussed in detail in Section 6.1.2 of Krisciunas et al. (2017), experiments carried out on two SN fields observed in both the Swope  SITe3 and du Pont+Tek5 systems confirm that the SN photometry obtained in the ugriBV filters with the du Pont+Tek5 is on substantially the same natural system as the Swope+SITe3 camera.

5. NIR Photometry

5.1. du Pont 2.5 m Telescope

NIR imaging in the YJH filters of the CSP-II SNe was obtained with RetroCam on the du Pont telescope. RetroCam employs a Rockwell 1024 × 1024 HAWAII-1 HgCdTe array with 18.5 μm pixels. This is the same NIR imager used at the Swope telescope during the CSP-I.30 RetroCam on the du Pont telescope gives a field of 3farcm4 × 3farcm4 and a pixel size of 0farcs201. For host galaxies that were larger than the dither pattern, separate sky images were obtained.

In 2013 October, Rheault et al. (2014) made spectrophotometric measurements of the RetroCam YJH bandpasses on the du Pont telescope, which can be compared with similar data collected in 2010 January with the same monochrometer when RetroCam was on the Swope telescope (Krisciunas et al. 2017). This is shown in Figure 6, where the total relative throughputs (telescope + filter + camera + atmosphere) are shown for RetroCam on the Swope and du Pont telescopes. As may be seen, the transmission functions of the Y and J bands did not change significantly between the two measurements. The most significant difference is in the H filter and is likely ascribed to variations in either or both of the reflective and transmissive properties of the optics of the two telescopes. Most importantly, for all three bandpasses, the filter edges have not shifted significantly in wavelength.

Figure 6. Refer to the following caption and surrounding text.

Figure 6. Cyan: YJH filter response functions for the LCO Swope telescope and RetroCam imager used during the CSP-I; Red: the LCO du Pont 2.5 m telescope and RetroCam used for NIR imaging during the CSP-II. Note that the curves give the total relative throughputs (telescope + filter + camera + atmosphere) for an airmass of ∼1.2.

Standard image High-resolution image

The NIR imaging of the SNe was calibrated to local sequence stars established in the fields of each of the SNe. Calibration of the local sequence stars was carried out through observations on photometric nights of ∼4–5 of the Persson et al. (1998) standard stars. In analogy to the optical filters, the photometric transformation equations for the measured instrumental magnitudes, yjh, are

Equation (7)

Equation (8)

Equation (9)

where kλ are the extinction coefficients, X is the airmass, epsilonλ are the color terms, and ζλ are the zero-points. In these equations, Jstd and Hstd are the magnitudes given in Persson et al. (1998), and Ystd is the magnitude in the RetroCam Y-band standard system defined by Krisciunas et al. (2017).

Zero-points derived from RetroCam during the 4+ years of the CSP-II are plotted in Figure 7. Note that these do not show the steady decline in sensitivity observed for the CCD detectors on the Swope telescope (cf. Figure 5). This is likely because the primary mirror of the du Pont telescope is cleaned with CO2 on an approximately weekly basis, whereas the closed-tube design of the Swope telescope does not permit this.

Figure 7. Refer to the following caption and surrounding text.

Figure 7. Nightly photometric zero-points derived from observations of standard stars observed on clear nights with RetroCam on the LCO 2.5 m du Pont telescope during the four years of the CSP-II. The dashed vertical gray lines indicate when the primary mirror was washed, and the solid vertical line corresponds to when the primary mirror was aluminized.

Standard image High-resolution image

Extinction coefficients in the Y, J, and H filters for RetroCam on the du Pont telescope were derived through a simultaneous Markov chain Monte Carlo fitting in the mixture model framework (Hogg et al. 2010) of all the CSP-II RetroCam nights. This procedure assumes a unique free parameter for the extinction coefficient, a fixed value of the color term estimated from synthetic photometry of model stellar atmospheres (see below), and the nightly zero point values. The resulting values are given in the top half of Table 6. We note that these differ slightly from the extinction coefficients measured with RetroCam on the Swope telescope during the CSP-I, but fall within the dispersion of the latter values (see Figure 8 of Krisciunas et al. 2017).

Table 6.  NIR Photometric Reduction Terms

Filter du Pont+RetroCam Baade+FourStar
  Extinction Coefficientsa  
Y 0.069 ± 0.006
J 0.101 ± 0.006
H 0.056 ± 0.007
  Color Termsb  
Y 0.000 0.106
J 0.019 0.001
H −0.039 −0.040

Notes.

aMeasured in magnitudes per airmass. Uncertainties in the extinction coefficients are the “standard deviations of the distributions,” not the standard deviations of the means. bSee Equations (7)–(9) for which standard colors are used in combination with these coefficients to obtain the color correction terms for the NIR photometry. The color terms in this table are estimated from synthetic photometry of Castelli & Kurucz (2003) stellar atmosphere models. The extinction coefficients measured for the du Pont+RetroCam were assumed for Baade+FourStar.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

The NIR color terms could not be measured at the telescope due to the small color range, +0.19 ≤ (J − H) ≤ +0.35 mag, of the Persson et al. (1998) standard stars employed for the nightly photometric calibration. However, as we have precise spectrophotometric measurements of the NIR filter bandpasses, color terms can be estimated from synthetic photometry of model stellar atmospheres. This was done for the RetroCam JRC2 and H filters on the du Pont telescope in Appendix C of Krisciunas et al. (2017), and the resulting values, reproduced in Table 6, were shown to be consistent with observations made of the red stars listed in Table 3 of Persson et al. (1998). As expected from the close agreement of the RetroCam Y filter bandpasses on the Swope and du Pont telescopes (see Figure 6), the color term for this filter is negligible since the standard system is defined to be the natural system of RetroCam on the Swope telescope (Krisciunas et al. 2017).

Final measurement of the SN light curves was carried out in an analogous way to the optical photometry. Local sequence stars were established in each of the SN fields and magnitudes for the SNe were measured differentially with respect to these.

5.2. Magellan Baade 6.5 m Telescope

Host-galaxy reference images were obtained mostly with the FourStar imager (Persson et al. 2013) on the Magellan Baade telescope, due to the superior throughput and image quality of this instrument. (Some reference images were also obtained with RetroCam on the du Pont telescope on nights of excellent seeing.) As mentioned in Section 3.2, a few active SNe were also observed with FourStar. FourStar employs four HAWAII-2RG detectors that cover a 10farcm8 × 10farcm8 field of view with a pixel scale of 0farcs159. Filter response functions for the FourStar filters are illustrated in Figure 8. Note that FourStar does not have a Y filter, but the J1 filter provides a useful alternative. When imaging CSP-II SNe, the target was centered typically in chip 2. If the host galaxy was larger than the dither pattern, the target was alternately positioned in chip 2 and chip 4 to construct sky images in both chips.

Figure 8. Refer to the following caption and surrounding text.

Figure 8. Filter response functions for the Baade telescope and FourStar imager. The FourStar filters are plotted in cyan and are compared with the du Pont + RetroCam filters, which are plotted in red. FourStar does not have a Y filter, but the J1 filter provides a reasonable approximation (see Contreras et al. 2018). Note that the filter curves give the total relative throughputs (telescope + filter + camera + atmosphere) for an airmass of ∼1.2.

Standard image High-resolution image

The Persson et al. (1998) red stars are far too bright to be observed with FourStar on the Magellan Baade telescope, and so we must also estimate the color terms for this instrument from synthetic photometry of model atmospheres. The resulting values are listed in Table 6.

6. First Results

Figure 9 displays optical and NIR light curves of four SNe Ia in the Cosmology subsample observed during the first CSP-II campaign. These objects were selected as representative of both the range of data quality and redshifts covered by the subsample. The photometric measurements have been fitted with the SuperNovae in object oriented Python (SNooPy; Burns et al. 2011) package.

Figure 9. Refer to the following caption and surrounding text.

Figure 9. Light curves of four representative SNe Ia (PTF11pbp, LSQ14ahc, LSQ12hzs, and LSQ12gln) are plotted with offsets for clarity. In most cases, the error bars representing the statistical uncertainties are smaller than the symbols. The data have been fitted using the “max_model” option in SNooPy (Burns et al. 2011) which fits the maximum magnitude in each filter using a template generator based on well-observed optical and NIR light curves from the CSP-I The solid lines represent SNooPy fits to each filter’s light curve, while the dashed lines represent the ±1σ errors in the light-curve templates. The filter names and magnitude offsets are labeled to the right of each light curve.

Standard image High-resolution image

In the left panel of Figure 10, histograms of the B-band decline rate, Δm15(B), of the SNe Ia in the Cosmology and Physics subsamples are plotted as determined from the SNooPy template fits. In the right panel of this figure, histograms of the color-stretch parameter, sBV (Burns et al. 2014), are also plotted. The distribution of the decline-rate parameters for the two subsamples differs only slightly in that the Physics subsample has relatively more fast decliners (smaller stretch). This may be due to that fact that 34% of the SNe Ia in the Physics subsample come from targeted searches monitoring predominately massive galaxies, where the vast majority of the fast decliners are found.

Figure 10. Refer to the following caption and surrounding text.

Figure 10. Histograms of the B-band decline-rate parameter, Δm15(B) (left panel), and the color-stretch parameter, sBV (right panel) for the Cosmology and Physics subsamples.

Standard image High-resolution image

The final photometry data release for the full CSP-II sample of 214 SNe Ia is planned for 2019. Note that light curves and spectra for a few individual objects observed by the CSP-II have already been published: LSQ12gdj, a slow-declining, UV-bright SN Ia (Scalzo et al. 2014); iPTF13ebh, a transitional SN Ia showing strong NIR C i lines (Hsiao et al. 2015); SN 2011iv, a transitional SN Ia that was discovered in the same Fornax cluster galaxy that hosted SN 2007on, another transitional SN Ia observed during the CSP-I (Gall et al. 2018); SN 2012fr, a nearby, peculiar SN Ia observed within a day of explosion (Childress et al. 2013; Contreras et al. 2018); ASASSN-14lp, a bright SN Ia also discovered within two days of outburst (Shappee et al. 2016); SN 2012Z,a luminous SN Iax (Stritzinger et al. 2015); and SN 2013by, a Type IIL SN with a sharp light-curve decline after a short, steep plateau/linear decline phase (Valenti et al. 2015). Optical and NIR photometry of two SNe Ia observed by the CSP-II, SN 2012ht and SN 2015F, that appeared in host galaxies with Cepheid distances is presented in Burns et al. (2018).

7. Conclusions

This paper has presented a summary of the second phase of the Carnegie Supernova Project, which was carried out between 2011–2015. Photometry was obtained for a total of 214 SNe Ia with host-galaxy redshifts in the range 0.004 < z < 0.137. A “Cosmology” subsample of 125 SNe with both optical and NIR light curves at a median redshift of z = 0.056 is described. These SNe, along with the subsample of 72 SNe Ia discovered by the La Silla-QUEST survey, will be used to study the intrinsic precision of SNe Ia as cosmological distance indicators and to measure the local value of the Hubble constant. Light curves and NIR spectroscopy were also obtained of a second “Physics” subsample of 90 SNe Ia at a median redshift of z = 0.021. This subsample will be used to determine precise NIR K-corrections and to study the explosion physics and progenitors of SNe Ia. The 214 SNe Ia monitored by the CSP-II combined with the 123 SNe Ia observed during the CSP-I (Krisciunas et al. 2017) constitutes a sample of more than 300 SNe Ia with precise light curves in a well-understood photometric system. This data set will provide a definitive low-redshift reference for future rest frame optical and NIR observations of SNe Ia at high redshift with next-generation dark energy experiments such as the Euclid and WFIRST missions, and the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration.

The work of the CSP-II has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation under grants AST-1008343, AST-1613426, AST-1613455, and AST-1613472. The CSP-II was also supported in part by the Danish Agency for Science and Technology and Innovation through a Sapere Aude Level 2 grant. M. Stritzinger acknowledges funding by a research grant (13261) from VILLUM FONDEN. T. D. is supported by an appointment to the NASA Postdoctoral Program at the Goddard Space Flight Center, administered by Universities Space Research Association under contract with NASA.

Facilities: Magellan:Baade (IMACS imaging spectrograph - , FourStar wide-field near-infrared camera - , FIRE near-infrared echellette) - , Magellan:Clay (LDSS3 imaging spectrograph) - , Swope (SITe3 CCD imager - , e2v 4 K × 4 K CCD imager) - , du Pont (Tek5 CCD imager - , WFCCD imaging spectrograph - , RetroCam near-infrared imager) - , Gemini:North (GNIRS near-infrared spectrograph) - , Gemini:South (FLAMINGOS2) - , VLT (ISAAC - , MUSE) - , IRTF (SpeX near-infrared spectrograph) - , NOT (ALFOSC) - , Calar Alto 3.5 m (PMAS/PPak) - , La Silla-QUEST - , CRTS - , PTF - , iPTF - , OGLE - , ASAS-SN - , PS1 - , KISS - , ISSP - , MASTER - , SMT). -

Software: SNID (Blondin & Tonry 2007), SUPERFIT (Howell et al. 2005), GELATO (Harutyunyan et al. 2008), SNooPy (Burns et al. 2011).

Footnotes

  • ∗ 

    This paper includes data gathered with the 6.5 meter Magellan telescopes at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile.

  • 27 

    In this paper, “normal” SNe Ia are defined to include “Branch-normal” events (Branch et al. 1993), as well as the 1991T-like (Filippenko et al. 1992b; Phillips et al. 1992) and “transitional” (Hsiao et al. 2015) events which, while considered by some as extreme, nevertheless fall on the luminosity versus decline-rate relation for SNe Ia (Burns et al. 2018).

  • 28 

    We choose to refer to these SNe as the “Physics” subsample because, as described in detail in Hsiao et al. (2018), the NIR spectral data are also an invaluable resource for studying the physics and the progenitors of SNe Ia.

  • 29 

    All of the V-band images taken during the CSP-II were obtained with the “V(LC-3009)” filter (see Section 6.1.1 of Krisciunas et al. 2017 for more details).

  • 30 

    Note that all of the RetroCam J-band observations made during the CSP-II were obtained with the “JRC2” filter (see Section 6.2.1 of Krisciunas et al. 2017 for more details).

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/1538-3873/aae8bd